r/TopCharacterTropes • • 21h ago

Hated Tropes (Hated)changing somenthing to be more "progressive" ends up being a bad thing

Now to be clear,i am not one of these "anti-woke" losers that complain some people exist,and i am also not the type to complain about changing somenthing in a new version or adaptation,however there are cases where it did ended up being a bad idea.

-In the anime of Cowboy Bebop there is the character Gren,despite being short lived the character is very memorable specially thanks to his tragic story.Basically his story was that he was a soldier from the titan war who was a great friend with Vicious(the main bad guy)after the war he was emprisioned thanks to Vicious who testified against him and he was forced to take a experimental drug that caused him hormonal problems,giving him a feminine appearence and even breasts.

In the Netflix live action,for some reasons they decided Gren was going to be non-binary,which wouldn't be a problem(some people believe he was gay in the anime)if it wasn't for the fact that they also removed all the nuances and complexities that made the character memorable and interesting,instead of a tragic war veteran that was betrayed and had his body changed against his will,Gren is just kinda there.

-The original Rugrats cartoon had the couple Betty and Howard,Betty was a big and masculine woman while Howard was a smaller and nervous man,it was a genuine interesting relationship that stood out from the other couples who were the standard straight couple.

In the new series however they replaced Howard with a woman named Trish,two things,first off why?What was the problem with having a woman being the stronger in a straight relationship?Second why does Hollywood seem to think that every tomboy or masculine woman is a lesbian?

Overall not the worst thing but it is jarring that they had a gender reverse roled that was progressive and decided that wasn't enough.

-Oh man,this one pisses me off the most so i am gonna have to break it down

So back in the late 80s and 90s there was this anime called Saint Seiya also knows as Knights of the zodiac,it tells the story of knights who fight for the Goddess Athena to protect earth,being divided in the golden,silver and bronze knights,the anime was a huge hit in latin america and Europe and while it floped in the US it still has a loyal fanbase.

Being a fan myself i can't recommend it enough,now granted the story does have a fair share of flaws,and that's because the author was honestly just making stuff up as he went along(also a lot of side characters are poorly used or even forgotten about)still it is a great story you should check out

But then a couple of years back Netflix got the rights and decided to a 3D reboot,in this reboot they decided to make the story more "american" to try to bring more american viewers,now i could go on and on a big rant about how that was a bad idea and the execution was so terrible that it made me want to strangle someone but this post is about one specific change.

So Saint Seiya has five main characters,those are Pegasus Seiya,Dragon Shiryu,Cygnus Hyoga,Phoenix Ikki and finally Andromeda Shun.

While the other four characters were the standard masculine and brute male characters who were always ready to throw punches,Shun was smaller,more sensitive and even feminine looking,a pacifist who didn't liked fighting,but don't mistake that for weakness because Shun was loyal to his friends and was extremely powerful.

Then Netflix decided to change Shun into a girl named Shaun.

So wait,you have a male character who goes against every male stereotype and you turn him into just another generic female character?

When asked about it,the showrunner Eugene Son said he made that change because there was no girl in the group and having a all boys group wouldn't be acceptable nowadays

First off that's not true because Athena was also part of the main cast,yeah she wasn't the fighting type but she still helped quite a lot in the story even saving the knights on several occasions,second if you wanted to add a girl to the main group why not use Marin or Shaina?Hell,if you were going to change the story anyway why not turn Seiya sister into a knight?

Thankfully this monstrosity was cancelled(so much for trying to bring more fans)

8.1k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.8k

u/MrSnippets 21h ago

In the original Avatar Animation, Sokka was a sexist douchebag when you meet him. But he learns and grows beyond his childish viewpoints.

In the Netflix adaptation, Sokka isn‘t sexist to begin with, robbing him of an essential part of his character development.

3.2k

u/abadstrategy 21h ago

Why can't we let characters be problematic anymore? Let em be bags of dicks, and learn to be better! Sokka was awesome specifically because he stuck out and grew

1.6k

u/LaserSharkPen 21h ago edited 8h ago

Because the loud bunch who has no life outside of social media will assume potrayal of negative traits = endorsing said traits, even when the story portrays them as a bad thing or characters grow out of them.

I've seen someone calling a villain a waste of budget because he hurts the child protagonists...

163

u/awaythrowthatname 17h ago

I've also noticed this weird idea thats become more prevalent lately where people think it would be a bad idea to let shitty people grow and learn and become better, because they somehow think that that means that all of the bad things they did were forgiven and dont matter at all?

88

u/TheBrewThatIsTrue 16h ago

Also people have no patience. If the character doesn't change or grow immediately they are written off.

16

u/WyldBlu3Yond3r 16h ago

Looking around at the irl villainous stuff people are doing and getting no punishment for it if they profess their love of a particular religion, I can kinda see how that could be a thing.

Honestly, some crimes can be forgiven but others...definitely never.

1

u/MozeTheNecromancer 3h ago

Frabkly that fact was what makes Megatron heel turn in IDW comics so damn good. It wasn't a redemption, he was not forgiven of his crimes and all the lives he took, but he was trying to do good anyway.

329

u/nate0113 19h ago

Every time I see someone getting mad at a villain doing villainous things I'm reminded of an old video Brad Jones (The Cinema Snob) made over 10 years ago where he reviewed a piece of Christian propaganda from the 80s that was condemning stuff like Star Wars and Thundercats as satanic, with one reason being because of how evil the villains were.

To which Brad responded with something along the lines of "You're not SUPPOSED to root for the villains. That'd be like getting mad at Die Hard for promoting armed skyscraper robbery."

35

u/NoobInPokeBowl 15h ago

I wonder what they would think of this really evil guy Satan... he's a character in my fave book, bible, but I guess he's too evil for them to read it... :(

3

u/PablomentFanquedelic 8h ago

Ironically, Narnia of all things actually made my gay ass simp for the villain

18

u/Unable_Shoulder_8747 16h ago

God I used to watch Brad's stuff compulsively. I learned of many horrific porno parodies. The Alice in Wonderland one is pretty entertaining though. 

1

u/SethCyclone 10h ago

Is it better than the Metal Gear Solid porn parody? That's the gold standard of porn parodies 

1

u/Unable_Shoulder_8747 7h ago

I did not know that even existed. The Alice one is a musical, which is strange 

2

u/Zak22wolf 8h ago

Random Cinema Snob reference in 2026? I approve.

-7

u/Obvious_Peanut_8093 12h ago

I stopped watching CinemaSins after they called Shrek 2 transphobic because the fairy godmother called the wolf "gender-confused". Even if you wanna call that low bar transphobic, it's just not good analysis or humor, whatever they would use to defend that take.

7

u/nate0113 12h ago

I think you're confusing who I'm talking about.

I'm talking about Brad Jones who has a review series called The Cinema Snob and is known for being a close friend of Doug Walker (The Nostalgia Critic).

-6

u/Obvious_Peanut_8093 11h ago

okay? You do know there are more than 1 movie "review" channel, right?

7

u/nate0113 11h ago

But...you kinda just brought up a completely different channel that wasn't even part of the original comment you replied to.

Its like talking about Batman and out of nowhere bringing up your problems with Spider-Man.

-5

u/Obvious_Peanut_8093 11h ago

Are we not allowed to talk about problems with similar things in a thread? What is this weird problem you have with someone pointing out a similar problem with another channel that also "reviews" movies?

7

u/Haunting-Vanilla1624 10h ago

Reading comprehension wasn't a strong point for you in school, was it?

-1

u/Obvious_Peanut_8093 10h ago

Clearly, my comment is so off base that you can see no similarities between cinimasins poor criticism and the poor criticism of the Satanic Panic, my bad.

→ More replies (0)

142

u/abadstrategy 21h ago

I remember when Epic was huge, people were practically calling for tar and feathers for anyone who thought Calypso or Antinous had good songs...

47

u/Professor-Xivass 19h ago

…a echo chamber I assume was mostly ignored given what I’ve seen is universal praise for the project including the villain songs.

28

u/Supreme_Canadien 18h ago

You dont remember the era then. I remember people having crying fits cause they liked the song but felt 'guilty' about it because of the subject matter.

21

u/Professor-Xivass 18h ago

I mostly just saw people react to it, but all the comments were always positive, besides the occasional “oh god this song is so fucked up but it’s so good” remark. It’s a well made villain song. Hellfire is arguably just as messed up but is hidden in the undertones, and it’s seen as the greatest villain song ever written.

13

u/Supreme_Canadien 18h ago

Firm agree, but it was wild seeing these tweenagers come into contact with their first moral dilemma and it being so miniscule

Like me and my friends were goose stepping like hyenas singing Be Prepared with the full knowledge it was hitler-like.

5

u/fatherof472 13h ago

I was a huge fan of Epic and was relatively active in the fandom, and I vividly remember watching people get threats and harassment because they said they felt bad for Calypso who, in the Epic rendition of the story, essentially had the mind of a younger child who was isolated from humanity and has no idea what's socially acceptable and, therefore, has no idea that what she did was wrong.

Jorge himself literally compared her to a kid in the way she was so excited and obsessed over Odysseus because, in her mind, he was the first person to ever wash up on her shores, and that had to be a sign, and she had to show him everything and convince him to stay.

But no, anyone who was capable of feeling empathy toward someone in a horrible position was a "rapist sympathizer"

6

u/abadstrategy 11h ago

I think the most egregious part of that whole debate was that people would be so quick to scream about mythological versions of the characters they hate, and ignore the unsavory version of a character that they loved. So Calypso is a rapist and jailer (despite the fact that Jorge confirmed she didn't force him), but we ignore the story of how Polites died on Temesa, after either raping a girl or pillaging it, because he's a smolboi cinnamon roll

1

u/fatherof472 9h ago

They're insanely hypocritical, it's infuriating

5

u/lacegem 15h ago

It's hell on writers. You can't write any depiction of a bad thing without a bunch of people thinking you must support it, even if the narrative goes far out of its way to hammer home that it's bad and not something anyone but this specific evil character supports.

If Darth Vader kills a puppy, then it must be because George Lucas himself personally endorses puppy murder. Cue a bunch of comments parroting "death of the author."

6

u/Neurospicy_Nightowl 15h ago

I think it's more that writing compelling character growth takes time and effort and being a showwriter nowadays means writing a story that is meant to be as compelling as a 20-episode season, watched episode by episode, over months, in 12 episodes or less, which people will bingewatch while looking at their phones. And you better write it fast, or your job will be given to an AI that will.

Oh, and if your first season doesn't guarantee the birth of a multi-billion multimedia franchise, don't expect to get a second season. So you better leave your characters without any major unresolved character arcs.

5

u/ComfortableCold378 14h ago

This always makes me laugh.

Progressives: In the USSR, there were dictates regarding what could be depicted in art. That’s censorship. Censorship is unacceptable.

Also progressives: You cannot show these characters. You must show these characters and these social groups. If you don’t, we’ll cancel you.

13

u/CptFinley 19h ago

the opposite of this also happens, when losers idolize characters like rorschach or walter white because they ignore their flaws and bad traits or see them as good characteristics at the dismay of their creators

3

u/qwerty8857 14h ago

This is my issue when I see things like “the office couldn’t be made today.” We’re supposed to think Michael’s an idiot and an asshole. It’s supposed to make you uncomfortable when he makes gay jokes. Everyone else in the show is clearly uncomfortable with a lot of the things he says. Shows like that should be made today because that’s the reality a lot of people face in their day to day lives. It doesn’t mean the writers and the viewers are all endorsing someone saying racist or homophobic things.

3

u/ehhdjdmebshsmajsjssn 13h ago

The show is Lanterns

2

u/WowIfOnly 12h ago

Well naturally you're not permitted to ever change your mind and grow as a person from learning and experiencing new things as you mature. THAT would be unacceptable in the absolute dumbest time to exist as a reasonable logical human being, because if everyone did that we would suddenly have vastly fewer issues across the world.

2

u/fresh-dork 12h ago

some people get mad at crowley for being crowley

2

u/stormdelta 12h ago

I feel like I'm running into the exact opposite issue on reddit, especially anime spaces where the anime really is making excuses or normalizing shitty behavior and not just portraying it. One in particular pisses me off that's praised as being a redemption story except the main character is still a supremely shitty person throughout, the writing just makes more excuses later and the fanbase can't tell the difference.

But I tend to avoid twitter/tumblr/facebook/etc, which is where the type of person you're talking about normally is I suppose.

2

u/pastelbunn1es 12h ago

I’ve even had people call me a genocidal racist fascist because I like a villain character. Like it’s fiction obviously if they were real I wouldn’t like them, that’s the point is exploring these topics in a safe way. I know no real people got hurt. That’s why I don’t like villains in “based on a true story” media. People can’t separate fiction from reality anymore.

2

u/LaserSharkPen 5h ago

Sadly, (internet addicted) people regard fictional characters as if they're real; and real people as if they're fiction. Iconic villains like Darth Vader would not survive if he debuted in this era.

2

u/pastelbunn1es 4h ago

Seriously, and I love Vader. Does that mean I condone his actions if it was real life? No. It’s wild that people truly believe it does.

1

u/mufassil 10h ago

Then you have RDR2 that has the KKK but theyre always dumb and kill themselves

0

u/Chama-Axory 12h ago

I bet I'm gonna get downvoted but this is what happens with Mushoku Tensei.

People can't stand a flawed character. 

1

u/abadstrategy 39m ago

I mean, one of the biggest things I always hear about it is the main character is an unrepentant pedo

145

u/WideConsequence2144 20h ago

And it’s not like he ran around being misogynistic for an entire season, it was the second episode when he met suki.

13

u/AnnoyedArtificer 11h ago

Him swallowing his pride and asking the Kyoshi warriors for help was the moment I truly fell in love with the show. It not only shows a character changing but other characters not just accepting his words but making him prove it by wearing the Kyoshi warrior dress. They didn't even make the crossdressing demeaning, it would have so easy to just make it a bit of hazing and move on. They handled it so well and it's a mystery why they removed it.

3

u/Homsarman12 6h ago

4th, but yeah.

1

u/WideConsequence2144 5h ago

3rd and I will die on this hill. I thought he wanted to ride the fish first then the temple but I was mistaken on that.

-1

u/Express_Aardvark8021 11h ago

he was literally introduced as being sexist towards katara

3

u/Ok-Inevitable819 10h ago

Reading comprehension is important. 

Work on it. 

1

u/Express_Aardvark8021 9h ago

got cha, fact checking is also important, he met suki 4th episode, he was sexist for the first 4 episodes

2

u/WideConsequence2144 6h ago

My bad. Third episode then. It changes nothing about my argument.

0

u/Express_Aardvark8021 6h ago

it changes the vibe, acting like a character trait is already gone by the 2nd episode makes it sound less impactful than it was, learn to read, met suki 4th episode

2

u/WideConsequence2144 6h ago

I think it makes it better actually. I can read just fine but I can’t force you to be correct. The first episode was a two-parter that I sat my ass down and watched in one sitting, second episode they went to the temple, third they met the painted warriors. For some reason I had them reversed in my mind.

1

u/Express_Aardvark8021 5h ago

no problem, im glad i was able to improve the point you wanted to make

123

u/SellClean4434 21h ago

Lack of patience among audience. When there is a problematic character people will jump on the writer by saying 'The writer is agreeing with the character'. Eg: Iron Heart's speech on Tony Stark.

60

u/Iheardthatjokebefore 19h ago

Also a deeply unsettling rise in determinism that believes bad people are inherently bad and can never be good or change in any meaningful way.

0

u/RokuroCarisu 13h ago edited 39m ago

Their sentiment is that only the highly empowered are capable of condemning someone. Mercy does not require power, thus mercy is conflated with weakness.

28

u/Revolver15 18h ago

You should see how the Avatar fanbase badmouths Uncle Iroh nowadays, one of the niciest and wisiest characters in the show, because the lore implies he wasn't always like that in his younger years as a military man.

22

u/awaythrowthatname 17h ago

Ive seen that, and i cant believe it! Like yes, did you guys really think that the Fire Nation general who was the brother of the big bad guy and fought for the Fire Nation was always good and wise and pacifistic? Obviously not, but that adds to his interesting character and how he has moved past it

12

u/abadstrategy 16h ago

Oh noooo... the man known for being the dragon of the west and being a highly decorated soldier in the villains army might have once been villainous

2

u/lacegem 14h ago

Also the thing with the bounty hunter during one of the early episodes. He stayed out of the fight and let her collapse onto him, and a portion of the fanbase treats this as a mortal sin for which there is no pardon or excuse. A bunch of people showed up to attack and kidnap a child, but it's the guy who didn't fight that's the worst of the worst. Zuko can be forgiven for threatening/trying to kill a bunch of innocent people, but Iroh being vaguely problematic is unforgivable.

3

u/onomstarr 11h ago

Collapsing on top of June was apparently such a mortal sin in fact that the comics had Iroh apologize to her for how awful he treated her.

6

u/lacegem 10h ago

He met the king of the nation he nearly destroyed and was just like "hey how ya doin" but he had bodily contact with June for a few seconds and needed a redemption arc.

166

u/Trident_True 20h ago

The most recent Dragon Age was just a bunch of people that should theoretically hate each other all getting along like it's no big deal. So unbelievably boring.

82

u/KingCuerno 20h ago

Made me miss Dragon Age 2, some of the party members outright hated each other.

37

u/trimble197 20h ago

Even Dragon Age Origins. Allistair and Morrigan were constantly bickering at each other

26

u/Altruistic_Ninja_148 19h ago

Yeah, I know some people saw that and thought Alistair and Morrigan were like that because they were attracted to each other or something. Nah, those two hated each other.

17

u/TerranImperium 18h ago

They do genuinely just dislike each other but they bond over the course of the game.

The idea of a ship between the two is not entirely baseless. That said, you can't change Morrigan at her core. She's quite a selfish person.

19

u/trimble197 18h ago

I love how much of a contradiction Morrigan is. She’s selfish and acts cold, but she does love her mother and respects you if you respect her back. Then there’s her romance where she absolutely doesn’t want to lose you.

8

u/FlakyRazzmatazz5 18h ago

We all know the only man for Morrigan is the male Warden.

8

u/Trident_True 19h ago

"swooping is bad"

40

u/Trident_True 20h ago

DA2 had it's flaws but the characters were excellent. I loved that you could max out their relationship with either friendship or rivalry, especially Fenris and Carver.

Everyone hated Anders quite understandably too.

19

u/Penakoto 19h ago

The friendship / rivalry system was brilliant, and I mourn the fact that because it was introduced in such an unpopular game, it's never going to adopted by other games.

It's my personal "Nemesis System", ie a mechanic so cool that it's a huge shame that nobody else can/will use it.

8

u/Trident_True 19h ago

Agreed wholeheartedly. Thought BG3 might have gone that route but it's just approval and disapproval.

1

u/National_Smell_5565 13h ago

Oh, it was adopted in Tyranny! And i think i saw another one rpg with that sysptem, but i couldn't remember.

14

u/Responsible_Mail_113 19h ago

Mass Effect 2 had a few character interactions like this too, especially Miranda-Jack and Tali-Legion. Which also lead into OP's Sokka example of giving the characters room to grow and better themselves with your help as seen in Mass Effect 3 with Tali breaking down over Legion's sacrifice and Miranda and Jack bantering with each other at the Citadel party.

15

u/Trident_True 19h ago

Good grief the Tali-Legion quest ending had me bawling my eyes out. Must play that again.

4

u/Consistent_Boss_9397 18h ago

The only thing I didn't like about Mass Effect 3 was that the Geth reverted to a hive mind, whereas in Mass Effect 2 it was the opposite.

7

u/Trident_True 18h ago

ME3 has some questionable story indeed. You could sense the quality had dipped since the 2nd one. I still love the series though and it is probably still my all time favourite. Shame what has happened to Bioware.

2

u/FlakyRazzmatazz5 18h ago

I think the companion peaked with Origins.

36

u/LichQueenBarbie 20h ago

And the serious dialogue options don't feel serious, and Rook still had that dumb fucking smirk on their face. Ugh.

20

u/omyomo 19h ago

According to some of the community ambassadors who playtested during development, Rook used to be outright insufferable before being turned into an HR representative

19

u/Trident_True 20h ago

Every dialogue has to have some marvel-esque sarcastic quip. Fucking abysmal writing.

28

u/AGuyWithTrouble 17h ago

It's such a gutless game. The elven gods are real and about, and this basically gets no real discussion, far as I know. Ain't gonna talk about whole cultures and religions based around very real and monstrous beings, no sir. That could be problematic.

Like, Inquisition had MANY problems, but the scene of Sera being scared at the thought of her religion being ACTUALLY real, alone, seems to beat the writing of the whole game.

10

u/Trident_True 17h ago

Inquisition felt like it had a whole writing team so even if 1 part was badly written the rest made up for it. Veilguard felt like it was written by a single person who was never told their ideas were shit.

I don't even know how you can work on something for years and nobody asks why it's bad? Did the staff just not talk to each other or something?

Like end of Inquisition Dorian goes off to try and end slavery and then in Veilguard his fringe political group have apparently made 0 progress. Also the Venatori have come back from literal annihilation somehow. Like what was the point of the entire previous game then? Infuriating.

2

u/CollectorOfMyst 2h ago

I will unfortunately have to defend the writers on a sole point: they had to change it from single player to live service and back to single player and they fired the senior writers and brought in the Mass Effect team to finish the job (and giving them seniority over the actual team).

Maybe they talked to each other but when you’re driving off road you don’t necessarily know where you’re going.

I still think Veilguard should be struck from the record of the franchise tho

13

u/trimble197 20h ago edited 19h ago

Especially when Taash was bullying Emmerich. When you call them out and tell them that you had expected for them to act like adults and stop arguing, they get mad at you because you didn’t do anything.

20

u/omyomo 19h ago

Taash in general felt like a swing and a miss. They're a professional dragon hunter, but with the exception of one mission where they act competent, they come off like a petulant teenager. They're a nonbinary second generation immigrant whose literal first words to you are "you don't get to decide who I am," only for their arc to culminate in you picking one of two options for them to be.

12

u/trimble197 19h ago

That’s what was so infuriating. Taash acts like an actual child despite supposedly being in their 20s.

18

u/ubersoldat13 19h ago edited 12h ago

Taash bullying Emmerich seemed like a decent setup for some character growth that was completely missed.

Taash says they're NB and requests the party use certain pronouns and respect her chosen identity, which the party does. Then they bully Emmerich, addressing him by names like "Death Mage" and "skull-fucker" and refuses to call him by his name when Emmerich specifically asks them to.

Like, the opportunity is right there, but it doesn't get addressed. You cant call them out on it. So Taash comes across as having zero self reflection, and being an asshat of a character.

11

u/trimble197 18h ago

That shit pissed me off so much. I don’t normally like kicking party members put, but Taash was really making me wish it was an option.

34

u/braaaaaaainworms 20h ago

i love dr house(the show) for this, the characters are flawed and make mistakes, and you see their behavior change, in one episode, house kept calling pregnant woman's baby a fetus, and during a surgery on it, he had a moment and started referring to it as "baby", or when foreman made a mistake and killed a patient and that stuck with him

6

u/UnquestionabIe 17h ago

My girlfriend and I have been rewatching it (she's probably watched it a half dozen times) and the character writing for the main cast is fantastic. Just love the evolution of how you view each of them, where early on you'll see someone like Foreman's opinions as a necessary way to temper how callous and outright unsympathetic towards patients House can be only for later on see how those same formerly positive traits can be just as destructive.

3

u/lacegem 14h ago

Even the "good" characters have huge flaws. Wilson is House's conscience, but he's got three ex-wives he's cheated on, and is shown to be just as immature as House (but is better at containing it because he values the opinion of others). The series isn't afraid to let people be imperfect.

8

u/TheDankestDreams 18h ago

Even more egregious, he grows past his sexism after what, 5 episodes? That whole part of his character literally only stuck around long enough to be like “this behavior is bad, but Sokka is a good guy and corrects his mistakes when pointed out.”

6

u/SuddenlyCake 19h ago

Did not stop them from making Aang an absolute asshole in season 2

13

u/Karaethon22 18h ago

I fucking hated Sokka almost instantly. He was so offputting in the first episode I was worried I'd have to quit watching the show because he was just insufferable. He's so unlikeable it's astounding.

But he starts growing fairly early in season 1 and continues growing throughout the series. By the end I don't know it's even possible to dislike him. He's complicated and flawed and at times very annoying, but he's got TREMENDOUS growth and really sticks out as having his own strengths despite being the only non-bender on the team. One of said strengths is an open mind and willingness to address those flaws to improve himself.

I can't imagine why anyone thought removing his dickishness was a good idea. I mean, yeah people were gonna hate him. THATS SORT OF THE POINT

5

u/Fr33zy_B3ast 17h ago

Also in Sokka’s case specifically, he was a dick because he built a persona to hide his fear and uncertainty about being the one in charge of the safety of his people despite barely being a teenager.

5

u/BOBOnobobo 19h ago

We can there's plenty of good shows that do that.

It's just that executives paying a lot for the rights to a popular story try and control the narative to much/give the popular IP to their friends as a project to make them feel better

5

u/UnquestionabIe 17h ago

Don't forget the writers who have their own stories they want to tell but can't get their foot in the door so apply it to an unrelated property. The Halo show was very much that

4

u/r31ya 18h ago

I vaguely remember there war a minor outrage because the bad guy is well... a bad dude.

if i remember it right, the dude is sex predator or something. well, he is the bad guy in the series and there are some busybody bitching about putting sex predator in a fiction series.

4

u/No_Procedure_5039 18h ago

Rex Splode approves.

2

u/rgiggs11 16h ago

There's a very interesting aspect to that. Apparently Sokka was originally planned to be in a few episodes. The writers decided to make him part of the main cast, but were bored of writing his childish sexist dialougue, so we got Sokka learning a lesson from the Kyoshi warriors. 

Sometimes the best parts of a story weren't part of the original intention. 

2

u/wareagle3000 15h ago

Hatred from Venture Bros was a goddamn pedophile and they made him a main character still. You can have a problematic character and still be fine. Just don't let them have the win for being problematic.

2

u/abadstrategy 15h ago

And I love Hatred! Dude had so many issues, and the show made it clear he hated it.

2

u/donoteatshrimp 14h ago

Add to that, why can't we just have characters that are problematic and stay problematic lol

1

u/abadstrategy 11h ago

Honestly, I'm down for that too. I've recently started watching Kevin can Fuck Himself, and Kevin is clearly a problem character. Will they stay problematic, or will they get better? It's a classic Schrodinger's Scumbag!

2

u/LiftingRecipient420 14h ago

Why can't we let characters be problematic anymore?

Because terminally online NEETs have a disproportionately impactful voice on the Internet and about things like this.

2

u/ScyllaOfTheDepths 13h ago

I was a kid during the original run of Avatar and watching Sokka actually get schooled by women, grow up, and get to the point of being comfortable enough in his masculinity to put on makeup and a dress was really cool. It was something a lot of shows weren't doing in the 00's and it was great to see it. Katara also had a great character development because of the sexism she was subjected to and they took a lot of that away.

2

u/abadstrategy 11h ago

I'm convinced I was right at the perfect age for Sokka to become an icon of positive masculinity

2

u/distortedsymbol 12h ago

i wonder if it's because it takes netflix on average 2 years to churn out 8 episodes of anything and there's no room to have proper character development lest they risk bad optics for extended periods of time.

1

u/abadstrategy 11h ago

Ain't that the truth. It'll never cease to confuse and astound me that when I was younger, they could churn out 27 episodes a year, and now you're lucky to get 8 episodes before cancelation

2

u/mashonem 11h ago

Because people don’t like to forgive when a wrong person changes for the better

1

u/Ok_You6737 12h ago

You'll still find it. First thing that comes to mind is Rex from invincible. 

1

u/fresh-dork 12h ago

sokka wasn't problematic, he was a pig. why can't we be specific?

1

u/abadstrategy 11h ago

By modern sensibility, being a sexist pig is problematic

1

u/fresh-dork 11h ago

no, that's grammatically wrong. problematic is an adverb, not an adjective. anyways, you're applying a generic 'bad egg' label to the guy instead of communicating.

1

u/Dull_Bid6002 10h ago

You can be problematic, you just can't be a hero protagonist and problematic.

There's plenty of protagonists that are problematic these days, but they're not heroes.

1

u/Smalldogmanifesto 9h ago

The same reason they got rid of Drow Chang in that one episode of Community 😞

1

u/Collegenoob 7h ago

Because gen z things if you write a problematic character you are a problematic author.

Not someone trying to make a realistic story