While this may actually be AI, sometimes I wonder about artists whose style was similar to this prior to the AI-overridden future. The models did learn from somewhere. Just sucks for those people
I mean the thing is, I'm pretty sure not many artists used that artstyle, but when you have a program that's the amalgamation of millions of random pictures, if you don't give it any more direction than just a subject, then it will generate something that's the amalgamation of a milion different artstyles in one
in today's age, it is hard sometimes to know for sure if an image or creation is ai or not, i've seen school related books have art styles and font styles simular to this when i was a kid, but in todays age i think it is hard to know for 100% if things are ai or not ai,
you mean Comic Sans? Shit, that was already overused by humans long before AI. So while possible it DOES use it a lot because of that, its not slam dunk evidence.
It’s clear it’s not legit art because why would the teacher spend time creating an elaborate drawing just to tell students not to use AI? That and it has all the AI tells other people have mentioned in this thread. The fact that it says “test, quiz, or knowledge check” also gives away that it’s not clipart because “knowledge checks” aren’t a super common thing.
No they aren’t. The two l’s in “allowed” are slightly different dimensions, for example. You might also be able to notice some inconsistencies in the e’s and a’s. (It’s obvious to me, but I’m not sure how detail-oriented you are when it comes to reading fonts/lettering).
when AI is really bad, most people can tell its AI, but as it improves the number of people sensitive enough to details and with the knowledge of the domain you are looking at (text, image, video, math, etc) because smaller and smaller until only the top experts in that field can actually tell the difference
I feel like we've reached a point where there's an entire generation of people on the internet that aren't even aware of what humans were capable of with art and digital art specifically.
They've developed along side the AI boom and now just assume every single thing is AI, and maybe they're right.
At the same time, all the digital creators I've followed in the past seem to have either stopped uploading work, paywalled it to prevent it from being scraped (for free anyway), or just outright given up and now use generative AI in some part of their workflow.
yeah like 3 years old if we assume kids start using social media at 13 we got 13-16 year olds who’ve only experienced social media influenced by ai. shit happens faster than you think
Where I work one of the leaders was accused of using AI in his publications by students who used AI to determine if his work was AI. Then he used AI to write a public letter responding to the student's AI-backed accusation, which was also fed through AI to determine that it was AI.
I guess my point is: I think it's just AI all the way down now
I'm leaning toward not. Yeah, it's the type of thing people use AI for. But notice that the grid lines over the lights are actually even. AI art, even good AI art, almost universally introduces botched patterns, especially at that level of detail. No dead giveaways on the racoon either. Lights in the correct order.
Look at the rest of the screen. Those "grid lines" are the moiré patterns you get when taking a picture of the screen, not part of the image. It also uses that classic marker font that AI loves to use on every flyer and graphic ever. Also a stoplight coming out of the ground where all of the lights are on? It's supposed to signify stop and read, but it doesn't even signal a stop. I feel confident it's AI.
the letter c is not consistent in the word "check." The second c is a little distorted and the bottom of the second c is below the bottom of k, which is not true for the first c. Honestly, this is the only objective clue I could find that it might be AI. The style, though, screams AI to me.
34
u/Rule_32 7h ago
How do you know that's not legit art? Like, seriously, are you assuming or is there some proof or evidence?