I just read a blog post from an old colleague of mine: https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20261008/?li261008

It lays out a truly dystopian (but completely plausible) future with AI.

"Thought will increasingly become a leisure pursuit, as hunting did following animal domestication, calligraphy after typography, woodworking after industrialisation, and horse riding after motorisation."

I'm glad I probably won't live to see it.

Does anyone ever check these?

I did today. The clinic had no record of the patient.

Five Ways Higher Ed Leaders Can Center Human Work In AI Adoption

What do you guys think? I personally think that this is an effective way to ensure that AI can be used responsibly if faculty choose to use it in their teaching/research.

I just gave the first exam in an introductory college course covering seven chapters. It had 50 multiple-choice questions worth 200 points, and students had 75 minutes. I provided a study guide, a review session, and a practice activity.

The preliminary distribution for 40 students is:
A: 8 students
B: 12 students
C: 7 students
D: 5 students
F: 8 students

I haven’t calculated the exact class average yet. I’m checking grading accuracy and looking at which questions were missed most frequently before finalizing scores.

I just feel like a horrible professor. I don’t know what to do does anyone have tips?

One of my students in an online section of my graphic design course submitted a fully AI-generated set of sketches.

OBVIOUSLY, using gen-AI to create designs in the course where you’re graded on design is not allowed.

The assignment was to do some research on a topic of their choosing (with some parameters), pull together 150 words, submit it as plain text so I can see the planned content, and then do 10 rough layout sketches.

Besides the obvious visual tells in the sketches and the SynthID, this student also left the prompt response in their plain-text content document:

Beneath the sketches is 150+ words, formatted for a graphic design hierarchy including at least four levels of text, ready to go for your poster process submission!

I gave her a zero on the submission and reached out to the university to figure out next steps, and they basically said “it’s up to you, but we like to give the students a chance to redo it and make up for their mistakes.”

The same day the university responded to me, she sent me an email asking how I was verifying my claims, because her work was METICULOUSLY done by hand — first on procreate and then on Canva — and she could show me her layered process (side note, her sketch submission was of pencil sketches on paper), and that I was causing her a lot of stress because she’s supposed to graduate in December, and that she redid the sketches just so we can put any confusion behind us so if I could review those that would be great and also it’s very hard for her to see her overall class standing because I have not yet graded all of her assignments, so it would be great if I could finish those too.

OHHHHHH. Is that how we want to play it? Okay. I was going to offer the redo but now I’m not keen on doing that. I said she can meet me in person, sketchbook in hand, and if it matches her submission I’ll issue an apology and give her the points back.

Haven’t decided what to do if it doesn’t match though. I’m not inclined to do favors for liars.

A student who has never shown up to class asked to be able to make up some assignments because of a bad injury. I asked for some documentation, as he said he had been treated for said injury at a clinic (not a hospital, mind you).

He said he didn't have documentation, but would send me the image of the injury (a "chainsaw gash" on a knee -- not sure if said knee is his since I have no clue what he looks like) and attached it to the email. Before I could read the email, I opened a rather bloody picture of a knee.

He wasn't trolling, either. This is the story he's running with to other students (pun intended). He didn't get the make ups, unfortunately.

But, girl wtf....

What voting level (department, college, or university) has the most influence in whether you advance?

Hi everyone--I teach a freshman level general biology course and would really like to add a more engaging project or assignment for my students to demonstrate their understanding of the material and earn points (other than just exams/quizzes). In the age of AI I think this kind of move is more important than ever. I would really like to find something that allows the students to tie together or integrate multiple sections of the material, but is still manageable for a freshman student. I teach a smaller class size so the design of the project/activity is not so important.

Does anyone have any suggestions or ideas that you have tried in your own course that you think worked well for this level of student?

Hi all,

I had a bad day today, and I need some perspective to see if I overreacted.

For context, I am an adjunct/ part-time instructor at a community college teaching an intro to college writing course. I am not new to teaching, but I am new to teaching at this college. Earlier this week, I gave them a lecture on paragraphing. That went relatively well. Today, I went in with some in-class activities for us to do in class where they would apply the material we learned earlier this week. Since they have visibly rolled their eyes when I asked them to work in pairs before, I decided to just let them work alone, but they could pair up if they wanted.

Of the twelve students who were in class, only four did the first activity. The other students were either just staring off into space, looking at their phones, or working on other assignments on their computers. While I noticed it during the work time, I let it go. But then only one student would answer the questions I asked.

I asked the students why they didn't do the activity. No one talked. I asked if they did not want to come to class, then why show up. I have a fairly relaxed attendance policy, so if they needed to work on other things, they did not have to show up. No one answered my question. I then said, " Well, if you did not do the activity, leave." No one left. I asked again, and no one left. I asked again what they were doing in class if they did not want to do the work because I was genuinely curious. They just stared at me. One guy started smiling. I ended up just dismissing class entirely, and then they all left.

Did I overreact? I can't help but think that I did. I felt so disrespected in the moment. I understand that everyone has different ways of participating, but not even doing a simple in-class activity?

Any advice or feedback would be great.

I am a second-year Assistant Professor in a humanities field at an R1 university that belongs to the AAU. I really enjoy my job. I am encouraged to do the research that I am interested in and get to design and teach interesting courses. However, there are logistical, cultural, and political aspects of the state/city in which I live that are not to my preference. I won't get into those details, but they have made my day-to-day life a bit challenging and lonely in various ways.

A friend just sent me a job ad for a position at a university with a similar standing and a program with probably a slightly higher reputation than the one in which I currently work (both are very respectable). Additionally, this new position is specifically aimed at research/teaching in the exact subfield of research that I am involved in. I am not currently active on the job market, but I admit I have lurked job boards out of curiosity in case a perfect job description was posted. I am feeling conflicted about the situation re: 1) letting down my current colleagues who spent a lot of time, effort, and resources in my hiring last year (and whom I really enjoy and have been supportive in my career development), 2) potentially finding a new job at a new school that I might not enjoy as much as my current job, and 3) the possibility of members of the hiring committee being in conversation with my current faculty colleagues (it is a fairly small field, people know each other) and how that might ultimately impact my mid-tenure review next year and annual reviews moving forward. So I guess I have two primary questions:

• Has anyone experienced a similar situation before and/or do you have any advice for me as I navigate the beginning of my academic career?
• If I do apply, how do I navigate the matter of letters of recommendation? Do I use the same letters from my professors from my first job market season? Do I ask them to write new ones? I certainly don't feel as if I should ask any of my current faculty colleagues to do so. I may have one respected person in the field who did not write one of my previous LORs, but aside from that I haven't really established relationships with other members of the discipline strong enough that I would feel comfortable asking a job LOR from.

Any bits of advice or insights are welcomed.

I've made a couple posts over the last few weeks about my speech class. You can read them here and here.

This is genuinely the worst class I have ever had. I have never had a class where literally every single student across the board was so apathetic, unprepared, and put in so little effort into completing the assignments.

Since they are delivering the next major speech next week, I decided to give them an opportunity to practice their speeches in class today so I can give them feedback on what to improve. Well, as I expected, most of them said they weren't ready to practice. I told them that if they didn't they will receive a zero, and more importantly, they probably won't end up doing well on the final speech if they don't practice. The last speeches were absolutely abysmal, which is why I decided to do this to at least try to help the few who actually want to do well. Only three people did practice btw.

For the rest of them who weren't prepared to try their actual speech, I decided to give them all an impromptu activity so they'd at least have something to do today. I gave them a random topic and then gave five minutes to prepare and each person had 2 minutes to deliver. As has been the case with this class previously, they did not perform very well. Most of them continue to make the same exact delivery mistakes that we've talked about avoiding over and over. Most just read straight off their notes. Most went under the time requirement and only said a few sentences. A few even said "I don't even know... that's all I guess..."

I'm not asking for any advice this time. I just wanted to rant. I am seriously over this class. I thought about just telling everyone that class was cancelled and to go home. I wish I could just give up.

We don't have very many weeks left in the semester and we still have to get thru 2 more major speech projects. I do not know how this is all going to go, but I'm thinking most are not going to pass. I already know I will get horrible evals.

I'm an academic nurse educator, and part of my job involves taking students onto the clinical floor to help bridge the gap between theory and practice.

So today we were nearing the end of a particularly looong shift, and I told my group students to ensure they had completed their patient care, charting, and other responsibilities by quarter to two.

This one student looked at me with a completely blank stare. I asked if she understood what I was asking. Nothing. Not a word. Just another blank stare.

So I repeated myself to everyone and not single her out: "Make sure you're all finished by quarter to two."

She then whispers (or so she thinks) to her peer, "What does that mean?"

Folks... I'd had a LOOONG shift with eight students and 16 patients between them all that I'm responsible for overseeing. At this point, I simply stared back and directly spoke to her. "It means everything is done by quarter to two."

I could practically see the cogwheels beginning to turn. And finally, some words! "Ohhh, you mean 1:30?"

🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️ Ugh. Nope. Try again.

A few more seconds of an intense stare down with some mental gymnastics, and suddenly, it clicked. You know when you'd slap the side of an old television and the picture would finally come into focus? THAT. "OHH, you mean 1:45!?"

DING DING DING! WE HAVE A WINNER! Congratulations! Your prize? Learning to tell time at the ripe old age of 19!

And before anyone comes for me, I have no issue with students asking questions or seeking clarification. That's quite literally part of my job. But there is something profoundly concerning about reaching post-secondary education without understanding something as elementary as "quarter to two."

This is also someone aspiring to become a nurse.... A profession that requires critical thinking, time management, and the ability to interpret information accurately, often under pressure. And yet somehow, we're still working on telling time...

Folks, like the title states, it's dire out there. I genuinely worry about how our public education system is preparing students for post-secondary studies, let alone professions where their decisions will directly impact the safety and well-being of others. It feels like we're having to teach the prerequisites to the prerequisites. Please pray for us nurse educators out there. We're genuinely trying our best to help address the nursing shortage, but my goodness, the student pool we're working with is abysmal.

Do you have a faculty development center (e.g. offering programming and mentoring about teaching)?

Is it run by faculty or staff, and what do you think about that?

TL;DR School wants to lower assessment standards for online courses to grow enrollment and increase revenue. Faculty don’t want compromise our ethics nor teach in an environment where academic misconduct is rampant.

A little background, our college, like most, is having its share of playing whack-mole when it comes to policing AI use in online courses. Some instructors have given up, others are still naive about their courses, while the most ardent opposers of academic misconduct have recently required on-campus testing after a long, hard, fight with administrators and student services.

The problem is however, that we lack the prestige and market power to be picky about enrollment, and like most colleges, are not in the strongest of financial health. Due to this, admins are suggesting we adopt online proctoring again, although data shows this was anything but successful and opened the flood gates to cheating.

My subject is very easy for students to offload in an unsecured testing environment, with proctoring software not being a deterrent for cheating nor sustainable for instructors to police. Additionally, project-based assessment is no longer an effective way to measure mastery, because again, AI can handle most of the heavy lifting.

The way I see it, for my course in particular, I can join the camp of giving up and wait until state and federal laws require admin to be responsible for the current misuse of public funds and/or a scandal to come to public light which would cause admin to reverse course…or I could keep trying to reinvent the assessment process.

One of the options I have been thinking about is requiring oral exams and setting a max grade for those who are unwilling to take a final assessment. For example, if you want to AI your way through the course, the max grade you can achieve is a B, but if you want to demonstrate mastery, you can have an online oral exam with myself. In this scenario you have the opportunity to then improve or worsen your final grade.

Lastly, I want to mention that I have been consumed with both frustration and anger in both college leadership and the behavior of the students. My mental health has severely degraded and most of my friends and family can tell that this problem is eating away at me.

If any of you guys have any advice or have been in similar situations, what do you think the best course of action would be. Or, if you have switched to oral exams, how did it go? Did you receive any pushback requiring non-native speakers to do oral exams?

Got this email from a student just now (week 5 of 12):

"I wanted to reach out to you personally to let you know that I’ve unfortunately decided to drop [your theatre class] this semester. I took six classes and was hoping I could manage everything, but with most of my courses in Political Science/ Human Rights and preparing for the LSATs, I’ve realized I may have taken a little more than I can handle. I really enjoy your teaching style and am disappointed to have to make this decision. However, I feel that I need to take something off my plate so I can give my other commitments the time and attention they deserve.

"Thank you for being so understanding. I really appreciate the experience I’ve had in your class, and I’m sorry that I won’t be able to continue this semester.

"I also wanted to say that it was really nice seeing you today! I hope it didn’t come across as me feeling pressured to come talk to you both. I just didn’t want to interrupt your break, and frankly, I have never seen one of my professors out in public, so I wasn’t sure what I should do."

Oh, my heart! I'm so proud of this student for having the maturity and awareness to come to this realization in time to drop my course. I focus a lot on time management and prioritizing as well, so I already feel like she's learned quite a bit.

And her feeling awkward realizing her prof is gasp a human person is adorable! I'm hanging onto this one for positive vibes for Future Me.

Not a rant. Just wondering what I can do differently. I wanted students to work in groups of 3-4 on 4 question and write down their own answers after discussing each question as a group. I was explicit that the group worked on the same question at the same time and then moved on to the next question when all were done with that question. After instructions, they break into groups and all just work individually on the 4 questions. So individual work, but sitting together. I asked why they weren’t working together and they just shrugged and kept working on their own. I’m a little flummoxed about this whole thing.

I kid you not... this actually happened.

Student and I are in an online recorded session doing an oral exam to review work that I thoroughly believe is AI (and which the student admitted, in writing, was AI). The point was for the student to study and take the oral exam to replace their original assignment grade, which was already generous.

About 2/3 of the way through, I stopped the exam because it was clear the student had no idea subject matter and could no longer earn enough points to pass. As I'm telling the student this, they interrupt because their phone is ringing (I do not hear it). Student is like, what happened? What happened? Gets off the phone quickly and tells me (relative) just died.

I am gobsmacked.

Hey everyone. I know deadlines are important but I have A LOT going on in my life and I’m not going to be able to do the things I’m supposed to do.

I hope you can understand.

This was an email from a student enrolled in a seated mini (8 week) "blended" course. It was in response to my announcement regarding our second day of class.

"Hey, I didn't attend class on Tuesday or today because I didn't even know I had new classes until I just got a phone call."

That was the entire email.

Y'all have a great weekend.

This happened last week, and I'm wondering if anyone knows more by now about who, and which departments, will be cut. There was a thread that discussed this the day it happened (it came out that it was Stockton after the OP tried to keep it anonymous). Anyone have an update or inside information?
I'm not being ghoulish; it's a really fine, more-under-the-radar-than-it-should-be, state university, one that has made some iffy financial decisions over the years, but one of the more unique places to study and learn (many multi- and interdisciplinary programs, beautiful setting, high quality academics). It hurts to hear that they, too, now, are in trouble.

In this era of, you know, all of it, the diminution of state funding and the fact that pensions cost money are constantly cited factors in almost all cases of rifs and closures (in addition to smaller enrollment and retention numbers). The social contract that existed around the value of education as a public good (and maybe the whole idea of a public good) is so eroded as to be broken.

For the record, I do not work there.

English instructor here. I’m almost at the point of letting them choose their own grade and have them write an argument for their reasoning. Maybe they would stop emailing me about how they “deserve” higher grades because they “worked hard.”

One student turned in a paragraph instead of an essay. I gave a 60 on the paragraph. This is my standard “you failed” grade. Student says they don’t deserve a 60 because they “worked really hard on that paragraph.”

How soon can I retire?

I have a mostly online class, but there is an in-person midterm and final (to combat AI cheating). The midterm was this morning. I cannot believe how many illnesses, hospitalizations, and car accidents I personally caused by requiring these students to come in person for the in person midterm in the class with in person midterms that they signed up for. And the relatives I've killed! I must be stopped. Good lord. 80 students and 14 major life crises, plus another 3 students who just didn't come and might or might not tell me why later. We are talking COVID, bird flu, jaundice, encephalitis, and a sore throat (poor baby!). Some dead grandmas, but we also got creative with some dead uncles and pets and best friends.

My chair thinks I should accommodate each student with a makeup opportunity, even if it means coming in every single day next week and proctoring a different exam for each student individually. And if they get sick again, I reschedule ad nauseam. Campus is a 40-min commute for me, and my office hours are online. I'm on multiple campuses and can't proctor before/after my usual in-person courses.

But if rescheduling is inconvenient, I could always give them an online option! Customer service!

I'm also not allowed to ask for doctor's notes or documentation because that is private. So basically any student can have unlimited extra study time if they ask. What is the fucking point of this course modality that my chair asked me to do if we're not requiring anything?

/cries in adjunct

*Edit: This is a community college, and I don't have the kind of protection that would let me push back on this and still expect employment in spring. I will start by setting a day/time next week and telling students just to come to that and go from there. But the messaging is really disheartening, and I needed to vent. I do not plan to allow an online option.

**Edit 2: I am not exaggerating. The numbers and disease names are real. Yes, my chair recommended accommodating with makeups at each student's convenience. I do not have an office, but there is a room I can use if I schedule in advance. There is no additional compensation. My chair reminded me that accommodations are part of my job. My chair is not physically in the state and cannot proctor for me. I should not have asked for permission or put it on his radar, but this is a new modality, and we have very complainy students. I was trying to avoid issues. This is not my usual department; I lost a course and needed extra income. Many of you are very funny, and you are making me feel better. Thank you.

Class took midterm exam this week (it’s a gen ed class, in case that is helpful context). It was a multiple choice exam taken on pen and paper. A student emailed me 15 minutes after they turned in their exam—and while others were still taking it—to ask me how many points each question is worth and then again about five minutes after that to ask me how long it typically takes me to grade midterm exams.

Sometimes I just can’t…

Assuming I could, which isn't a given, should I switch jobs?

I'm in my 13th year at my institution. My most measures, they are good to me. I teach the same 2/2 course package. My salary is fair and lets us travel, save for retirement, etc. I like my research and I like my students.

I do NOT have any friends on the faculty. I'm friendly enough with folks but I'm an outlier here for a variety of reasons. Imagine I'm a Muslim at a Catholic college. Or a white woman at an HBCU, that sort of thing. The mission matters to me but not like it does for some others and this shows up in various ways.

For example, we're in the process of hiring new folks and after watching a candidate give their spiel "briefly" summarize their research for 15 minutes of a 25 minute interview, I thought, "well, this person cannot concisely summarize complicated ideas into digestible chunks for students. Hard pass because they'd be a bad teacher." My colleagues said, "they're so enthusiastic!". Not said, IMO, is that the real truth is that they're well liked because they love Jesus! and we should hire them for our christian college, etc.

Anyway, I've begun to feel more constrained in my oddness here. Just that I don't belong.

But we're comfortable. We have a community, our children have friends, we have friends, we aren't too far from family, we're in a major city, etc. So while I could be much happier in my job if I went someplace where I was not such a minority or I was better aligned with my colleagues otherwise, it would come at a substantial personal/family cost. At a minimum, there would be major transition costs. And some of those could be more longstanding. Maybe our well-adjusted teen would become surly without his friends, etc.

Thoughts?

TL;DR - Lateral move being considered for a better professional fit but worried about personal/family costs to uproot. stay or go?

x-posted with r/academia

Create a username. There are secret requirements, but we'll only tell you them after you try and fail.

Create a password. There are secret requirements, but we'll only tell you them after you try and fail.

Oh, wait, 7 years ago, you also recommended someone for this. What? You don't remember? You'll have to recover your old account.

Grrrrr.