Zio dogs who support murdering gazans just because their government is shit are pure evil

I learned this a year ago, but I found it in an old draft post today.

The bombing killed 91 people and one terrorist

I firmly believe that terrorists are people, but I was entertained to find that in Palestine police force historical website

My eyes rolled hard when I read this comment: “It was unclear to me, why, as an American citizen, I was being asked to comment on a foreign government,” Kletenik said.

(context in my first comment)

palestinian in los angeles here. i loved this girl like a little sister. she's never really had any opinions on israel and she seemed to support my people. until 10/7. she started growing distant so i gave her her space. until mahmoud khalil. that escalation made me spiral. they're taking away our first amendment rights and you STILL can't say anything? nevermind the thousands of children we see being blown to bits.

after i sent her a few emails about jews for peace and stuff like that, she responded with this:

"i know what's happening there is bad, but i feel uncomfortable being a jew in LA"

that's when i went hard sending her around ten emails showing her exactly what's happening in gaza since she's looked away this entire time. i explained that parents were carrying their children in plastic bags, civilians being evaporated, etc. i went hard because i was VERY PISSED at her comment, completely victimizing herself. shes a beautiful young white woman who centered her uncomfort around an actual g-side.

BUT THATS NOT IT.

i knew her from my other (indian) friend of a decade who i've helped with her airbnb business. my jewish friend came to stay at her airbnb and all three of us became really close. we were like sisters. like FAMILY. my indian friend, heard me cry for two years on me spiraling watching my people being annihilated ALL while 97% of my white friends betrayed me in the most horrific ways for speaking out. they knew how many people betrayed me, yelled at me to shut up, told me i made them uncomforable, tried to silence me, etc. they KNEW how hard this was for me.

WELL, guess what my jewish friend did- she brainwashed my indian friend (who is 55 btw and won an emmy for a popular la newschannel) into telling her islam was a religion of violence. indian friend messaged me to ask me if islam was a religion of violence. i coulnd't believe it. that's the last thing she said to me.

BUT THATS NOT IT.

they teamed up together, who i thought were my best friends/sisters, TO TAKE ME TO COURT FOR A RESTRAINING ORDER BECAUSE MY JEWISH FRIEND THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO KILL HER AND HER DOG. i knew the indoctrination was deep but i didn't know how deep. i was bewildered, stunned, shocked and went into a deep deep depression. they teamed up together to backstab me at my lowest, while i'm watching the gside of my people. THEY MADE ME the monster in this. i couldn't believe it and i still don't.

we went to court, i fired my cousin lawyer because i wanted to make a speech. i was online and she was in the courtroom. judge was a black woman.

she sat in the courtroom and completely embarrassed herself, told the judge i got too radicalized and was afraid of me hurting her. UNBELIEVABLE. she made herself look SO bad. she even said israel blew up a hospital on the stand!

she never responded to my emails to tell me to stop, so the judge laughed her off, but she let me make a 5 minute speech about how this is a microcosm of what's happening in the world. how a white woman centers her feelings in an actual gside. how this will follow her for the rest of her life.

when the judge dismissed the case, she cried on the stand "but they're killing jews on the street!!!!" (she's gorgeous white girl who live in LA).

i knew the indoctrination was deep, but i didn't know how. this has broken something so deep in me. it's bad enough if they stopped talking to me, but to team up and backstab me like this, when i'm at my lowest??? i dont' think i'll ever recover- has shattered my heart. we were like family.

i wanted to share my story so others would share. thank you, it also feels better to talk about.

EDIT: DUE TO A REQUEST, I POSTED THE TRANSCRIPT BELOW FOR THOSE WHO THINK IM A BOT lol

ALSO , i MADE SURE TO USE THE WORDS PALESTINIAN HOLOCAUST in my court speech, i wanted that on record. also, i was via zoom in my home, wearing a keffiyeh and a red and green light behind me . petty af

Translation of video (Haddad speaking):

Turns out that tonight, on Channel 14, they turned me into Mansour Abbas.

Look at this headline!

“Yoseph Haddad’s connection to the organisation that helped children from Gaza is exposed.”

Look at what they wrote next.

“Has the national hasbara figure revealed his true colours?”

That’s what was reported on Channel 14’s main evening news tonight.

On October 7, Yoseph Haddad promoted an Israeli organisation that worked to help children from Arab countries, many of them from Gaza, get to hospitals in Israel.

So, once again, anyone who answers to the pro-Palestinian cause is an enemy of the people, right?

Well, wait a minute.

First of all, let me tell you what Channel 14 didn’t tell you.

This was a report I filmed in the past with the organisation Save a Child’s Heart. As part of my work at the time for i24NEWS in English, I presented the organisation in a report aimed at promoting Israel’s image abroad, portraying it as an Israeli international humanitarian organisation that saves the lives of children with heart conditions around the world.

I wasn’t promoting the organisation and I didn’t receive a single shekel from it. I was promoting Israeli hasbara. How outrageous!

But wait a minute. Do you know who else promoted this organisation?

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself.

See for yourselves!

So, wait a minute. Let’s give this a headline:

“Benjamin Netanyahu’s connection to the organisation that helped children from Gaza is exposed.”

“Has the Prime Minister revealed his true colours?”

Tell me, did I do that right?

In short, what’s permitted for Bibi is forbidden for Yoseph Haddad — just as, for example, speaking in the past about a Palestinian state was apparently acceptable for one but not the other.

Wait, wait, wait. Are you ready for this?

Do you know who else promoted this organisation?

Channel 14 itself.

it's a "user box" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxesַ called תיבות משתמש/סרט כתום (orange ribbon user box)

Here's the original text text on the "user box"

משתמש זה יניף סרט כתום עד להחזרתם של גוש קטיף וצפון השומרון, שטחי A, שטחי B וכל שטחי C - לשטח ישראל

Wiki on Howard Chaykin

Who is Howard Chaykin? He is long time comics veteran & creator of indie comics such as American Flagg & Black Kiss. He once made a series for Image Comics called 'Divided States of Hysteria' which has covers which featured a woman draped in American flag burqa, and a South Asian/SWANA man hanged & lynched.

Chaykin claims to be one of those "I hate Trump"-types who still leans to Zionism.

New outposts, roads, and military bases are carving up Palestinian communities in an area that saw little settlement activity for two decades.

Matt and Daniel, I'd love to see you interview Adam Shatz, editor of Prophets Outcast: A Century of Dissident Jewish Writing about Zionism and Israel.

I read this book more than 20 years ago, and several of its essays have stayed with me ever since. It's a fascinating anthology of Jewish intellectuals who challenged Zionism, Jewish nationalism, and the idea that Jewish identity necessarily requires a Jewish nation-state.

The collection includes writings by Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Martin Buber, and Ella Shohat, among others. What makes it especially interesting is the diversity of perspectives: some contributors rejected Zionism outright, while others supported Jewish cultural revival or settlement but questioned the pursuit of Jewish statehood.

One of the most memorable selections is a 1930 letter from Sigmund Freud, written eighteen years before Israel's establishment, in response to a request that he publicly support the Zionist cause.

Freud wrote:

But my sober estimation of Zionism does not allow me to do so ... I do not believe that Palestine could ever become a Jewish state, nor that the Christian and Islamic worlds would ever be prepared to have their holy places under Jewish care. To me, it would have seemed more sensible to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically unencumbered land. But I know that such a rational viewpoint would never have gained the enthusiasm of the masses and the financial support of the wealthy ... The baseless fanaticism of our people is in part to be blamed for the awakening of Arab distrust. I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives ... Now judge for yourself whether I, with such a critical point of view, am the right person to come forward as the comforter of a people deluded by unjustified hope.

What strikes me about this letter is that Freud wasn't simply questioning whether a Jewish state was politically feasible. He was also expressing concern about the religious nationalism surrounding the project, its impact on the Arab population, and the unrealistic expectations of its supporters.

The anthology also includes Albert Einstein's reservations about Jewish nationalism, Martin Buber's advocacy of Jewish-Arab coexistence, and Ella Shohat's critique of the marginalization of Mizrahi Jews within Zionist narratives.

I think Adam Shatz would make a fascinating Bad Hasbara guest. He's an accomplished writer and editor with extensive knowledge of Jewish intellectual history, Zionism, and the Middle East.

One of the most interesting subjects for discussion would be the long and often overlooked history of Jewish dissent from Zionism, including the fact that some of the twentieth century's most prominent Jewish intellectuals were deeply critical of the movement long before Israel was established.Matt and Daniel, I'd love to see you interview Adam Shatz, editor of Prophets Outcast: A Century of Dissident Jewish Writing about Zionism and Israel.I read this book more than 20 years ago, and several of its essays have stayed with me ever since. It's a fascinating anthology of Jewish intellectuals who challenged Zionism, Jewish nationalism, and the idea that Jewish identity necessarily requires a Jewish nation-state.The collection includes writings by Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Martin Buber, and Ella Shohat, among others. What makes it especially interesting is the diversity of perspectives: some contributors rejected Zionism outright, while others supported Jewish cultural revival or settlement but questioned the pursuit of Jewish statehood.One of the most memorable selections is a 1930 letter from Sigmund Freud, written eighteen years before Israel's establishment, in response to a request that he publicly support the Zionist cause.Freud wrote:But my sober estimation of Zionism does not allow me to do so ... I do not believe that Palestine could ever become a Jewish state, nor that the Christian and Islamic worlds would ever be prepared to have their holy places under Jewish care. To me, it would have seemed more sensible to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically unencumbered land. But I know that such a rational viewpoint would never have gained the enthusiasm of the masses and the financial support of the wealthy ... The baseless fanaticism of our people is in part to be blamed for the awakening of Arab distrust. I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives ... Now judge for yourself whether I, with such a critical point of view, am the right person to come forward as the comforter of a people deluded by unjustified hope.What strikes me about this letter is that Freud wasn't simply questioning whether a Jewish state was politically feasible. He was also expressing concern about the religious nationalism surrounding the project, its impact on the Arab population, and the unrealistic expectations of its supporters.The anthology also includes Albert Einstein's reservations about Jewish nationalism, Martin Buber's advocacy of Jewish-Arab coexistence, and Ella Shohat's critique of the marginalization of Mizrahi Jews within Zionist narratives.I think Adam Shatz would make a fascinating Bad Hasbara guest. He's an accomplished writer and editor with extensive knowledge of Jewish intellectual history, Zionism, and the Middle East.One of the most interesting subjects for discussion would be the long and often overlooked history of Jewish dissent from Zionism, including the fact that some of the twentieth century's most prominent Jewish intellectuals were deeply critical of the movement long before Israel was established.

Matt and Daniel, I'd love to see you interview Adam Shatz, editor of Prophets Outcast: A Century of Dissident Jewish Writing about Zionism and Israel.

I read this book more than 20 years ago, and several of its essays have stayed with me ever since. It's a fascinating anthology of Jewish intellectuals who challenged Zionism, Jewish nationalism, and the idea that Jewish identity necessarily requires a Jewish nation-state.

The collection includes writings by Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Martin Buber, and Ella Shohat, among others. What makes it especially interesting is the diversity of perspectives: some contributors rejected Zionism outright, while others supported Jewish cultural revival or settlement but questioned the pursuit of Jewish statehood.

One of the most memorable selections is a 1930 letter from Sigmund Freud, written eighteen years before Israel's establishment, in response to a request that he publicly support the Zionist cause.

Freud wrote:

But my sober estimation of Zionism does not allow me to do so ... I do not believe that Palestine could ever become a Jewish state, nor that the Christian and Islamic worlds would ever be prepared to have their holy places under Jewish care. To me, it would have seemed more sensible to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically unencumbered land. But I know that such a rational viewpoint would never have gained the enthusiasm of the masses and the financial support of the wealthy ... The baseless fanaticism of our people is in part to be blamed for the awakening of Arab distrust. I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives ... Now judge for yourself whether I, with such a critical point of view, am the right person to come forward as the comforter of a people deluded by unjustified hope.

What strikes me about this letter is that Freud wasn't simply questioning whether a Jewish state was politically feasible. He was also expressing concern about the religious nationalism surrounding the project, its impact on the Arab population, and the unrealistic expectations of its supporters.

The anthology also includes Albert Einstein's reservations about Jewish nationalism, Martin Buber's advocacy of Jewish-Arab coexistence, and Ella Shohat's critique of the marginalization of Mizrahi Jews within Zionist narratives.

I think Adam Shatz would make a fascinating Bad Hasbara guest. He's an accomplished writer and editor with extensive knowledge of Jewish intellectual history, Zionism, and the Middle East.

One of the most interesting subjects for discussion would be the long and often overlooked history of Jewish dissent from Zionism, including the fact that some of the twentieth century's most prominent Jewish intellectuals were deeply critical of the movement long before Israel was established.

It took me several attempts to watch all of this

It is possibly the most thoroughly shadow banned video on YouTube

It is, quite biased, but it's the missing other half of the story

I like that they just leave out the other side of the wall completely, they have a documentary about that as well, it focuses on military base attacks.

He can't possibly be this stupid

In about 5 seconds Daesh will have this all over Facebook and Instagram inspiring attacks.

While Palestinians in Gaza are forced to live among the rubble of their destroyed homes, children play amid the ruins, facing the constant danger of unexploded Izralie munitions and damaged buildings that could collapse at any moment. With winter approaching once again, families are preparing to endure freezing conditions with inadequate shelter, limited supplies and barely any of the basic necessities needed to survive.

And let’s not pretend there has been a genuine ceasefire. Palestinians continue to be killed with impunity. Izraels idea of a ceasefire seems to be nothing more than an opportunity to continue killing Palestinians with less international attention, not only in Gaza but also in the occupied West Bank. They continue their bombardments in Gaza and Palestinians being killed by illegal settlers in the West Bank are a grim reminder of how little the word “ceasefire” means when Palestinian lives remain expendable.

And against this backdrop, we have this individual, born and raised in the United States, who chose to make aliyah to Izrael,casually making a video set to a Taylor Swift song and suggesting that somehow this song could bring peace to the Middle East

The sheer lack of self awareness is staggering. The disconnect from reality, the insensitivity, and the almost surreal level of privilege are difficult to comprehend.
While she sits comfortably in a home in Izrael,, enjoying electricity, running water, safety, and all the basic necessities of modern life, Palestinians just miles away are struggling to survive amid the ruins of their homes, deprived of those very necessities. And in a land where so many Palestinians have been dispossessed of their homes, the contrast becomes even more sickeening
Imagine witnessing this scale of human suffering, destruction, displacement, and death, and deciding that the appropriate response is to make a lighthearted video about a Taylor Swift song bringing peace to the region.

What makes this so disturbing is not merely the ignorance on display, but the extraordinary privilege of being able to treat someone elsessuffering as the backdrop for your own entertainment.