r/TopCharacterTropes • • 19h ago

Hated Tropes (Hated)changing somenthing to be more "progressive" ends up being a bad thing

Now to be clear,i am not one of these "anti-woke" losers that complain some people exist,and i am also not the type to complain about changing somenthing in a new version or adaptation,however there are cases where it did ended up being a bad idea.

-In the anime of Cowboy Bebop there is the character Gren,despite being short lived the character is very memorable specially thanks to his tragic story.Basically his story was that he was a soldier from the titan war who was a great friend with Vicious(the main bad guy)after the war he was emprisioned thanks to Vicious who testified against him and he was forced to take a experimental drug that caused him hormonal problems,giving him a feminine appearence and even breasts.

In the Netflix live action,for some reasons they decided Gren was going to be non-binary,which wouldn't be a problem(some people believe he was gay in the anime)if it wasn't for the fact that they also removed all the nuances and complexities that made the character memorable and interesting,instead of a tragic war veteran that was betrayed and had his body changed against his will,Gren is just kinda there.

-The original Rugrats cartoon had the couple Betty and Howard,Betty was a big and masculine woman while Howard was a smaller and nervous man,it was a genuine interesting relationship that stood out from the other couples who were the standard straight couple.

In the new series however they replaced Howard with a woman named Trish,two things,first off why?What was the problem with having a woman being the stronger in a straight relationship?Second why does Hollywood seem to think that every tomboy or masculine woman is a lesbian?

Overall not the worst thing but it is jarring that they had a gender reverse roled that was progressive and decided that wasn't enough.

-Oh man,this one pisses me off the most so i am gonna have to break it down

So back in the late 80s and 90s there was this anime called Saint Seiya also knows as Knights of the zodiac,it tells the story of knights who fight for the Goddess Athena to protect earth,being divided in the golden,silver and bronze knights,the anime was a huge hit in latin america and Europe and while it floped in the US it still has a loyal fanbase.

Being a fan myself i can't recommend it enough,now granted the story does have a fair share of flaws,and that's because the author was honestly just making stuff up as he went along(also a lot of side characters are poorly used or even forgotten about)still it is a great story you should check out

But then a couple of years back Netflix got the rights and decided to a 3D reboot,in this reboot they decided to make the story more "american" to try to bring more american viewers,now i could go on and on a big rant about how that was a bad idea and the execution was so terrible that it made me want to strangle someone but this post is about one specific change.

So Saint Seiya has five main characters,those are Pegasus Seiya,Dragon Shiryu,Cygnus Hyoga,Phoenix Ikki and finally Andromeda Shun.

While the other four characters were the standard masculine and brute male characters who were always ready to throw punches,Shun was smaller,more sensitive and even feminine looking,a pacifist who didn't liked fighting,but don't mistake that for weakness because Shun was loyal to his friends and was extremely powerful.

Then Netflix decided to change Shun into a girl named Shaun.

So wait,you have a male character who goes against every male stereotype and you turn him into just another generic female character?

When asked about it,the showrunner Eugene Son said he made that change because there was no girl in the group and having a all boys group wouldn't be acceptable nowadays

First off that's not true because Athena was also part of the main cast,yeah she wasn't the fighting type but she still helped quite a lot in the story even saving the knights on several occasions,second if you wanted to add a girl to the main group why not use Marin or Shaina?Hell,if you were going to change the story anyway why not turn Seiya sister into a knight?

Thankfully this monstrosity was cancelled(so much for trying to bring more fans)

7.9k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

674

u/ArcaneMadman 17h ago

Time to beat a dead horse, Netflix Devil May Cry

In Devil May Cry, demons are demons, creatures born from the Underworld which is a reality of darkness to our reality of light. They are magical beings that worship evil and power, with the strongest ruling over the weak while the weak serve until they can claim some more power and force their way up the ladder. They look down on humans both as food, since human blood powers them up, and as inferior beings for being weak. They fundamentally lack "heart" or the ability to love, so when one of them shows the capacity to care for another being it is a HUGE deal.

In the Netflix show, they instead make it that demons are just aliens from another dimension that just like humans can be good or evil, and makes an entire lower caste of people that look like normal humans that live in the demon world that act as an allegory for middle eastern refugees from the Iran war, and makes the american government invade the demon world for its resources and abuse these innocent demons. Unfortunately it still wants Dante to kill demons guilt free, so it makes it so that there are still evil demons that act like they do in the games, eating humans and looking like monsters. Oh, and demons are biologically more aggressive and violent. So the allegories for arabic refugees of war are cannibalistic and biologically violent, and the only ones you can trust are the ones that look "normal". Which is so much more racist than it needed to be and echoes dangerous rhetoric about immigrants and refugees, but what did you expect from a showrunner cozying up to Trump?

310

u/SuperSaiyanTrunks 16h ago

Why cant anyone just stick to the source material? Its like these directors take something awesome and beloved and think hmmm im going to do something COMPLETELY different. Surely the fans wont take issue!

121

u/myrmonden 16h ago

well the director of this openly hates games so.

74

u/RealityOk9823 15h ago

Why do they keep doing that? "Let's make this fresh by having someone who either hates the show/game/movie or knows nothing about it". OK, it worked once for Starship Troopers, but outside of that?

37

u/myrmonden 15h ago

because they SUCK so they cant get any investment for their own projects.

9

u/RealityOk9823 15h ago

Fair, but it seems to be a thankfully dying trend with the movie studios where they're like "let's hire the guy that doesn't like this franchise to make the new movie!".

6

u/myrmonden 15h ago

ye but not for netflix when it comes to tv series

1

u/RealityOk9823 8h ago

Ha, true.

1

u/blitzbom 8h ago

Meanwhile Tony Gilroy is on record that he's not a fan of Star Wars but made one of the best side stories.

Don't give non-fans keys to an adaptation.

1

u/blitzbom 8h ago

Brandon Sanderson has said that someone bought the rights to Emperors Soul and the script that came back was about pirates. Exactly what you said, someone had an idea for a story that they couldn't get greenlit so they bought his.

Part of the reason that it took so long to get anything of his put on screen and one of his requirements being he needed control over the project.

1

u/myrmonden 7h ago

BUT I WANT TO MAKE A STORYU ABOUT PIRAITES !"!

yes...its a very known issue a lot of terrible writers /producers etc. Cannot get greenlit, mostly because they just F suck, so they instead ONLY can get jobs writing on shows that are part of a franchise like castlevania, cowboy bepop, etc this is basically most of Netflix shows, Now these people HATE the actual source material they dont wan to write about some stupid vampire hunter or w.e thjey wanna write a story about a space lesbian cowgirl that (half cow half girl) that is on a fender bender trying to fuk transdragons underwater

6

u/Loki_Agent_of_Asgard 12h ago

Starship Troopers is a fluke, and only works because it's (excellent) sci-fi action schlock but it is not remotely an adaptation of the book and has basically no similarities whatsoever. Like Starship Troopers the movie is so abysmal as an adaptation that it's actively damaged the view of the book and made brainlets think it's fascistic when that's not remotely accurate.

1

u/RealityOk9823 8h ago

I love the book and the movie but for totally different reasons.

1

u/Loki_Agent_of_Asgard 7h ago

Same, the movie is FANTASTIC as a film, but the only thing it has in common with the book is the name of the characters.

8

u/extinct_cult 11h ago

The director wanted to be the one who "revives" the series, but dmc5 came out and it rocked, so he was mad that a game, from the game series he was adapting, was good

2

u/Kaining 12h ago

Honnetstly i've come to term with it i'm ok with that pathetic ego trip from most producer. I've got so many thing in the different backlogs that having to add good adaptation to my game/book/movie/tvshow pile is unmanageable.

Please, continue to make slop not worth my time. It's finite and there's so much more that's worth seeing.

It's the "imma gonna invent Chess 2(tm)" syndrome. No, you won't. It's a waste of ressource, don't bother me anymore !

1

u/Rider-Idk-Ultima-Hy 12h ago

Because their blinded by their ego. We could’ve gotten a good american Yakuza show, but they SQUANDERED IT!

3

u/Secuter 8h ago

I'm amazed that people who openly hates or mocks the source material is chosen. Like, what made the studios think that they'd do good with that material when they state how much they dislike and what to change it?

3

u/Cavery210 7h ago

Adi Shankar is also a hypocrite who hates the Iraq War, yet showed up at Trump's inauguration, which also got us into a pointless war against Muslims.

53

u/NatashOverWorld 14h ago

A lot of times apparently the director has their own story they can't get produced, so they take someone else's IP, skin it and wear it over their personal project, which produces iPs that are just as horrifying as it sounds.

Or just plain ego of course, like the Witcher series. The directors hated the original story and thought they could make fanfiction of it that surpassed the original.

They could not.

4

u/Verraise-Mage 3h ago

Henry Gigachad dropping the role because it wasn't book-accurate:

153

u/audiodudedmc 15h ago

I blame superiority complex, I think hollywood script writers think they are better than people who write video game scripts, even when said video game stories are more beloved and successful than anything that they have done in their entire careers.

15

u/Golden_Alchemy 13h ago

As i say in other comment, it is more than the studio buys the scripts, think it will not work without a strong name behind, buys the license and then applies the mask over.

6

u/oops_all_memes 9h ago

Not the case for DMC. Adi Shankar fought to do DMC. It was a shock to me that apparently what he loved about DMC is... I've no fucking idea tbh now that I typed it out. I've no idea why he wanted to do DMC so bad

8

u/Demon_AbyssWalker 8h ago

Kenny Omega(Pro-Wrestler and Big Capcom guy) had him on his podcast and the idiot absolutely self-reported that he wanted to be the savior of what he thought was a dead franchise and got mad when he found out about DMCV being a thing

1

u/TechnicalBen 5h ago

Also swapping scripts and titles. Often a script is for "movie/show A" but they want to publish/push it, and "brand X/label C" is what's popular, so they just go with an entire branding swap. Like "This is actually an alien invasion book, but Zombies are the big thing now, so... just make it about zombies, okay?" corporate meddling.

2

u/sunstruker 12h ago

not just video games, mangás too, and intentionally ignore the fans (dragon ball evolution was ass and both goku and picollo's actors were dragon ball fans who still couldnt help fixing all this)

7

u/MiseryGyro 15h ago

Nah I will defend writers. When you do an adaptation you do have to make it your own thing. You cannot just recreate what happened before. It would bore people already familiar with the material.

Adi Shankar just sucks and his shows suck

10

u/Slateboard 11h ago

It really seems like 'making it your own thing' is what has people upset over many adaptations.

Making pre-existing work your own thing sounds more like fanfiction.

Or am I misunderstanding your words?

1

u/MiseryGyro 9h ago

A lot of you all seem to think "make it your own" means "change it completely"

Let's look at Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings. Peter Jackson had to make a film. He only has so much time an audience can sit down to watch his movie.

Inherently he cannot fit all of Tolkien's work in that time frame. So he fits what he can. To be economical with time he does something like remove Glorifindel and gives Arwen more prominence.

That is not Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, it's now Peter Jackson's adaptation. His own thing.

If you are adapting anything you have to start asking yourself what can stay and what must be cut

1

u/Verraise-Mage 3h ago edited 3h ago

There's a difference between removing side characters from one chapter, and doing a 180 on the story, characters, and lore, especially considering DMC was already voiced visual media.

Lord of the Rings characters spoke unsubtitled Elvish, referenced the Silmarillion, relied on in-universe information, and lots of lines are written in Tolkien's style or just make zero sense unless you read the books ("Fourth Eorlingus!").

1

u/MiseryGyro 3h ago

Glorifindel was one example I chose of many from Jackson's Lord of the Rings. My father has been complaining about the lack of Tom Bombadil for almost 30 years.

Jaws and Jurassic Park are good examples of Stephen Spielburg knowing what subplots to cut and what characters to change.

When it's done well, none of us care. We only care when it's bad.

10

u/amaROenuZ 10h ago

Nah I will defend writers. When you do an adaptation you do have to make it your own thing. You cannot just recreate what happened before. It would bore people already familiar with the material.

I disagree strenuously. Some of the best films ever made are faithful, by the numbers adaptations of the source material. Lord of the Rings, the Godfather, the Wizard of Oz, the Princess Bride, No Country for Old Men, the Shining, Silence of the Lambs, they're all good precisely because they refrained from trying to "make it your own thing", and instead preserved the plots, themes, and settings that people came to the theatre to see. Your job when adapting a book, a game, a play, a comic book, is to make the adjustments needed to translate mediums, not to use the original work as a costume for the story you pitched and got shot down on.

2

u/blkbullnyc 4h ago

In the case of The Princess Bride, it helps when the guy who wrote the book also wrote the screenplay.

0

u/MiseryGyro 9h ago edited 9h ago

I'm assuming you mean Jackson's Lord of the Rings films? Because those famously cut a lot from the books and changed the character arc of Aragorn.

Book Frodo is 50 when he leaves the Shire.

You are dead wrong about your very first example. And a number of your examples. They all famously divert from the books in some way. Except for No Country for Old Men. Edit: McCarthy wrote the script for No Country first then wrote it as a book so it would get made I believe

Stephen King famously hates the Shining film because Jack Torrance is his negative self insert. And in the novel Jack is given a small redemption at the end.

2

u/HarrisonTheBarbarian 5h ago

I'm assuming you mean Jackson's Lord of the Rings films? Because those famously cut a lot from the books. Book Frodo is 50 when he leaves the Shire.

Hence the "adjust for the medium". Why waste time in an already massive movie trilogy when you can cut to the chase. Quite frankly, it's a small change and certainly doesn't "do it's own thing".

And the movie Trilogy famously has a lot of content CUT from the final cuts played in theater. Everytime there's a new one we learn that there's apparently even more cut scenes.

1

u/MiseryGyro 3h ago

Jackson's films fundamentally change Aragorn as a character. They needed to give the trilogy a character in the B plot that goes through a hero's journey.

Elrond is changed to be antagonistic to Aragorn in that story. In the books he loves him.

If I was to explain all the work Peter Jackson did to "adjust to the medium" I would be here all day.

And that work is my point. It was a substantial task to translate these books to film and it required creative decisions from Jackson. And writing from him and Fran Walsh when they veered from Tolkien.

5

u/ERedfieldh 12h ago

The Wheel of Time.

That's all I'm gonna say.

2

u/bigtiddieslover 11h ago

Make their own thing but sadly they suck at that

2

u/Godzillagamer15777 12h ago

Monster adaption

1

u/mega153 11h ago

People forget that adaptations and even translations are not good in 1 to 1 transitions to different media. Look at the Last Airbender live action for an attempt at directly copying the source.

8

u/Bacon042302 11h ago

Not really a good example as the issue people have is how much was changed

1

u/RobertPham149 8h ago

Yeah I am also of the opinion that writers adapting to the screen need to change it into its own thing that is fitting with the medium. However, what grinds my gear is that whatever you adapt, you must keep the thematic and emotional core intact, but showrunners consistently miss the mark on this.

1

u/blkbullnyc 4h ago

I agree. An adaptation isnt supposed to copy. It's supposed to adapt. Imagine being a part of the fandom of the book The Orchid Thief and being excited because the movie version is coming out. Would they be mad because it wasnt exactly like the book? I can't imagine a writer/filmmaker just copying and pasting soemone else's work and expecting to be respected. I definitely wouldnt want to be considered a glorified Xerox machine.

-1

u/PM_ME_SMALL__TIDDIES 12h ago

Nearly every anime adaption in existence begs to differ

And the ones that actually followed your logic are wildly panned lol

5

u/MiseryGyro 12h ago

Both Dragon Ball Z and One Piece are so infamously poorly paced that we got Kai and are getting The One Piece on Netflix.

1

u/PM_ME_SMALL__TIDDIES 12h ago

Manga to anime. Not anime to new anime(which most often only exists because the first adaption didn't follow the manga)

4

u/Misa_rosia 12h ago

FMA 2003 catching strays

2

u/PM_ME_SMALL__TIDDIES 12h ago

I didn't want to name names but we all knew the guilty parties.

That horrid 3d Berserk too.

1

u/RaDiOaCtIvEpUnK 11h ago

The 3d Berserk was such a tease too. The first couple of minutes of it is done in really nice 2d that was really great. Then everything else was just wildly crap 3d. All it could do was make you wish the rest of it was in that 2d style, but no. Just tempting you with what could be.

And they even do this again at the start of season 2 just in case you forgot things could be better, but won’t. Such an ass thing to do.

1

u/TheGentleSenior 10h ago

FMA 2003 is still worlds above something like Berserk 2016 though. Even when it outpaced the manga and started doing its own thing, it was still pretty damn good.

0

u/94MIKE19 6h ago

This was me for the whole of the 2023 WGA/SAG-AFTRA Strike:

6

u/VanguardVixen 15h ago

See Amazon and Stargate. They rejected the newest idea because it's too close to classic Stargate and the crowd. There are some people in positions of power which are simply nuts.

3

u/StevieMJH 9h ago

The wild part is they said the quiet part out loud.

"We didn't want Martin Gero to make it because it was too similar to what fans liked in the past."

What?

1

u/VanguardVixen 9h ago

Yeah, it is absolutely baffling. Not just rejecting the concept but also saying it in the face of their very audience. It's like.. are you averse of making money? Do you deliberately torpedo your own company here? It's like Amazon here was infiltrated by a competing company.

5

u/TheFlyingSheeps 15h ago

Because egotistical writers and directors who could never create anything worthwhile hijack existing IPs and fans in order to shoehorn their own creation

6

u/Shikabane_Sumi-me 12h ago

Cause Adi Shankar wanted to be heralded as the one to bring back Devil May Cry in the mainstream. I am not joking. There was an interview where he was working on the Netflix series a long time ago and he wanted to bring it back since there wasn't a game since 4. Then Capcom made 5 except Adi didn't get the memo or know about it, for some reason, until a few months after that game came out. Apparently he was furious over that. He felt Capcom stole his thunder.

The other thing to keep in mind is that Adi always wants to make original stories but Netflix doesn't let him. So he takes other properties and uses them as an engine for his stories. Many folks don't know but he did this with Castlevania. Adi wanted to make a show about how religion was bad but couldn't get it greenlit. So he used to concept in Castlevania instead. To be fair, the first Netflix Castlevania series did turn out fine. He wanted to do another original series but Netflix executives denied him, so we ended up with Devil May Cry.

5

u/allquietonzanzibar 15h ago

Those people while being talentless corporate losers, think they are superior to the original's authors and therefore have the right to change the source material however they see fit.

3

u/Golden_Alchemy 13h ago

A lot of times, it is because people and studios buy scripts and then executives start thinking that without a real license or a name people will not know the movie/it will not work. So, they have a script, see a license of a game/book/something that looks kind of similar to the original script and then buy it.

3

u/SuperBackup9000 13h ago

I mean, everyone loved the Castlevania anime (DMC anime creator was a producer) despite that being one giant mess full of extremely odd decisions stated right from the get go.

1

u/TransBrandi 12h ago

Many of these people want to make their own thing, but "existing IP" is sometimes the only way for them to get the studios to greenlight anything, so they use it as a backdoor to tell their own stories. Tale as old as time. Just look at the original Super Mario Bros. Movie from the 1990s. It's basically another movie with a tiny bit of Mario wrapped around it.

1

u/ScrambledxEggzz 12h ago

These writers want there own series but can't get it greenlit. So they pitch an exisiting IP that is gauranteed to make money and then change the story completely to what they wanted to write.

1

u/Ensign-Nemo 10h ago

Directors want to leave their mark. Netflix DMC is an example of how not to do it.

1

u/Thin-Nerve6367 9h ago

Funny enough though the new DMC anime IS actually pretty good when it's not trying to shove politics in your face. And since S3 SHOULD be moving away from that completely I have high hopes for it

1

u/Mr_Piddles 9h ago

A lot of the Netflix DMC is Adi Shankar "fixing" things.

1

u/Such-Cookie7226 5h ago

Tbf to dramatically changed adaptations (for example Starship Troopers and the Shining) making something different than the source material can have great results. The important part is these examples had reasons and thought behind them (Criticism of the source material and adaptation for different medium & emphasizing a different interpretation that the source downplays/denies) and weren’t just trying to be different or tell an unrelated story. The DMC show is a great example (imho) of someone having an idea for an unrelated show and just slapping an existing inappropriate license on it to get it funded and out the door.

A good example (imho) of a simple adaptation that changes a lot is “30 Days of Night”. A lot is changed to make it a both tighter as a film while also wider in (narrative) scope, it’s not trying to say something different nor commenting on the original, it’s as simple as “movies aren’t comic books”.

TL;DR: being beholden to source materials is dumb, shot for shot adaptations are dumb, but it seems that too many adaptations simply don’t care about the source material at all which is usually worse.

1

u/Mrbubbles96 14h ago edited 14h ago

Contrary to what most people are answering, IDK, personally, i don't think it's them arrogantly thinking "I'm better". They do this simply because usually, a lot of these adaptations weren't part of insert franchise they're currently working on originally--they was it's own, seperate thing. The problem is, thier original thing isn't something most backers are interested in giving money to. They're want them Big Franchises like Halo, Resident Evil, and God of War, because those IPs are safe (they're popular, acclaimed, and for sure hits, at least in theory).

So there you go. In order for thier original thing to see the light of day, the creator/producer puts a team to work on this Frankenstein of thier original idea and an existing IP, with the idea being that because it's such a popular and recognizable series (or it just had a massive resurgence and made it to the mainstream's attention) it'll bring a lotta cash from folks with only a basic understanding of it, and some fans that accept the adaptation or hate-watch it. Oh, the dev's of the adaptation will say stuff like "I've always been a big fan of the series, the original specifically" during interviews and shit, but that's just for promotion and to generate interest, not something they mean. Because usually, the existing IP is just a means to an end they don't really care about.

1

u/ArcaneMadman 5h ago

In this case it is the creator thinking he's better. He wanted the credit for saving the series and when a new game came out he was upset because it meant it wasn't a dead franchise and he wouldn't be praised for saving the series.

https://reddit.com/link/pgsctr1/video/b3oxlo87hivh1/player

1

u/Mrbubbles96 5h ago

Oh no, yeah, in this case there's very much arrogance involved. I've seen the clips and when i gave the example qoute, I was thinking of Adi specifically since...yeah, if he was a fan of the original game like he claims, it'd look very different from what he made.

-1

u/CoachDT 11h ago

Adaptations are meant to change. If we wanted a carbon copy of DMC the games then folks can play them. Its the reason why we have the current Samuel L Jackson Nick Fury because someone thought "wouldn't it be cool if instead we just..." and tweaked something.

The "problem" is that not every swing hits. If we want cool creative renditions of things we have to also accept that sometimes folks are gonna fuck up.

44

u/phlegmatic_static 16h ago

never watched the series mysel;, read nothing but bad things about it. scared to ask but gotta know: how badly did they butcher my man Virgil? 🪦

45

u/MonkeyBar0n 15h ago

Badly

He is a frankensteined moronic mess of all DMC games that he appears in(DmC Devil May Cry included) with a poorly done psa about misinformation mixed in

Captured as a child and turned into nelo angelo without being fully turned into nelo angelo by being told lies that argosaxs cult was responsible for his moms murder. Learns that Mundus was responsible and then wants to conquer the underworld

Also a human hating hypocritical moron that uses human made weapons twice (and teaches Dante how to do demon infused shots). Kills like 50 soldiers without hesitation only leaving one alive for info only to then not kill humans when Lady gets involved

Him and Dantes relationship is utterly onesided with him feeling like he hated Dante all his life. All they show in flashbacks is him failing to keep up with Dante by getting beaten in stickfights and him hitting his nose on a monkeybar. All of this makes his "if our positions were switched" speech at the end of season 2 fall flat

Also an utter moron. Teleports Dante and Lady with a McGuffin and instead of going with them to help protect the McGuffin. He goes to fight a guy he lost to earlier only to lose instantly. Make an interview in a TV show where he says "you need to question your sources"(says that to Dante too). Learns the Mundus lied to him all his life and the says "he might be telling the truth" when Dante accuses Mundus of lying.

17

u/Yharnam_Hunter25 15h ago

I heard it was bad, but I didn’t know just how bad💀

2

u/Qant00AT 6h ago

And that’s just the PLOT STUFF. Character wise his entire motivation has changed.

Rather than the tragedy of his home hardening him with the resolve of gaining power in order to not be a victim again while also protecting those he loves with the absolution of said power… he does it because he wanted his mother to say he was just as strong (or stronger) than Dante.

His entire quest is to gain power in order to be recognized as the”proper” heir to Sparda and go beyond Mundus to rule the underworld. Granted that last bit is pretty much canon Vergil, but—no pun intended—the motivation is all wrong. Not to mention he’s willingly subservient to Mundus and ate up everything he said to get Vergil on his side. All just to culminate into betraying Mundus at the end with a scene ripped right from Captain America: Civil War. “…But you killed my mother.”

7

u/AdAshamed5509 15h ago

I didn't watch it, but from what I heard, they turned him into a henchman for the main villain.

0

u/ScreamingNinja 10h ago

I did watch it, and yes. Im actually playing through the dmc game now. But yeah the netflix one was fun, but the political shit was super heavy handed and just.. didnt need to be. However, i will say theres some great stuff in there but again i never played the series (only 4 i think) so i dont know how badly it was butchered.

4

u/the_monkeynator 15h ago

A guy called mangakamen has a lot of more indepth videos avout it

25

u/AGuyWithTrouble 14h ago

This particularly pisses me off because a big part of Dante's character is his love for humanity. He fights for them tooth and nail, he tends to take shit or outright refuse pays for saving people, and he even isolates himself from humanity out of shame for being part demon. He clearly ADORES humans, flawed as they are. Humanity is, at large and inherently, good and demons tend towards evil. This also makes the human antagonists of the series particularly despicable.

So why the fuck are we adding some basic bitch grey and dark morality conflict? Literally part of the franchise is saying "humans are good and deserve protection". This ain't the fucking franchise to go for a "humans are the real monster" kind of deal.

18

u/psychoenoshima 14h ago

Like, Dante embraces his humanity, Vergil rejects it. That's their dynamic.

Dante embraces humanity, Vergil sees his humanity as a weakness to be cast out (in DMC it's literally being cast out of him in the form of V, along with his trauma taking the form of shadowy nightmare demons)

Vergil acts calm and composed, but he's ruled entirely by his trauma. And it's what makes him interesting as an antagonist, just how far he'll go so he'll never have to feel helpless ever again

9

u/Canai97 15h ago

I will always upvote any post that talks shit about this shitass adaptation.

20

u/r31ya 15h ago

there are people bitching about frieren being racist to demon race.

the man eating, manipulator race that noted to be devoid of sympathy and upheld very different world view in comparison to humans.

the series have like several examples on how the attempt to treat them as human will end badly. Hell, the central incident, the human war against demon was apparently started because the demon king have warped idea on cozying to humanity.

9

u/the_monkeynator 15h ago

I've seen that. Like they are mimics of some sort, not 100% but they copy human speech to try to trick em.

4

u/r31ya 13h ago edited 13h ago

yup,

older demon like Qual the Elder Sage of Corruption actually look like scary apex predator.

but then newer demon evolve to mimic (pretty/attractive) human as it help their hunting process. its easier to manipulate human by being attractive or look sympathetic.

---

"why you saying "mother" "

"because human will stop attacking me if i say that"

Funny enough, Demon didn't have concept of family. they were abandoned by their parent after birth. the language used is just manipulation/hunting tool for them

0

u/VincentMagius 14h ago

I dislike those in general because it's Bluesky angry at Twitter for what Bluesky said. As far as I can tell, every single one starts with Bluesky in some way. Twitter may pick it up. Bluesky gets angry that Twitter agrees.

9

u/YamLow8097 15h ago

I knew a lot of people hated this adaptation, but I wasn’t sure why since I’ve never played the games. I get it now.

1

u/NuvolaSooffice 13h ago

Saved yourself a massive headache

9

u/Sartexir 14h ago

Adi Shankar is history's biggest larper

6

u/the_monkeynator 15h ago

Yea like... from what i've heard the og is all about demon(s) gaining the ability to love and have emotions. Isn't that Dantes entire arc??? Wasn't Sparda another rare case of a demon fighting for humanity? All that was just thrown out the window, it literally completely misses the entire point that A DEVIL MAY CRY.

7

u/Yharnam_Hunter25 15h ago

His cozying up to Trump is so weird too; the show is actively criticizing Trump-Era Republicans and basically saying they’re complete moronic pieces of garbage with the way they worship war and always try to start crap, but then he goes to Trump’s inauguration for funsies and acts like Trump is great, even buttering up to Asmongold of all people, so he’s sending a mixed message about the partial purpose of his show. It’s like he can’t even stick to whatever he’s trying to do and just keeps screwing everything up. He’s his own worst enemy with the self sabotage of the series and the constant lies he’s vomiting out online.

1

u/Gamyeon 9h ago

That last part of the comment you're responding to was confusing to me because of what you just mentioned about the show. I've never played DMC so I wasn't aware it was such a terrible adaptation (and I did like the show in itself).

1

u/Yharnam_Hunter25 9h ago

Sorry about that. Shankar using the show to criticize the Republicans that support Trump and even Trump himself in how he writes the American government, the president, and the people who support him is made into a very shaky and foundation-less criticism because he went to Trump’s inauguration, which technically shows support to the very person and his beliefs that Shankar is trying to criticize. Him going to the inauguration just essentially destroys his whole critique and makes it as flimsy as a wet noodle.

Oh, I highly recommend the games, they’re great! The characters are very fun and the stories do a good job of exploring the question “What makes someone human, and is it possible for nonhumans to learn to become human?” The only game not really worth playing is the second game since it doesn’t really add much to the overall series and is a bit of a dud to play, Lucia is a good character though, so go ahead and play it if you want to see what she’s like.

Yeah, it’s not the best adaptation. It undermines a lot of what the games set up and pulled off, while also being a pretty shallow critique of real world problems. His use of demons as allegories for Arabic refugees is really rough in the grand scheme of the series, and his overall treatment of legacy characters does them all dirty. Some of the boss demons he uses are also really weird since they have specific purposes for existing in each game that he ends up undermining: Agni and Rudra defend the doors into Temen-ni-Gru, so they cannot leave their stations for fear of intruders getting through (not to mention how they have actual heads now instead of their swords being their heads in and out of their bodies, which kind of ruins how unique their designs are in DMC3). And Cavalier Angelo doesn’t exist until DMC5 because of very specific events that lead to his creation. These events are incredibly important to another character’s entire story and arc throughout the series, so seeing him just exist like a standard demon throws a lot off and narratively can’t work properly. Those are just a few examples from what I can remember, I hope they can help and make sense.

The new anime is just a very rough adaptation all around as it undermines a lot and kind of feels like a bizarre parody of the series. I hope I don’t sound like I’m judging you for liking the show, that wasn’t my intention and if I did sound like that, I deeply apologize for it all.

4

u/myrmonden 16h ago

buuuut is not way cooler if the super evil demons are just poor immigrants that are super nice and then like american can invade hell and NUKE IT or something

8

u/Salnder12 15h ago

His Castlevania was so good, how did he shit the bed so hard with DMC?

38

u/SecondAegis 15h ago

Because he didn't make Castlevania. He just bought his way into being a producer, then claimed all the credit. When he actually makes something of his own, it's almost always pretty shit

https://youtu.be/xI-NWH5C49g

19

u/MonkeyBar0n 15h ago

he isn't the director like he claims he is

he makes other people do all the work then takes all the credit

7

u/Salnder12 15h ago

Yeah looking at it, it does seem like it was mostly warren ellis with him just slapping his name on it

9

u/Rpponce 15h ago

From what's been said it seems like the reason Castlevania was better than his DMC adaptation is because he was allowed more creative freedom when writing DMC.

0

u/Apprehensive-Boot88 5h ago

He didn't write castlevania

6

u/AdAshamed5509 15h ago

His Castlevania wasn't good. Was it a good series? That depends on who you ask—but a good adaptation? Not at all; it was an adaptation just as bad as DMC.

1

u/Various-Cup-9141 15h ago

Castlevania wasn't good because of him but more there were other writers on the team that made it work.

3

u/Content-Explorer5468 15h ago

I’ll never get tired of people hating on the Netflix devil may cry show

3

u/Cyberbug7 14h ago

The scene where America invades Hell set to American idiot was one of the most heavy handed and stupidest things I’ve ever watched that it tipped the scale over to being hilarious.

3

u/Deku_100 5h ago

As much as I enjoyed this show as a DMC fan, I just could not get behind this. It removes what makes Sparda and Trish so special. There's a lot about the anime I can defend...this is not one of them

Edit: also, fuck Adi Shankar. I may enjoy the anime but the dude is 10 feet up his own ass

5

u/LegacyofLegend 14h ago

I do wanna note that on the OG Devil May Cry anime that is canon to the games there are demons who do just live amongst humans peacefully. One even fell in love with a human and asked Dante if it’s possible. So with that in mind I don’t find as much frustration with the change in the recent anime.

Also with DMC3 there was a whole ass religious order with the express purpose of some weird ascension shit using demon dna.

2

u/the_ghost_of_bob_ros 15h ago

Don't forget that Dante has the demon blood powered devil trigger powered by rage and hatred. Is the metaphor basically mixed people have to constantly fight back their "dark blood" lest they be overwhelmed by violence?

2

u/M1k0M1k 12h ago

I mean, it is called "Devil" and "May Cry" because demons CAN have feelings, just as humans can be evil. But yeah the show still went about this really badly.

1

u/ArcaneMadman 5h ago

Demons could always be good and humans could always be evil, but the thing that defined these things was humanity. Not humanity as in if they were a homo sapien, but humanity as in the ability to love and cry. All the human villains in DMC, from Arkham to Sanctus to even Vergil have explicitly given up their humanity for power. They abandon the capacity to love which, as far as the series is concerned, means they are no longer human.

On the other hand, demons that show the capacity to love are "human" even if they aren't biologically. "Devils never cry" is an important line in the series not as a badass creed but as a condemnation. Devils never cry, and that's why they're weak. So when a demon does cry, does show that capacity to care for others, it's the ultimate proof of their humanity. But they have too choose it. The series title is Devil May Cry, not devil can cry or devil will cry. Just as evil humans choose to give up humanity, demons must choose it to become good. Most don't, and would rather die than lower themselves to the level of human. But rarely, very rarely, one does choose to have a heart and become human.

2

u/NadeshikoEatingPasta 11h ago

I'm so sick of the noble savage shit

ontologically evil beings can exist in fiction and at this point they're almost a breath of fresh air.

3

u/clashcrashruin 16h ago

I think all of your points are right but the show actively and openly mocks Trump-era Republicans so I’m not sure about the cozying up to Trump part.

11

u/ArcaneMadman 14h ago edited 5h ago

No the guy who put his name on everything, Adi Shankar, literally went to trump’s inauguration to celebrate. It’s still up on his instagram if you want to see it, I’m stuck on mobile so I can’t link it right now.

He’s also a fan of asmongold and, I shit you not, Henry fucking Kissinger. You know, the war criminal? Again all you need to find proof of this is just search up Shankar and Kissinger’s name together.

EDIT: got my computer now

8

u/MonkeyBar0n 15h ago

That might be thanks to Alex Larsen and the other netflix hacks

Parasite Shankar just takes the credit from his "creations"

1

u/FewAngle737 14h ago

Has anyone forgotten the DMC: Devil May Cry reboot?

1

u/Maladal 8h ago

As someone who's never played a DMC game I enjoyed the show.

It wasn't really what I'd call good, but I thought it was a fun popcorn kind of show to turn my brain off to. For that reason the parts with demon refugees and the like are still the worst part because they're not action scenes but they're not actively offensive to me either.

0

u/Zuzuzu__ 11h ago

Esa adaptación esa horrible adaptación, no vi mas de la primera temporada porque me daba repele, y es algo que esta pasando en todos los medios en realidad ya sean libros,juegos, series etc... Pintar a los demonios como buenos osea no es mala idea pero la an quemado tanto que se volvió cliche, hermano yo no quiero la historia de redención 1792827 sobre de que "nunca fueron malos" solo dame a mi criatura salida de los pozos del infierno creando un plan malignos para cenarse a la humanidad mientras el protagonista carga una espada gigante para matarlo.