All answers from all parts of the state are welcome, but am especially looking for info from these areas:

-Majority and plurality Black communities (Detroit, Flint, Saginaw, etc.)

-Obama-Trump Counties (Shiawassee, Macomb, Monroe, Calhoun, Van Buren, etc.)

-Oakland County

-The UP

Also both AES and Rogers supporters, try to keep it respectful in the comments. Thanks!

The article doesn't say how or exactly when because it varies. Check with your city or township clerk if interested.

MIRS News had 203 political junkies who filled out the MIRS Master Prognosticator survey. The majority believe Democrats will retain control of the statewide constitutional offices, Abdul El-Sayed will be Michigan's next U.S. Senator, Democrats will pick up one state Senate seat and Republicans will narrowly retain control of the House, 56-54. The survey also has the granular results in the story itself for those who are interested.

The second governor race debate is tonight on Local 4 in Detroit. It doesn't say that it will be broadcast statewide, so you may need to watch online if you're outside the Detroit area.

Is she secretly wanting him to lose so she can run again next time? Will she try to use the “you see. AES can’t win in a general election” shtick if he loses to Mike Rogers?

A meeting with Jack Bergman MI-01. Reposting from other sm. I was not there personally

We promised you a report on Melissa's meeting with Jack Bergman. Here it is.

Monday night, Melissa, along with five other MI-01 constituents, sat down with Rep. Jack Bergman in his Traverse City office for 90 minutes. This is the meeting that took three months, two reschedules, and one 200-mile drive to a U.P. meet-and-greet to make happen. You already know that part.

What you don't know yet is what happened inside that room.

Melissa opened by thanking Bergman for meeting with the group and noting that the day happened to be Indigenous People's Day. He scoffed, laughed, and rolled his eyes... in a district with one of the strongest and most vibrant Native communities in Michigan. That was the first thirty seconds.

It didn't get a lot more encouraging from there.

Meeting attendees went in with five questions about real issues affecting real people in this district. What they got back, in the words of one attendee, was "lots of stories and no action." Bergman talked at length, often going well off topic, and rarely gave a direct answer to a direct question.

A few things stood out.

On Medicaid and Rural Health

Bergman asked the group whether they agreed the country was founded on states' rights, then described his high-level work at the Department of Defense. He couldn't give a specific answer about what would replace the funding Michigan stands to lose under the One Big Beautiful Bill -- billions of dollars that keep rural hospitals open and mental health services running.

On Social Security

He said he'd heard nothing about privatization. What he did describe was a three-tier plan: people 55 and older keep what they have, ages 30 to 55 get "a different plan," and anyone under 30 gets "an entirely new plan." He offered no details on what those plans actually are. Make of that what you will, especially given that his own president said publicly, just days before this meeting, that he wanted to privatize Social Security.

Ice Storm Recovery

On the $357 million in recovery funds that have been sitting undelivered for 17 months, Bergman said he would "check where the money was" (shouldn't he know?) and suggested Michigan would need to "buck up" as infrastructure pressures mounted. He did not say the federal government would help, so buck up Northern Michigan!

On The War In Iran

He said he "doesn't play in the media" and would not make any public statement expressing concern about the war — even when asked directly by constituents whose family members and fellow servicemen are confused and upset about it.

On Accountability

He used that word several times. He just didn't demonstrate it.

There was one moment that revealed something we think is important about who Jack Bergman actually is. The group noted that Trump's name doesn't appear on all of his campaign signs, which Bergman confirmed. He picks and chooses where to use the Trump endorsement. Politically smart maybe, but it also means he knows exactly what that name does to certain voters, and he's making a calculated decision to hide it from them when it suits him.

He's playing both sides of a brand he's not sure he fully believes in, while voting with that brand nearly 100% of the time.

To be fair, he was more open to the conversation than some expected. The door to a follow-up meeting is not closed. And our members who were in that room were sharp, prepared, and represented this community with real dignity.

But open doors don't mean much if nothing changes on the other side of them.

The only thing that has ever made politicians like Jack Bergman actually accountable is losing. November is coming.

My opinion

Bergman is a complete old man sus grifter. Anyone who votes for him is a fool

MIRS News does a contest that should be perfect for people here in Michigan Politics. Everyone here *Knows* who is going to win. Well here is your chance to prove you actually have the chops. MIRS News is a political insider publication. Put your political knowledge to the test and test yourself against other political prognosticators in this MIRS survey.

he can't debate for shit

WOOD-TV debate is at 7:00 tonight. It will broadcast statewide. Check local listings. Mike Rogers says he'll show up this time. We'll see.

Did a sketch with William Lawrence running for US congress in Michigan's 7th district

There are a REMARKABLE number of MAGA Republicans running with blue signs this election.

Please do your homework!

I’m interested in your opinions about the candidates. What should I consider when I go to vote?