Literally, the word means '(a) remover', referring to its ability to split in half. However, historically, does the word actually refer to itself? Or is due to its behaviour as a monster–one that removes organs?

If you were to translate the word to English, would it make more sense to call it 'disemboweler' or even 'eviscerator'?

hindi ko alam kung tama ba o error lang ito ng editor tinignan kona sa mga social media pero muhkang hindi ginagamit ang owo, uwu, uwo pero kailangan ko ng konpirmasyon ng mga taga kanlurang batanggas

Is there a difference between the formalities, or do they both ask the same question in any context?