Context: I work for someone that does events and promotes stuff. Today I helped her clean her storage room and she gave me a bunch of stuff related to Ubisoft. She also gave me this piece of artwork and I'm wondering if anyone can help me out.

I finally got around to playing the DLC for Assassin's Creed IV and was surprised to see that the main game had mods for getting a higher FPS cap, while Freedom Cry did not, despite both games sharing pretty much the same Engine and tech under the hood.

So I got curious and reverse engineered the main game's mod. AC Freedom Cry now supports high frame-rates on PC, with open source patcher code to allow for future improvements by the community.

Gameplay showcasing the mod working.

Edit: fixed the YouTube link. Sorry everyone!

is the most beautiful map ever created in the gaming history for me. the details, the landscapes, views, everything looks so unreal it feels like you re actually in Norway. Thanks Ubisoft for this masterpiece of a game (even tho it might be a bad assassin's creed game for some, its a absolutely amazing viking game for all of us)

Evior and Randvi, as it should be ❤️ beautifully done ❤️

I've reuploaded the post with all the different concepts in it because I found out I couldn't split them across different posts

I've chosen to do a project, which is centred around concept art, on Assassin's Creed and at this point in the project I'm looking for audience feedback.

The different concepts are separated by the slides with a red background.

For the first, the time period is 1066 during the Norman invasion of England and the Assassin himself is from Normandy.

The second time period is 1588 Spain during the time of the Spanish Armada and the Assassin is from Spain.

The third time period is late 1800's at the later half of the wild west with the setting being Los Angeles

The fourth setting is the discovery of the new world in south/central America

If you could let me know your opinions on my designs (positive or negative), that would be much appreciated thanks.

So I've 100% completed every mainline game in the franchise at least once and the majority of them I've done multiple times but I wanna ask the rest of the community what you all think is the easiest game to 100% complete. We all know there's a lot of hard things in these games like the full sync on the tank mission in brotherhood or getting through the bloat in valhalla but as a whole what does everyone think would be the easiest game to 100% complete as a whole?

1. The stiff animation lock after running and double assassinations in AC Black Flag Resynced completely kills Edward's momentum. Instead of a smooth flow, the engine forces a hard pause after every stealth kill. Please update the physics buffering so we can maintain our forward sprint velocity. #ACResynced u/UbisoftSupport

I've chosen to do a project, which is centred around concept art, on Assassin's Creed and at this point in the project I'm looking for audience feedback.

The time period is 1066 during the Norman invasion of England and the Assassin himself is from Normandy.

If you could let me know your opinions on my designs (positive or negative), that would be much appreciated thanks.

This is Kevin, a Crested Caracara who lives at the Lake District Wildlife Park in England, and he appeared in a live action Assassin's Creed TV advert.

I was wondering if anyone could find the commercial he was in?

Only ever played up to half of Brotherhood years ago, but always was intrigued by this world. So I decided to finally go back to it, but I wanted to FULLY dive into it. Thankfully, I am an autistic master completionist who loves making spreadsheets. So I made this Assassin's Creed list which encompasses most games (mainline and spin-offs), all the comics I could find, all the novels and the few movies/short films. All neatly arranged in mostly publication order except for a few things here and there where it made sense to read earlier or later.

I wasn't going to post this one on here because I didn't think it would interest others like the Transformers or G.I. Joe lists would (that you can find on the other tabs in this spreadsheet, give it a look, they are MASSIVE!) but in my last post for the G.I. Joe, someone said that it would be helpful for their son who's on a big Assassin's Creed kick, so I thought others might actually be into it. So there it is! Hope it can be of use to anybody else haha

Was thinking about how much lore was around Subject 16 (Clay), Lucy, the first civ etc.

If done well, I think they could make a really cool prequel (could be a show or game) similar to how Andor was made or Edgerunners (concept wise).

It would tell the tale of Clay leading up to the incident.

I know they made a DLC years ago and the story telling was great but let’s be honest, they could’ve done so much better.

It would show the dark side of Abstergo and what led to the Desmond saga to a character who deserved more screen time.

Any thoughts on this?

So I've been replaying AC1 for the first time in over a decade, loving the game and nostalgia trip, but there's something that's been bothering me in the back of my mind. Very early on in the game, Lucy mentions English is the common language in the Animus and that she could make the language more authentic if she could. So here's the thing, why do those Templar knights in Acre all speak German? Wouldn't they also speak modern English, for the sake of the Animus? Additionally, why modern German? The language spoken and written during the Third Crusade would have been French-dominated with German, Swiss and English being the minority, not to mention the language during 1100s sounded absolutely different from it is now.

I did look up if anybody had answered this before but it seems like I only found that the Templars spoke German, not why.

One inconsistency I noticed in Black Flag Resynced is that the new Havana scenes show Anne eager to kill Torres, even though she has already heard Edward identify him as the governor. Yet later in the final mission, she asks, “Who's this ‘Torres’? And what's your man done to earn a death sentence?” This can sound as though she's only now learning who he is. However, I think there's another way to interpret the line. Anne already knows his official position and may despise him as a representative of Spanish authority, but she doesn't necessarily know who he is beyond his title or why Edward specifically wants him dead. So rather than forgetting who Torres is, she could be asking who he really is and what he's done to have Edward and the assassins so obsessed with killing him. This interpretation makes the scenes more compatible, although the added content still makes the dialogue feel somewhat awkward and potentially inconsistent. Do you think this is a realistic headcanon?

Solution for Ship Swap Request - Post-Game Unlock Only

Hi Ubisoft Resynced team,

We understand why full ship model swap (like Queen Anne's Revenge) wasn't approved. Some story missions are too narrow for a Frigate/Man O War.

Suggestion: Enable true ship model swap ONLY after 100% story completion / in free-roam post-game.

- Story missions stay locked to Jackdaw model to prevent bugs

- After ending, player can switch to Queen Anne, Man O War, La Dama Negra at any Harbor Master

- Hull shape changes for real, not just texture

This way new players won't get stuck, but veteran players who already finished the game (like many of us from PS3 era) can finally sail the Queen Anne we saw only in mission.

P.S. Yes, we know there are PC mods for this, but many of us play on PS / Xbox / Switch and don't have a PC. We need an official feature, not a mod. Console players also deserve to sail Queen Anne.

Many of us are waiting for this and New Game+ as well. Thank you!

I wanted it to resemble a typical renaissance chiaroscuro portrait!

Man, how I wish I could wipe my memory and play AC2 all over again

At Liverpool Comic Con yesterday

I'd like to start be apologising and admitting that I, myself, am not extremely well versed in Assassin's creed's lore. When I was around fourteen, I played Unity and gave Odyssey a go, and as much as I loved the storytelling and atmosphere of both games, I was a little young to grasp it and life got in the way of finishing my runs, so this is not coming from a super-fan, just a curious 18 year old.

I'm Irish, and lately, just for fun, I've been looking for games set in the country. I've played "Crowded. Followed." (Set up in Belfast) and other Irish indie games, but I've always found myself wondering how came this series in particular never found a way to make an Irish-based game. I feel like there's so much interesting, controversial history that could make a hell of a game to play through and open a lot of discussions. To me it seemed like a perfect fit. Unity was all over the civil unrest in France during the revolution and Arlo's time in prison and his escape was a pretty awesome plot point, which could absolutely be touched on from an Irish history standpoint as well (if they were to take the "Wind that Shakes the Barley" route) I can't help but draw similarities to what's brewing in my head; a game set shortly after 1916 in a city like Dublin or Cork. I feel like they could do a lot with the English occupation and the suppression of the Irish language, the rebels, the fear of persecution or violence by the English. It seems like a really interesting story could take place there, and Unity proved that they could more than handle a tense, city setting full of unhappy people.

But, of course, I'll say it again- I could be totally wrong! I really don't know enough to fake my way through the fandom, so please take that into account if this is a stupid question or if my memories of Unity's themes are totally messed up. Thank you for reading!

In Unity there are these little cafes around Paris where you can find people playing classical music. Does anybody know what these classical tracks are called? There's six of them that play on a loop. Timestamps for each - 00:05, 01:16, 02:29, 03:40, 10:52, 16:51

video credit: letsgohotcheeto

Finally playing the Ezio trilogy for the first time and just had a bit of an out of body experience— when Desmond is in the Colosseum, Lucy’s voice over comms makes a mention that “today’s date is October tenth… Why is today so important? We’re just picking up the apple and leaving”

Really insane to get to that scene on October 10th of all days, and totally by coincidence!!

Finished the main game and playing dlc right now. Even though it is the same map it plays out very different. I feel like main game has gta vibes while dlc has batman similarities. id say this one is in top5 what u think about and which is ur favourite

When it came to the Isu, they mostly came off as politicians, diplomats, or scientists. But Odin's side came off as more military; in their memories, they seemed more military. Just wondering if it was just me, or if anyone else noticed this. Odin kinda came off more like a General then and didn't seem to care about the Science. Isu, seen as Greek gods or Frost Giants, depending on whose memory you were watching, was like a dictator or a group of scientists and engineers. Odin seemed to care only about wartime fighting strategy and finding the enemy's weakness and then exploiting it.

I know there's no new game plus. But all the items you got from the shop do carry over, so that would probably help I'm thinking. Has anyone restarted the game and enjoyed it? Or does it not feel worth it to those who have done this?

I have been noticing a recent trend in the Assassin's Creed franchise where Ubisoft has been setting the recent Assassin's Creed games in questionable and often times nonsensical time periods that nobody really cares about or wants to play in. In my opinion, some of the recent Assassin's Creed time periods in recent games like Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Assassin's Creed Mirage and Assassin's Creed Shadows and recently the upcoming Assassin's Creed Hexe which is set in Europe in the 16th century that's said to include freaking outlandish things like witchcraft and witches have been completely nonsensical and non engaging. Why did Ubisoft feel the need to set an Assassin's Creed game in the Viking Age of history in England and Norway? Nobody gives a crap about Vikings.

That's not an interesting or a immersive time period. Who wants to play a game where you run around England pillaging villages and raiding monasteries while sailing the rivers of England in the 9th century? That shit is boring. What's the point of setting an Assassin's Creed game in the Viking Age when there is virtually very few historical figures from that time period to really care about and it's just nothing but forests and mountains? It's mind boggling why Ubisoft felt that the Viking Age would be an acceptable time period to set an Assassin's Creed game in. They should've tooken a look at the setting and they should've been like: "I don't know if anyone wants to play a video game where you play as a Viking". No. That time period of the Viking Age in Assassin's Creed Valhalla should have never have been made.

Another Assassin's Creed time period that I think is nonsensical is the setting of Assassin's Creed Mirage in the Islamic Golden Age that features that one character from Assassin's Creed Valhalla that wasn't really all that interesting: Basim. That time period is not interesting. Nobody cares about that time period. Nobody talks about that time period. They say they set AC Mirage in 9th century Baghdad as a "homage" to Assassin's Creed 1 in 2007 when I'd argue that Assassin's Creed Revelations as well as the Assassin's Creed novel The Secret Crusade by Oliver Bowden is more of a homage to Assassin's Creed 1 that Mirage is as it made it feel like you were playing the original Assassin's Creed game with Altair whereas Assassin's Creed Mirage is basically a boring rehash of Aladdin and One Thousand and One Nights that really isn't all that good. Basim is literally just Aladdin. I wouldn't be surprised if the team at Ubisoft took one look at Disney's Aladdin and decided to make their own version of it that's not engaging at all. The time period of that game makes no sense whatsoever and it feels more suitable for an Aladdin or a Prince of Persia game than it is for an Assassin's Creed game. No. The Islamic Golden Age is a time period that nobody cares about which was probably more violent and more barbaric than a Mortal Kombat game in real life. I don't think that particular time period is acceptable for an Assassin's Creed game.

The most recent Assassin's Creed game Assassin's Creed Shadows is set in Feudal Japan in the time of ninjas and Shinobi and samurais which features some black guy as a samurai and another generic Japanese woman as a ninja who's name sounds like it was ripped out an anime. That time period of Feudal Japan is quite frankly the worst time periods that an Assassin's Creed game has ever been set in. I mean Jesus f**king Christ, stop making games set in Feudal Japan. I'm not trying to be xenophobic, but I am getting sick and tired of this trend of setting video games in Feudal Japan with ninjas and samurais. It has been done to death in other video games like Ghost of Tsushima, Ninja Garden, Rise of the Ronin, Sly Cooper Thieves in Time and Ghost of Yotei. It needs to stop. Enough is enough. Ninjas and samurai have done to death in various forms of media and I don't get why that particular time period is so popular. It befuddles me. People need to take a break from setting games in Ancient Japan. It's getting to be oversaturation at this point. I guess Ubisoft doesn't give a shit about it being oversaturated. That time period isn't really all that interesting to begin with. It needs to die down. It's getting tiring at this point. The only reason why Ubisoft decided to make an Assassin's Creed game set in Feudal Japan was because Ghost of Tsushima made a crap ton of money in 2020 and Ubisoft wanted to jump on the bandwagon. I refuse to accept the fact that it has been one of the most requested time periods for Ubisoft to set an Assassin's Creed game in. People couldn't have been that eager to play an Assassin's Creed game where you get to play as a ninja. The demand for it couldn't have been that high.

And now the upcoming Assassin's Creed game: Assassin's Creed Hexe is set in yet another boring ass, nonsensical time period, this time 16th century Germany that involves the occult and magic. Why? Ubisoft needs to set the Assassin's Creed games in better, more engaging time periods that people actually want to play in that are more popular and historically engaging instead of being boring and not engaging or immersive like the settings of Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Mirage, Shadows and now Hexe. There are countless other historical time periods that Ubisoft can set an Assassin's Creed game in that are better than the recent time periods that Ubisoft has decided to set their modern Assassin's Creed games in. In fact, I'm going to list off some historical time periods that would make perfect sense to set an Assassin's Creed game in that will be more engaging and more immersive than the drab time periods that the modern Assassin's Creed games have been set in.

These are the historical eras that I would like Ubisoft to set an Assassin's Creed game in instead of these boring, nonsensical and non engaging time periods that nobody in the universe wants to play in:

A Western Assassin's Creed game: That historical time period is tailor made for an Assassin's Creed game. You've got a lot of historical people that Ubisoft can implement into the game like Jesse James, Doc Holliday, Wyatt Earp, Annie Oakley, Calamity Jane, Pecos Bill and Billy the Kid. There can be a plethora of different weapons you can choose from, lots of different cities to explore, and a lot of other things like riding a train to get to point A to point B like in Assassin's Creed Syndicate. There should be no reason why Ubisoft cannot create an Assassin's Creed game set in the Wild West with that much potential. That's mind boggling that they refuse to make an Assassin's Creed game set in the Wild West where players can live out their fantasy of being an outlaw. And don't give me the excuse of it's going to face competition from Red Dead Redemption. So what if it receives competition from Red Dead Redemption. As long as it's an engaging game all around, Ubisoft shouldn't have to worry about competing with Rockstar Games' Red Dead Redemption series. That game needs to happen. It's practically begging for Ubisoft to turn it into an Assassin's Creed game. Playing as an outlaw in the Wild West is a hell of a lot more exciting and engaging than playing as a Viking or as a ninja. Westerns used to be insanely popular back in the day. A Assassin's Creed game set in the Wild West could reinvigorate interest in the Western genre. It needs to happen. Give it to me.

A Assassin's Creed game set during the Russian Revolution: That's another historical time period that's tailor made for an Assassin's Creed game. The Russian Revolution is such an interesting time period for an Assassin's Creed game to cover. Imagine playing in Russia and the surrounding countries in the late 1910s where you go up against the Bolsheveks trying to take over Russia where you get to meet Rasputin as well as the Romanav family before they get horrifically executed by the Bolsheveks. What if you could prevent that from happening? What if you could start a rebellion against the Russian empire? An Assassin's Creed game has never been set in Russia before and that would be an engaging experience for an Assassin's Creed game. Why hasn't Ubisoft considered setting an Assassin's Creed game in that time period? That would be a perfect time to set an Assassin's Creed game in. It needs to happen. Give that game to me.

An Assassin's Creed Prohibition game: That would be a phenomenal choice to set an Assassin's Creed game in. Imagine facing off against Al Capone and his cartel or infiltrating a speakeasy to bust a bootlegging operation. That would be phenomenal. That could be an engaging setting for an Assassin's Creed game. Imagine playing as a gangster rebelling against Prohibition in the 1920s. That would be amazing. That's 100% engaging. You can drive a car to get places instead of being forced to go on foot through environments. I want an Assassin's Creed game where you get to fight gangsters and organized crime in the 1920s.

And the last time period that I'd like Ubisoft to set an Assassin's Creed game in is: The 1960s. Do I need to say anything? That was a turbulent time in history. You've got the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the JFK assassination, counterculture revolution, British Invasion and other things. That time period is a no brainer for an Assassin's Creed game to be set in. It's mind boggling that so few video games are set in that time period.

Those time periods that I just listed would be better and more engaging time periods for Ubisoft to set a future Assassin's Creed game in than the Viking Age, The Islamic Golden Age, Feudal Japan and 16th century Germany. Those time periods are more logical and more sensical for an Assassin's Creed game to be set in than the time periods that the recent Assassin's Creed games have covered. The fans would be jumping up and down in anticipation and jubilation to want to play in those settings such as the Wild West, the Russian Revolution, The Prohibition Era and the 1960s. I hope Ubisoft sees this Reddit post and takes my suggestions to set a time period that's engaging and immersive and that people want to play that people actually care about instead of boring time periods that no one in their right mind would set an Assassin's Creed game in or want to play. Ubisoft needs to stop picking these random nonsensical and boring time periods for their Assassin's Creed games. At this rate, the fans are going to be less interested in playing future Assassins Creed games because they're set in drab historical time periods. People are eventually are going to be like: "Are you freaking kidding me? Another boring time period for an Assassin's Creed game. Yeah, I'm not interested in playing that. I want something more engaging."