i bought this adapter yesterday but now i don't know if it will burn my 2.5 hdds (it doesn' t work when i only use the usb port, it doesn't work if i conect a 3.5" hdd without the 12v adapter and i don't wanna burn my 2.5" hdds because this case uses 12v instead of 5v) can someone help me
this is the mercadolibre link of the product i'm asking for
(mercadolibre says "supports 3.5, ssd and 2.5 hdd")
Ok so my computer is not recognizing my second monitor, or my gpu drivers. Nothing is working and I cannot change anything like my hertz. When I look at device manager, it says windows cannot recognize or connect to my RX 7600 drivers. And my internet speed is also being incredibly slow. It’s Ethernet so it should be like this.
i5 12400f
Hi, I’ve run into a problem. All my programs usually work fine, but recently, when I logged back into my computer and tried to launch *War Thunder*—a game I’ve played hundreds of times—it asked me to choose a launch method. There was also a Steam service error; I had to go into the Windows Services manager and change the "Steam Client Service" startup type to "Automatic" because it had switched to "Manual" and was preventing games from starting. Also, I had just installed LibreOffice, and for some reason, it wouldn't open either—it kept throwing an error (something about administrator privileges), though I didn't pay much attention to it and simply reinstalled it, which fixed the issue. Anyway, getting back to the main problem: after the prompt about the launch method, everything seemed fine, but the next day here’s what’s happening: when I launch the game, the BattlEye launcher starts, and the game gets minimized to the taskbar. When I try to open it, the screen flashes black, but the game fails to launch; the cursor jumps to the top-left corner. A couple of times, it did manage to load, but it only displayed the top-right portion of the screen along with an oversized cursor. Resetting the graphics driver helped temporarily, but then the whole issue returned. I’ve already tried deleting the cache from the Windows Registry and clearing it via AMD Adrenalin Edition, but nothing has worked. Plus, when Steam was fucked up, I checked and saw an error code LiveKernelEvent 1b8. Does Its drivers or what is that shit. By the way, I recently downloaded a Windows update and received some new Asus drivers for my mouse. The funny thing is, I already have Asus software installed, and I’ve never seen drivers for a mouse or keyboard show up in Windows Update before.
Hey, first of all sorry if that doesn't belong here, ill move the post if needed.
Im looking for recommandations for a new gaming laptop. I have a Lenovo legion y520 who has been a very good boy for 10 years, but he really start to be old.
I currently have 700e budget (i can wait more if you know stuff that's really worth putting more, could go to 1000e). Id like to play huge city builders with mods like anno without issues, and generally recent games in low graphics (nothing online if that matter).
Id like something robust that could last for the next 10 years, if you have any ideas ill be happy to read them !
If you have spent any time testing high-powered mini PCs over the last couple of years, you already know the biggest catch with cramming 54W to 65W mobile workstation silicon into a tiny box: heat. Plenty of compact rigs look great on a spec sheet, only to hit a thermal wall two minutes into a heavy workload.
Over the past couple of weeks, I have been putting the VZMORE AX9 Max through a full suite of synthetic benchmarks, AI workloads, storage stress tests, and 30 hours of real-world gaming. This system packs AMD's "Gorgon Point" Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (12 cores / 24 threads), the Radeon 890M integrated GPU, and a 55 TOPS Ryzen AI NPU into a 135 x 131.8 x 57.7 mm (777.5 g) aluminum chassis. To keep those components under control, VZMORE built the system around its V-Cooling thermal design, which pairs a full-coverage VC Vapor Chamber with active fan cooling to support up to 65W (V-Boost Pro).
Across 73.22 minutes (2,197 telemetry samples) of HWiNFO64 hardware logging and 30 hours of gaming, the cooling setup did not record a single thermal throttling event (PROCHOT or HTC) or Windows Hardware Error (WHEA). We did, however, uncover a quirk with wireless input stability when the system is pinned at 100% load, which VZMORE's engineering team is already addressing via an upcoming BIOS update.
Quick Specs & Test Unit Configuration
Our review unit arrived pre-configured with Windows 11 Pro (64-bit), 32 GB of dual-channel DDR5-5600 RAM, and a 1 TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD. Below is the full breakdown of the official specs alongside what HWiNFO64 and Geekbench detected inside our test machine:
Category
Official Specification (VZMORE AX9 Max)
As-Tested Review Unit (HWiNFO64 & Geekbench Telemetry)
Processor (APU)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (12C/24T: 4x Zen 5 + 8x Zen 5c, up to 5.2 GHz)
Codename Gorgon Point (Socket FP8, 2.00 GHz base; observed peak: 5,240.5 MHz Zen 5 / 3,294.1 MHz Zen 5c)
Cache Hierarchy
Zen 5 / Zen 5c Hybrid Cache
L1i: 32 KB x 12 / L1d: 48 KB x 12 / L2: 1.00 MB x 12 (12 MB) / L3: 16.0 MB x 1
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 2x 2.5GbE RJ45, 1x DC-in
Chassis & OS
135 x 131.8 x 57.7 mm (777.5 g); 120W Power Adapter; VESA Mount
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit) pre-installed
Ports & Connectivity Highlights
Quad-Monitor Support Out of the Box: Between the dual rear HDMI 2.1 ports (rated up to 8K at 60Hz) and two rear 40Gbps USB4 ports supporting DisplayPort 2.0 Alt Mode, you can run four monitors without a dock. One of the rear USB4 ports also accepts Power Delivery (PD) input if you want to power the PC over USB-C.
Plenty of High-Speed USB-A & Dual 2.5GbE: You get four USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) Type-A ports right on the front panel (one with S5 power-off charging), plus another USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A and a USB 2.0 Type-A port on the back. Add in a side-mounted SD 4.0 card reader, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, and dual Realtek 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, and the port selection easily covers creator desks and homelab setups alike.
V-Cooling Vapor Chamber & Thermal Performance
The main reason this mini PC performs as consistently as it does comes down to its V-Cooling architecture. Instead of relying solely on narrow copper heatpipes that can saturate when both the Zen 5 cores and the 16-CU Radeon 890M are pulling power simultaneously, VZMORE uses a wide VC Vapor Chamber paired with active fan cooling.
To see if the vapor chamber lives up to the marketing, I logged 2,197 samples (73.22 minutes) of HWiNFO64 sensor data across six distinct torture and benchmark runs HWiNFO Combined CPU + iGPU + SSD Burn-In (hwinfo burnin.CSV): 389 samples over 13.01 minutes (780.6 seconds) pinning all 12 cores at 100.00% median CPU usage (mean 89.57%), 88.00% median iGPU utilization, and 629.08 MB/s median NVMe read load. Extended FurMark GPU Burn-In #2 (furmark burnin 2.CSV): 739 samples over 24.65 minutes (1,478.7 seconds) holding the Radeon 890M at 100.00% median utilization and a 3,053.00 MHz median clock. Baseline FurMark GPU Burn-In #1 (Furmark burnin.CSV): 261 samples over 8.68 minutes (520.7 seconds) at 100.00% median iGPU load. Geekbench 7 & AI Benchmark Suite (Geekbench 7 tests.CSV): 702 samples over 23.42 minutes (1,405.0 seconds) covering single-core, multi-core, OpenCL GPU, and AI inference runs. CrystalDiskMark NVMe Stress Log (ssd bench.CSV): 96 samples over 3.17 minutes (190.5 seconds) tracking SSD temperatures during heavy sequential and random read/write passes. Under-Load Wireless Input Diagnostic Log (HWinfo64 log Wireless input under load.CSV): 10 samples over 18.02 seconds capturing a simultaneous CPU (95.85% median / 100.00% max) and GPU (93.50% median / 97.00% max) spike at 64.43W median / 65.01W max package power.
Complete HWiNFO64 Thermal & Power Breakdown
Sensor / Metric
Workload Log
Count (n)
Mean
Median
Min
Max
Std Dev (SD)
CPU (Tctl/Tdie) [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
83.47
85.00
45.90
95.00
12.08
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
72.25
73.80
43.90
80.10
5.95
FurMark Burn-In #1 (8.7m)
261
72.43
75.10
45.80
76.40
7.57
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
55.11
49.90
35.90
94.90
14.70
SSD Benchmark Log
96
49.51
47.10
45.50
73.10
7.47
Wireless Input Load Test
10
81.33
91.70
45.80
95.00
19.96
CPU Cores (Avg) [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
69.62
71.40
43.40
78.40
7.92
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
58.73
59.60
41.80
62.10
3.61
FurMark Burn-In #1 (8.7m)
261
58.91
60.40
43.50
62.10
4.46
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
43.05
41.20
33.70
71.40
6.27
SSD Benchmark Log
96
45.24
44.80
43.30
52.50
2.27
Wireless Input Load Test
10
63.89
69.60
43.30
72.60
11.56
Radeon 890M iGPU [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
62.10
63.60
43.10
69.00
5.70
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
71.62
73.40
41.90
76.10
7.00
FurMark Burn-In #1 (8.7m)
261
71.71
74.80
43.20
76.20
8.67
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
41.56
40.10
34.00
65.80
5.20
SSD Benchmark Log
96
44.43
44.15
43.00
48.80
1.35
Wireless Input Load Test
10
53.96
55.55
43.20
62.20
6.78
VDDCR_VDD VRM [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
49.50
51.90
23.00
57.30
7.50
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
50.79
53.00
22.00
55.00
6.51
FurMark Burn-In #1 (8.7m)
261
50.20
53.30
23.10
54.80
8.01
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
22.63
20.90
13.50
39.80
4.97
SSD Benchmark Log
96
25.44
25.00
23.00
32.90
2.41
Wireless Input Load Test
10
37.72
40.00
23.10
46.40
8.45
DDR5 SPD Hub #0 / #1 [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
56.33 / 54.40
57.50 / 55.80
43.20 / 41.20
58.20 / 56.20
3.52 / 3.60
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
57.46 / 55.23
58.80 / 56.50
42.00 / 40.00
59.20 / 57.00
3.34 / 3.31
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
38.00 / 36.29
38.00 / 36.20
33.20 / 31.50
42.80 / 41.20
2.74 / 2.61
NVMe SSD Composite [C]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
47.31
48.00
39.00
54.00
5.85
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
40.16
40.00
36.00
47.00
1.40
SSD Benchmark Log
96
50.05
50.00
41.00
59.00
5.25
CPU Package Power [W]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
50.02
54.06
4.77
64.92
15.09
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
51.32
54.08
4.70
61.75
11.75
FurMark Burn-In #1 (8.7m)
261
49.83
54.18
4.67
57.58
14.35
Geekbench 7 Test Suite
702
15.49
7.04
4.79
65.00
14.96
Wireless Input Load Test
10
48.66
64.43
5.64
65.01
25.53
APU STAPM Power [W]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
48.91
54.00
6.28
54.06
11.97
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
49.83
54.00
5.32
54.03
10.00
Total System Power [W]
HWiNFO Combined Burn-In
389
92.18
93.12
81.00
94.69
2.98
FurMark Burn-In #2 (24.6m)
739
91.44
92.06
80.54
93.02
2.25
What Stood Out in the Thermal Logs
Spot-On Power Management (54W Balanced + 65W V-Boost Pro): With Windows set to the Performance power plan, the AX9 Max immediately lets CPU Package Power boost to 64.92W to 65.01W (CPU Core Power SVI3 TFN peaking at 77.15W), matching VZMORE's V-Boost Pro Up to 65W spec. After roughly 90 seconds of continuous torture load, the APU STAPM controller settles cleanly at a 54.00W median (54.06W max), while Total System Power tops out at 94.69W, leaving plenty of headroom on the included 120W power brick.
Wide Heat Spreading Across the Die: While the instantaneous CPU (Tctl/Tdie) hotspot sensor briefly touches AMD's 95.00 C boost ceiling during initial 65W bursts, it settles to an 85.00 C median (mean 83.47 C) during the 13-minute combined CPU+GPU+SSD torture test. Even better, the physical CPU Cores (Avg) sensor holds a 71.40 C median (mean 69.62 C, max 78.40 C) and the L3 Cache averages 63.70 C. That 13.6 C to 15.4 C gap between the Tctl/Tdie hotspot and the physical core average shows how effectively the vapor chamber spreads heat away from the cores.
Rock-Steady 25-Minute FurMark Temps: During the 24.65-minute FurMark Burn-In #2, the Radeon 890M iGPU and CPU (Tctl/Tdie) sit at a flat 73.40 C and 73.80 C median, while physical CPU cores average 58.73 C (median 59.60 C).
Fast Cooldown & Ice-Cold VRMs: Once the 100% load in the HWiNFO Combined Burn-In ended at second 726.5s (89.90 C), CPU (Tctl/Tdie) dropped to 47.10 C by second 780.6s, shedding 42.80 C in 54.1 seconds (0.79 C/sec). Meanwhile, the motherboard's VDDCR_VDD VRM never exceeded 57.30 C (median 51.90 C to 53.30 C under torture), and the dual DDR5 SO-DIMMs peaked at 59.20 C / 57.00 C.
CPU Performance: Geekbench 7.0.0 Single-Core & Multi-Core
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 pairs 4 full-sized Zen 5 cores (Cluster 1) with 8 dense Zen 5c cores (Cluster 2), backed by 12 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. In our HWiNFO64 logs, Zen 5 Cores 0, 2, and 3 boosted up to 5,240.5 MHz (5,150.7 MHz on Core 1), beating the 5.2 GHz rated boost clock, while all eight Zen 5c cores hit 3,294.1 MHz. Under 100% all-core load in hwinfo burnin.CSV, the chip maintained a 3,585.20 MHz median average clock (3,627.50 MHz median effective clock).
In Geekbench 7.0.0 for Windows AVX2, the AX9 Max posted a Single-Core Score of 2,664 and a Multi-Core Score of 17,051, giving it a 6.40x multi-core scaling ratio:
Geekbench 7.0.0 Workload
Single-Core Score
Single-Core Throughput
Multi-Core Score
Multi-Core Throughput
Multi-Core Scaling
Overall CPU Score
2,664
N/A
17,051
N/A
6.40x
Ray Tracer
2,420
679.7 Ksamples/sec
32,037
9.00 Msamples/sec
13.24x
Asset Compression
2,585
57.4 MB/sec
27,762
616.9 MB/sec
10.74x
Photo Library
2,738
9.38 images/sec
21,813
74.7 images/sec
7.97x
Clang (Compiler)
2,204
11.9 Klines/sec
19,614
106.1 Klines/sec
8.90x
Text Processing
2,539
149.8 pages/sec
16,514
974.3 pages/sec
6.50x
HDR
2,720
164.3 Mpixels/sec
11,488
694.1 Mpixels/sec
4.22x
File Compression
2,539
361.2 MB/sec
11,459
1.59 GB/sec
4.51x
Photo Editor
3,455
63.5 images/sec
8,638
158.7 images/sec
2.50x
Structure from Motion
3,277
59.2 Kpixels/sec
N/A
N/A
N/A
Video Player
3,022
319.5 FPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
PDF Viewer
2,858
128.4 Mpixels/sec
N/A
N/A
N/A
Audio Encoder
2,624
3.65 Msamples/sec
N/A
N/A
N/A
Game Physics
2,553
103.3 FPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
Video Encoder
2,466
89.7 FPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
HTML5 Browser
2,462
30.8 pages/sec
N/A
N/A
N/A
Navigation
2,438
13.4 routes/sec
N/A
N/A
N/A
Heavy multi-threaded tasks scale impressively across all 24 threads: Ray Tracer jumps 13.24x (from 679.7 Ksamples/sec to 9.00 Msamples/sec), Asset Compression scales by 10.74x (from 57.4 MB/sec to 616.9 MB/sec), and Clang compilation speeds up by 8.90x (from 11.9 Klines/sec to 106.1 Klines/sec).
Local AI Performance: Geekbench AI 1.7.0 (CPU ONNX vs. GPU DirectML)
Alongside the dedicated 55 TOPS Ryzen AI NPU (which clocks between 0.2 MHz at idle and 800.0 MHz under load in Geekbench 7 tests.CSV), we benchmarked both the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 CPU (using ONNX with AVX2/AVX-512) and the Radeon 890M iGPU (using ONNX DirectML) in Geekbench AI 1.7.0.
The results show why having both strong AVX-512 VNNI CPU cores and a 16-CU RDNA 3.5 iGPU in the same box is so useful for local AI workflows:
Workload / Metric
Precision
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 CPU (ONNX)
CPU Accuracy
Radeon 890M iGPU (DirectML)
GPU Accuracy
Faster Backend & Speedup
Overall Single Precision
FP32
4,106
N/A
8,356
N/A
GPU by 2.04x (+103.5%)
Overall Half Precision
FP16
1,937
N/A
15,143
N/A
GPU by 7.82x (+681.8%)
Overall Quantized
INT8
7,732
N/A
6,045
N/A
CPU by 1.28x (+27.9%)
Image Classification
SP (FP32)
3,347 (622.5 IPS)
100%
2,529 (470.4 IPS)
100%
CPU by 1.32x
HP (FP16)
637 (118.4 IPS)
100%
5,662 (1.05 KIPS)
100%
GPU by 8.89x
Q (INT8)
7,220 (1.35 KIPS)
99%
2,088 (388.3 IPS)
100%
CPU by 3.46x
Image Segmentation
SP (FP32)
1,332 (21.6 IPS)
100%
4,412 (71.5 IPS)
100%
GPU by 3.31x
HP (FP16)
1,169 (18.9 IPS)
100%
8,601 (139.4 IPS)
100%
GPU by 7.36x
Q (INT8)
10,827 (176.0 IPS)
98%
3,660 (59.5 IPS)
98%
CPU by 2.96x
Pose Estimation
SP (FP32)
8,442 (9.85 IPS)
100%
48,298 (56.4 IPS)
100%
GPU by 5.72x
HP (FP16)
6,661 (7.77 IPS)
100%
108,344 (126.4 IPS)
100%
GPU by 16.27x
Q (INT8)
27,636 (32.4 IPS)
94%
33,686 (39.5 IPS)
96%
GPU by 1.22x
Object Detection
SP (FP32)
3,391 (269.0 IPS)
100%
2,222 (176.2 IPS)
100%
CPU by 1.53x
HP (FP16)
946 (75.0 IPS)
100%
4,202 (333.3 IPS)
100%
GPU by 4.44x
Q (INT8)
8,132 (653.6 IPS)
86%
2,097 (168.4 IPS)
87%
CPU by 3.88x
Face Detection
SP (FP32)
6,866 (81.6 IPS)
100%
6,404 (76.1 IPS)
100%
CPU by 1.07x
HP (FP16)
1,937 (23.0 IPS)
100%
11,366 (135.1 IPS)
100%
GPU by 5.87x
Q (INT8)
11,383 (135.7 IPS)
97%
5,337 (63.6 IPS)
97%
CPU by 2.13x
Depth Estimation
SP (FP32)
9,276 (71.5 IPS)
100%
18,869 (145.4 IPS)
100%
GPU by 2.03x
HP (FP16)
2,946 (22.7 IPS)
99%
29,473 (227.1 IPS)
99%
GPU by 10.00x
Q (INT8)
17,299 (138.0 IPS)
78%
14,494 (116.2 IPS)
77%
CPU by 1.19x
Use DirectML on the Radeon 890M for FP16 and FP32: In Half Precision (FP16), the Radeon 890M scores 15,143 vs. 1,937 on the CPU, making it 7.82x faster (+681.8%) overall, with a 16.27x speedup in Pose Estimation (HP) and a 10.00x speedup in Depth Estimation (HP). In Single Precision (FP32), the GPU also leads by 2.04x (8,356 vs. 4,106).
Use the Zen 5 CPU for Quantized INT8 Inference: Thanks to native AVX512-VNNI and AVX-VNNI support, the CPU scores 7,732 in Quantized (INT8) workloads compared to 6,045 on the GPU (1.28x faster overall), beating the GPU by 3.88x in Object Detection (Q) and 3.46x in Image Classification (Q).
Radeon 890M Graphics: OpenCL & 30-Hour Gaming Test
Equipped with 16 RDNA 3.5 Compute Units (1,024 Stream Processors) and a rated boost clock of 3,100 MHz (observed peaking at 3,096.0 MHz in HWiNFO64), the AMD Radeon 890M (gfx1150) has access to a 4 GB dedicated UMA buffer plus 14.4 GB of shared device memory in OpenCL.
Geekbench 7.0.0 OpenCL GPU Score: 35,031
In Geekbench 7.0.0 OpenCL, the Radeon 890M hit an overall score of 35,031, led by Super Resolution (70,665 / 130.4 Kimages/sec), Particle Physics (55,705 / 9,986.9 FPS), and Background Blur (46,523 / 120.2 images/sec):
OpenCL Subtest Workload
OpenCL Score
Measured Throughput
Overall OpenCL GPU Score
35,031
N/A
Super Resolution
70,665
130.4 Kimages/sec
Particle Physics
55,705
9,986.9 FPS
Background Blur
46,523
120.2 images/sec
Feature Matching
37,409
70.6 Mpixels/sec
RAW Image Processing
36,778
1.49 Gpixels/sec
Face Tracking
33,907
42.1 images/sec
Photo Filter
32,769
537.7 pixels/sec
Horizon Detection
31,522
1.22 Gpixels/sec
Video Filter
30,379
8.23 Gpixels/sec
Path Tracer
27,340
49.0 Mpixels/sec
Fluid Simulation
13,301
196.0 FPS
30 Hours of Real-World Gaming (1440p & 4K)
With AMD's HYPR-RX global profile enabled in Adrenalin, I logged 30 hours of gameplay across three titles at 1440p and 4K:
Game Title
Resolution & Preset
Driver Profile
Logged Playtime
Average Framerate
The Sims 4
1440p, Ultra Settings
HYPR-RX
16 hours
66.6 FPS
Mewgenics
4K, Default Settings
HYPR-RX
8 hours
93.8 FPS
Cosmoteer: Starship Architect & Commander
4K, Ultra Settings
HYPR-RX
6 hours
108.9 FPS
Holding 66.6 FPS at 1440p Ultra in The Sims 4 over 16 hours and 93.8 to 108.9 FPS at native 4K in Mewgenics and Cosmoteer makes this a very capable casual, indie, and strategy gaming box without needing a discrete graphics card.
NVMe Storage Speeds & Thermals
The primary M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 x4 slot comes populated with a 1 TB Lexar SSD NQ7A1 (RC1191R001242P2237) running at a full 16.0 GT/s PCIe 4.0 link speed. Tested in CrystalDiskMark 9.0.3 x64 (3 passes, 1 GiB test size, 18% drive fill at 176/953 GiB), it delivered fast Gen4 numbers while staying cool:
CrystalDiskMark 9.0.3 Benchmark
Read Performance
Write Performance
Sequential 1M (SEQ1M Q1T1)
4,810.91 MB/s
5,099.54 MB/s
Random 4K (RND4K Q1T1)
68.45 MB/s
247.73 MB/s
Random 4K Throughput (IOPS)
16,712.40 IOPS
60,481.69 IOPS
Random 4K Latency (microseconds)
59.74 us
16.46 us
During the 190.5-second CrystalDiskMark run (ssd bench.CSV), the drive's composite sensor averaged 50.05 C (median 50.00 C, min 41.00 C, max 59.00 C, SD = 5.25 C), while the ASIC controller sensor (Drive Temperature 3) briefly touched 66.00 C during sequential writes before dropping right back to its baseline. Even during the 24.65-minute FurMark GPU burn-in, the SSD sat at a cool 40.00 C median, showing zero heat soak from the APU.
Testing Note: Wireless Connections Under Heavy Load (BIOS Fix Incoming)
During our stress testing, we noticed an issue affecting wireless connections (specifically wireless mouse input and receiver stability) when the system is pushed to maximum combined CPU and GPU load (HWinfo64 log Wireless input under load.CSV, where CPU load hits 95.85% median / 100.00% max and GPU load hits 93.50% median / 97.00% max at 64.43W median / 65.01W max package power).
To isolate the behavior, we captured polling intervals in MouseTester across wired and wireless configurations both at idle and under heavy system load:
MouseTester Dataset / Capture Window
Sample Count (n)
Mean Update Time
Median Update Time
Min / Max Update Time
Std Dev (SD)
Updates >15 ms
Wired Mouse Under Load
519
8.00 ms
8.00 ms
5.36 ms / 10.42 ms
0.77 ms
0.0%
Wired vs. Wireless Combined Log
2,578
10.73 ms
8.25 ms
0.01 ms / 934.53 ms
26.12 ms
7.6%
Wireless Mouse No Load
1,109
8.10 ms
7.52 ms
0.25 ms / 127.76 ms
5.49 ms
2.6%
Wireless Mouse No Load (2nd, short test)
528
7.87 ms
7.54 ms
6.00 ms / 22.17 ms
1.75 ms
2.8%
Wireless Mouse Under Load
1,387
11.42 ms
9.71 ms
0.01 ms / 128.02 ms
7.59 ms
18.5%
Wireless Mouse Under Load (2nd, short test)
509
10.90 ms
9.52 ms
0.01 ms / 48.97 ms
5.58 ms
18.3%
What Happens Under Load: With a wired mouse, polling remains rock-solid at both idle (hovering tightly between 7.5 ms and 8.5 ms) and 100% system load (averaging 8.00 ms with a tiny 0.77 ms standard deviation and 0.0% of updates exceeding 12 ms). A wireless mouse at idle also tracks near the 125 Hz target at a 7.87 ms mean (7.54 ms median) with only occasional ~15 ms intervals. However, when the system is hammered by a 100% combined CPU+GPU load, wireless update intervals jump to an average of 10.90 ms in the capture window (11.42 ms across the full log, pulling the effective polling rate down to 90.4 Hz), with 32.4% of updates exceeding 12 ms and latency spikes reaching 33 ms to >41 ms.
Fix on the Way: We shared our HWiNFO64 and MouseTester telemetry directly with VZMORE's engineering team. The manufacturer's technicians have already reproduced the behavior and are currently building a BIOS update to resolve the under-load wireless resource/interrupt contention, so this issue will be fixed shortly.
Final Verdict: Pros, Cons & Should You Buy It?
The Good:
Legitimate Vapor Chamber Cooling: The V-Cooling VC Vapor Chamber holds a rock-solid 54.0W sustained STAPM (65.0W V-Boost Pro peak) with zero thermal throttling, keeping physical CPU cores at a 71.4 C median under combined torture, FurMark iGPU temps at a 73.4 C median over 25 minutes, and VRM temps below 57.3 C.
Strong Zen 5 + Zen 5c Compute: Hits 5,240.5 MHz on Zen 5 cores to post 2,664 Single-Core and 17,051 Multi-Core in Geekbench 7.0.0.
Flexible Local AI Hardware: Gives you a 55 TOPS Ryzen AI NPU, Radeon 890M DirectML (15,143 FP16 score, 7.82x faster than CPU), and Zen 5 AVX-512 VNNI (7,732 INT8 quantized score, 1.28x faster than GPU).
Great 1440p & 4K Casual/Strategy Gaming: Scores 35,031 in Geekbench 7 OpenCL and averages 66.6 FPS at 1440p Ultra in The Sims 4 and 93.8 to 108.9 FPS at 4K in Mewgenics and Cosmoteer across 30 hours of play.
Loaded Port Selection & Fast Gen4 SSD: Dual 40Gbps USB4, dual HDMI 2.1, dual 2.5GbE LAN, Wi-Fi 7, SD 4.0 reader, six USB-A ports, and a 1 TB Lexar Gen4 SSD hitting 4,810.91 MB/s read / 5,099.54 MB/s write.
The Trade-Offs:
Secondary M.2 Slot is 2230: While the primary M.2 2280 slot takes up to a 4 TB drive, the second PCIe 4.0 x4 slot uses the shorter M.2 2230 form factor (up to 1 TB).
Wireless Jitter Under 100% Torture Load (Fix Pending): Wireless peripherals currently experience polling spikes when the APU is pinned at 100% load, though wired peripherals are completely unaffected and VZMORE's technicians are rolling out a BIOS update to resolve it soon.
Overall, if you are looking for a compact Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 mini PC that actually has the thermal engineering to sustain its 54W to 65W power budget without cooking its VRMs or SSD, the VZMORE AX9 Max is an impressive piece of hardware, and once that BIOS update lands for under-load wireless stability, it will be firing on all cylinders.
I was given a pc that didn’t work past the log in screen. Sold the power supply then found out the problem afterwards of course.
I finally got money to actually buy the power supply just don’t want to fuck the pc by getting the wrong one. Got a screenshot of when a guy was helping me like half a year ago. Anyone able to help me find or recommend a power supply? Just looking for a price below or between 100-200.
My currency is AUD if that helps
Hey everyone, I need some advice about my PC. I'm trying to figure out what's causing the problem before spending money on a new motherboard.
For a while, my PC has had some issues when gaming or rendering. Sometimes it would suddenly shut down under heavy load. Now, when I press the power button, the fans spin for about 1–2 seconds, then everything shuts off and tries to start again. It keeps repeating this cycle.
My technician suspects the motherboard is faulty, but I want to make sure it's actually the problem before replacing it.
My PC specs:
CPU: Intel Core i7-11700
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME H570-PLUS
RAM: 64GB Corsair DDR4 3200MHz (4 × 16GB)
GPU: ASUS TUF RTX 3070 OC 8GB
PSU: Corsair 850W
Storage: 512GB NVMe SSD, 2TB HDD, and 476GB SSD
Here's what I've tried so far:
Disconnected the power cable and performed a power reset.
Checked the motherboard and CPU power connectors.
Tried booting with just one RAM stick.
Removed the GPU and tried.
Tested with a different PSU.
Unfortunately, nothing has fixed the issue.
Has anyone experienced something similar? I'm wondering if this is definitely a motherboard issue or if the CPU or something else could be causing it.
Would you recommend trying anything else before replacing the motherboard?
bought a new Bluetooth module for my PC. When I try to connect my headphones, they seem to connect, but they don’t show up as an option for audio playback—not even in the list of hidden devices or anywhere else. I don’t know what to do; please help!
I’m actually fucking stupid. I returned it a few days ago and only now remembered that I forgot to do a factory reset. It should be arriving later today. I used the laptop for about a week before returning it so it had like everything on there. Is there anything I can do to minimize the potential damage? I doubt it but I figure it’s worth asking.
And before anyone comes at me, I have an unusually bad memory for someone my age, like my doctor recently put a referral in for neurology because of it. So that’s probably also in my data…
How fucked am I? Genuinely freaking out so please be kind.
Hi! I currently have Ryzen 5 2600 and XfX RX580. I wanna do a small upgrade. Have decided on the Ryzen 5 5600 as for the new CPU. Regarding the GPU, what is the best choice between ASRock challenger 6650xt, sapphire nitro 6600xt and XfX 6600xt swft 210 (they cost the same in my area). I tried to find any 6700xt but the only result (after spending days searching) was a couple ones that were used for mining.
Does anyone know which HSM vendors NVIDIA, Intel, Google, and Apple use to protect private keys for firmware signing and Secure Boot, and which commercial HSMs support FIPS 140-3, non-exportable keys, offline/air-gapped operation, and multi-party signing authorization?
i've noticed that my pc has 8gbs of hardware reserved.
I have two 8gbs of ram and it shows that both are working.
I have done some research and tried different methods in order to fix it.
I have tried
1. going into msconfig and unchecking the maximum memory under the boot settings.
i have tried going into the advance system settings and changing the virtual memory under a custom size.
lastly i have tried reseating my ram and testing each stick by their selves to see if one is broken.
everything is working perfectly and everything I have tried has not fixed the issue.
if you can think of a different solution i can try would be helpful.
One day I turned on my 2 year old PC and the monitor said “Display Port: No Signal.” The case light was blinking and a red light was on the motherboard indicating a GPU failure or something like that. The computer turns on, lights on, fans working, but still display port no signal.
Weird, because I just gamed on it the night before it died. It was shut down normally.
I figured it was unlucky and dead so I bought a new prebuilt. Played on it for two weeks fine, then suddenly again, “Display port: No signal” with a red light on the motherboard and a blinking power button AGAIN.
Things we’ve tried
New power supply
Took out the RAM
Tried plugging GPU into different slots on the motherboard
Checked voltage of the wall, looks a normal 120 but I’m worried that it looks normal now and will surge later, is that possible?
PC was plugged directly into the wall
Tried different cables
Tried a different monitor
Bought a whole NEW pc and the same exact failure happened
I’ve lived in this old building for almost 4 years and this has never been a problem until now. We’re thinking about getting an electrician out here to check on the outlet itself.
Hi - I’m looking to buy myself a gaming PC. I want to run games like FC27, GTA etc.
My budget is roughly £1000 ($1327) with a bit of freedom to go over
Is this possible on the budget, as I googled gaming PCs and they were mostly over £2000.
Not sure if it’s clear but the middle of the laptop is not as bright as the rest? I don’t know if this is bad, and if it is how bad. If it’s fixable I want to get it fixed. But If this isn’t / going to get worse I can live with it. I just got this computer of a seller and everything else works awesome. So I’m not sure if I should be worried about this. Main things I want to know.
A. What happened to the screen/ what’s it called
B. Is it fixable
C. Is it worth fixing
D. If I don’t fix it will it get worse
Got a new house and while unpacking i found my old computer OPLIPLEX 990 running windows 11 i think? but whenever I start it I keep getting a boot failed message.
I'm not a computer or tech savvy guy so I was hoping someone on this subreddit can help?
Edit: i got it fixed and working. I just did the USB trick someone mentioned in the comments. The original driver is completely dead I'm assuming from not using it for like 8 years. But that's fine. I got the files I wanted off it and am literally only using it to swap files to an external hardrive and whatever I can't use my phone for. Thank you guys for helping me out! ¡solved
It was suggested that for trading you need a cpu with at least a 45000 benchmark score. I’m generally a Mac user and also have windows computers. I’ve noticed silicon Mac scores are never close to that benchmark. But are the values “different “ because of the different platforms? I don’t need a ridiculous priced computer I have a 2020 iMac with a 10700k intel but I’d like to upgrade and don’t know if a Mac mini would suffice for example or just go with a decent pc I use TOS. Thanks
купила новый блютуз модуль для пк при подключении наушников к пк они вроде подключаются но, в выборе воспроизведения звука их нету в скрытых и все такое их нету не знаю что и делать помогите пожалуйста
Hi this is my first Reddit post in a while but I need your guys help I’m getting into animation and 3d modeling but the pc I have to now is not able to support those things like blender etc and I want to to support that for my job but I also want it to be useable for my gaming addiction and I need your help figuring out good specs for a pc or gaming laptop my budget is around 4-5k but I don’t really know how to find good specs and how computers in the physical processing power sense. If anyone has any recommendations on what I could use that is long lasting and able to handle the physical strain of high powered games combined with power for 3d modeling and adobe please let me know.
A couple of days ago, I finally managed to clean my laptop for the first time after 5 years (I know it's been quite a long time). The thing that confuses me is that while I was playing CoD WaW before the cleaning, the CPU temperature was around 65-70 and the fans were running loudly; however, after I cleaned and ran the game, the temperatures were around 68-75 and the fans aren't even running as fast as before until it reaches 75-80.
After doing a brief search around the net I unscrewed and rescrewed the cooling block, but still no change. Also, if you ask my CPU and the thermal paste:
recently joined and my last post was extremely helpful. I've been able to identify the ethernet, vga and usb-a slots but the rest are unknown to me. if anyone knows what these ports are it would be a great help to know :)
can someone help me find what’s going on? i understand that there are some stuff going on in the background, (like the riot client for example) but recently there’s been some nasty lags and stuttering
there’s a chance that something malicious is happening as well