Since Texas started selling suppressors over the counter Mammoth Arms made a commitment to be the first store in Georgia to legally transfer suppressors over the counter using 4473s. We have worked tirelessly with the GOA, National and state legislators, state and local law enforcement, and many, many lawyers and legal teams.
All of this has led us to this moment. The moment all of us have been waiting for.
On 10/10/26 Mammoth Arms in Griffin Georgia became the first store in Georgia to sell over the counter suppressors in over 92+ years!
How did Mammoth Arms come to this conclusion when others haven’t?
The question is how did we come to this conclusion where others have not? Let us break down our (and our legal team’s) interpretation of the process.
What does Georgia law say?
If we look at the Georgia Code, O.C.G.A. section-16-11-122, it says that
“No person shall have in his possession any sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun, dangerous weapon, or silencer except as provided in Code Section 16-11-124.”
Let’s follow that to O.C.G.A. Section 16-11-124.
Section 16-11-124 states
“This part shall not apply to:
…(4) Possession of a sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun, dangerous weapon, or silencer by a person who is authorized to possess the same because he has registered the sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun, dangerous weapon, or silencer in accordance with the dictates of the National Firearms Act, 68A Stat. 725 (26 U. S. C. Sections 5841-5862)”
What does the National Firearms Act require?
Okay, let’s follow this next part: 26 U. S. C. Sections 5841-5862. now, to start, only sections 5841-5849 exist. the others do not, maybe they were deleted or removed. There is no log of removal so I do not know when that could have happened.
What remains is an explication of definitions and how to register said NFA items.
Section 5841 states you must keep records of all transactions and ownership from manufacturers to end users. And the last paragraph states:
“(e) Proof of registration
A person possessing a firearm registered as required by this section shall retain proof of registration which shall be made available to the Secretary upon request.”
(This is what people are getting hung up on, we will return to this.)
If we continue to Section 5846 it states:
“All provisions of law relating to special taxes imposed by chapter 51 and to engraving, issuance, sale, accountability, cancellation, and distribution of stamps for tax payment shall, insofar as not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, be applicable with respect to the taxes imposed by sections 5801, 5811, and 5821.”
Again, let’s continue to section 5812, this was not even directly cited here, but in that section it states:
(b) Transfer of possession
“The transferee of a firearm shall not take possession of the firearm unless the Secretary has approved the transfer and registration of the firearm to the transferee as required by subsection (a) of this section.”
What changed with the ATF’s 10/9/26 letter?
This is directly what the ATF has come out on multiple occasions and said is no longer needed and no longer enforced.
The ATF paper that was published 10/9/26 also clearly states that the NFA has CHANGED. Previous rulings were injunctions based on, and due to court proceedings. This newest letter establishes that the ATF, the governing body over the NFA and the group charged with enforcing and interpreting the NFA, has plainly stated that ANYONE can now purchase and/or possess a suppressor, SBR, or SBS over the counter and does not need to do any federal registration. They say that the NFA no longer requires registration at all.
If you would like to voluntarily register your NFA items you MAY, but it is not required.
So am I compliant with Georgia law?
So, let’s circle back to the GA code.
The GA code, as quoted above, says you must abide by the NFA and register your weapon in accordance with the NFA. However the NFA no longer requires registration. Therefore you are compliant with Georgia law if you follow the ATF’s rulings on 4473 transfers.
Don’t I have to “voluntarily” register my suppressor?
The argument we have seen (A LOT if you look at our Facebook page lol) is people saying that you MUST voluntarily register your NFA item.
…but wait, that sentence doesn’t make sense. Are you forced to do something voluntarily?
Will Georgia prosecute 4473 suppressor purchases?
Additionally, the Attorney General for Georgia, Chris Carr has made a public record stating that he will not prosecute 4473 suppressor transactions in the state of Georgia.
On top of that, local conservative DA’s in conservative districts will join with the state and share their opinion and thus will not prosecute either.
Both local, and state law enforcement agencies have confirmed to us that they are not interested in pursuing any legal action against suppressors, and many of them have expressed interest in acquiring their own suppressors in the newly established manner!
Is there any risk at all?
Now, TECHNICALLY there is an extremely minute chance that an anti-2A DA could try and prosecute someone for having an “unregistered suppressor” in their jurisdiction. However, it would first need to be IN their jurisdiction. Secondly, they would need to know that someone was in possession of said item. Thirdly, they would then need probable cause to find and detain that person, and EVEN IF they were able to pull all of that off, all the accused would need to do is appeal the case to a higher court where it immediately gets thrown out because the AG said he is not prosecuting these cases.
Plus, the whole point of this is that nothing is registered so there is no way for anyone to know if you have purchased a suppressor or not! The only way someone would be able to gain access to our sales records is if law enforcement with jurisdiction over me came to my store with a court ordered, judge signed warrant to see my sales transactions for a specific person.
It is our opinion that the risk is negligible, and that IF an arrest under such pretenses were to happen it would further benefit the case of suppressor rights in Georgia.