r/interestingasfuck • • 11h ago

This Camera Can Literally See Sound Waves and detect hidden air leaks.

14.9k Upvotes

414 comments sorted by

•

u/Chucklum 11h ago

How much does this baby cost? I want one for, stuff.

•

u/Plus_Leopard9367 11h ago

$790

•

u/Chucklum 11h ago

That's not that bad honestly.

•

u/ImPinkSnail 11h ago

Great value if you're in a machine shop spending a hundred hours a year locating leaks.

•

u/old_flying_fart 8h ago

Great value if you're in an expensive production environment spending 2 hours a year locating leaks.

•

u/sl33ksnypr 8h ago

For sure, that thing will pay for itself multiple times over if it prevents downtime or limits downtime to less than if they didn't have it. Downtime in certain production facilities can be hundreds of thousands per hour.

•

u/jaiagrawal 8h ago

Saw your username and first thought someone was trying to use this detect a fart

•

u/old_flying_fart 8h ago

We all know that every one of these gets used for fart detection within 30 minutes of unboxing.

•

u/theDomicron 7h ago

"I got one coming get it ready!"

•

u/Mephistito 5h ago

"?? Is it broken?"

"Silent but deadly 😏"

•

u/Drunk_Britches 5h ago

Ma! Grab the sound camera!

•

u/TacticalTwinkOnTop 3h ago

“What was my score?!?”

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/HI-McDunnough 7h ago

Or if you're in your living room and can't figure out where that clicking noise is coming from.

•

u/TheGrandWhatever 6h ago

Or if you're in your bedroom and you keep hearing that clawing in the walls and those footsteps as you rustle awake in the dead of night

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

•

u/vivaaprimavera 10h ago

It's a bit of money just to find out who farted.

•

u/AlpineVW 10h ago

No, that's only for testing

•

u/Basic_Novel_9203 9h ago

I just farted. Find me.

Edit: No, I won’t tell you what I ate.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

•

u/1-800-ASS-DICK 10h ago

hopefully there's no contract/service subscription attached to it.

•

u/hedronist 9h ago

I hate that that was my first thought, too.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/dat_oracle 9h ago

wdym you don't want an AI enhanced experience that costs tokens, which are ESSENTIAL to the devices functionality, so once they are spend, you have to buy new stacks. Also unused tokens will be deleted at the end of the month.

you sure you don't want that?

•

u/Son_of_a_Bacchus 8h ago

But by the time the Snap-On truck adds it's financing charges...

•

u/Revenge_of_the_Khaki 7h ago

I was absolutely expecting another zero at the end. I'll definitely be getting one of these at work.

→ More replies (3)

•

u/fiero-fire 11h ago

That's so much cheaper than I expected

•

u/Downtown_Let 9h ago

I looked at these a couple of years back and they were in the thousands. Glad prices are falling.

•

u/ItzMe610 9h ago

The FLiR version is $26k. It makes me wonder about the effectiveness of this one…

•

u/Aries_IV 9h ago

So I've used both and for the price this little one here is just about as good if not better.

I'm not exactly sure if this is the one but we got one for around a grand on Amazon and it looks exactly like this one. There's not really a difference, at least not for what we use it for.

•

u/Empty-Part7106 8h ago

Can I select frequencies to search for?

•

u/Aries_IV 8h ago

Yes you can

•

u/Faxon 5h ago edited 5h ago

Only? Fluke charges 20-30k for theirs goddamn

Edit: it appears fluke has a cheaper one now but it's still a worse deal since it has 1/4th the sensing microphones and costs more. The fluke is good to 65ft or 19.8m while the other one is 60m or 196ft https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/fluke-ii01-isee-mobile-acoustic-imaging-camera-android-devices.html

https://us.fotric.com/products/fotric-td2e-acoustic-imager-camera?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=24029103296&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIn7bvpfG6lwMVKyNECB3nyh-BEAQYASABEgJk1PD_BwE

•

u/atomictrolley 4h ago

I use a fluke Ii915 and it is impressive in that range. Paid for itself rather quick

•

u/Farmchuck 4h ago

My last shop had a fluke one that we bounced between branches. The vibration analysis guys mostly used them but we used them a few times for refrigerant leak surveys in grocery stores. It's pretty awesome being able to leak search a grocery store from the ground without having to bomb around on a lift in between the aisles and cases.

•

u/zaio_baio 10h ago

That's how much it costed me to change the turbo hoses of my car. This excludes the mechanics wage and the damaged dpf filter.

•

u/KhitomerKonspiracy 5h ago

As someone with a husband with NO hearing and very expensive equipment... would you be so kind as to provide a link to a reputable place to purchase one? Then I can finally stop saying, "You hear that?". He says no. Then I get out a soap bottle 😑

→ More replies (3)

•

u/BlobAndHisBoy 7h ago

I want one so I can point it at my wife's ass so she can't deny a fart.

•

u/PiratesOfTheArctic 11h ago

The first place we would use it? On our heads, its always the first test 👍

•

u/ripzipzap 7h ago

For about half that you can build one, if you're a tinkerer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5ynZ3lMQJc

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/kbachert 11h ago

Would this work in a loud environment?

•

u/Wooden-Peach-4664 11h ago

Yes, I use this device in a chemical plant where it is so noisy that you have to wear hearing protection at all times.

•

u/Phoenix__Wwrong 5h ago

Does it show every single source of sounds?

•

u/Lv_InSaNe_vL 3h ago

I use a Fluke i915 at work, you can filter it to specific frequencies. And then you can filter "slightly wrong" frequencies too.

•

u/TheShaunD 4h ago

I use these in a chemical plant too. The model we have is Fluke ii900, and yes, it lets you filter out surrounding decibels to isolate the leak. It works up to 50 feet away too, which is great for overhead pipe racks.

•

u/Terrorzwergi 51m ago

What does Fluke not do

→ More replies (1)

•

u/BlazerWookiee 11h ago

WHAT?

•

u/SelfInteresting7259 11h ago

They said "WOULD THIS WORK IN A LOUD ENVIRONMENT!"

•

u/Chucklum 11h ago

WWHHHAAAAATTTTT??!!

•

u/SenatorBus_ 11h ago

WHY WOULD THIS WORK WITH THE OBAMA GOVERNMENT?

•

u/Pendraconica 11h ago

NO, THEY SAID TWERK IN A CROWDED APARTMENT

•

u/Electrical_Name_5434 11h ago

NO, THEY SAID WOOD AS FORK IS BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

•

u/TheMarkola 10h ago

🇼‌ 🇭‌ 🇦‌ 🇹‌

•

u/PauloAEAE 9h ago

WHY WOULD YOU BRING A FORK TO THIS ESTABLISHMENT?

•

u/ron-paul-swanson 7h ago

Sir, this is a Wendy’s

→ More replies (0)

•

u/marimoso 9h ago

You don't have to yell, I'm right here

•

u/useless83 8h ago

I AM YELLING, CARL.

→ More replies (0)

•

u/Miqo_Nekomancer 9h ago

NO THEY SAID HOOD DISS SORT OF A CROWD ENVIRONMENT!

→ More replies (1)

•

u/itsmeiassureyou 9h ago

Wexford is a town in Ireland.

•

u/extreme_bananas 6h ago

PHONEBOOK?! NO HE SAID ARACHNOPHOBIA!

•

u/iwee3 10h ago

They said "WOODEN SHIRT IS PROUD AND VIRAL, GENT!"

•

u/LikeSonyD 9h ago

They said they're selling chocolate!

•

u/torturekiller2025 11h ago

"NO! BREAK'S NOT FOR ANOTHER FORTY MINUTES!"

•

u/Mikeologyy 7h ago

THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH FIREMEN?

•

u/whoyoucallin_pinhead 8h ago

NO IM STILL TRYING TO REACH ENLIGHTENMENT, DO YOU HAVE ANY TIPS???

•

u/chronofreak 4h ago

WHAT ARE THEY SELLING?

→ More replies (3)

•

u/Historical_Gur_3054 8h ago

HE SAID THE SHERIFF IS NEAR!

•

u/Lint_baby_uvulla 8h ago

I LIKE BEER! I SAID I LIKE BEER!!

•

u/ArcticSekai 9h ago

THE ELECTRIC CITY.

•

u/pleasantothemax 6h ago

I read this in David Lynch’s voice

•

u/ottwebdev 6h ago

WOOD HIS JERK ALLOWED EXPERIMENT

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Mr_Chicle 11h ago

I work with Gas Turbines, we use these to find leaks while its running. A gas turbine is loud AF and ours finds air leaks no problem (admittedly, we have a very high end one)

•

u/ThatDamnThang 10h ago

I work with gas turbines (and steam turbines) and we had a vendor come in to demo a unit similar to this and it wouldnt work. I really wish that particular one had worked because my chief engineer was ready to buy one on the spot for us to find gas leaks.

I absolutely believe that these work in loud environments, but i just havent seen it in person. Im glad yours works.

•

u/Mr_Chicle 10h ago

Ill have to find what model we have, ours works in enclosed and open spaces

•

u/throwaway928816 9h ago

would also like to know

•

u/tommos 8h ago

Me too.

•

u/Mr_Chicle 5h ago

I left work early today and have jury duty tomorrow, but on friday ill drop the model after this comment

•

u/DashLeJoker 5h ago

jury duty can wait we need it NOW

•

u/whyitno_workgood 10h ago

Thats cool. Do you know what the device is called?

•

u/AssociateFalse 10h ago

Acoustic Imaging Camera is what it's marketed as. This one is like $800 USD. Fluke sells one that's $21.2K.

•

u/PacificNorthwest09 10h ago

Yeah a lot of warehouse conveyors work on compressed air and are not quiet. I think ours is like that 20k version if not more it’s like a modified tablet.

→ More replies (3)

•

u/Marcos340 11h ago

From memory, it should.

You can select the frequency band for the sensor to display

LTT did a video on a similar product a while back where they looked for air leaks on their compressor lines in their shop.

https://youtu.be/fL1GB-3Bkwc?is=fQIDAar4HFL23Bm9

Full video if you’re interested in the operation of it and some more in depth explanation

•

u/MeanForest 11h ago

Adam Savage from Mythbusters tested that on his YouTube channel, he's it would https://youtu.be/UPVcwDzhBZ8?t=1025

•

u/TheDigitalOne 11h ago

He's using a Fluke 910 acoustic imager, looks like they sell for about $26,600, wow.

•

u/stupid_cat_face 10h ago

I’ll take two

•

u/PiccoloAwkward465 5h ago

Fluke stuff is expensive because it’s some of the best.

•

u/93EXCivic 9h ago

The HBK version starts are $60k and that doesnt include software. Saw a demo for my guy recently

→ More replies (4)

•

u/theModge 11h ago

We use a better version for listening train bearings, ignoring the sound of the wheel - rail interface, so yes definitely

•

u/majorpun 9h ago

As others have answered, yes it works.

It's part of a "predictive" maintenance tool kit because it's an iteration on ultrasonic tools used for a long time in engineering and maintenance.

Acoustic imagining, as it's called, overlays acoustic data over an image, and can be calibrated for distance and range depending on what is being detected. Air leaks, mechanical rubbing, electrical arching, and the like. The parenthesis around predictive, is that you're detecting a failure before the entire system has gone into functional failure. ~Something~ has failed, but the device is still working, for now.

I'm honestly excited for this tech to be as ubiquitous in industrial environments as infrared, or used with lubrication, installed on a robot, or even be a software solution, depending on hardware limitations (You'll note the asymmetrical location of the microphones).

I like demonstrating it by pointing it at some one who's talking and then the rest of us point and laugh at them.

•

u/Dreams-of-Cthulhu 7h ago

I did notice the seemingly random placement of the holes, which I assumed were the microphones. Obviously, they're not placed randomly but I am very curious about why they are placed where they are and how their placement was determined.

•

u/majorpun 4h ago

So the old sensors were kinda like somewhere between a stethoscope and a boom mic, you had to calibrate it, walk around, hope you didn't accidentally point it at something super loud, and hone in on leaks gradually. Obviously digital meters made it easier, but this is next level.

It's especially awesome feeling when you make an entire air compressor redundant after you patch an entire factories worth of air leaks. This makes it a helluvalot easier!

I remember reading about why the mic placements seemed random, but don't recall it to be satisfying. If someone knows I'd love to be corrected.

•

u/SpockIsMyHomeboy 11h ago

NO THANKS I ALREADY HAVE A MINT

•

u/Chucklum 11h ago

NO I DON'T WANT A WINDOW TINT

•

u/Andurilmage 11h ago

WHAT DO YOU MEAN THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT

•

u/GrantacusMoney 10h ago

Yes as long as there is a delta. You can tune it to a sensitivity

•

u/Silvedl 10h ago

They're using them to find out who is farting during fancy party events.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Outkast_IRE 9h ago

Yes , I have seen these used on noisy factory floors to find leaks in the overhead compressed air pipelines to machines. They work really well.

•

u/fullitorrrrrrr 9h ago

It depends... For the sound localization it should be capable of filtering to a certain frequency range, but for how well it will do, it will depend on what the loud environment is, as well as the characteristics of the noise you're looking for. If you know the speed of a rotating shaft and want to know if a bearing on that is going bad, you can narrow down to a very tight frequency range , and if the background is loud due to something at a much lower or higher frequency than your target, you can still easily get good separation between the noise of interest and the background noise level, so it can work well. If however the loud environment is a lot of heavy impacts that generate a lot of broadband noise that will overlap with and drown out the noise of interest.... Then probably not so well

•

u/guajojo 6h ago

it does! lucky our "hearing" sound spectrum goes from like 20 to 20000 hz. This machine has a setting to isolate only a portion of the spectrum and can reach up to 90000 hz, so it can easily ignore noisy enviroments

→ More replies (16)

•

u/Shtyles 11h ago

They really could have used this in the ISS when they had an airleak

•

u/diplomatic_koboko 10h ago

But there's no sound in space

•

u/CapricornTV 10h ago

But there is inside ISS

•

u/gobbleself 10h ago

Not when there’s an air leak!

•

u/Mikeologyy 7h ago

I think if the air leak has progressed to the point there’s no sound in the ISS, it’s probably time to start arranging a body recovery mission

•

u/k-mcm 9h ago edited 58m ago

There is when you're leaking.

Edit - Not that the tool could work well in space.  The speed of sound would be next to nothing so there'd be no sound waves for a synthetic aperture.  It would just be sparse air molecules slamming into the microphones at high speed. 

•

u/ImNotSkankHunt42 10h ago

Ok, Iñarritu

→ More replies (4)

•

u/BrockKetchum 8h ago

They use a Distran Ultra Pro. Its a Swiss company

•

u/SelfInteresting7259 11h ago

Thats fuckign crazy. Cant even whisper shit or fart anymore

•

u/St_Kevin_ 11h ago

points weird camera around

“The farts are coming from Selfinteresting7259!!”

•

u/MountainAlive 10h ago

Silent but deadly detected

•

u/Ozzyg333 8h ago

They'll definitely put these on the drones when they start hunting us down for saying something bad about the gov

→ More replies (1)

•

u/SinisterCheese 10h ago

Those who wonder how it works.

The series of holes front of it have mics in them. They are set in such manner that there is unique "fingerprint" for every direction the sound can come from. And the machine resolves from that fingerprint where the display the location on the display.

This same thing is user in satellites telescopes. You can figure out where a specific spectrum of light is coming from, with one "exposure" by looking at the pattern it caused. The pattern is such that it can be solved for the direction because ebery direction causes specific pattern.

•

u/fuku_visit 9h ago

The layout is a Finonachi sequence spaced by a fraction of the median freq of interest.

•

u/lhgh 8h ago

Fibonacci*
FTFY

•

u/ggf95 8h ago

I think he meant mariachi

•

u/Perryn 6h ago

Fettuccine Sequence

•

u/PaigeMarshallMD 7h ago

Thank you so much. I was like wtf is this dude talking about? What the hell is a finonacci sequence? You saved me, and probably thousands of other people, a ton of confusion.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/theusualsteve 8h ago

Its fascinating that a "random" layout of sensors actually gives more resolution than if it were an organized array. This isnt true for every application but its cool to see. I used to think that arrays of radio telescopes on hillsides were placed randomly due to geotechnical or other infrastructure constraints unrelated to the science being done. The randomness is very intentional!

•

u/Kqyxzoj 4h ago edited 3h ago

Yeah, the random nature is part of it's charm. In the same area you also have coded apertures that do have an intentional pattern to them. You've got the boring rectangular grid ones, Uniform Redundant Arrays (URAs). And then there's the bestagon ones Bestagonal Hexagonal Uniform Redundant Arrays (HURAs). Similar to the pseudorandom ones you can reconstruct the original signal by deconvolving. It's pretty fun, you don't need much to get something sorta kinda working. To get it working well is another story. But for just a bit of tinkering fun it's pretty neat.

See for example this one for pattern construction:

•

u/guice666 7h ago

Basically, a super-sharper version of our ears. Did you know the canals in our ears are specifically for that? It bounces sound in our ears allowing us to understand the direction it's coming from.

For us, we actually adapt to our ear structure vs the other way around (ears adapt the environment during growth).

→ More replies (5)

•

u/scotshie 10h ago

I’ll use this $1000 device to find the air leak in my $20 inflatable mattress.

Because, guy math.

•

u/Pulmonary_Archery_ 10h ago

Repair 50 leaks in your air mattress instead of throwing it out each time and the thing nearly pays for itself

•

u/TIL_IM_A_SQUIRREL 9h ago

The air mattress of Theseus

→ More replies (1)

•

u/GoatCovfefe 10h ago

My company bought a similar product but different brand that we use to find air leaks. Its a $25k little piece of equipment, allegedly pays for itself over time.

•

u/mikew_reddit 8h ago

$500 for a used one. $50 air mattresses, and leaky garden hoses. if it can identify gaps where there's heat loss in a house, it's probably worth it from lower heating bills.

→ More replies (3)

•

u/RedaNassef 11h ago

this feels like straight out of a sci-fi movie, absolute game changer for finding invisible leaks and sound waves

•

u/IamTheUniverseArentU 11h ago

I have spent far too much of my life searching for leaks in various pieces of equipment. I wonder if it works for vacuum equipment.

•

u/Realistic_Owl3093 10h ago

I wish I could quantify the number of hours I've spent at my job looking for a leak in a piece of equipment. This would make my life so much less frustrating

→ More replies (3)

•

u/Most_Bet_3658 9h ago

Difference between sci fi and real life is it doesn't have a cool sound wave animation and audio effects on screen. Just the exact db number is all you really need

•

u/Snoo6702 10h ago

Right on! I can so see this being used for finding sound waves and maybe even air leaks! Incredible.

•

u/Snoo6702 10h ago

Maybe even invisible air leaks and sound waves?? Amazing stuff.

•

u/TwoElksInaTurtleNeck 6h ago

Or dissenters hiding underground.

•

u/Raging_Dick_Shorts 11h ago edited 11h ago

It's detecting ultrasonic pulses, so vibrations at high frequency. It doesn't technically "see" sound waves, it uses a bunch of sensors to detect frequencies.

We have a $20k unit in work and it's pretty sweet. Saves a bunch of money by finding leaking air/gas lines as well as failing bearings, or electrical insulation.

•

u/thrallswreak 11h ago

If I wanted to be pedantic I'd argue that's what they eye does too, broadly speaking 😉

→ More replies (5)

•

u/vivaaprimavera 10h ago

That works with an array of "microphones"?

•

u/kratz9 7h ago

Yes. Each microphone can compare to the other microphones to detect phase shift. With the phase shift plus the frequency, you can know the difference in distance the sound traveled to each mic. Since the microphones are a known distance apart, you can do the trigonometry to pinpoint where the noise is coming from. 

•

u/reParaoh 5h ago

man this thing seems like a nightmare to calibrate. They also gotta calibrate the camera image relative to the sound too, as well as sound pressure level at a given distance

→ More replies (4)

•

u/antiduh 9h ago

This isn't ultrasonic. It can detect audible sound and ultrasound.

And saying the sound is ultrasonic doesn't change anything about what it takes to spatially resolve the source of the sound, it's still the same work audible or not.

•

u/Only_Journalist7895 9h ago

So would this help find the super high pressure hydraulic leaks that can cut through stuff?

•

u/fuku_visit 9h ago

Yes.

•

u/SerGT3 8h ago

How does it detect failing insulation?

•

u/Raging_Dick_Shorts 8h ago

It detects arcing and corona, which is typically a sign of failing insulation.

•

u/dudeCHILL013 2h ago

I'm an electrician in the navy, I am greatly interested in how this works to see failing insulation so I can justify getting one for my command.

Being able to see failing bearings and leaks would also be a huge plus.

→ More replies (6)

•

u/Mothanius 6h ago

Man, this is one of those things I would have loved to have on the flight line, but they would probably never let us use it. Trying to use the soapy water on hot bleed air lines can be tough. Especially at the angles and the types of connectors that were used. You'd have to use a flashlight and a mirror while trying to get some soapy water on this hot ass tube and hopefully you can see the bubbles if there is a leak.

•

u/Siguard_ 4h ago

This tool will save a company thousands upon thousands of dollars every year.

•

u/GlockAF 3h ago

OR…hear me out…languish unused in the tool cage because it’s too expensive or management didn’t bother arranging for the required training to use it . Or both.

→ More replies (2)

•

u/Jojothereader 3h ago

Soapy water on bleed air? What aircraft

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/Lopsided_Flamingo_27 9h ago

Amaze amaze 👎

•

u/deaglebingo 7h ago

is there a long range version for drones? should be.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Antique_Essay4032 4h ago

Fist my bump 👊

•

u/RathVelus 8h ago

I was scrolling just looking for somebody that made the reference. I was almost disappointed.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/mushroognomicon 6h ago

Will it help me find crickets and mosquitos in my house!? 

•

u/branm008 6h ago

It actually could. We use a variation of this from Fluke and it can detect some pretty minimal soundwaves in a very, very loud manufacturing plant.

•

u/mushroognomicon 6h ago

Definitely some googling tonight. I use a lot of Fluke products for network testing and never knew they had something for sound waves. 

→ More replies (1)

•

u/TechnicallyCant5083 9h ago

It can't "literally see sound waves" it's a regular camera with an array of very well calibrated microphones and some clever software 

•

u/fuku_visit 9h ago

The mic calibration actually matters a lot less than you think. They will just be standard MEMS mics which are like $2. It's not a quantitative measurement device, so all you need is a reasonable frequency response from each mic and good spacing between them. The software is also pretty simple to design, pretty basic beamforming.

•

u/TechnicallyCant5083 9h ago

Alright Dexter's Laboratory, that has nothing to do with my point

→ More replies (7)

•

u/mini-hypersphere 8h ago

I mean sure, be pedantic. But then no camera can see, it just has an array of CCD sensors that are well calibrated. Hell, no human can "literally see light waves" because we just have a set of highly calibrated cone and rod detectors. At that point the word seeing is merely philosophical

→ More replies (2)

•

u/Ghostley92 9h ago

I used a FLIR one at a previous job just screwing around. We had an air line drop in the middle of our lab, which was normally at 80-90dB if the pumps were running.

From about 30 ft away the acoustic camera easily picked up a leak at the end of the drop. I think the leak was noisier than the 10-15 dB shown in the video, but it wasn’t THAT bad…

In any case, it was an air leak nobody really noticed that was picked up from considerable distance inside a ~85dB environment. I was impressed, but the camera cost like 25k

•

u/MobiusDie 11h ago

They have one that can go on your smartphone for $700.

•

u/screamtracker 11h ago

Is it better than the flir one camera that goes on my phone? Wasnt too impressed with that, kinda crappy unless really really close to the object 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/heeheehoho2023 9h ago

I'll wait for the harbor freight version

•

u/Syzyjyzygy 10h ago

We have one of these at my work any my biggest takeaway from it is that we are constantly bombarded with extremely loud noises outside of the audible spectrum. It can sound completely silent in a room but then you point this camera at the ceiling and there’s like 100dB of 70Khz just blasting through the ducts. Kinda freaked me out a little bit.

•

u/fuku_visit 9h ago

That's unlikely. 100dB from about 1.5m away (or so) is something quite serious. Ultrasound can effect congnition at those levels. Also, if you measured 100dB with that machine I'd take it with a giant punch of salt. They are generally not well calibrated. You need a proper sound level meter.

•

u/Syzyjyzygy 8h ago

100 dB is an exaggeration, I don’t remember the actual number but I do remember thinking it seemed very high.

→ More replies (2)

•

u/CryptographerLow6772 11h ago

We used to use an ultrasonic leak detection device for compressed air. It was not nearly as cool as this.

•

u/LetUsQuest 11h ago

Fist my bump!

•

u/zlliksddam 10h ago

Adam Savage reviewed a similar device on his YouTube channel. Really cool device. His was quite pricey if I recall.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/SustainedSuspense 10h ago

Can it find underwater leaks through a pond liner you think?

•

u/fatcatfan 10h ago

Bro, you and me both. Came here to ask the same thing. Every year without fail right when it's time to close the pool I get a leak I can't find, and can't keep water in the pool.

•

u/RickShaw530 5h ago

Would this work on politicians?

→ More replies (1)

•

u/NiceRockyship 11h ago

Nice. As a mechanic I have one question. How much?

•

u/zergling424 11h ago

Adam savage has a great video on this device

•

u/Drummerdanneh 11h ago

My fellow creamers will have seen this one before

→ More replies (1)

•

u/PDXGuy33333 9h ago

$800 on Amazon. If I had an auto repair shop this would be on my list.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Lint_baby_uvulla 8h ago

“Babe, wake up, a new queef detector just dropped”

•

u/gamerjerome 6h ago

Pointing it in a movie theater during The Quite Place

•

u/Inspector_Spacetime7 10h ago

It does not literally see sound waves.

→ More replies (2)

•

u/Merwinite 11h ago

Amaze! Is perfect for navigating on Eridian ships.

•

u/SlimPickens77Box 11h ago

This would help me keep 1970,s cars running

•

u/Opposite-Cranberry76 11h ago

Ok that's just magic.

•

u/domthemom_2 10h ago

Two thumbs down

•

u/WispTheWanderer1 10h ago

Bro can see sounds

Bro is NOT human

•

u/einzweitres 10h ago

Some on Amazon for ~$1,000, but I'm sure the $25k versions work better!

•

u/Pyronatic 9h ago

The amount of work to calibrate that thing is probably insane. Like I imagine a half a day or a day just to calibrate it

•

u/tauzN 9h ago

Pricetag?

•

u/MoeSzyslakMonobrow 9h ago

What a fun toy

•

u/GoochGrundle 9h ago

I want one now. I don’t know what I’d use it on but I want it.

•

u/Your-cousin-It 9h ago

This is the kind of stuff I assumed Geordi could see in Next Generation

•

u/Training-Employee-18 9h ago

It is not the camera that is doing the “seeing”, it’s the sensors. The camera is just overlaying an image on top of the data from the sensors for the benefit of the user

•

u/odditytaketwo 8h ago

awesome device for bird watching.

•

u/ANEN0ME 6h ago

WHAT is it CALLED

•

u/KvBla 6h ago

I'll sell my entire shop's souls for this

•

u/LumberJesus 6h ago

I need one of these to track down a maddening buzzing sound in my dash.

•

u/AmbassadorBasic4867 4h ago

Actual useful ghost hunting tool!?!??!

•

u/nobodychosetobehere 3h ago

Pretty sure it’s microphones and software but that is cool as hell.