This is on a post about a school shooting keep in mind. Don't see what that really has to do with men as if only cis men have done school shootings. Also there response to some people dying in a school shooting, is murder all men? #girlmath I guess.

I reported these comments that have hundreds of upvotes for hate for hate and..... you know.... celebrating the idea of murdering all men but I know its not going to do anything, and im likely to get a warning for making a false report. If you made a comment like this about women your account would get nuked easily though.

Now even if it’s consensual you’re exploiting women. These strong independent women.

Currently being harassed by one of these creatures then deleting her comments. Like imagine acting like this and thinking your rhetoric has any sort of traction other than emotional manipulation. Your side is so weak and riddled with fallacy you cannot have an open forum to discuss social issues because you choose hate. You try to gas light and attack people because you couldn’t understand any sort of perspective other than your own and your ego blinds you to the opportunity. You can continue to do this though. It’s nice being important to you.

If you look at the age gap discourse, the core issue according to the usual suspects(women and simps) is ''power imbalance''

they will say something like ''oh but old men have more life experiences and maturity and this creates power imbalance''

So why is that a bad thing?

''because it increases the likelihood of exploitation''

Ok so for arguments sake, lets assume this is true

So if this is the case why arent the usual suspects showing extreme vitriol towards other relationship dynamics like, heightgap, financialgap, statusgap, IQgap?

A huge power imbalance exists in a relationship Where the woman is 5'4 and the guy is 6'5

A huge power imbalance exists in a relationship where the man is a millionaire or an E-celeb and the woman is making minimum wage

And yet what you see is the same usual suspects encouraging women to seek such relationship arrangements. They get told by society to seek ''666'', regardless of who they are and where they stand. They are told to ''never settle'' and always look up

Why? Because all of these directly benefit women and cater to their interests. Suddenly the high probability of exploitation in an imbalanced relationship becomes a non existent issue. Suddenly we have to consider ''biology'' and become nature understanders

But if a man lets say is an older adult or middle aged and wants a beautiful young woman to have sex with or marry as a wife. Now suddenly hes a ''predator''(no proof whatsoever)

Now we have to look at ''power imbalance''

Now we get lectured about how ''evil'' power imbalances are blah blah blah blah

This is systematic misandry

As the article's title says, the concepts of SA, consent, and non-consent have crept (goalposts moved). And this comment below iterates how bad it all is.

I tell young men today that if they have sex with a woman they're not married to even once, they have handed her the power to utterly destroy their lives and their futures. Whether it's next week, next year or even 20 years in the future when she's broke and needs money. She may not ever use that power, but she will always have it and she can exercise it with a single email.