The EPA Is About to Hand Oil and Gas Companies a Huge Methane-Related Gift – Mother Jones

for lack of a better term, what i mean when i say "climate-accepters" are people who accept that climate change is real, but, for the purpose of this post, otherwise misunderstand what it actually entails

Warming near Earth’s surface and cooling high in the atmosphere form a distinctive pattern. Scientists predicted that combination decades ago, and increasingly detailed observations now help distinguish human influence from natural climate fluctuations.

A review published in Earth's Future concludes that such climate “fingerprints” provide stronger evidence than they did in 2009. Benjamin Santer of the University of East Anglia led the work with Susan Solomon, David Thompson, Qiang Fu and Gabriele Hegerl.

Their institutions include MIT, Colorado State University, the University of Washington and the University of Edinburgh. The review brings together more than three decades of attribution research. It examines the scientific basis underlying the EPA’s 2009 determination that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.

Hallo,
ich habe folgende Abwägung: wir wollen von Berlin nach Venedig. Wir sind Eltern und ein Baby( 1 Jahr alt). Zug würde zwei Tage dauern über München und dann am nächsten Tag bis Venedig, ist mit kleinem Baby natürlich auch anstrengender. Flug wäre ca 200 Euro billiger. Was ist fürs Klima besser: Fliegen und die 200 Euro spenden (ich spende immer an den Klimafonds von ‘effektiv spenden’, weil sie da durch Hebelwirkungen große CO2 Einsparungen versprechen) oder Zug fahren ohne spenden ?