How people can defend creationism in general is beyond me like this is not something you can be objective about, the bible and it‘s religious tales are entertaining but taking it‘s teachings as facts is wild to me. I‘m not religious but I can understand believing in a greater thing sure man you do you if it helps you but creationism is something else…
Like my guy creationists built the ark (as a sight you can visit) realized it makes no sense and still believe in it… It is beyond me how this will be taught at some US schools as an alternative „real“ way humans were made instead of just going by logic. (we‘re just mammals that got a way too overpowered brain and we were lucky to end up like we are today and nothing special from a biological standpoint at least no more like any other being that evolved in their way)
Creationism is what‘s holding many people back in the US and actively fights against change which is exactly the opposite of how life works in general…
(To the guy who tried to comment saying it‘s about being objective and then calling me names, there‘s a difference between having a biased opinion and telling about negative aspects of a topic… being objective in a wiki page does not mean you can‘t have positive or negative remarks… it just means that you see both parties of an argument with the same objective view seeing both negative and positive sides… it‘s about telling the whole story and truth without regards to opinion and feelings)
450
u/Additional-North-683 Jun 28 '26
This whole thing started because he was upset about the Wikipedia article for young creationism being negative about it