r/scotus • • Jan 30 '22

Things that will get you banned

345 Upvotes

Let's clear up some ambiguities about banning and this subreddit.

On Politics

Political discussion isn't prohibited here. In fact, a lot of the discussion about the composition of the Supreme Court is going to be about the political process of selecting a justice.

Your favorite flavor of politics won't get you banned here. Racism, bigotry, totally bad-faithed whataboutisms, being wildly off-topic, etc. will get you banned though. We have people from across the political spectrum writing screeds here and in modmail about how they're oppressed with some frequency. But for whatever reason, people with a conservative bend in particular, like to show up here from other parts of reddit, deliberately say horrendous shit to get banned, then go back to wherever they came from to tell their friends they're victims of the worst kinds of oppression. Y'all can build identities about being victims and the mods, at a very basic level, do not care—complaining in modmail isn't worth your time.

COVID-19

Coming in here from your favorite nonewnormal alternative sub or facebook group and shouting that vaccines are the work of bill gates and george soros to make you sterile will get you banned. Complaining or asking why you were banned in modmail won't help you get unbanned.

Racism

I kind of can't believe I have to write this, but racism isn't acceptable. Trying to dress it up in polite language doesn't make it "civil discussion" just because you didn't drop the N word explicitly in your comment.

This is not a space to be aggressively wrong on the Internet

We try and be pretty generous with this because a lot of people here are skimming and want to contribute and sometimes miss stuff. In fact, there are plenty of threads where someone gets called out for not knowing something and they go "oh, yeah, I guess that changes things." That kind of interaction is great because it demonstrates people are learning from each other.

There are users that get super entrenched though in an objectively wrong position. Or start talking about how they wish things operated as if that were actually how things operate currently. If you're not explaining yourself or you're not receptive to correction you're not the contributing content we want to propagate here and we'll just cut you loose.

  • BUT I'M A LAWYER!

Having a license to practice law is not a license to be a jackass. Other users look to the attorneys that post here with greater weight than the average user. Trying to confuse them about the state of play or telling outright falsehoods isn't acceptable.

Thankfully it's kind of rare to ban an attorney that's way out of bounds but it does happen. And the mods don't care about your license to practice. It's not a get out of jail free card in this sub.

Signal to Noise

Complaining about the sub is off topic. If you want the sub to look a certain way then start voting and start posting the kind of content you think should go here.

  • I liked it better before when the mods were different!

The current mod list has been here for years and have been the only active mods. We have become more hands on over the years as the users have grown and the sub has faced waves of problems like users straight up stalking a female journalist. The sub's history isn't some sort of Norman Rockwell painting.

Am I going to get banned? Who is this post even for, anyway?

Probably not. If you're here, reading about SCOTUS, reading opinions, reading the articles, and engaging in discussion with other users about what you're learning that's fantastic. This post isn't really for you.

This post is mostly so we can point to something in our modmail to the chucklefuck that asks "why am I banned?" and their comment is something inevitably insane like, "the holocaust didn't really kill that many people so mask wearing is about on par with what the jews experienced in nazi germany also covid isn't real. Justice Gorsuch is a real man because he no wears face diaper." And then we can send them on to the admins.


r/scotus • • Jan 09 '26

Order Bans are going to go out to top level comments that are emotional reactions or off topic. This is a heads up to anyone who wants to change how they’re posting.

44 Upvotes

This is SCOTUS. Talk about scotus. Talk about the opinions issued. If you want to criticize them that’s fine but have something to back it up.

Complaining about “tRump”, trump, motorhomes, “scrotus”, or any other number of things where you react to something instead of respond to something isn’t going to fly. The bar is very low. Almost all of you are tripping over it.


r/scotus • • 17h ago

Opinion The Vanishing Black Caucus

Thumbnail
nytimes.com
179 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 15h ago

news Bonus 257: Hard Questions About Court Expansion

Thumbnail
stevevladeck.com
14 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

Order Supreme Court Sides With Republicans In Political Ad Dispute

Thumbnail supremecourt.gov
308 Upvotes

The Supreme Court sided with Republicans in a Wednesday ruling that will give political parties lower rates for broadcast campaign ads.

The court ruled 7-2 in favor of lower rates, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.

In the final weeks before the midterms, the ruling will largely benefit Republicans, whose political committees have raised more money from wealthy donors than the Democrats’ party committees. Democrats have raised more money through direct but limited individual contributions.


r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Neil Gorsuch Joins Liberal SCOTUS Colleague to Blast ‘Absurd’ Immigration Case

Thumbnail
thedailybeast.com
2.5k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news The Supreme Court may be about to make America’s prisons much crueler

Thumbnail
vox.com
486 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news Transgender prisoners ask U.S. Supreme Court to stop Trump from taking their medical care

Thumbnail
advocate.com
1.7k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news Supreme Court to Consider Halting Bid for Information About DOGE

Thumbnail
bloomberg.com
1.1k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news Supreme Court to Hear Asylum Case Over Man Who Involuntarily Cooked for Separatist Group

Thumbnail
news.bloomberglaw.com
171 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 3d ago

Opinion SCOTUS is the Most Dangerous Weapon Against Democracy

Thumbnail
npr.org
974 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 3d ago

Opinion We Now Know Just How Devastating the Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Rulings Were - TPM

Thumbnail
talkingpointsmemo.com
905 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 5d ago

news Christa Pike’s Botched Execution Was Even More Gruesome Than We’ve Been Led to Believe

Thumbnail
slate.com
2.5k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 7d ago

Opinion Alito's 'practical originalism' doesn't sound very originalist

Thumbnail
reason.com
1.6k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 7d ago

Cert Petition Chief Justice Roberts quickly comes through after Trump DOJ slams 'egregious intrusion' that a Reagan-appointed judge called a 'board game'

Thumbnail
lawandcrime.com
1.5k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 7d ago

news Chief Justice Roberts pumps new life into oldest federal judge's suspension battle, gives her another shot at proving whether she's mentally fit at 99…

Thumbnail
lawandcrime.com
789 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 7d ago

news Samuel Alito’s Tortured Attempts to Explain Himself

Thumbnail
newrepublic.com
864 Upvotes

In the midst of his will-he-or-won’t-he retirement tour, the justice is at great pains to make his view of originalism make a lick of sense.


r/scotus • • 7d ago

news Man Who Threatened Supreme Court Justices Avoids Jail Sentence

Thumbnail
news.bloomberglaw.com
260 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

news Katy Faust tells Pray Vote Stand summit 'Obergefell v. Hodges' is "next to be overturned", despite Samuel Alito statement to the contrary

Thumbnail
christianpost.com
1.6k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

Cert Petition Wrestler Asks Justices To Shield Her From Trans Opponents

Thumbnail
law360.com
606 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

news Republicans prep as they catapult toward Supreme Court 'nightmare scenario': Politico

Thumbnail
rawstory.com
2.7k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

news Anti-Abortion Activists Finally Overreached at the Supreme Court

Thumbnail
slate.com
614 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

news Alito says Supreme Court can’t stem emergency appeals and voices concern over Trump’s rhetoric

Thumbnail
apnews.com
706 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 8d ago

news Burned cattle, drought, smoke-choked pastures—and the SCOTUS case to make Exxon and Suncor pay

Thumbnail
motherjones.com
103 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 9d ago

Opinion Casting Justice Samuel Alito As 'MAGA' Hurts His Feelings. Here's His Record.

Thumbnail
huffpost.com
2.0k Upvotes