Last year I got into biking after supporting my daughter at the Leadville 100MTB. Seeing all those bikers was mind altering and inspiring! After visiting multiple stores, I saw the hot pink/watermelon 2024 Crux (on sale at that), tested it in the parking lot and was SOLD! I was 61, in decent shape, and to the salespersons credit, they did try to get me to try a diverge....but they weren't as pretty. Needless to say the bike is a bit too large at size 54, I am 5'7". I did a bike fit, shortened the stem and it feels okay, hands not going numb as much, feet still do. I love the zippiness of it, but gosh, I wouldn't mind a little less jarring over rough patches, and perhaps a more relaxed geometry. Learned a lot in the last year about all that stuff. As a beginner, I had no idea bikes could be so different.
I have since tested the diverge, almost bought it, the checkpoint, the salsa flyway-which felt so smooth, but looking at its geometry, it seems similar to the Crux, also the Stigmata, not so comfy. It is so hard to tell on short test rides on pavement how they will feel after 2 hours.
Basically, is it sensible to have a more race oriented gravel bike AND a more relaxed gravel bike? Does anyone have 2 like this? I do dirt roads, gravel trails and some county park trail riding on it. Some days I want to zip around fast, and some days I think I want to take a longer, more sightseeing kind of ride. Just trying to justify it in my head.