r/OpenChristian • • May 16 '26

Discussion - General New AI Policy

123 Upvotes

Hello all,

We wanted to make a quick announcement regarding the use of AI-generated content in our community. Many of our users have reached out voicing concern over the increase in “AI slop” posts, so hopefully this clarifies how things will work moving forward.

We have updated Rule 7 (Spam and Proselytizing) to include AI content. Specifically, AI-generated images and videos. These are officially no longer allowed. Any post which consists entirely of an AI image or AI video will be removed, so please report them as you see them.

Please note that we are not implementing a blanket ban on AI. Some people use AI to organize their thoughts, proofread their posts/comments, and help explain their viewpoint. Our goal is to judge the content of a post, not prohibit any form of AI used to help create it.

Obviously, there is going to be some moderator discretion involved here. If you feel like a post is spreading AI slop, feel free to report. If a post is generating good discussion but looks like some AI was involved in creating it, please keep in mind that this does not break the rules.

If anyone has any questions, feel free to comment and the mods will answer as we are available. God bless!


r/OpenChristian • • Mar 26 '26

Discussion - Sex & Relationships Sexual Ethics and the Question of Sin

154 Upvotes

Hello Open Christians,

We get a lot of questions about sin. Most of those questions are about sexual sins, so we want to take the time to write an official stance on the subject of sexual sin and ethics from the perspective of progressive Christianity.

The first thing to note is that sexual sins are never held up as greater than other sins in the Bible. The Bible has a concept throughout the scriptures that being guilty of one part of the law makes you guilty of the whole law. For this reason, Judaism doesn't have a tradition of personal confession. When you would bring sacrifices to the temple, you were atoning for the whole law, not for specific rules that you broke. If you bore false witness, you needed the same atonement as if you had committed adultery or murder or eaten shellfish. Paul speaks to this in Romans 1 and 2. The Jewish Christians in Rome were making claims about the Gentile Christians being unholy and unrighteous for participating in some of the social aspects of idolatry, specifically eating the Sunday meal after the meat had been sacrificed and cooked on the Roman altars. Paul responds by pointing out the sins that Jews commit and telling them that they have no room to talk since they are guilty of the law, too. No sin is greater than any other. And no sin is lesser. All sin equally takes us away from God.

So, what is sin? Since Romans is entirely about that question, we can find the answers very easily in there. Romans 3 talks about the law because the Gentile Christians in Rome were calling the law the source of all evil and sin. They said that the law brought sin because they didn't know they were sinning before they learned about the law. Paul refutes this by saying that Adam and Eve sinned before the law existed, so it can't be the source of sin. Instead, the law reveals sin by showing us how we missed the mark. By chapter 13, Paul has spoken enough and brought the two sides of this argument together, so he sums up the Christian way of life in verses 8-10.

"Owe no one anything, except to love one another, for the person who loves has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery; you shall not murder; you shall not steal; you shall not covet,” and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor, therefore loves fulfills all of the law."

Here, we see Paul equate sin with harm. Things that hurt other people and ourselves are what take us away from God. Paul follows this up in chapter 14 by saying that godliness is not in the rules we follow. Some people worship on the Sabbath, but other people worship on any day. Some people drink wine, and some people abstain. And so on. He tells us to each be convinced in our own minds and to leave each other alone because judgment is a stumbling block that can cause our siblings in Christ to fall away from the faith. For Paul, sin was not found in breaking the rules of the law, rather it was found in the absence of love.

Jesus followed a very similar path in His ministry. The only people that He had harsh words for were the priests and scholars who used the law to oppress and control and extort the laity. Jesus never followed the letter of the law when it interfered with loving His neighbors. Jesus worked on the Sabbath. Jesus drank wine and went to parties. Jesus had a reputation as a drunkard. When He called the priests "a den of vipers", that was the equivalent of calling them "sons of bitches" in the modern world. Jesus once cussed a tree to death. Jesus was sinless.

The example of Jesus's life is that all things are secondary to loving your neighbor. Nothing that is done from a spirit of love is ever sinful. Not even premeditated violence against those who extort money from the faithful in the name of God is sinful because Jesus did that too. Jesus taught us that love is the foundation of the law and the prophets, so love can never be wrong or sinful.

John, in his first letter, tells us to test the spirits whether they are from God because there are many false prophets. This is 1John 4:1. He then spends a lot of ink to tell us all about how God is love, and no one who hates can have God because hate and God are incompatible. Similarly, fear and God are incompatible, so anyone who preaches hate and fear cannot be from God. John goes so far as to say that anyone who claims to love God but hates their neighbor is a liar.

Peter wrote in 1Peter that love covers an uncountable number of sins.

Clearly, through the example of Jesus and the writings of the Apostles, we can see that love and sin are opposites. This holds up to logical analysis if we accept the claim that God is love. Sin takes us away from God. Love brings us to God. If love does no harm to a neighbor, then it follows that sin does harm to a neighbor.

How do we apply this to sexual ethics? That's actually very easy. Sex can be used to harm other people or to help them. Obviously, sexual assault, child molestation, and any other form of nonconsensual sex are harmful by their nature. However, sex itself is not harmful on its own. Sex can carry potential harm like the possibility of pregnancy for people who are not prepared emotionally or financially to have a child. Sex can be addicting which is harmful, but humans can become addicted to nearly any pleasurable behavior. None of those other things are sins on their own.

Driving a car can be used as a very apt metaphor for sex. Cars kill thousands of people every year. They have a very large potential to cause harm. However, if we spend the time to learn how to drive safely and always drive with the concern for our fellow drivers and the pedestrians that we share the road with, we can go our entire lives without harming anyone in our cars. There are very few people who would argue that motor vehicles are sinful to operate. If we approach sex with the same attitude, we will similarly be able to operate our bodies without sin.

Relating this to specific actions, we can talk about masturbation. This is an act that is simply not harmful at all. Unless you are doing it in front of someone who doesn't consent to seeing you pleasure yourself, which is a form of sexual assault, of course. Contrary to the concept of sin, masturbation is actually beneficial for people with prostates. It lowers the risk of cancer and helps maintain pelvic strength which important for bladder control as you get older. Something that helps a person without harming anyone else doesn't fit the definition of sin that we see in the New Testament.

Sex outside of marriage comes up a lot. First, marriage is a social contract that is recognized by the state. You can get married in a church, but it means nothing without a marriage license. This is not a primarily western idea, either. I live in Cambodia, and you can get arrested for having a marriage ceremony without government approval. Marriage is, and has always been, deeply intertwined with the social and political structures of society. The Bible demonstrates so many different kinds of marriage that we can't accurately define a "Biblical marriage." Also, there is evidence that the couple in Song of Solomon isn't married until chapter 6. Most telling to this theory is that they don't receive the blessing of their families until that chapter which would have been a large part of the wedding ceremony. They brag about how hot they are for each other and how much sex they have for five chapters prior to that blessing. This is the ur-example of a healthy, godly sexual relationship.

Porn is a big question as well. The porn industry can certainly be harmful. No one would argue that it isn't. However, it is not universally harmful. I dated a pornstar for a few months. She was decently popular in a specific fetish, and she made good money. She was self-produced and self-promoted. It wasn't harmful for her at all. Some of the biggest pornstars in the industry are similar. Many pornstars produce content with their spouses. It's actually not too hard to find ethically produced porn.

Again, porn can be addicting. If you are struggling with porn interfering with your daily life, you should absolutely seek help from a professional to learn how to control your urges. However, other than asexual humans, most people are addicted to sex in a very similar way to how we are addicted to oxygen and water and food. The biological imperative to propagate our species is one of our strongest innate desires. It only becomes a problem when we overindulge and let that desire dictate our lives. Too much water is fatal. Oxygen destroys DNA. Obesity leads to possibly fatal health conditions. But, eating, drinking, and breathing aren't sinful. Neither is a healthy sex life.

Foundational to this idea that sex isn't wrong on its own is the truth that God created sex. God could have made humans reproduce asexually. He didn't. God could have created sex to not feel as good. He didn't. God could have made us completely different from how He did, but He didn't. We feel sexual attraction because God wants us to feel it. Sex is fun because God made it fun. There was no devil who swooped in and changed God's design at the last second. There was no accident where God said, "Oops, I really screwed up that sex thing, oh well." No, God created humans and said that we were good. That included penises and vaginas and how they fit together with all manner of body parts. God commanded Adam and Eve to populate the Earth. He did that while realizing that there's only one way for humans to get that done. God created sex, thinks it's good, and commanded us to get busy. And Adam and Eve didn't have any kind of marriage ceremony either.

Where does that leave us as progressive Christians? We evaluate the sinfulness of every action against love and whether it causes harm to our neighbors. We don't elevate sexual sins above other sins because all sin causes us to fall short of the glory of God. So we look at each sexual act under the same lens as lying, cheating, stealing, and so on. We don't believe that love is ever sinful, so gay sex between loving partners can't be a sin. We believe that love always seeks consent because love never harms. We believe that ethically-minded sexual behaviors are inline with the concepts of loving your neighbor as yourself. We believe that sex is a gift from God.


r/OpenChristian • • 8h ago

Discussion - LGBTQ+ Issues a question for queer Christians

19 Upvotes

hi guys, sorry if this is post is a bit of a mess. I almost dont really know what im asking or how it can even be answered. but I feel like i need to talk to someone about this and i dont know who.

im a gay Christian. about 2 years ago I became Christian and it was the best decision of my life. obviously I was quickly made aware of biblical interpretations suggesting that being gay is wrong. I thought i was okay with accepting that these interpretations were simply wrong, outdated, mistrannslated and misinterpreted. I also always felt strongly that, surely, God wouldnt make me gay just to punish me for it, that just doesn't make any sense.

what i cant get over is the anxiety and guilt i feel every time I think about it. I dont know why and I dont how how to resolve it. it adds up in my head at the very least - that im gay because I was made this way, but then why do my emotions seem to contradict my beliefs?

and ive felt this for a long time, and I keep pushing the feeling down. but am I wrong for doing that? is there something that im missing or something more that I need to understand? I feel I live by God in every way that I can. so what's happening with this?

and I ask for advice specifically from people apart of the lgbtq community, as i know ill find more understanding from people who have experienced what I have. how do I fix this, how do I get rid of these feelings? how have you guys learned to cope with it all?


r/OpenChristian • • 10h ago

What helped me realize that I can follow Christ and still have a man.

27 Upvotes

I'm a gay Christian in my early 30s, and I'm in a committed relationship with a man. For years I assumed I'd have to pick between him and God, so I'm posting for anyone who's still stuck in that spot.

What changed things was reading the passages I'd been handed for myself. Leviticus is a holiness code that sits right next to rules about shellfish and mixed fabrics. Romans 1 is about idolatry. Sodom was a mob trying to rape strangers. None of them describe two men who love each other and keep a promise. Jesus spoke about a lot of things, and He never said anything against us. Paul even calls forbidding people to marry a false teaching (1 Timothy 4:3).

What people add on top is a rule of lifelong aloneness, and then they call it faithfulness. That rule isn't in the text.

My life now is ordinary. We cook, we pray, we go to church, and we argue over the dishes. My faith is stronger than when I was hiding from God, because I stopped believing He was angry at me for something I never chose.

Where I'm still curious is how you all handle this with family or churches that don't see it the way we do. What's worked for you?

I wrote about what Christians get wrong on this here: https://alextoughtakes.substack.com/p/what-christians-get-wrong-about-being


r/OpenChristian • • 4h ago

My Dad Accepts My Gender Dysphoria but Opposes Trans

5 Upvotes

I’m a trans girl who’s a teen and I’ve always knew that I was a girl from when I was 2, but tried to live as a Christian boy, feminine boy, and a trans girl. When I lived as a Christian boy it felt ”unnatural“ and being in a role that isn’t me and I had the pressure to act as a boy instead of myself and I got mental health issues from it. Then I tried living as a Christian trans girl and now I don’t have any pressure to change myself and feel the most honest and happiest I’ve ever been with God. But my mental health has been getting worse because I’ve been asking if we could start medical care for a long time and still my dad is saying no. My dad has seen my mental health getting worse and it’s obvious, but he says it’s all because of my wish of hormones that‘s made my mental health worse so we wouldn’t get it. He also doesn’t support trans anymore and thinks it could be a sin because he’s seen my mental health getting worse “after I became trans” even though I always was, but couldn’t because he used to be an anti-trabs and against trans Christians. He only believes I have gender dysphoria and I’m choosing to be trans and when I’m “reborn on Christ” my identity would change.

So I’m trying to do things that could help my situation and he doesn’t accept progressive Christian books at all so it’s hard to find stuff. The first part I did find; therapy sessions with Dr. Mark Yarhouse for my dad to learn to accept my identity and see me a girl, but Dr. Mark also doesn’t support medical care.

What are some books or resources that can help to be my next step that’s traditional Christian but also does support trans medical care?


r/OpenChristian • • 6h ago

Question about religious diversity and Christian life in Canada

Thumbnail
7 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 10h ago

Favorite Gospel?

Thumbnail
9 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 2h ago

Biblical Tattoo

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 3h ago

About sex and certainty

2 Upvotes

Hi everyone, I hope you're all doing okay.

I am almost 22, and when I was 14 I was diagnosed with severe OCD. I honestly had some rough teenage years. I had to drop out of high school and then out of college because my obsessions were pretty bad. It got to the point where I was spending 24/7 obsessively researching things about the Bible and theology, and I almost went fully psychotic. Thankfully, I am in a much better place now, and I'm even just a few months away from finishing college.

Lately, I’ve been thinking extensively about the topic of sex in Christianity. Because of my past obsessive research, I have a cognitive leaning towards progressive theology and a view of the Bible as non-inerrant. Because of that, I feel like I lean towards a more sex-positive viewpoint.

At the same time, I deeply respect tradition, and I am terrified of committing a sin. I understand that marriage is holy, and I know that sex is a powerful, vulnerable bond between two people. But I’m also a young guy who wants to experience sex and connection (I have had sex in the past).

My struggle is this: because of my OCD, I know that I will never have an absolute, 100% certain answer that satisfies my brain. There will always be a "what if tradition is right and I'm sinning?" fear in the back of my head.

This brings me to Romans 14:23: "But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin."

How should someone navigate such a difficult question when certainty is practically impossible for them? Does this verse mean we must have 100% certainty and zero doubts before we make a move? Or is there room in the Christian walk for "figuring it out along the way" and trusting God's grace in the gray areas, rather than waiting until we are completely sure we are doing the right thing?

I honestly have no one to talk about these type of things. I feel like everyone will give me different answers depending on their denomination and even political leaning and I feel honestly lost and confused.


r/OpenChristian • • 19m ago

People who claim to have visited hell?

Thumbnail
• Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 5h ago

Support Thread I Almost Faced the Death Penalty in Iran Because of My Faith. This Is My Story.

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 10h ago

Discussion - LGBTQ+ Issues Why do some religious people use spiritual manipulation to try blocking feminizing surgeries?

6 Upvotes

They moralize my medical need for MTF gender affirming surgery lying to me that God wouldn’t want me to have it which contradicts “With God, anything is possible”, demanding spiritual benchmarks a.k.a. moving the goalposts before "allowing" surgeries disguising it as “care” or “concern”, but they’re just being architects to my suffering. They even have the nerve to say I’m selfish when they’re manipulating me using shame to control me by saying I’m selfish because I’m not doing what they want me to do: be a straight or gay cisgender male when I’ve known since I was 4 (exactly 3 decades ago btw) that I’ve always been a girl wrongfully assigned male at my birth.. Those kinds of religious people are narcissistic!


r/OpenChristian • • 13h ago

Discussion - Church & Spiritual Practices Looking for a church home

6 Upvotes

Hello everyone 👋 I’m looking for some advice/perspectives. I’m exploring returning to some kind of Christianity (I grew up Church of England, no religious trauma or anything but just drifted away as a teenager and now feel pulled to return) but I’m struggling with finding a church.

I like the traditional hymns etc (I’m not after anything really modern), but I also want something progressive that allows room for doubt and uncertainty. Extra complication: I’d like to take my family with me, which includes an 8 year old, who won’t be quite so keen on sitting through a long service/sermon.

Any suggestions? Anyone else struggling to find a church that fits?


r/OpenChristian • • 11h ago

Is our pursuit of peace just a well-packaged escape from global suffering?

5 Upvotes

Lately, I’ve been reflecting on how we cope with the overwhelming amount of suffering in the world—war, poverty, systemic injustice—and I’m struggling with how easily our coping mechanisms turn into complacency.

When the world gets heavy, our natural instinct is to retreat. We listen to uplifting music that tells us our own happiness is all that matters, or we consume media that lets us forget. But lately, I’ve noticed a deeper, more institutionalized version of this escape: hiding behind spirituality and faith.

It is incredibly common to hear people handle global tragedy by saying, "It’s in God’s hands," or "I surrender it to the universe." While surrender can be a beautiful tool for personal anxiety, it becomes dangerous when it is used to justify inaction.

When we say "everything happens for a reason" to comfort ourselves about someone else's ongoing trauma, we are essentially using faith as an emotional shield. We surrender our own agency and power to effect real change, outsourcing our moral responsibility to a higher power so we can go back to enjoying our lives guilt-free.

But whatever your worldview, culture, or conditioning, pain is a universal currency. We don’t have to agree on the meaning of life or the existence of a higher power to agree on what hurts. Minimizing suffering for others is the lowest common denominator of human decency.

If spirituality or faith is used to build a wall between us and the pain of the world, it isn’t true peace—it’s spiritual bypassing. True peace shouldn’t be a hiding spot to keep us safe from reality; it should be an anchor that gives us the strength to step into the storm and help.

Comfort is a necessary place to refuel, but it’s a dangerous place to live. If our coping mechanisms make us numb to the pain of others, our personal peace is built on an illusion. How do we balance the absolute necessity of protecting our mental health with our shared human duty to actually look at, and minimize, the suffering around us?


r/OpenChristian • • 6h ago

Study of Believers and Nonbelievers

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 7h ago

News Invitation to 'Weathering the Storm Together'

1 Upvotes

I'm part of a group that has been putting on an annual small festival of 'Faith, Justice, and Do-It-Yourself' called Cahoots Festival for the past 10 years. We meet in May each year, in South-West Ontario, on Attawondaron and Wyandot territory, in Turtle Island (North America).

Organizing this festival is the best, weirdest, most engaging thing I do each year. Our goal is to teach each other the skills we need to create the world that God has dreamed for us. For me, that starts with learning how to organize, feed, communicate, and pray together.

May 27-30, 2027 will have the theme 'Weathering the Storm Together' for our times of worship, and we are particularly thinking about the skills we need to survive in capitalism and under the threat of home-grown authoritarianism, and US-based imperialism. That means how we can do good mutual aid, sharing and supporting in the vision of the early disciples (and countless others before and since!)

We're looking for people to come to the festival who can teach skills, lead discussions, share music and art, and generally help to accomplish this goal. We usually have a couple of US friends attending as well as some folks from neighbouring provinces (we don't believe in colonial borders).

Check out our session proposal form (due Dec 31). Feel free to comment below with reactions, responses, questions - I can talk about this event until the cows come home (we also wrote a 'So What Is Cahoots Anyway' page with some basic values and intentions).


r/OpenChristian • • 15h ago

Discussion - LGBTQ+ Issues How to accept oneself

3 Upvotes

On my journey to knowing god on my own terms, there’s been a problem. I have a hard time accepting that I’ve liked the same gender and possibly still do now. As a kid I grew up in an anti-lgbtq household and it’s a miracle I didn’t turn out like my parents. (Not necessarily saying their bad but how they treat others who aren’t straight or are just different in general really grinds my gears) For example, I have a trans uncle who doesn’t come around often due to my family thinking being trans isn’t okay.

Things switched up when I was 11 years old and I got my first girls crush. I was horrified, thinking “how could I?” “It’s not what god wants!” “I can’t date her!” So I said I couldn’t, and I honestly never got over that. I did whatever I could to stay straight. I dated someone older than me and the sad fact was that my parents didn’t care as long as I was straight. If I was anything other they’d hate me, especially my mother.

As I got older I found more friends, friends who didn’t judge me because of what my heart felt. And it’s great, I just wish I was so confident like them. That i could show love to myself like I do to them.

I want to accept myself, but I have this all or nothing thinking. in my brain it’s like I have to be one or the other. My heart is big and is full of love and I don’t want to contain it.

i need help.


r/OpenChristian • • 13h ago

Questions about faith and morality and the afterlife.

2 Upvotes

Hello all,

I have OCD. And despite not being religious my OCD has had and currently has religious themes. At 13 the thought "I sell my soul to Satan" popped into my head, i even said it out loud i do not know why. The next 2 years I spent riddled with guilt and fear. I did a prayer every night cause if I did not I would go to hell, or my mom would die, or my dad would be injured. Eventually my theme moved on having a brain tumor. And well that was that. I explored a lot at that time but mainly about how to avoid hell but simultaneously also doubted the existence of it.

Lately, my religious themes are back. Another terrifying "i am going to hell, i am evil, i need to find my faith" i have spent hours looking up religious videos, its the first thing I think about and the last each day. Its eating into my life. I have found a secular therapist and that will start soon. I have started to genuinely pray. I will say it brings me some solace although i will admit I sometimes wonder who is listening. But I struggle with some things. I guess i have questions for God and I look up relevant verses but everyone has a different interpretation. My biggest struggles are with hell.

I struggle to believe as that would mean my Jewish uncle who was one of the most considerate and kind people out there, who lit up a room, is burning for eternity. I struggle to believe that my friends who are gay or even myself who is Bi, will go to hell for who I am or they are.

I struggle with sex as a sin? I know, classic, but why. Why not make us all Demisexual if having sex was only to be in one pair for life. And how do you get married without knowing about someone first. Marriage is a commitment and should be life long but you need to explore first its not something you should do with the first girl you or guy you meet.

I struggle with Revelation. When you learn the context and how it is likely about Rome and the persecution faced then it makes sense. While certainly an allegory for today, Christians are one of the largest faiths out there I do not see the end times happening anytime soon and it does seem like a revenge fantasy.

I do believe there is a higher power that is good. And i also believe every positive has a negative and there are evil forces. I am kind of a paranormal guy so NDEs, ghosts, UFOs, it kind of interests me. But I struggle to accept the Christian perspective fully. I just want to see the thoughts of the community here, if thats ok. You guys seem welcoming and well, i have questions.


r/OpenChristian • • 13h ago

How to stop having doubts?

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • 16h ago

losing parts of myself

3 Upvotes

As I’ve been trying to get closer to god. I feel like I’m losing enjoyment in the things I love most and it got to the point where I have a hard time enjoying my own writing. I write fictional stories and characters with different types of sexualities and etc.

When I’m getting closer to god I don’t want to lose that part of myself. I love writing things but it feels like it’s wrong to enjoy that now?

Any advice?


r/OpenChristian • • 18h ago

Today Bible verse and daily devotion

Post image
5 Upvotes

I was meditating sister and brother in Christ on 1 Samuel 20:5 There are moments in life when wisdom calls us to step back from the table — to slip away from the noise, the pressure, and the expectations of others, in order to find clarity in a quieter place. David's request to Jonathan was not cowardice; it was discernment. He recognized that something was wrong in his circumstances, and rather than pretend everything was fine, he chose to seek shelter and truth before making his next move. How often do we stay seated at tables that are draining us, out of obligation or fear of what others might think, when God may be inviting us to step away and rest in His presence? Like David hiding in the field, sometimes our greatest act of faith is creating space to hear clearly — away from the demands that cloud our judgment. Trust that stepping back to seek God's wisdom is never a retreat; it is preparation for the next step He has planned for you.


r/OpenChristian • • 1d ago

Discussion - General Why do false/Larpers Christians always gravitate toward the orthodox path?

Post image
84 Upvotes

I have Orthodox friends, and none of them are as big an idiot as this guy on Twitter.


r/OpenChristian • • 22h ago

Is it okay to pray to find true love?

8 Upvotes

Just a question


r/OpenChristian • • 1d ago

Discussion - LGBTQ+ Issues Christians should support same-sex marriage (because they’re Christians)

22 Upvotes

Agapic interpretation of the Bible promotes flourishing. In previous posts, we noted that the Jewish tradition deems Scripture to be of inexhaustible meaning, and this inexhaustible meaning invites perpetual discovery. The surface meaning exists only to be surpassed. 

Likewise, we will deem Christian Scripture to be of inexhaustible meaning—and that inexhaustible meaning is agapic, forever channeling divine love. In the imitation of Christ, inspired by the Holy Spirit, we plumb the Bible for its agapic implications. Interpretatively, we will practice agapism, which chooses love over fear, mercy over wrath, and justice over privilege. 

Biblical agapism conflicts with biblical infallibilism, which declares the Bible to be the perfect Word of God, without error, utterly reliable on every subject in every way, including as a science and history textbook. The clearest contemporary example of this clash of interpretations is the issue of LGBTQ+ rights, in particular the issue of same-sex marriage.

An agapic interpretation of the Bible supports same-sex marriage. Christian opponents of same-sex marriage cite about seven passages in the Bible, the clobber texts, which they interpret as forbidding it. They also declare that the purpose of sexuality is reproduction, and same-sex couples can’t reproduce, so same-sex marriage is unnatural. 

Neither argument stands up to scrutiny. The passages that ostensibly forbid same-sex relations were written thousands of years ago in cultures very different from our own. They require historical knowledge of those cultures for interpretation, since they are deeply tied to practices unfamiliar to us like temple prostitution, fertility rites designed to produce good harvests, pederasty (the taking of a young male lover by older males, in a process of sexual initiation), and the humiliation of defeated enemies in wartime. They do not address same-sex emotional intimacy, or the sexual expression of that emotional intimacy, since these concepts were unfamiliar to the biblical authors.

Familiar to the biblical authors were concepts of sexuality and marriage that we would consider abhorrent today. A bride who could not prove her virginity could be stoned to death (Deuteronomy 22:20–21). Virgins who were raped had to marry their rapist (Deuteronomy 22:28–29). Polygamy was practiced; in Genesis, for example, Lamech, Abraham, Esau, and Jacob all had two or more wives. Some of these “wives” were concubines, secondary wives whose children had less hereditary status. King Solomon had three hundred concubines (1 Kings 11:3). On the command of Moses, the Israelites slew the Midianite men, women, and boys, leaving alive only the unmarried girls to take as wives (Numbers 31:1–18). We conclude that the concept of “biblical marriage” may not work very well if adopted wholesale into contemporary culture.

To read the Bible well, we need to know the historical circumstances and cultural context in which it was written. For a contemporary analogy: imagine someone two thousand years from now is reading stuff from our time, and they stumble across the phrases “butt dial” and “booty call”. They may think that “butt” and “booty” are rough synonyms, and “dial” and “call” are rough synonyms, so “butt dial” and “booty call” are rough synonyms. But they’re not. 

Same-sex relations are entirely natural. If not arguing from the Bible, opponents of gay marriage frequently argue from nature: nature intends sex for reproduction, homosexual relations cannot produce offspring, therefore homosexual relations are unnatural. Alas, animal sexual behavior is as complex as biblical marriage. 

Increasing knowledge of zoology has disproved the claim that same-sex relations are “unnatural”. In fact, nature is rife with same-sex relations, which have now been observed in hundreds of species. They seem to serve a variety of purposes, such as male bonding and female bonding for intensified social support, reconciliation after conflict, experimentation with social organization, or the simple pursuit of pleasure in a painful world. Such exchanges frequently occur within a bisexual framework, although in some species a percentage of members will never seek out heterosexual copulation. 

Heterosexual members of these species seem unbothered by same-sex behavior. At least, they have not proposed a constitutional amendment banning it just yet. So, if we survey nature with open eyes, we will see that same-sex attraction is natural and part of God’s plan, while opposition to same-sex attraction is unnatural and not part of God’s plan.

Love is love, and love is sacred. Even if same-sex relations were unbiblical or unnatural, which they are not, progressive Christians would still support same-sex marriage for theological reasons. God the Trinity is three persons united through perfect love into one divine community. God is love, and humans are made in the image of God, for love. Romantic relationships characterized by emotional intimacy fulfill the image of God within us. According to the self-report of gay men and lesbians, which is to be trusted, they can achieve such intimacy only within same-sex relations. To condemn these relations denies the image of God within them; to celebrate these relations fulfills the image of God within them. Therefore, all Christians should approve of same-sex intimacy and celebrate it within the institution of marriage.

This issue is of great importance, as young people are currently fleeing a religion they see as oppressive of LGBTQ+ persons. So adamant is fundamentalist objection to same-sex marriage that most young people consider Christianity to be inherently anti-LGBTQ+, rather than accidentally anti-LGBTQ+. Christ never mentioned same-sex marriage, so it’s unclear why some Christians are so vigorously opposed to it, while being quite tolerant of conspicuous consumption, rapacious greed, and social injustice, all of which Jesus explicitly and repeatedly condemned. 

We can do better. We can be more like Jesus. In fact, we’re supposed to.

(adapted from Jon Paul Sydnor, The Great Open Dance: A Progressive Christian Theology, pages 255–257)

*****

For further reading, please see: 

Kinnaman, David, with Aly Hawkins. You Lost Me: Why Young Christians Are Leaving Church . . . and Rethinking Faith. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011.

Poiani, Aldo. Animal Homosexuality: A Biosocial Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.


r/OpenChristian • • 19h ago

Discussion - Sex & Relationships Is it possible that " my future spouse " may mess this up for the both of us?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes