no thank you we've gotten enough of that in the past.

Waiting for some disappointment. Don’t know why.

Maybe bc we have a real cfo? Af least not a recent mba grad like AV. I am so glad that I don’t have to hear a slow “weighted average cost of capital” and volume trading increase.

But, at Task Force Easy, we’re really focused on small unmanned aerial systems [and] unmanned ground vehicles

https://defensescoop.com/2026/10/14/military-drone-tech-task-force-easy/?_hsmi=444342046

Kinda good feeling bubbling up! 😎😁

👏👏👏👏

Email IR they've probably never heard of these extremely obscure small mom-and-pop shops in the defense sector

Thanks for this. It is helpful.

Something great for MVIS Longs.

Manifest the great outcome…feel the excitement of it as having already occurred.

Read the works of Neville Goddard and many others on manifestation.

I just read a short piece by a neurosurgeon named Dr. Lee Warren, M.D. about our mind not knowing the difference between that past event, past regretted conversation, past mistake, that we keep repeating in a loop in our mind which treats it as if it’s occurring now, changing our neurochemistry for the worse through neuroplasticity and stress hormones and rehearsing feeling bad. I’ve made an effort to break that, for me lifelong cycle. It requires persistent effort but is worth it.

Highly successful athletes use similar techniques in a positive way to rehearse over and over in their mind the physical routine they’re about to perform in order to enter the “Flow State”.

I read the book years ago, “Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience” By Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

How long have you owned this stock? If it’s longer than about 3 months you’d know we weren’t going to be profitable this year and likely not next year either. So take your garbage elsewhere. That MVIS 2.0 site LOVES people like you. 

Probably not going over a hundred dollars a share until 2028 unless there is a short squeeze. Even then it wouldn’t stay over a hundred. It’s going to be a grind. Best case short term is have cash ready for a squeeze over a hundred sell when you feel it’s topped then wait for 50% pull back then reenter and hold.

$1000’s in revenue

If they are going into the defense industry, I really hope they are talking to the major players.

Lockheed

RTX / Raytheon

Northrop Grumman

General Dynamics

L3

Booz Allen

BAE

Nothing burger, with the same message as the last call plus this latest PR. It will send us to $1.05 if we aren’t there by then.

“Stargate” always reminds of SG-1

Jaffa! Kree!

Jack, see the rules about civility.

Oooooh right right. I forgot we just did a massive reverse split that absolutely screwed a lot of infestors only to end up at a SP about where we started before the RS because everything is fine and we're for sure selling massive amounts of product and are nowhere near insolvency.

cue the captain planet theme

Pound for pound, with the same real-time mapping functionality, the ouster solution is definitely going to be more expensive than the movia solution. An ouster payload with an orin (which is what the mvis rep in your video said movia air is packaged with I believe) will also be physically larger. That said, the ouster solution is also going to be more capable if lidar is the primary product. More range and greater point density means that the ouster drone can fly higher and map a larger area faster with the same point density in the ground. The ouster will also be better at penetrating vegetation and netting and detecting objects beneath it. Putting two and two together, I would say that an ouster payload would generally be more useful for airborne mapping (this is supported by the fact that microvision is pushing halo for the same purpose), but maybe there are use cases out there for cheap drones that are small enough for a human to carry and deploy that only need to slowly map a small area before the battery dies.

I think movia for UGVs makes more sense. I don't think movia is really competing with ouster directly here though. It is a short range sensor that could give the vehicle a picture of the environment immediately adjacent to it. It would need to be complemented by a long range sensor like iris to really deliver full autonomy. Ouster is more of a jack of all trades, competing with a mixed iris/movia sensor package.

Something motivated an early call. Could be something coming before, during, and / or after. Don't know what though.

Zen you’re the best man. I hope you more than anybody is rewarded in the end.

A big if but we could double OUST which is trading at $31.00 a share. We could also go below a dollar that’s why they call it gambling. We just need something to jumpstart the company and hopefully go into the hundreds of dollars a share.

I like where this is going . I like the price they sell it at .

Grok absolutely drew from that source when prompted and this debate has been had well before today. I'm actually still curious to hear u/Late_Airline2710 's opinion on why a UAS or UGV company might prefer Movia Air over Ouster's Rev8.

u/gaporter a little something to get the graphics police off your tail... MVIS explicitly documents Iris as solid state on the product page, in the Overland announcement, and in a filing where it states on page 4: “Our lidar sensors, all solid state, include...” followed by a list expressly including IRIS and HALO. If you want "no moving parts" ambiguity clarified, ask IR to answer this question for you: “Does the current IRIS contain any mechanically actuated mirrors or other optical components that move during scanning?” [I have an answer btw.] Then add this context: Is it materially concerning? If it causes shorter life, degraded accuracy, maintenance costs, or failed customer requirements—it is.

Meanwhile... There are orders for 1000s of Iris across multiple customers. Customers that invested in integration and validation. Overland notes selection is influenced by ability to operate in demanding environments. Ramping is happening by all appearances, on route to Halo—and the work to scale production will be focused on Halo btw.

Is having absolutely no moving parts a prerequisite for winning customers? In the context of this 'debate' no. Customers buy performance, validation and sales confirm it. Context.