The Ramadan observance surveys were only conducted among the people who self identified as Muslim, thus excluding non-Muslim populations (conducted in 2022,2024,2025)

I'm just saying.

China have the most messed up government policies in history. Introduced in 1979, it was designed to control population growth, but it caused a hell of a lot of suffering for many families. Imagine being told by your own government that you could only have one child. For parents who dreamed of having a big, happy family, this rule was a heartbreaking nightmare.

One of the worst things about this policy was how it affected parents and children. Some families faced huge fines, forced abortions, and forced sterilizations for breaking the rules. That is some seriously cruel shit. Families were put under pressure to follow the government's demands instead of making their own decisions about their lives. Even worse, the preference for boys in some families contributed to sex-selective abortions and the abandonment of baby girls. This created a serious gender imbalance and left many people struggling with loneliness and unfair treatment.

Compared with China, families in the United States generally have much more freedom to decide how many children they want. Some American families have three, four, five, or even more children running around the house. Sure, having a huge family can be expensive and stressful as hell, but parents can usually make that choice without the government telling them they have broken a population rule. A house full of siblings might be loud, chaotic, and sometimes a total pain in the ass, but it can also be full of love, laughter, and support.

The biggest difference is freedom. American families generally have the freedom to choose between having one child or a whole damn football team of kids. China's one-child policy took away much of that freedom and caused suffering that lasted for generations. Although the policy officially ended in 2016, its effects did not disappear overnight.

In conclusion, China's one-child policy shows how badly things can go when a government controls something as personal as family life. No family should have to suffer because of rules that take away their basic choices and happiness.

(Spanish)

I coined the term to describe the PM of Hungary, Peter Magyar. He is pro-EU, anti-corruption, anti-immigration and pro-natalist. He wants better ties with the EU to unlock new funds, so that he can upgrade on Orban's already decent natalist policies. He is anti-immigration to prevent the rise of the far-right, maintain Hungarian cultural cohesion, law and order. He is pro-LGBT and promotes modern Christian values. Could this be a optimistic ideology to boost birth rates, by creating a big coalition of liberals and conservatives? You could also call it upgraded liberalism, or conservative liberalism.