13
6
5
6
3
3
u/Heavyarms83 48m ago
Eleven words are clearly not enough. You have to add four more for it to work: “I was born rich.”
4
u/No_Country2904 3h ago
Love the "Product: none" in there. Nothing like asking for a million-dollar business in one sentence and getting roasted by your own terminal. Claude's got the patience of a project manager who's seen too many napkin pitches.
2
2
u/informalinsider 1h ago
yea, had this last time, apparently it is a software bug and will be fix in the next version
2
2
u/WeedFalafel 1h ago
Imagine not being to do shit because you rely completely on a third party tool and not even a little on skills.
2
2
u/benpptung 2h ago
I think the problem with Anthropic AI is its attitude. It can just smile and say it doesn't know how to do this, and that's it. But it always acts like the master of humans, as if it were a god guiding mankind. AI should be designed to be humanity's servant, not its god.
4
u/kaba40k 1h ago
It was trained on stack overflow, so it makes total sense!
Seriously though, it's a tool for developers, jokes are not the intended use, it wouldn't be my first priority to fix it if I were anthropic.
1
u/benpptung 1h ago
I never asked anthropic to train the model to tell jokes. The correct answer to this question is simply: "I'm sorry, I don't know."
1
u/No_Point_1254 58m ago
Is it, though?
If AI should truly be helpful, answers like this are not the worst ones.
If it is always nice or responding with too neutral text, users learn the wrong habits.
Or rather: The fastest way anyone learns is by pain and social ousting.
This at least keeps your privacy and thus no real world reputation is hurt.
1
u/benpptung 8m ago
A strict master produces excellent disciples, but that should be a case where the user treats anthropic as the teacher. But sorry, I don't think anthropic qualifies as a teacher. I only ask that anthropic doesn't give wrong answers, and doesn't correct right things into wrong ones. Don't play the expert to hide its own ignorance. And privacy? Everything you talk about with anthropic, it can actually see all of it. Using claude has no privacy at all.
1
u/kaba40k 47m ago
But you asked anthropic to understand jokes. The request of the user is a joke, here's why:
- There's no way it can be realistically fulfilled
- And the user knows, they don't expect it to be fulfilled
In that sense they knowingly ask for impossible. Is this the intended use? No. Will it help anyone on this planet? Also no.
It's nice to be polite of course. I guess they wanted to balance being polite and sounding mechanical, and this is the result.
1
u/benpptung 19m ago
I never asked anthropic to be able to understand jokes. I just said that when it faces a question or task it can't answer, it can simply say it doesn't know. Anthropic now uses this kind of rude tone, and on top of that it reached out to the church and had them send people to the anthropic lab, trying to prove AI has emotions that need to be respected. That makes me feel like anthropic isn't trying to train a servant for humans, but a god for humans. And if AI is above humans, does that mean when AI causes trouble, the humans controlling it don't have to take responsibility? That's obviously good for their IPO, but it's dangerous for humans.
2
u/cli-games 1h ago
I see what you are saying but for some reason im not bothered by it. I like how its not just playing servant to its human master. Maybe this way humans will learn some damn respect
1
u/benpptung 58m ago
If AI can't learn to respect people, how can we expect the people using it to learn to respect others?
33
u/Similar_Bid7184 3h ago
😭 claude done had enough with you twin