I don't think the standards or expectations are equivalent for the teacher and the student in this case. The student's job in doing the assignment to learn the material and demonstrate they have. A student using AI as a shortcut compromises that objective. The teacher's job is to teach the material and assess the student. Using AI in this way as a shortcut to produce a graphic not core to that teaching or assessment does not compromise that objective in anyway. False equivalences are not helpful to anyone.
Why does this note to students need a graphic? They aren't trying to sell a product to a customer and need a flashy logo for it, they just need words on a page to convey the message lol.
The amount of people insisting to me that this graphic was super totally very necessary to convey to students that they can’t use AI, is absolutely ridiculous lmao. Students don’t need to be engaged with instructions, this isn’t the course content this is simple assignment parameters. Red bold text at the top of the page is quite literally all that’s needed.
87
u/Next-Supermarket9538 14h ago
I don't think the standards or expectations are equivalent for the teacher and the student in this case. The student's job in doing the assignment to learn the material and demonstrate they have. A student using AI as a shortcut compromises that objective. The teacher's job is to teach the material and assess the student. Using AI in this way as a shortcut to produce a graphic not core to that teaching or assessment does not compromise that objective in anyway. False equivalences are not helpful to anyone.