r/winnipegjets • u/Pristine-Display-697 • 8h ago
The Jets 2.0 logo is approaching 20 years old—can we talk about moving to the heritage branding permanently?
I have never really loved the Jets 2.0 logo and colour scheme, and I'm so glad they brought back the original heritage branding as an alternate.
Here’s my pitch: Let’s make the Heritage branding our full-time primary, right down to the corporate level.
The Jets 2.0 logo is approaching its 20-year milestone. In my mind, that's old enough to let it rest as a distinct era of modern hockey history, put it on the back shelf, and usher in the timeless iconography of the original look.
Why it works better:
- The "Lifestyle" Appeal:
You see people walking down the street in LA or New York wearing vintage Yankees or Raiders hats because they are classic fashion statements. The heritage blue and white has that exact same clean, universal aura that the busier 2.0 corporate logo just can't compete with. (Case in point: seeing guys like Theo Von rocking the heritage jersey).
- Market Reach:
The current logo leans heavy into specific patriotic/military symbolism, which is fine, but the original circle-and-jet crest has a broader, retro appeal that plays exceptionally well outside of Canada.
- Aging it like fine wine:
If we retire the 2.0 logo now, it will age gracefully as the defining look of the 2010s and early 2020s. We can bring it back down the road as a special heritage or alternate night, giving everyone the best of both worlds.
I'd even be fine keeping a nod to the 2.0 era as a shoulder patch, but making the cleaner, classic look the front-and-center identity of the franchise moving forward. (And yes, a part of me wishes we could somehow get the old Thrashers IP into the mix as a deep-cut heritage night down the road, though I know that's a long shot!)
Anyway, what do you all think? Would you ever want to see a permanent shift back to the vintage look, or do you prefer the current 2.0 identity? Let's hear it.