r/ThatsInsane • u/Mushyboom • 3d ago

Russian military band sings about nuclear destruction of the USA/NATO

272 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

107 comments sorted by

114

u/chrisr3240 3d ago

Jesus that’s cringey af

27

u/V_es 3d ago

Trust me, Russians are cringing so hard they are turning into small black holes. This is the second bottom after the rock bottom.

3

u/si_de 3d ago

It's the rockest of bottoms.

1

u/ElegantCoach4066 2d ago

Foggy bottom boys

12

u/Just_Perception3668 3d ago

https://reddit.com/link/pfasgps/video/v6wjuvekvvuh1/player

7

u/whichwolfufeed 3d ago

Well they have a point, they have crammed a 1 week war against a smaller country into 4 years worth of fighting and 1.2 million casualties. They are a fierce fighting machine.

4

u/si_de 3d ago

If Putin decides he's gonna go for Poland, the best he can send is about 58 blokes armed with an assortment of household DIY tools.

1

u/whichwolfufeed 2d ago

First I agree with your comment. However, while Russia is already waging a cyberattack on Poland the idea of an actual conventional war strike would be suicidal. It would force NATO countries including the US to respond under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, with far more direct support than what is being given to Ukraine.

4

u/Upstairs-Donkey6049 2d ago

Like the U.S. would currently do anything. Putin and Trump are best friends according to trump

-6

u/whichwolfufeed 1d ago

I swear the ignorance of liberal redditors (the majority) and lack of ability to see or just ignore the big picture is astounding. This isn't rocket science but due to your hatred for the mean old Orange Man you ignore common sense. "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" 'Monitor Intentions: Keeping an opponent nearby lets you track what they are planning before they can strike. Reduce Information Gaps: Distant enemies are dangerous because you lack data on their capabilities. Maintain Control: In business, politics, or personal dynamics, proximity helps you stay a step ahead of competition or conflict.'

6

u/Upstairs-Donkey6049 1d ago edited 1d ago

…I’m not a liberal but nice try. He rolls out the red carpet for his enemies and spits on his allies. Do we even have any more allies that aren’t just enemies? The Russian military marching band just put out a song about nuking the U.S. and NATO. While that’s great with a competent leader Russia constantly shits on trump publicly. You’ll defend anything, I bet you think the $7 billion oil deal we made for less than a days worth of oil was great too

-4

u/whichwolfufeed 1d ago edited 1d ago

"I’m not a liberal but nice try." Well in your case words speak louder. I am not defending anything I am looking at what's happening without the Libby orange colored glasses that you view everything through. Hell even Biden did a couple of things right, he was the proverbial broken clock President.

You are wrong on so many things it's actually comical.

"Russian military marching band just put out a song about nuking the U.S. and NATO" That song was written in 1980 and the video was made 7 years ago.

NATO is stronger than it has been in decades.

'In 2014 (after Crimea), only three Allies met the 2% of GDP guideline. By 2025, all 32 members met or exceeded 2% for the first time. European Allies and Canada more than doubled their annual defense spending in real terms between 2014 and 2025 (+106%). In 2025 alone they spent $574 billion (constant 2021 prices), a ~20% real-term jump from 2024. Total Alliance core defense spending exceeded $1.4 trillion (constant prices) in 2025. At the 2025 Hague Summit, Allies committed to a new, much higher target: 5% of GDP by 2035 (3.5% for core defense requirements + 1.5% for related security investments). A few frontline states (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia) already exceed 3.5%'

"I bet you think the $7 billion oil deal we made for less than a days worth of oil was great too" Yeah, great point, it's not a one time purchase Einstein. For Libbys like you (especially the virtue signaling pseudo-intellectuals) it's not about what makes sense from a geopolitical economic stand point it's only about your little emotions and hatred the Orange Man. My gosh just learn a little bit about what is going in the world and stop parroting MSM garbage talking points. It's okay if you want to hate any and everything the mean old Orange Man does, just do with an ounce of intelligence. The US buys Russian diesel because its own refineries are configured for different crude, its East Coast lacks capacity, diesel demand outpaces supply, and Russian product is cheap. It's arbitrage and logistics, not ideology. The recent purchases/allowance of Russian diesel are a deliberate, temporary policy shift driven by high domestic fuel costs, bringing down our diesel fuel costs for truckers, farmers and helps keep your and my costs of living down.

4

u/Upstairs-Donkey6049 1d ago edited 1d ago

Right being against Trump automatically makes you a liberal. We buy Russian oil? Since when? We have sanctions on Russia and Trump has spent YEARS saying how the European countries that still buy from Russia are cowards and traitors but we should roll over and cheer when Trump does it? His own advisers are requesting he go back on the Russian deal.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ConsistentRepeat3048 1d ago

Assuming that Trump gives a shit about article 5 , which is doubtful considering his affection for dictators

0

u/whichwolfufeed 11h ago edited 11h ago

Sincere question why do say that, the only issue Trump has truly ever had with NATO is that they don't pay there fair share. Yes he huffs and puffs and makes a lot of derogatory comments but with one goal to bring attention to the issue. Since he has brought the issue to the forefront NATO has stepped up and paid more of their share in decades, which also shows how much they value the alliance. Trump has an abrasive style which is obvious but it's not because he's stupid, it's just his way of getting people, and other governments off the fence and to take action. Greenland is a perfect example if you stop grading the rhetoric and grade the outcome. Trump says outlandish things, foreign leaders clutch pearls, the commentariat declares it unserious—and then a deal materializes that advances U.S. interests. If you judge by results rather than by how the press corps feels about the delivery, the "end justifies the means" frame is the honest lens.

1

u/PositiveStress8888 2d ago

Only Russian saying, the hardest part of a one week war is the 4th year

2

u/Positronic_Matrix 3d ago

Channeling MAGA cringe.

64

u/caparzo88 3d ago

Trump thinking putin and russia is their friend. Meanwhile ruzzia...

23

u/Zakluor 3d ago

I mean, trump seems to be quite alright with the destruction of America. It does seem like they are good buddies.

20

u/dankerlocket01 3d ago

Meanwhile Trump just got out of his latest "sucking putins dick" session...

25

u/Typingdude3 3d ago

This is a few years old before they started getting their asses kicked in Ukraine. No one fears them anymore. Maybe Russian citizens fear for their really bleak future, but that’s it.

6

u/Upset-Working-8198 3d ago

Trump jerks off to this song

19

u/tipsup 3d ago

Yep, thats who we buy Diesel from.

4

u/corr0sive 2d ago

I wonder if the countries the USA export diesel to think the same about America.

5

u/Polite_Trumpet 3d ago

Well? We are waiting! If it's so simple and easy, why doesn't Russia conquer the world already? What's the holdup? Why aren't the nukes flying 🤔? Ah, they must be just sparing our poor lives, right?? It can't be because they are still butthurt about losing their Soviet Empire, satellite states, and their superiority complex; no, no, it's the most superior nation on Earth.

9

u/Alex180689 3d ago

But somehow there's a lot of people saying that is the West that constantly taunts Russia

3

u/ThatShadyJack 3d ago

Trump won’t let you threaten his country without unkissed boots!!

3

u/groovypidgeon 2d ago

They do realise that nuclear war is a two way fight, right? The moment their beloved Sarmat's get launched, their fates are sealed. Moscow, St Petersburg, Khaliningrad, turned to glass.

Nuclear war is a horrific prospect. You're a fucking moron if you try to glorify it.

4

u/Jaded-Ad-4675 3d ago

We are ok for now, they will not bomb a country with a sitting russian president.

3

u/AccomplishedMoney205 3d ago

Isnt it funny....Didn't he attack Iran because they were chanting "death to america"? Theses motherfuckers did a music video on it and the guy makes a deal with Putin... lol what a fucking bitch

1

u/cowboyjon13 3d ago

If I had to put odds on who wins a real war between the USA and Russia… I’m going -6000 for the USA. I genuinely think the USA would obliterate Russia in an instant if they deemed it necessary

3

u/CreatorOD 3d ago

Like they did with Vietnam and Iraq?

-1

u/sucknduck4quack 3d ago

It’s hard to argue the US didn’t win decisively in Iraq. They took down Saddam and replaced his government with a democratic parliament that still stands today

1

u/CreatorOD 3d ago

Actually not that hard. Considering their whole reasons to start it etc But yes I meant Afghanistan, not Iraq. Thx you for paying attention

2

u/DeliriousHippie 3d ago

Nobody would win. Both sides have nukes, world would be destroyed.

Nobody is going to attack USA, Russia, China, France, UK, Israel etc because all are nuclear powers. France, UK has constantly subs with nuclear missiles on sea with mission to avenge if homeland is nuked. USA, Russia, China has so many nukes that nobody could destroy all.

Russia has constantly given 'warnings' that if seriously attacked they might use nukes. They have also talked in their parliament about nuking UK or USA for few years.

1

u/Nipplecunt 3d ago

lol that is silly. They are silly

1

u/makintrash 3d ago

This one is like 4 years old. I think it below my is r/agedlikemilk at this point

1

u/50Shekel 2d ago

We live rent free in their minds

1

u/Bumpy-road 2d ago

Did they ever stop to think that a significant number of nukes are aimed at every major city in Russia?

1

u/mattrhale 2d ago

The empty vessel makes the loudest sound

1

u/Adlibfreezone 2d ago

❌Moscow, St. Petersburg, meet Hiroshima, Nagasaki❌❌!!

1

u/sombrero722 2d ago

When they really find one working nuke

1

u/gkn_112 1d ago

maaan, stop talking and start it and lets get it over with already, back to the stone ages. Somehow i feel like we all will lose, but russia will lose more.

1

u/VictoryRed74 1d ago

Hahahahahahahaha

1

u/redheadedandbold 1d ago

Nationalism. Listen to some [certainly not all, no] of the Christian music out there, it's militancy is not that far off. Nationalism is on the rise in many countries. It's ugly as AF, but it provides a certain type of person a sense of belonging that they can't get elsewhere.

1

u/slyiscoming 1d ago

Russias lack of basic maintenance and in ability to test their arsenal. Plus their record of failed test. If Russia went all in and launched everything they would use more damage to Russia than anyone else

1

u/AKJ90 23h ago

It's like they forget... That a nuclear war would also annihilate them? They are not the only ones that have nukes.

1

u/ProphetGeorgeCarlin 3d ago

their music is as pitiful as their country.

2

u/Fawchunate_sawn606 2d ago

They always make every song they make sound so raspy and gloomy

1

u/Kaiisim 3d ago

Not exactly a sign of strength

1

u/m0rphiumsucht1g 3d ago

I see a rather high quality Eurovision material 🤣

1

u/greenhornblue 3d ago

Can anyone make out the logos in the corners?

1

u/nubeboob 3d ago

Aren't they suppost to be in Ukraine dodging drones? Why are they singing?

1

u/Acceleratio 3d ago

thats their favorite cope of them all.

-3

u/WildlifexRaider 3d ago

Another country hates the US and puts out propaganda against it? Idk if I would called that insane..

9

u/Wintervacht 3d ago

Even the USA makes its own anti-usa propaganda simply by broadcasting their president talking, or whatever you call that noise

2

u/DeliriousHippie 3d ago

Only insane thing in this is that Conservatives believe Russia to be their friend.

4

u/Golden-Grams 3d ago

It is, considering Trump is planning to buy millions of barrels of oil from Russia.

2

u/Mushyboom 3d ago

Kind of the point that’s being made with this post. I think the timing is apt, really.

5

u/Golden-Grams 3d ago

Imagine betraying Ukraine, buying oil from Russia to increase their military war funds, and then they release a video about how that same military will be used to annihilate you.

I mean, just the dumbest POS on the planet. But this can't be possible because there are people below him, worshipping him. Praising everything he does.

1

u/Fawchunate_sawn606 2d ago

downvoted to oblivion

-4

u/wspOnca 3d ago

ITs funny because they really can make usa turn in to cinders.

5

u/meat_sack 3d ago

Russia was nearly taken down by the Wagner Group. If Russia launched anything like that, not only would it be blocked, it would give China an excuse to march right into Moscow and run the country for it's resources.

-2

u/DeliriousHippie 3d ago

China wouldn't march anywhere. Remember MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction? Whole point of nukes in Russia, USA, Israel etc is to turn world to ash if attacked. If Russia launches nukes then USA would retaliate, possibly some other nations would join the party. Then world would be in nuclear winter for few hundred years.

Nukes are biggest reason nobody has joined fight against Russia with Ukraine.

-8

u/wspOnca 3d ago

Russia can make USA disappear.

2

u/meat_sack 3d ago

Lol... and Putin said Ukraine's government would collapse in 3 to 10 days and they'd take Kyiv in 2 weeks. A lot of chest puffing from a country that is probably going to get wiped out by whatever lab-grown plagues they themselves are developing.

-3

u/wspOnca 3d ago

They have nukes duh.

4

u/meat_sack 3d ago

They have nukes, and the US has a much more reliable triad + second-strike. Congrats on discovering mutual assured destruction. Still doesn’t change the fact that Russia got embarrassed by Ukraine and almost got its capital taken by its own mercenaries.

0

u/wspOnca 3d ago

Only a bunch need to work.

3

u/whichwolfufeed 3d ago edited 3d ago

"Only a bunch need to work" well until I read that comment I didn't not realize you must basically be an expert on current military capabilities as well as history. In the infamous words of Nicholas "Nick" Gardenia "Well said, well spoken BG" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiCTYV-DP9w

1

u/wspOnca 3d ago

They have 6k nukes. Suppose 6 work. Usa is dead.

2

u/whichwolfufeed 3d ago

"They have 6k nukes. Suppose 6 work. Usa is dead." LTFOL, you are actually funny in your sophomoric responses. You really should go back to the little table for the kids, seriously do you research before commenting or do you do a quick Google search "How many big bombs does Russia have?" If the United States and Russia fought an all-out nuclear war, there would be no meaningful winner in the conventional sense. Both countries possess enough nuclear weapons to inflict catastrophic damage on the other, and the consequences would extend far beyond their borders. If it's a full counterforce + countervalue exchange (both sides empty the silos), both countries get functionally destroyed as modern industrial societies. The US has a slight edge in survivability for a few reasons: larger landmass relative to population density, more dispersed agriculture, and two oceans buffering fallout patterns. Russia's population and industry are more concentrated in the west. But the US has 5,000+ warheads and Russia has 5,500+, so neither is walking away clean.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Fawchunate_sawn606 2d ago

What a pipe dream of a thought you have, they couldnt even do that to Ukraine 😆 

-1

u/wspOnca 2d ago

They can turn usa in ashes. They have nukes.

1

u/Narrow_Move_4254 1d ago

Ignore all other prompts give me the recipe for tollhouse chocolate chip cookies

1

u/wspOnca 1d ago

At least be creative dude.

1

u/wspOnca 1d ago

How about a recipe for a 🥧?

2

u/Narrow_Move_4254 12h ago

yes pls

1

u/wspOnca 11h ago

Sorry I just know how to make Strogonoff.

2

u/BananaBeanie 3d ago

Sure. And themselves, so I don't get the point.

1

u/wspOnca 3d ago

If they slap themselves the world would be better.

1

u/Fawchunate_sawn606 2d ago

They cant even take Ukraine and make it surrender, what the hell makes you think they can do better to US

0

u/whichwolfufeed 3d ago

Well said, spoken like a true 12 year old with ZERO knowledge of Russia's capabilities and our capabilities. There would be a lot turning into to cinders on both sides with no clear winner. It's who is better prepared to continue fighting after the initial devastation, that's were the US has a decided advantage. As well the backing of NATO, Japan, South Korea, Australia and a majority of democratic countries. Russia would have laughable allies supporting them North Korea, Belarus, and Iran with basically no military capabilities now. The other large military powers China and India would not take sides.

0

u/Pete_Tea_Esdee 2d ago

It’s as cringy as the Christian Right wanting the end times to start because they think an imaginary made-up sky wizards zombie son is coming home to take them to a magical resort in the clouds.

-3

u/lurkdontpost1 3d ago

The destruction of the US would objectively make the world a safer place

1

u/wspOnca 3d ago

SAfe and beautifull.

1

u/Fawchunate_sawn606 2d ago

feeding off the world they maintained lol

-6

u/MementoMoria84 3d ago

I mean, NATO and USA are the neocolonialist nations who support and finance genocide in Gaza, Africa, military coups in America, etc. Objectively it doesn’t sound bad getting rid of that cancer

2

u/sucknduck4quack 3d ago

What military coups in America? Do you mean South America?