I have been instrumental in successfully expanding my team’s remit; it now includes a high priority strategic programme that I’ve integrated with my BAU responsibilities. I have 5 staff as a G7 analyst. The work is clearly expanded beyond what can realistically be delivered by one G7 team.
A highly optimistic assumption (with very little scope to test that assumption) is that a substantial proportion of work needs to be redistributed across the G6 area, some work can be deprioritised and start after completion of a priority work stream. Alongside this, there is still a need for 2 new G7 teams.
The discussion about this is centred on what G7 area I will pick up. Obviously this pivots me away from a role with substantial strategic influence and oversight toward project management and BAU. There’s an assumption, in my view, that the current G6 area can absorb two new G7s and associated junior staff when they already have 6 G7 teams (they are a 1.5 FTE). A lot of the new work is time-limited.
I am trying to suggest that they could have FTAs for a lot of this, including a 12 month G6 to oversee. It’s landing on deaf ears.
I think there are legitimate operational reasons to entertain the above - and there is some self interest. I’m on the future leaders scheme and I’ve worked unbelievably hard to build this programme and influence. My reward, it seems, will most likely be a demotion in all but name. Finding it hard not to bring emotion into this, but I’m human. Very demotivated and glum.
Any practical advice welcome.