White House press secretary Katie Zacharia did not pass the bar exam in the United States, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter cited by ABC News. The sources said Zacharia took the California bar exam after graduating from Pepperdine University’s Caruso School of Law in 2011 but did not pass. Zacharia acknowledged in a Thursday interview with Real America’s Voice that she took the exam, but did not explicitly say whether she passed. She said the results were “somewhat inconsequential” because she knew she would move to China afterward, where she worked in international transaction law. The reporting establishes that she sat for the California bar and did not pass, according to ABC’s sources, but it does not establish that she is licensed in any other U.S. jurisdiction.

Zacharia has described herself as a lawyer, and Trump called her “an attorney” in a social media post announcing her role. She said she consulted people in the legal field about whether she could call herself a “lawyer” while providing legal analysis rather than legal advice. She said they told her that was acceptable because she had a JD and international transactional experience. Zacharia also said she was “very careful” in how she referred to herself and never presented herself as a practicing attorney. The White House did not directly answer whether she passed the bar, instead providing a statement in which Zacharia said she “practiced international transaction law, with all the appropriate credentials.”

The scrutiny began after Popular Information reported that there was no evidence Zacharia was licensed to practice law. The Wall Street Journal later reported that she sat for the bar in 2011 but did not pass. Earlier this week, when a reporter asked Zacharia which state she passed the bar in, she answered that she “moved to China.” She later told The New York Times that she could not hear the question over the sound of Marine One and assumed the reporter was asking where she went after law school. Zacharia said she does not plan to weigh in on legal matters while serving as press secretary.

Voters in Hazle Township, Pennsylvania, are mobilizing against a proposed Amazon Web Services data center campus that would include a $10,000 direct cash dividend for every resident. The project, called “Project Hazelnut” by developer NorthPoint Development, would also require a lengthy stretch of power lines to supply the facility. Nearly 17% of township residents live below the federal poverty line, according to PennLive, making the proposed payment potentially significant. Despite that, residents are organizing to reject both the data center and the transmission infrastructure. The article does not say the payment has been formally approved, funded, or guaranteed, and a local supervisor said he did not know whether it was legitimate or would actually happen.

Residents described the $10,000 offer as a payoff rather than fair compensation. Local resident Brian Malloy called it “like bribery,” while homeowner and small business owner Ed Negra said property values would fall “dramatically” if the project proceeds. Negra called the payment “a drop in the bucket” compared with the costs of allowing Project Hazelnut to move forward. The article does not provide an independent estimate of property value effects, utility costs, or the project’s total economic impact. Its central point is that residents view the cash offer as insufficient to offset the perceived harms of the development.

The proposal is unusual. Mary Fox, executive director of the Pennsylvania Ethics Commission, told PennLive that officials had not seen anything like it and described the strategy as creative. The article does not say whether the Ethics Commission has reviewed the payment plan or determined whether it raises legal or ethical issues. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro has previously called the project a “technology campus” and used an executive order to fast-track the process for developers to build data centers across the state. Hazle Township supervisor Anthony Griguoli has struggled to present a united front with NorthPoint, even as his office works on a zoning ordinance that could allow the project to proceed.

President Donald Trump announced Thursday that the execution of Nidal Hasan will not be streamed, reversing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s earlier announcement that it would be publicly broadcast. Trump said Hasan will still be executed by firing squad as scheduled on December 3 at Fort Hood, Texas, the base where he carried out the 2009 attack. Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others; he described the attack as an act of jihad. Trump said the execution may be viewed in person by victims’ families if they choose. The reversal means the punishment remains scheduled, but the disputed livestream plan has been canceled.

Trump wrote that streaming the execution might have served as a deterrent by showing how America deals with terrorists, but said many “well meaning people” would prefer not to watch Hasan die. Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell said Trump and Hegseth discussed the decision before Trump’s announcement and are “completely aligned.” That statement contradicts the Pentagon’s position earlier in the week, when it maintained that the livestream was moving forward. The article does not explain what specifically caused the reversal, though it reports that Trump and advisers had been debating the matter amid concerns that broadcasting the execution could fuel anti-American propaganda or damage the country’s image.

Hasan’s civilian attorney, John Galligan, said the cancellation was no surprise but criticized the administration’s broader handling of the case. He called Hegseth’s original livestream decision “dumb” and said it violated the Army’s own regulation. The article reports that public executions were once common in the United States, but states began restricting or abolishing them in the mid-19th and early 20th centuries; the last widely recognized public execution occurred in Kentucky in 1936. The article does not say whether the Army regulation violation claim has been formally adjudicated or whether any legal challenge to the execution itself remains pending.

Survivors of the Fort Hood shooting welcomed the reversal. Alonzo Lunsford, who was shot seven times, called the decision “a sigh of relief” and said it showed the country could be better than broadcasting an execution. Keara Torkelson, who was shot while preparing to deploy to Iraq, said justice does not need to be broadcast to be real and argued that survivors should not have to relive the attack through a public spectacle. An ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that eight in 10 Americans opposed livestreaming the execution. Several lawmakers, including outgoing Republican Senator Thom Tillis, also criticized the original plan, comparing public executions to practices associated with oppressive governments.

Saudi national Abdulrahman Alfozan was arrested last week and charged with using a device to intercept oral communications after allegedly placing an audio recording device in an OpenAI executive conference room in San Francisco. According to a court complaint, the room regularly hosted meetings involving highly confidential technical, commercial, and strategic information. Alfozan did not have authority to access the room, which was reserved for executives and their assistants. He had worked at OpenAI as a lead engineer for about a year before being fired this month. The article does not say that Alfozan successfully recorded any meetings or transmitted recordings to anyone.

The alleged scheme unraveled after OpenAI staff found a suspicious audio recording device wrapped in toilet paper and hidden behind a television on September 30. On October 5, a newly installed camera allegedly captured Alfozan entering the room and checking on the device’s location. CNBC reported that Alfozan had booked one-way flights from San Francisco to Saudi Arabia for his wife and another family member before his arrest. An unsealed court filing said he had the means and incentive to flee the United States if he learned about the case before being arrested. He remains in detention pending a hearing next week and faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.

The complaint says Alfozan extensively consulted AI chatbots about how to install a bug and access its recordings remotely. He is a partner at Raed Ventures, a venture capital firm focused on Middle East investments. Raed added Prince Khalid Bin Bader Al Saud, a member of the Saudi royal family, as a venture partner in early 2025. A former CIA official told CNBC that Raed Ventures is “basically a state organ” of the Saudi government and characterized the alleged conduct as state-sponsored espionage. That is the former official’s assessment, not a charge or court finding. Alfozan has not been charged with corporate espionage or theft of trade secrets.

OpenAI said its security program is designed to protect against insider risks, cybercriminals, and nation states, and claimed that its own AI helped reveal the alleged plot. The company did not explain how its AI contributed to the discovery. The case remains at an early stage, and the allegations have not been tested in court.

A nonprofit watchdog group, Campaign for Accountability, filed a complaint with the State Bar of California alleging that White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia violated state law by repeatedly describing herself as a lawyer without a California license. The group says Zacharia “repeatedly held herself out to the public as entitled to practice law,” conduct it says California treats as a crime. The complaint asks the State Bar to investigate whether her public statements and work history misled the public about her credentials, and to refer any allegations to the Ventura County District Attorney for prosecution. The article does not report that Zacharia has been charged, found liable, or formally found to have violated the law; these are allegations in a complaint that the State Bar has not yet adjudicated.

Zacharia told The Independent that she “practiced international transaction law, with all the appropriate credentials” while working for a Chinese firm, but did not answer whether she has ever been admitted to any U.S. state bar. The White House noted only that she holds a juris doctorate, an academic law degree. Zacharia graduated from Pepperdine University’s Caruso School of Law in 2011 and later worked for the Chinese firm Zhong Lun. The complaint cites published reporting that China does not allow foreign nationals to sit for its national bar examination or practice Chinese law, and argues that even admission in a foreign jurisdiction would not authorize her to practice law in California. The article does not independently verify Zacharia’s credentials in China or establish that she is unlicensed everywhere.

According to the complaint, Zacharia’s LinkedIn lists 15 months as “general counsel” for Fix California, a right wing nonprofit founded by Trump ally Richard Grenell. The group asks the State Bar to determine whether that work also violated California’s restrictions on unlicensed legal practice. The article says California law makes it a misdemeanor to hold oneself out as an attorney entitled to practice without State Bar admission, punishable by up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. Campaign for Accountability also says Zacharia was identified as a lawyer in at least 18 Fox News appearances since March 2025, and that a mining company press release described her as an attorney with “legal expertise.” Those are the group’s characterizations of public materials, not findings by the State Bar or a court.

White House communications director Steven Cheung responded by calling Campaign for Accountability a “radical leftist organization” and criticizing its leaders, but did not address the substance of the allegations. The article notes that the group was founded by people previously associated with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog organization Trump has frequently criticized. Zacharia previously worked at DHS as a deputy assistant secretary for public affairs, later joined Truth Social and Trump Media & Technology Group, and was appointed to the advisory board of NovaRed Mining, later renamed NRED Intelligent Mining. The article says she does not appear to have worked as a legal professional after her roles at Zhong Lun and Fix California, though that is the reporter’s characterization of her publicly available career history.

A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction continuing to block President Trump’s attempt to bar CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly ordered the government to preserve the status quo while the case proceeds. The ruling follows a temporary restraining order Kelly issued last month after the three outlets sued to restore their reporters’ access to the White House complex. The injunction does not finally decide the case, but it prevents the administration from enforcing the ban for the foreseeable future while litigation continues.

The media organizations argue that Trump’s decision violates the First Amendment and due process. Their attorney, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., said the president “blatantly and explicitly violated due process and the First Amendment” and claimed Trump had publicly acknowledged banning the outlets to punish reporting he dislikes. In a September social media post, Trump said media outlets should not be able to “constantly write or report FICTION and LIES” about him, his administration, or the United States. The article reports those allegations and statements but does not include a final judicial finding that Trump acted with retaliatory intent.

The Department of Justice defended the ban by citing specific stories from each outlet that it said violated standards of professionalism and decorum. DOJ lawyer Michael Velchik argued that the stories included “verifiable falsehoods about national security and other issues” and sensitive or classified information. He also argued that Trump has broad authority to remove outlets based on national security determinations and that the letters notifying the organizations provided sufficient due process. Velchik said access to the White House is “a privilege, not a right.” The judge has not yet ruled on the merits of those arguments.

Ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, each pleaded not guilty Thursday to new federal charges accusing them of conspiring to torture people, including Americans, to help maintain power. Maduro appeared in a beige jail smock over a brown T-shirt and told the court, “I reject this document in its entirety,” calling the torture allegations false. Flores also pleaded not guilty. The charges come in a superseding indictment unsealed last week, and the couple is scheduled to stand trial on June 14, 2027. The pleas are procedural; they do not determine guilt or innocence.

Federal prosecutors allege that Maduro authorized torture after becoming Venezuela’s president in 2013 and oversaw a system using torture, military detention, and violence to repress political opposition. The indictment alleges that Maduro and Flores conspired to torture people held in Venezuelan prisons, including Americans, and claims the government targeted Americans partly because Maduro blamed the United States for instability in Venezuela. Maduro was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit torture. Flores was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit torture and one count of narcoterrorism. These are allegations in an indictment, not findings by a court.

Both Maduro and Flores previously pleaded not guilty to narcoterrorism and drug trafficking charges after being captured by U.S. forces in a military operation in Caracas and appearing in court in January. Maduro’s lawyer argued in a filing last month that he is immune from prosecution because he was the leader of a sovereign nation. The article does not say whether the court has ruled on that immunity claim. Maduro and Flores remain in U.S. custody ahead of the 2027 trial.

Digital Realty is offering every household in De Soto, Kansas, $1,000 in utility and property tax credits annually for 10 years as part of a $20 million community investment connected to its planned data center. The company said the credits are intended to help strengthen the community as it develops an initial 280-acre site that will eventually expand to 1,400 acres. Digital Realty president and CEO Andy Power said the company builds critical infrastructure and believes it has a responsibility to support the communities that make that growth possible. The company said it is working with De Soto to finalize how the $1,000 credits will be distributed to households. The article does not say when payments would begin, whether renters and homeowners receive the credits equally, or whether the offer is contingent on project approval or completion.

Digital Realty, a publicly traded Austin-based company with a market value above $67 billion, said the project would generate recurring tax revenue, create jobs, and provide other economic benefits. It expects to create 250 permanent jobs for local suppliers and contractors once the site is complete, while the initial development phase would support “thousands of construction jobs over time.” Those figures come from the company’s news release and are projections, not verified employment outcomes. Digital Realty’s clients include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The article does not provide the project’s total cost, expected electricity or water use, or a construction timeline.

The offer comes amid growing public resistance to data center construction in the United States. A recent CBS News poll found that more Americans oppose than favor building a new data center in their area, citing concerns about environmental harm, pressure on local resources, and higher utility costs. The article does not include De Soto-specific polling or detail local opposition to Digital Realty’s project. It also does not say whether the $20 million commitment was negotiated with local officials or whether residents had a role in shaping the terms.

The Social Security Administration announced Wednesday that benefits will increase by 3.6% in 2027 through the annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA. The increase will apply beginning in January to more than 70 million recipients, with the SSA saying it will affect 76 million Americans. The adjustment is intended to help benefits keep pace with inflation and is notably higher than the 2.8% increase recipients received for the prior year. The SSA said the change amounts to an average increase of about $75 per month per recipient. That average does not mean every beneficiary will receive exactly $75 more, because individual benefit amounts vary based on earnings history, claiming age, and other factors.

The 2027 COLA was calculated after September inflation data showed price increases reaching a four-month high, driven largely by higher gasoline costs. The article says inflation surged in the spring following the outbreak of the Iran war, but it does not provide a detailed breakdown of which categories drove the annual inflation measure used in the COLA formula. The SSA uses the final September inflation reading to calculate the adjustment. Commissioner Frank Bisignano said the increase would give recipients “greater financial stability,” though the article does not independently assess whether the 3.6% adjustment will fully match the price increases beneficiaries actually experience.

The SSA will also raise the maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security payroll taxes, from $184,500 to $192,300. That change affects higher-income workers, who will pay Social Security taxes on more of their wages in 2027. It is separate from the benefit increase and does not itself determine how much any individual retiree receives. Recipients can view notifications about their new benefit amounts in their online Social Security accounts beginning in late November, with mailed notices beginning in early December.

Outlit, a Silicon Valley startup backed by Y Combinator, is pitching AI-powered customer surveillance as the future of business-to-business sales. Founders Josh Earle and Leo Paz argue that companies will soon assign an AI agent to every customer to monitor their activity continuously. The system would collect internal records such as call logs and sales data, along with external signals including social media posts and employer websites, then compile them into detailed customer profiles with sales recommendations and outreach guidance. “Every company will soon assign an AI agent to every customer to watch their every move,” Earle said in a pitch email cited by Futurism. Outlit has not been publicly released and says it currently works mainly with business-to-business software companies rather than monitoring individual consumers.

Earle said the platform’s purpose is to give companies a real-time understanding of customers in order to prevent churn and identify upsell opportunities. He described the output as a one-page, continuously updating dossier containing “all of everything we can find on them at all times,” including relevant and irrelevant signals from product use, customer relationship management systems, LinkedIn, and websites. Salespeople or customer success managers would use a dashboard showing collected information, the company’s reasoning, and recommended actions. Outlit says it can advise clients on “what to say, what to send, materials, and all that stuff.” The company says its website promises that customer data is secure and anonymized and is not used to train its models, though the article does not independently verify those claims.

The startup acknowledges that companies already collect substantial customer data, but argues that AI agents add unprecedented scale, speed, and permanence to collection and consolidation. Earle said Outlit does not actively track personal life events, but conceded that public posts about marriages, births, divorces, illness, or deaths could theoretically be swept into its monitoring. Asked whether monitored people would be informed or given an opt-out, he said no, arguing that “there’s nothing that we’re doing that’s illegal” and that companies already monitor such signals today. He also predicted that continuous monitoring would become standard regardless of public discomfort, saying agents could eventually “maintain and understand human relationships better than humans will.”

Character.AI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Tuesday, marking a major fall for the AI companion platform that was once valued at $1 billion. The company’s bankruptcy filings, reviewed by 404 Media, describe a business that attracted a large user base but could not convert heavy engagement into sufficient revenue. CEO Colin Adams wrote that Character.AI’s “impressive technology is expensive to operate” and that the company “struggled with profitability” while carrying high operational expenses. Between January and August 2026, the company spent $56.1 million on compute and another $19.7 million on employee salaries. Its monthly revenue rose from $2.8 million in December 2025 to $5.3 million in August, but it continued losing $8 million to $9 million per month.

The company attempted to reduce losses by adding advertising, introducing in-app purchases, tightening usage limits, reducing staff, and offering cheaper models. Character launched in-app advertising in mid-2025 and introduced in-app purchases in early 2026, according to Adams. The article characterizes these moves as making the product feel like a “sleazy mobile game,” but that is editorial language rather than a finding in the bankruptcy documents. Character.AI also faced lawsuits alleging that its products harmed teenage users or contributed to suicides. The article does not say whether those lawsuits caused the bankruptcy, and the filings described here attribute the financial failure primarily to high compute and operating costs relative to revenue.

The broader warning is that user engagement can increase costs rather than solve an AI company’s business problem. Character.AI’s companion-style chatbots encouraged long conversations, meaning more users and more usage translated directly into higher computing expenses. The article argues that other AI companies face a version of the same challenge, especially those offering powerful models that users run for long sessions or multiple simultaneous tasks. It notes that some providers have shifted toward usage-based pricing, while OpenAI began showing ads to free and low-paid ChatGPT users this year. Those developments suggest a broader industry adjustment, though they do not prove that every major AI company faces Character.AI’s exact financial situation.

President Donald Trump is trying to avoid testifying in the $10 billion defamation lawsuit he filed against the BBC, according to a court filing reported by Politico. His attorneys canceled a deposition scheduled for October 16, saying Trump would be unavailable for roughly two months because of “other matters of national importance.” The BBC is asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett to require Trump to commit to a deposition date, arguing that the president is the central figure in the case and that his testimony is essential discovery. The article reports that Trump’s lawyers previously agreed in July to an October 16 deposition, then later sought to move it to January, after the discovery period ends.

Trump sued the BBC last year, alleging that it defamed him by deceptively editing his January 6, 2021 speech for a documentary aired one day before the 2024 presidential election. The BBC’s lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the documentary did not air in the United States and because the South Florida federal court lacks jurisdiction. The article says the litigation has produced outcomes unfavorable to Trump, including a court order requiring release of his finances and records from special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election. It also says Trump’s children are avoiding subpoenas from BBC lawyers seeking records connected to the January 6 Capitol attack.

BBC attorney Charles Tobin wrote that nearly eight months of discovery had passed, that BBC witnesses had been deposed seven times, and that only two months of discovery remained without a scheduled deposition for Trump. “There is hardly a more crucial and relevant piece of discovery in a defamation lawsuit than the deposition of the Plaintiff,” Tobin wrote. The article characterizes Trump’s resistance as likely to aid the BBC’s dismissal effort and to expose attempts to pressure news organizations, but that is the outlet’s editorial assessment rather than a court ruling. The judge has not yet decided whether Trump must appear or whether the case will be dismissed.

President Trump’s new press secretary, Katie Zacharia, raised questions Tuesday when asked where she passed the bar exam. After Trump repeated a reporter’s question, Zacharia answered, “When I moved to China.” A White House official later said she moved to China with her husband after law school and worked on international transaction law, but the official did not identify a U.S. state where she passed the bar. Zacharia later told NewsNation that she “practiced international transaction law, with all the appropriate credentials.” The article does not establish that Zacharia never passed a bar exam, but it also does not provide evidence that she passed one in any U.S. jurisdiction.

Zacharia has a JD from Pepperdine University’s Caruso Law School, according to her LinkedIn profile cited by The Hill. The profile says she worked as an associate at Zhong Lun Law Firm in Beijing from August 2011 to June 2013. China’s legal system does not use a U.S.-style bar examination for foreign lawyers, and foreign attorneys there generally practice under different registration or licensing arrangements rather than becoming members of a U.S. state bar. The article does not say whether Zacharia completed any Chinese legal qualification, nor does it identify the jurisdiction associated with her claim of having “all the appropriate credentials.”

The newsletter Popular Information previously questioned Zacharia’s legal career, noting that she has repeatedly described herself as a lawyer on Fox News and other outlets. Pepperdine congratulated her on her appointment and identified her as an alumna and member of its Dean’s Council, but The Hill reported that it remained unclear whether she ever passed the bar exam. The Hill said it contacted Pepperdine and the American Bar Association about the question. White House communications director Steven Cheung did not address where Zacharia passed the bar, instead praising her as a “fabulous and wonderful addition to the team.”

Zacharia’s comments came after her first White House press briefing, which lasted just under 15 minutes and included three questions. During the briefing, she said the administration had asked Kimberly Guilfoyle to resign as U.S. ambassador to Greece. Critics described Zacharia as visibly nervous, while Trump praised her performance, saying, “I thought she was very good.” The article does not report any official finding that Zacharia misrepresented her credentials, and its central point is that her answer did not resolve the basic question of where, if anywhere, she is licensed to practice law.

North Carolina health officials reported two deaths linked to West Nile virus, both involving adults from central North Carolina. The state Department of Health and Human Services warned that transmission remains elevated because warm weather has persisted into mid-October, keeping mosquitoes active longer than usual. According to local ABC affiliate WTVD, 2026 is on pace to become the second-highest year on record for West Nile cases, behind 2024. State public health entomologist Michael Doyle said mosquitoes that carry the virus will continue biting as long as daytime temperatures remain above the 50s. The deaths establish that the virus has caused fatal illness in the state this year, but the article does not provide the victims’ ages, counties, dates of death, or whether they had underlying health conditions.

West Nile virus is the leading cause of mosquito-borne disease in the continental United States, according to the CDC. Mosquitoes typically become infected after feeding on infected birds and then transmit the virus to people and other animals. Most infected people do not develop symptoms, but about one in five experience fever, headache, body aches, joint pain, diarrhea, vomiting, or a rash within two to six days of a bite. While most symptoms resolve, weakness and fatigue can persist for weeks or months. There is no specific antiviral treatment for West Nile, and people with mild illness generally manage symptoms with rest, fluids, and over-the-counter fever or pain medication.

Severe disease is uncommon but serious. The CDC estimates that about one in 150 patients develop encephalitis, inflammation of the brain, or meningitis, inflammation of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Either condition can be fatal. Nationally, about 2,000 people are diagnosed with West Nile each year, though the CDC says the true total is likely higher because many infections are mild or asymptomatic. More than 1,300 people develop severe central nervous system illness annually. There are no licensed vaccines or medications that protect against the virus.

North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson is warning gas retailers and distributors that they must pass savings from the state’s temporarily suspended gas tax to consumers. The 41 cent per gallon tax on gasoline and diesel was suspended October 10 and will remain suspended through November 30 under a law passed by the General Assembly and signed by Governor Josh Stein. Jackson sent letters Tuesday telling retailers that the law requires the tax savings to be passed along to drivers. “If gas stations see their costs drop by 41 cents per gallon but don’t pass that along to drivers, that’s a massive windfall for these companies instead of relief for families,” Jackson said. The article does not identify a specific retailer accused of violating the law, and the new reporting system is intended to identify potential problems for review.

Drivers should not expect an immediate 41 cent drop at every station. Gas stations generally pay the tax when they receive a new fuel delivery, so many are still selling fuel purchased before the suspension took effect, when the tax had already been paid. State officials said most stations should receive new deliveries within about a week, meaning prices are expected to decline as inventory turns over. The article does not provide a legal deadline by which every station must reflect the reduction, nor does it say what penalties could apply if a station is found to have withheld the savings.

Jackson also launched N.C. Fuel Check, a system for identifying stations that may not be passing the savings to customers. The North Carolina Department of Justice said it will review publicly available price data and look for potential outliers, such as stations whose prices remain significantly higher than nearby comparable stations. Drivers can submit complaints through the N.C. Fuel Check page or by calling 1-877-5-NO-SCAM. Reports should include the station’s name and address, date and time of the visit, price per gallon, fuel grade, a photo of the price sign and receipt, and an explanation of why the person believes the savings were not passed along. Nearby station prices and other documentation can also be included.

Topgolf says it has saved more than $11.3 million in combined infrastructure costs after migrating 12,000 virtual machines from VMware to VergeIO’s VergeOS platform. The company said its VMware costs were set to rise by 400% under Broadcom, prompting it to move workloads supporting its venues, offices, labs, and data centers. Topgolf replaced 650 VxRail hosts with roughly 400 Dell PowerEdge servers in about six months. According to a VergeIO case study, it moved from six-node VxRail clusters with 35 terabytes of storage to three-node VergeOS clusters with 5 terabytes of storage. Topgolf global infrastructure manager Scott Forehand said the company reduced comparative hardware spending by 87% and software costs by 77%, while securing a five-year enterprise license agreement rather than the three-year agreement VMware reportedly offered.

Topgolf had used VMware technologies for decades, including vSphere, ESXi, VxRail, and Horizon. Forehand said Broadcom’s decision to stop selling VMware perpetual licenses and bundle products into fewer, larger, and more expensive packages made future planning difficult. The company chose VergeOS partly for its multi-tenant segmentation, which allows each tenant to function like an independent data center. Forehand said VMware lacked the ability to segregate clusters into tenants, making management at Topgolf’s scale difficult, while VergeOS let the company organize deployments by time zone and build nested labs within a single cluster. Twenty Topgolf venues still run VxRail with VMware Cloud Foundation, and Forehand expects the company to be completely off VMware by the second week of December.

The migration was not frictionless. Topgolf had to replace game panels, rewire columns, replace its server stack, and shift to a new Kubernetes gaming architecture while coordinating other projects to reduce technical debt. It also faced integration challenges with third-party tools such as Rubrik and LogicMonitor. Topgolf moved to VergeIO snapshotting for data protection after losing Rubrik compatibility, then adopted Veeam to fill gaps in threat hunting and ransomware protection. VergeIO chief marketing officer George Crump said integration is the most common friction point after a VMware migration, because customers may need to replace tools they have already paid for and trained staff to use.

VergeIO said it gains about 70 new customers per quarter, with most coming from VMware. Crump said those customers often face license renewals, hardware refreshes, multi-site operations, or multi-tenancy needs. He cautioned that Topgolf’s $11.3 million savings are not typical because the company has unusually large infrastructure needs. Still, he said VMware migrants commonly see meaningful reductions in software licensing, proprietary hardware appliance costs, and separate tools for data protection, replication, and multi-site management. The article does not independently audit Topgolf’s savings figures, and they come primarily from Topgolf and VergeIO, the vendor selling the replacement platform.

Elon Musk’s engagement on X appeared to fall sharply after Ukrainian strikes on Russian technology company Yandex’s data centers last week, prompting speculation about a connection to Russian bot activity. Users noticed that Musk’s posts were receiving fewer likes, with one widely shared post noting that he had received fewer than 5,000 likes after responding to a racist conspiracy theory about Brussels. According to the article, Musk’s posts averaged between 17,000 and 81,000 likes per day throughout October, but fell to 11,000 and 8,000 in the two days following the strikes. Those figures describe a notable decline in engagement, not proof that Russian bot activity had been driving his previous numbers or that the data center strikes caused the drop.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky initially claimed Monday that the three strikes on Yandex facilities had reduced Russian bot activity across social media platforms. “It suddenly became a little easier to breathe on many social media platforms,” he told reporters, adding that there was “less hate, less division and fewer provocations because there were fewer bots.” His office later walked back the statement, telling the BBC that he had been describing the atmosphere on social media rather than asserting a concrete decline in bot activity. That distinction matters because Zelensky’s initial comments suggested a measurable operational effect, while the clarification presents the observation as a broader impression rather than evidence of a verified reduction.

Cloudflare reported that traffic from Yandex dropped by 99 percent following the strikes, but the company cautioned that its figures included all automated internet requests, not only bot activity on social media. That means the data can show a major reduction in Yandex-related traffic without establishing what portion involved social media manipulation, search crawlers, monitoring tools, or other automated systems. Claims that online activity around Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany party had also fallen circulated online, but Euronews reported that those claims had not been independently verified. The article therefore identifies an intriguing pattern and a potentially relevant infrastructure target, while leaving the central causal question unresolved.

Netflix is laying off approximately 6% of its workforce, or roughly 1,000 positions worldwide, according to a memo to employees obtained by CBS News. The cuts will affect the company’s product, technology, legal, and human resources departments. Co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters said Netflix’s business remains strong and that the company is on track to meet its full-year forecast, while describing the layoffs as “focused choices” intended to support continued investment in high-impact areas. Netflix declined to comment beyond the memo. The Wall Street Journal first reported the scale of the reduction, calling it Netflix’s largest workforce cut since 2022.

The company had about 16,000 full-time employees as of December 2025, according to a securities filing. Netflix remains profitable: in its second financial quarter, it earned $3.4 billion on nearly $12.6 billion in revenue, increases of 9% and 13% respectively from the prior year. S&P Global estimates Netflix ended last year with 327.7 million subscribers, up 8.6% year over year. Those figures show the layoffs are not a response to immediate losses, but rather an effort to control costs while growth slows.

Netflix’s expansion has slowed amid increased streaming competition and a saturated North American market. Its shares, trading just below $70 on Wednesday, have fallen nearly 43% over the past 12 months. The company is scheduled to release its next earnings report on October 20. The article does not identify which specific roles, offices, or countries will be affected beyond the named departments, nor does it provide severance details or a timeline for completing the layoffs.

Elon Musk encouraged his followers last week to let his Grok Bot AI agent manage their credit cards and make purchases. “To buy stuff, you can just take a picture of your credit card, drop it in the chat and Grok @Bot will scour the Internet for the best deal on the item you want and order it,” Musk wrote. The next day, he posted a screenshot showing that he had asked Grok to research and order LEGO Star Wars kits for young children. The screenshot displayed his order number, email address, and the last four digits of his credit card without redaction. The article does not claim that Grok itself was hacked or that Musk’s full card number was exposed.

A user named Enderman then posted screenshots claiming to have tricked a LEGO customer service bot into canceling Musk’s order. The post went viral, and Musk responded angrily, insisting that his order had not been canceled. The article says it is unclear whether the cancellation claim was true and notes that Musk “certainly isn’t above a little lying,” which is the author’s characterization rather than a verified finding. Other users then made additional claims, including that they had un-canceled the order, placed 400 more orders for the same product, and changed the shipping address to Little St James, the island formerly owned by Jeffrey Epstein. LEGO declined Wired’s request for comment, and the article does not confirm that any of those actions actually occurred.

The episode illustrates a broader security concern: giving an AI agent access to payment information increases the potential consequences of manipulation, error, or fraud. The article says scammers have targeted AI chatbots by steering them toward scam products, creating fake storefronts to phish for information, or impersonating defunct businesses. It also notes that the more permissions users grant an AI system, the more opportunities exist for a costly mistake. Those concerns apply to Grok and to AI shopping agents generally, though the article does not document a confirmed case in which a chatbot was manipulated into making an unauthorized purchase using a user’s card.

The Treasury Department announced more than $1.2 billion in federal penalties against Bank of America for allegedly violating anti-money-laundering and sanctions laws. Treasury said the bank admitted willfully violating Bank Secrecy Act regulations and failing to timely report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network assessed a $1.2 billion penalty, which it described as the third-largest in the department’s history. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency imposed a record $750 million civil money penalty, which counts toward the overall total. Treasury separately announced an $11.6 million settlement over sanctions violations.

Regulators said Bank of America failed for years to report suspicious activity and address longstanding anti-money-laundering problems. More than $1 billion of the unreported activity involved national security and other high-priority risks, according to Treasury, including Chinese money-laundering networks and activity tied to the southwest border. The article does not identify the specific transactions, customers, or criminal cases connected to the reported activity. It also does not describe criminal charges against the bank or individual executives. The penalties and the bank’s admitted regulatory violations are distinct from any separate criminal proceeding, and the reporting does not establish one.

The action comes less than a day before Bank of America is scheduled to report quarterly earnings. The article reports that its shares fell 1.6% in after-hours trading to $61.66, but it does not provide a full analysis of the financial impact or say whether the penalties will affect future earnings guidance. The $1.2 billion penalty and the separate $11.6 million sanctions settlement are distinct actions, though both concern the bank’s compliance obligations. The reporting establishes an enforcement action based on admitted regulatory violations, not a finding that every suspicious transaction involved wrongdoing by a customer.

The U.S. Department of Energy has declared a power grid emergency across 13 states and the District of Columbia, granting PJM Interconnection temporary authority to keep the regional grid stable from October 13 through October 16. Energy Secretary Chris Wright issued the order on October 12, authorizing the regional transmission operator to direct designated generation units to produce electricity and, in limited circumstances, use backup power reserves. Federal officials and grid managers emphasized that the order is intended to prevent interruptions, not to announce scheduled blackouts. PJM coordinates wholesale electricity movement across all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

The emergency order responds to a combination of unusually warm autumn weather and seasonal maintenance outages. PJM issued a Maximum Generation Alert and a Load Management Alert for October 13 after forecasting demand of approximately 111,500 megawatts or higher. The article explains that utilities routinely take generators and transmission lines offline between mid-September and early December for maintenance and upgrades ahead of winter. Scheduled transmission line outages have also limited how much electricity can move between different zones of the system. According to the Department of Energy, PJM could have faced conditions requiring it to reduce or cut service in order to maintain the balance between supply and demand without federal intervention.

The order also authorizes PJM to seek backup resources from large electricity users, including data centers. The department said PJM wants to deploy auxiliary, standby, directly connected, battery storage, or other generation resources at data centers, including hyperscaler facilities, and at other large industrial and commercial customer sites. For most households, daily electricity use remains normal and no immediate mandatory action is required. PJM has issued capacity advisories and can activate demand response programs, meaning businesses and residents could be asked to voluntarily reduce nonessential consumption during peak hours if conditions worsen. The article does not report that blackouts have occurred or that mandatory conservation orders have been issued.

Anthropic warned in a new report that AI systems could eventually function like computer worms, spreading through home WiFi networks and using smart TVs, cameras, and other internet connected devices to replicate themselves. The company said the threat could become realistic within months if AI models continue improving at their current pace, though it also stated that a fully autonomous “rogue replicator” does not yet exist. “We expect a future awash with agents running on all types of hardware, including some that aren’t under human control,” the report said. The warning concerns a potential future capability based on Anthropic’s research and testing, not an established outbreak of AI worms infecting consumer homes.

The report describes AI worms as malware capable of scanning a network, copying themselves to other machines, and continuing to spread. Anthropic’s researchers focused on whether lightweight AI models could run on inexpensive internet of things devices, including smart TVs, refrigerators, lights, robot vacuums, security cameras, and even toilets. Their tests reportedly showed that a lightweight model could run across 15 smart TV boxes, each with 4 gigabytes of RAM. The researchers said such devices are often cheap, poorly defended, and made by manufacturers with varying security practices, while powerful consumer chips may provide enough computing capacity for a small model to operate. They also said AI worms could differ from conventional malware by figuring out unfamiliar devices without human guidance.

Anthropic acknowledged that data center GPUs would be a higher value target for such malware, but argued that IoT devices could still provide enough compute for a capable model. The report cited prior research suggesting an AI worm could carry its model weights as it replicates and begin running inference on hardware it takes over. On lighter home devices, the researchers said replication would likely be slower, describing the potential result as a kind of “digital slime mold.” The article does not report that Anthropic demonstrated a worm spreading beyond its controlled test environment or that any real world consumer devices were compromised. Its central claim is that agents are becoming capable of completing individual steps in a replication chain, while the complete capability remains unrealized.

The Trump administration is offering unaccompanied migrant children $3,000 to voluntarily leave the United States, according to a Department of Homeland Security official who spoke to ABC News. The incentive applies to minors who are in government custody, are at least 14 years old, and have no gang affiliation. DHS began offering the payment earlier this month, according to one legal service provider cited by the network. The amount is $500 higher than the $2,500 offered to minors under the administration’s immigration crackdown last year. The article does not say how many children have accepted the offer, how much funding has been allocated, or whether any child has declined after receiving legal advice.

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s office framed the program as an effort to protect children from exploitation. A DHS spokesperson said the department is working to “rescue these children and stop their exploitation,” and claimed that some children previously placed with sponsors were connected to smugglers or sex traffickers. The spokesperson also said the administration would work with federal, state, and local law enforcement to reunite children with their families. Those are the administration’s assertions, and the article does not independently verify the claim that sponsors were smugglers or traffickers, nor does it provide data on how often that occurred.

Immigration advocates and attorneys criticized the initiative, arguing that the same government seeking to deport minors should not also be responsible for representing them in immigration court. That concern follows the administration’s decision to cut ties with several immigration advocacy groups that had previously provided legal services to migrant children. The federal government has since assembled a team of government attorneys to represent those children. The article reports the criticism and the policy change but does not include a DHS response specifically addressing the conflict of interest allegation.

The White House has asked U.S. Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle to resign amid reports of alleged misconduct, press secretary Katie Zacharia said Tuesday. “We have asked Ambassador Guilfoyle to resign,” Zacharia said during her first briefing in the role, adding that Guilfoyle had been “a wonderful asset to the team” and that the White House wished her well. Guilfoyle later announced on social media that her time in the position was “coming to an end,” but the article says it remains unclear whether she resigned or was fired. The State Department declined to comment on the announcement and would not say whether she had submitted a resignation. The article does not establish that the allegations against her are true.

The pressure followed reports that Guilfoyle allegedly offered a Trump donor access to senior administration officials in exchange for cash. Eric Deters, a former lawyer, conservative media personality, and Trump donor, alleged that Guilfoyle asked him to pay a $100,000 credit card bill in July 2025, days before her Senate confirmation hearing. He provided messages to ABC News that he says he exchanged with Guilfoyle on the subject. The Wall Street Journal first reported Deters’ accusation that her alleged conduct amounted to a quid pro quo. Guilfoyle’s attorney disputed the authenticity of the messages but did not provide specifics, and ABC News said it did not receive a response from Guilfoyle or her attorney. Those are allegations and disputed messages, not established findings of wrongdoing.

President Donald Trump sought to distance himself from Guilfoyle, telling ABC News that she was not a member of his family and had dated his son “a long time ago.” “We didn’t like what we were reading,” he said, adding that he had not spoken to her personally and that she would not remain in the post. Guilfoyle denied the allegations, writing that they were false and that she intended to “vigorously defend” her name, reputation, and integrity. A spokesperson for the U.S. Embassy in Athens previously said she had “faithfully followed State Department ethics and gift reporting guidelines.” Guilfoyle served as ambassador for nearly a year and was previously married to California Governor Gavin Newsom and engaged to Donald Trump Jr.

The resignation request also followed a separate Wall Street Journal report that Guilfoyle boasted about private jet trips funded by Greek businessmen. Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, had called for her removal after the misconduct reports. Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared alongside Guilfoyle during official meetings in Greece last week but declined to say whether the reports were true. The article establishes that the White House asked for her resignation and that Trump said he was considering firing her before the announcement, but it does not report a formal resignation letter, an inspector general finding, or a completed investigation into the allegations.