Hi everyone, I’m Ruggiero, a CS student working on a research project about human-computer interaction and AI.
I’ve been thinking about something that bothers me with many current AI interfaces: they generally either wait for you to explicitly ask for help, or increasingly try to take over the task.
I wanted to explore a middle ground.
I built QUIET, a small interactive prototype where the assistant observes what you’re doing and can choose how much to intervene:
- stay silent
- point you toward something
- explain / teach you
- do the task for you
The interesting part isn’t really whether AI can perform these actions. It already can.
The question I’m exploring is:
What if the AI’s job was not just to decide what to do, but when and how much to intervene?
The prototype is intentionally not AI-powered yet. All four scenarios are scripted. I’m trying to test the interaction model first, before building the underlying AI system.
You can try it here:
https://quiet-hci.pages.dev
I’d really like feedback from people interested in HCI:
- Does this interaction model feel natural?
- Would these interventions feel helpful or annoying?
- When would you want the AI to teach you instead of doing something for you?
- Does the idea still make sense knowing that the current prototype isn’t actually AI-powered?
I’m especially interested in criticism. If you think this is just another form of Clippy / an agent / contextual help, I’d also like to hear why.