I had an interesting conversation in a group with a man who said that if a woman rejects him now because he is broke and chooses another man who can provide financially, he sees no reason to return to her when he becomes successful in 2040. Instead, he plans to date younger women, even her younger sister or daughter, provided they are 18 or older.
He argued that this is not revenge but simply how relationships work today. He also brought up sugar mummies, sugar daddies.
Here are some points I raised:
- The impact on younger men: When older, financially established men frame dating younger women as a way to prove themselves after being rejected, they reinforce the idea that younger men are not good enough unless they have money. This creates unnecessary competition between generations of men.
- The age gap question: Why would a 35-year-old man specifically pursue an 18-year-old because he was rejected when he was younger and broke? At 18, someone may just be entering adulthood, while a 35-year-old has had considerably more time to develop emotionally, financially, and intellectually. What exactly is the motivation beyond having the money and opportunity to do so?
- Is it really business, or is it revenge? If the intention is to prove that you can now afford the women you couldn't attract before, is that genuinely about compatibility, or are you trying to compensate for past rejection?
- The sugar daddy comparison: Sugar relationships exist, but that does not automatically justify the original argument. Someone choosing to date a younger person because they genuinely want to is different from someone planning to do so to prove a point to a woman who rejected them.
- The double standard: If a woman rejects a man because he cannot provide financially, does his eventual success justify targeting younger women or even fantasizing about dating her daughter? And if the man identifies as a Christian, how does this attitude align with the values he claims to uphold?
My main argument was that being rejected because you lack money should not become a reason to build your future around proving your worth through younger women. Success should be about personal growth, not getting even with people who did not choose you.
I also challenged him to answer the original questions rather than introducing other examples to make his position appear normal.
So, Reddit, what do you think?
Is a man who plans to date younger women after becoming financially successful simply exercising his freedom to choose a partner, or does the reasoning behind his decision reveal resentment and a desire for revenge?
And more importantly, is there anything wrong with pursuing an 18-year-old at 35, or does the motivation behind the age gap matter just as much as the age gap itself?