r/conservation • u/Nila_Script • 36m ago
Protecting nature benefits who?
I mean, we spend millions to save pandas, who have very low survival instinct because it is cute and can attract tourists but not passenger pigeon, dodo, tasmanian tiger because of " Charismatic Megafauna Bias". We need vertebrates, not vertebrates, algea, fungi and plants that provides us, is charming or indirectly help us(like tourism).
So, if it a pure act of kindness, why are vertebrates(mammals, birds, fishes, etc) gets 86% of nature conservation funding
And only 6.6% for plants and less than 0.1% for fungi and algea?
Isn't it biased? Who benefits from that?