r/SipsTea • • 18h ago

SMH The advice didn't age well.

Post image
30.4k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/TelephoneNorth8640 15h ago

Why do people think the 80s were a boon? People struggled. Remember mortgage rates were over 15% at points, and averaged around 11%. Sure houses were cheap, because financing was so expensive...

17

u/Atomic-Avocado 15h ago

Houses were cheap because there were way less people and boomers had an exodus from cities into brand new suburbs. Houses are expensive now mostly because cities refuse to allow new dense housing to be built where people want to move

8

u/Inf1z 14h ago

Houses became an investment so many people and companies began buying houses to rent because of passive income.

-2

u/Thiswas2hard 13h ago

About the same number people own homes now then they did in the 80’s. Biggest problem is we stopped building homes at the same rate after 08.

-6

u/renner1991 14h ago

Being a landlord isn’t passive income. A landlord should be maintaining the property, otherwise it degrades over time.

1

u/Inf1z 13h ago

True and especially for mom and pop landlord who own just a few homes. Most of them are handy so they do the maintenance themselves. Others just hire a handy man to take care of things.

0

u/CheGueyMaje 14h ago

Being a landlord is absolutely passive income.

Let’s take my apartment for example. I’ve lived here 3 years. Do you know how much time my landlord has put into “maintaining the property” besides simply raising my rent?

Maybe 15 minutes of gaslighting me telling me the black mold isn’t a structural problem. That’s it. He hasn’t done a single day of work in years.

-4

u/renner1991 13h ago

I said “should”. I thought you were coming to it from a landlord perspective. Sucks you have a shitty landlord.

0

u/CheGueyMaje 13h ago

Yeah, tell that to me and the other billion of us.

1

u/cti0323 14h ago

Yep, which makes builders no longer build starter homes because they have to maximize returns due to limited areas to build.

1

u/krism142 13h ago

I think we need to be more specific about the types of housing being built as well. In this very post you compare suburban sprawl single family homes with dense urban condos, those are not attracting the same buyers

1

u/ClassicTBCSucks93 10h ago

The only neighborhoods that have been going up in my area for the past 10+ years are all 55+ communities, anything else being built are soulless voids of gray apartment buildings for $2k+ /mo. rent and will raise the rates $500-$1000 just cuz.

You'd think those 55+ communities would be full of old crotchety "Get off my lawn" in bed by 7PM and up at 4AM types, but its quite the opposite. Those 55+ communities are wild and devolve into drug and alcohol fueled fuck n' sucks, lots of swinging, and lots of partying. It would make sorority/frat behavior seem tame. Honestly sounds like an awesome way to live out the golden years.

1

u/TelephoneNorth8640 14h ago

Houses were cheap because they were smaller, older, and had expensive financing. No young person today would want to live in a "starter home" from the 80s...

3

u/gfty457 14h ago

Yet those 70k starter homes are now being sold for 350k

1

u/redditis_garbage 14h ago

And yet young people have to live in starter homes from the 80s lol. Any of my friends who own a house have a tiny old house. And it was 300-400k.

1

u/SamanthaLives 12h ago

Mine is from the 50’s. There’s probably lead paint and asbestos but I try not to think about it. 

0

u/Objective_Run_7151 14h ago

100% correct.

A majority of US homes in 1980 did not have a dishwasher. Or a/c. Or covered parking. A microwave was something only the very rich could afford. Clothes dryers were common, but not universal. Same for insulation - even if you had ac, you didn’t run it constantly because you could t afford to.

That’s why houses were cheaper back then.

0

u/modsaretoddlers 13h ago

That's not how that works. The houses haven't just been sitting there since time immemorial, waiting for buyers and now, suddenly, they've all been bought. They get built as a function of demand. The issue today is that only luxury housing gets built and it's only for rich people, anyway.

10

u/mden1974 14h ago

They don’t remember having to wait in line for gas. The eighties for me was McDonalds on a Saturday night as the big reward for not being seen for the week at my house by my parents. No one had shit in the eighties. Also we didn’t care

9

u/Automatic_Art_4469 14h ago

Credit scores weren’t invented until 1989, and student loans didn’t start to get sold to 3rd party’s until the mid-80/ either. Also, inflation was tied to your wage increases until the 80’s too. All changes that wouldn’t be felt majorly for another 5–10 years, well in to the 90’s. You guys might not have been much more rich but you absolutely had way more spending money than we do today

0

u/Friendly_Yak_2713 12h ago

Total nonesense if you actually look at disposable income stats

2

u/Automatic_Art_4469 9h ago

Looking at those stats are meaningless when you remember the buying power $1 had back then compared to now.

3

u/TwistedBamboozler 14h ago

Cause they’re mixing up their decades

1

u/laiszt 14h ago

They dont want to remember that people live in containers like even Eminem did. It was always a % of people who own everything and big number of those who own nothing. However now we have internet and we all can see that, also now there are actual things we can WASTE our money(and time) on, which did not been invented yet back in the days.

1

u/FaceMace87 14h ago

Give me 15% on 60k  over 6% on 400k

2

u/No_Mind_7397 13h ago

Adjusted for inflation, both of those scenarios come out to around $2,300 a month.

1

u/gnanny02 11h ago

I had one at 11% and then the next was at 9.5%. We refinanced that down several times. Now thankfully all paid off.

1

u/CloseEnoughToKnow 15h ago

More of the tax raised in the 80s went to support working people. Most of the tax raised now goes to support retired people. It was much easier to be a working person back then.

1

u/NickBurnsCompanyGuy 15h ago

Yeah, if you're gonna glorify an era, glorify the 90s. The final calm before the storm. 

1

u/Infinite_Respect_ 14h ago

15% of 90,000 for a house then

5% of a 1.1M house 30 years later

Tell me I’m lucky to have inherited the circumstances as a buyer of the latter. I’ll be waiting…

5

u/TelephoneNorth8640 14h ago

Home price are not 1.1 mil. Median prices are about 400k. You can still find starter homes in the 200-350k range. If you are paying over 1 mil for a house that is a choice.

And, 5% is brilliant compared to the best of 80s... And, if you got a 2%er during COVID you are gold right now...

1

u/Zealousideal-Park778 14h ago

Gold, but also trapped. We couldn’t afford to buy our own home right now.

1

u/Infinite_Respect_ 13h ago

No that’s a literal example of my life experience of the house I grew up in, but thanks for conflating a point you don’t want to listen to.

0

u/TelephoneNorth8640 12h ago

It's not a point that matters, respectfully. If you can afford a 1.1 mil house at 5%, you do indeed have it lucky....

Complaining about affordability, while purchasing a house well over double the median home price, is quite something...

1

u/Practical-Sink-3987 14h ago

The average cost of a house at that time was 50k. That means you could find a house for 30-40k and still own property. With an 11-12% mortgage rate you could earn minimum wage at that time and still afford the mortgage. Minimum wage in 1980 was 3.10. A 2 person family could afford that mortgage. If either one was making more than minimum they would be better off.