In my defense, unlike the Plato's Republic post I made, this time, it isn't because I happen to be reading Tocqueville and made a connection to RWBY. Instead, it's because I'm currently writing a crossover fic that involves the French Revolution. I am deliberately making this connection, not accidentally.
Now, for context. Alexis de Tocqueville in The Old Regime and the Revolution says the following:
Evils which are patiently endured when they seem inevitable become intolerable once the idea of escape from them is suggested. The removal of an abuse illuminates those which remain, and quickens our perception of them; the evil has indeed become less, but our sensibility to it is more acute.
For some history, Tocqueville argues that the French Revolution occurred not because they were at their worst, but that because things are becoming better. Many reforms and improvements were introduced during this time, he argues, that it served to make the remaining injustices unacceptable.
In the beginning (insofar as this is concerned), the faunus were basically discriminated against by the humans. We know that it exploded into the Faunus Rights Revolution. The short end is that the faunus managed to gain things from that war.
However, because they still faced discrimination after the war, the White Fang rose up likely as a peaceful organization handled by Ghira. Did it make a difference? Maybe, maybe not. In fact, I would think that the not could probably accelerate that escalation since the things they gained from the faunus war did show that faunus don't have to stay as being less than humans.
Blakes says, in reference to Sienna's ascent:
And the worst part was it was working. We were being treated like equals.
Because it was working, the few that continue to discriminate become more glaring, more out there, than if plenty of places ever did like Atlas (as I assume it to be the case). It also makes sense that the White Fang appears to be more violent in places like Mistral and Vale since those places are relatively more progressive than Atlas (at least insofar as we've seen of them). Vale naturally has Adam Taurus, and Mistral has Sienna Khan herself before Adam took charge.
In France, the places most violent were those where peasants have the most freedom they ever had. It works out, funnily enough, in favor of what we already have had we gone with that as an allegory than what was initially claimed to be (the Civil Rights Movement).
We can even do the same with the leadership. With Ghira, we have the early reformists. He could be like the constitutional monarchists who argue for reform while keeping the monarchy. Through peaceful reform and protest, meaningful change could occur albeit slowly.
When Sienna came along, we have what Blake has said. The early raids and violence that were targeted against those that discriminate against the faunus. Under Sienna, one can argue a moderate approach where violence is a tool. But like a tool, it must used properly, calculated and controlled. Sienna here is our Girondin.
With each concession and equal treatment the faunus receive, expectations skyrocket. And since violence is what's getting them these results, it follows (however fallaciously) that more violence should lead to better results.
Enter Adam Taurus, who one can argue is "more extreme" than Sienna and our Jacobin. Anyone familiar with the French Revolution would know that things only got more radical as it went on, with the moderates being executed (like Sienna had been).
One can even fit the Cinder/Salem elements into this as the White Fang making an alliance of convenience (working with the humans) as the Revolutionary government did just that in order to ensure the survival of their Republic. In the case of the White Fang, they are working with Roman Torchwick just to dismantle the academies (even if it's technically Cinder's machinations).
Even the dissolution of the White Fang in Volume 5 can kind of fit into this, albeit with more heads still on their respective shoulders, if we consider the Thermidorian Reaction. Here, the downfall of Adam Taurus resulted in the end of the White Fang's peak radical violence. Here, Adam's obsession would have threatened all faunus as per canon and thus needed to be removed.
If you follow history, however, you'd know that during the Thermidorian Reaction is the First White Terror, the retaliation against the Jacobins which could have covered the plotline of Adam's obsession over Blake if this was the direction taken (rewriting required, but you get it). Alternatively, this could be the implied storyline (or companion material) focusing on Ilia Amitola continuing the work of improving faunus lives in Mistral while canon does as it does.
Should there be reason to take it further, we'd have to deal with a faunus Napoleon Bonaparte. But by that point, the White Fang plotline becomes its own thing independent from the show by then.
The point here is thus: The White Fang plotline would have done better as a French Revolution allegory than a Civil Rights Movement one.
Your thoughts?