r/lebanon • u/Lebanoneh • 12h ago
Discussion Israeli ambitions in southern Lebanon predate Hezbollah. That history belongs in the “who started it?” debate
Every new escalation produces arguments about who started the war. Identifying who initiated a particular round of fighting matters. But treating that moment as the beginning of the entire conflict leaves decades of history outside the discussion.
There is documented evidence that influential Zionist and Israeli leaders considered acquiring territory in southern Lebanon long before Hezbollah existed. So why do we forget that even if Hezbollah started a round, today or tomorrow, the Zionists down South see our land as something promised to them.
1919: A formal Zionist proposal included territory in southern Lebanon.
The Zionist Organization’s submission to the Paris Peace Conference placed the proposed northern boundary of Palestine:
“in the vicinity south of Sidon”
The document then describes its route inland. This was a concrete boundary proposal by the organised Zionist movement, before Israel’s establishment. It included territory that became part of Lebanon.
1955: Moshe Dayan discussed annexation up to the Litani.
Avi Shlaim’s The Iron Wall, drawing on Moshe Sharett’s diary, records Dayan proposing intervention in Lebanon and the establishment of an allied Christian regime:
“The territory from the Litani southward will be totally annexed to Israel”
This was a proposal within Israel’s leadership. Nevertheless, the territorial ambition is explicit.
1956: Ben-Gurion proposed expansion into southern Lebanon at Sèvres.
At the secret discussions preceding the Suez War, Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion outlined a wider regional reorganisation that included Israeli expansion to the Litani and a smaller Christian Lebanon.
Historian Avi Shlaim documents this proposal and the French preference to concentrate on the immediate campaign against Egypt. It was not adopted as the final agreement.
Then there is the record of military action.
1968: Israel attacked Beirut’s civilian airport. The UN Security Council unanimously condemned the operation in Resolution 262. Resolution text. (refworld.org)
1978: Following a Palestinian attack inside Israel, Israeli forces invaded southern Lebanon. The Security Council established UNIFIL and called for withdrawal. UN historical account. (research.un.org)
1982–2000: Another Israeli invasion was followed by a prolonged occupation of part of southern Lebanon. Hezbollah emerged in the context of that occupation, with Iranian support. Historical background. (cfr.org)
The record supports a serious argument without those exaggerations: this is a longstanding conflict with successive wars, occupations, withdrawals and renewed confrontations. The latest opening attack is one part of that history. It cannot substitute for the whole of it.
All in all, Israel started this the moment it came to existence under an extremist expansionist ideology, there is no escape, especially for people living in the South. As a Lebanese, we are supposed to defend our land, not have the northerners sit and watch the southerners suffer, as has always happened pre-Hezb, and then attack and bash them for rising up, as is happening.
A Lebanese Muslim is much closer to a Lebanese Christian than a Zionist would ever be.
Dispute the interpretation. Check the sources. But an explanation of responsibility that leaves this history out is incomplete.
