The ones I implemented as a POC test for an educational client had a 98% success rate for detecting AI content. Unfortunately they also had an average 65% false-positive rate.
AI detection software has a long, loooong way to go. But they're already implemented everywhere sadly.
Coincidentally one of the documents we fed it was an essay on segregation that was written in 1972. The top AI detection suite reported 83% (iirc) confidence that it was AI generated...
beep boop, I am a bot and this action was performed automatically. Please [suck my balls](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ if you have any questions or concerns)
I was speaking of AI generated text. There's tools out there that change the text to remove the word pattern scheme. Or the student can just change some of the wording themselves by just adopting synonyms.
Well, if they’re at least changing some words then they’re technically just doing exactly what kids in my school did back in the day. Read text book. Need to write something about what textbook taught. Basically write verbatim what the textbook said but change some words and the order itself to not plagiarize.
244
u/shiddedandfarded69 13h ago
The ones I implemented as a POC test for an educational client had a 98% success rate for detecting AI content. Unfortunately they also had an average 65% false-positive rate.
AI detection software has a long, loooong way to go. But they're already implemented everywhere sadly.