The first shot is a black lens so not easy to see what that is. Shot 3 is a big fat white lens, so looks like the 70-200 2.8. Shot 4 looks thinner so might be the f4 rather than 2.8? Not sure why a photographer would have both those in their bag though feels like a waste if you have the 2.8
I know but if you have a 2.8 there is no need to even own a 4 other than you want a lighter lens. The 2.8 is superior in every way except weight. So not impossible but given the cost unlikely. Probably more likely that the angle makes the "f4" look different and it is all the 2.8
1
u/kapitaalH 12h ago
The first shot is a black lens so not easy to see what that is. Shot 3 is a big fat white lens, so looks like the 70-200 2.8. Shot 4 looks thinner so might be the f4 rather than 2.8? Not sure why a photographer would have both those in their bag though feels like a waste if you have the 2.8