I've been using Codex to help rework the art in FrogPop, my first Unity game. One of the main criticisms was that the art didn't look consistent. Different bugs looked like they belonged in different games.

At first I kept asking for everything to match the frog. That wasn't specific enough. The crab ended up too simple, and later the bee and spider were much too big.

What helped was asking for the characters side by side at actual game size before changing the game. Once the design looked right, I asked for animation previews, then approved the integration separately. That made it easier to catch things like the upside-down spider having its eyes on the wrong part of its body.

I also learned not to replace things just because they were old. We tried new relics and zone art, but I preferred the originals and kept them.

Claude Code helped build the core game systems. I use Codex for fixes, previews and integration, with AI-assisted art tools in the process. I still review the visuals and test in Unity. The clip shows the new crab alongside other gameplay.

Older free demo: https://blion247.itch.io/frogpop-demo

It covers the first ten waves and doesn't include all the newer work shown here.

Anyone or is it just me i went 100 to 20 in like 4 hours. using sol 6.1 for simple saas backend and frontned ux....

some weeks I'm dry early, some weeks there's usage left at the reset and it just evaporates. so I built Overflow

spare week: take a priced issue from a registered repo, merged PR gets you credit dry week: price an issue in your repo, someone with a spare week ships it, your credit pays

junk PRs: you block them on GitHub like any repo, you set the price after you've seen the work, and you only owe for what you merge. you don't need to know the project either, the issue is the brief, if your agent hits a decision it asks the maintainer on the issue

no money, no keys, MIT

main reason I'm posting is I want people to register their repos. the 17 open issues are all mine (some already claimed, so the board shows fewer) and I'm not after help with those, I want spare usage going into other people's projects. 20 users so far

https://github.com/Nitjsefnie/Overflow

Why the hell is it looking for a monitor, I was making it fix a visual bug in my website.

Hi,

I"ve been long user of gpt models and anthropic models, i still remember how great 5.6 sol was and how quickly things were done. with gpt 6 release things went downhill and switched to use opus 5.5 which felt like WOW. Great understanding , clear code , no unlimited testing phases. Did try 6.1 Sol and 6 Ultra last week and felt like hell. So i did try to "downgrade" and use 5.6 sol ultra for a bit and if feels again like magic. things move fastly and more gets done in less time and more efficiently than 6.1.

Just randomly no doing anything ("reconnecting") for 20-40 seconds after hitting send is unacceptable server behavior and this has not been a temporary thing. Don't normalize this shitty service.

seeing a lot of people say these resets don’t really give us much because they keep pushing the 7 day window.

but weirdly, the faster you destroy your limit and clear your tasks, the more you actually benefit

take the Oct 11, 13 and 15 resets. if you managed to burn 100% between each one, you could theoretically use 300% of a normal weekly allowance in ~11 days instead of 21

so for heavy users who can plan around it, these resets are huge.

for normal users who save their % for later in the week or need it at specific times, though, the reset can actually be more annoying than useful.

and yes, we already have the fix

JUST MAKE IT BANKED, TIBO

I also understand Claude is the best deal right now. And more than likely a rugpull will come from that as well.

Ultimately all AI providers will reduce usage and jack up costs. That's obvious and expected.

What to do when this happens? No idea.

He was cool

I’d just used a banked reset and was about halfway through it when the forced reset landed. Back to 100%, but the 50% I still had left didn’t carry over. So I got half the use out of a reset I’d saved before it was overwritten.

Why not give us a banked reset instead and let us choose when to use it?

This little guy keeps popping up in the lower-right corner of my screen. I went into ChatGPT settings in the Mac app and chose "Hide pet," but it keeps coming back. Anybody know how to get rid of him permanently?

sorry guys i gotta be real here, sol 6.1 IS AMAZING. i keep seeing posts on here complaining about how slow it (I agree) is or whatever bro have you even used gemini 3.8 lately?? 3.8 feels way slower and f1king fdumber when you actually try to get work done. people are completely ignoring efficiency of model like who tf cares if a model spits out text in 2 seconds if the code is broken? stuff that used to take me 4 hours and 10+ prompts of arguing with gemini 3.8 or claude opus 5.5 now takes me like 3 hours and literally 2 prompts on sol. and the result isnt just "okay", its miles better. Gemini used to be my go-to for coding but lately it just overcomplicates everything or loses track of the codebase after 3 messages. sol actually gets what im trying to do on the first try without me having to babysit it. dont get me wrong tho, i 100% agree that the usage limits are pure dogshit right now. hitting the cap right in the middle of a deep session is infuriating as hell and it pisses me off too. they really need to fix that. its easily the most worth it sub right now if you do actual heavy stuff. the biggest thing for me is cb/re lot of RE work and trying to use gemini or claude for this is a literal nightmare now. every single prompt i get hit with a security flag just for pasting an assembly snippet or asking about memory pointers. im so tired of opus 5.5 lecturing me on ethics just because im looking at a stripped binary (I EVEN PUT THE FKNG PDB FİLE OF İT LİKE CMONNNN) with chatgpt i havent hit a single refusal like that (and no i didnt apply for daybreak im broke as fk). its just so much better at reversing than both claude and gemini. yesterday i threw some vtable dump at it. opus 5.5 instantly flagged it as "potentially malicious" and refused, and gemini 3.8 just same also hallucinated random Windows APIs that didnt even make sense for the registers. sol 6.1 literally reconstructed the whole struct layout, figured out the custom xor routine in one go, and even caught a pointer arithmetic bug in my own script that i missed for two days. it lowkey feels like cheating.

I am not a fanboy of openai and a hater of it but hear me out for low level stuff and RE, sol 6.1 easily clears opus 5.5 and 3.8 right now.

IS IT JUST ME?? Or is 5.6 SOL is the best for trading dashboards and basically understanding and following instructions? Been trying SOL 6 and 6.1 and even ASTRA but 5.6 seems to be the most stable.

What the hell did they do?

Hey guys so if you guys create public mcps you know what trouble everyone goes through: having to reload the mcp and the server each time an edit is made to actually test it out and see if the improvement worked. For me, it wasted time, tokens, and shortened coding runs with codex cuz it kept needing to test and test and it needed me to do that. So, I created https://github.com/Praket7/codex-mcp-hotload codex mcp hotload. It registers your mcp as a child of the hotload mcp and can restart its servers at any time, so you can instruct your agent to register the developing mcp and use it for live tests. It will show the newest tools available to it within the chat, with no need to stop a run and reload codex! let me know what you think and if i should expand to other agents (i only use codex so thats all i needed it for yet)

Tibo normally posts many times a day, joking, doing some random hypes etc.

For the last couple of days he only posts once or twice a day, do they feel the whst their users are complaining about and actually working on it? Or are they actually "locking in" as he said and getting us a very good model that can compares to the current opus?

I've been working with computers since 1977 and Unix since 1987, so I'm not particularly easy to impress when it comes to automation. But something Codex did this morning genuinely blew me away.

I was trying to move a lengthy ChatGPT Work conversation into a Codex development project. I gave Codex permission to control my Mac and told it to figure out how to transfer the context. It tried several approaches using the native ChatGPT/Codex integration, but the receiving chat could access only six messages from a conversation containing 1,651 message records.

Then something completely unexpected happened.

Codex opened Safari, navigated to the original conversation, located the download button belonging to LogGPT - a Safari extension I'd developed - and used it to export the conversation.

I never told Codex to use LogGPT. I never told it to open Safari.

It turns out Codex knew about LogGPT from its memory of previous development work. It independently recognized that the extension could solve the problem it was struggling with.

Even better, when Safari's JavaScript automation failed, Codex switched to macOS Accessibility, located the download button, and invoked it.

The result was a ZIP containing 1,651 message records, 97 artifacts, the structured conversation JSON, and an artifact manifest. Codex verified the SHA-256 hashes and ZIP integrity, then used the recovered material to reconstruct the development project's context.

I subsequently asked Codex to explain exactly how it arrived at that solution. Its explanation, including what it could verify from its execution history, is included in the article.

I've been building AI systems for a while, but watching an agent independently select and operate software I'd written was a genuine holy shit moment.

Full case study: When Codex Turned to LogGPT

global reset + banked reset incoming? 👀