​

I have a genuine question for the youth of this country.

Why are we so busy defending political parties, whether pro-BJP or anti-BJP, that we have forgotten our actual responsibility as citizens?

Our job is not to defend the government. It is not to defend the opposition. And it is certainly not to act as unpaid spokespersons for their IT cells.

Our job is to question those in power, regardless of who they are.

I understand the motive behind the current protests, and I understand why people are angry. What I don't understand is why we are fighting among ourselves instead of focusing on the actual issue. Why are people more interested in proving that the other side is wrong than in demanding meaningful reforms? And why do political IT cells keep answering questions nobody asked, turning every legitimate concern into a party-versus-party debate?

At what point did questioning the government become equivalent to supporting the opposition? And when did questioning the opposition become equivalent to supporting the government?

We need to stop thinking in terms of political teams. Governments change. Parties change. Leaders change. But the institutions that protect our democracy must outlast all of them.

Look at the Right to Information Act. It was the result of years of public movements and demands for accountability. It gave ordinary citizens a legal way to question the government and access information that would otherwise remain hidden. Yet, over the years, the effectiveness of the RTI framework has been weakened by changes in implementation, vacancies, delays, and other systemic issues.

The irony is that even a law introduced under one government can be weakened under another. No party should get a permanent free pass simply because it once did something good.

And that brings me to my bigger concern.

Why are we focusing only on demanding resignations instead of demanding structural reforms?

Suppose the Chief Election Commissioner resigns tomorrow. A new CEC is appointed. Then what? If the process for appointing the CEC still leaves room for partisan influence, haven't we merely replaced one individual without fixing the underlying problem?

We should demand a system in which the integrity of an institution does not depend on the goodwill of the person running it or the party in power.

The same principle should apply to the Election Commission, the RTI framework, investigative agencies, regulatory bodies, and every institution that is supposed to hold power accountable.

If we want an independent Election Commission, we should debate and demand a genuinely independent, transparent, and non-partisan appointment process, with safeguards against any one party dominating it.

If we want transparency, we should demand stronger RTI laws, timely responses, functional information commissions, and meaningful penalties for non-compliance.

If we want accountability, we should demand laws that make it harder for those in power to misuse their authority, regardless of their political affiliation.

And before someone jumps into the comments to call me a BJP supporter or an opposition supporter, please understand this: criticising one party does not automatically make someone a supporter of the other.

We, the people, are the ones who give these parties the mandate to govern. They are supposed to work for us, not the other way around.

We have the right to question them. We have the right to demand better laws. And we have the responsibility to ensure that the power we give them comes with meaningful checks and balances.

So my question to the youth is simple:

Why are we spending so much energy defending political leaders who would replace us with another spokesperson tomorrow if it suited their interests?

Why not put that energy into demanding reforms that protect us from the misuse of power by any political party?

Don't blindly trust the government. Don't blindly trust the opposition. Don't blindly trust political influencers or IT cells.

Read the laws. Understand the institutions. Question the claims. Demand evidence. And most importantly, demand reforms that will still protect us when the political party we support is no longer in power.

Because democracy is not about ensuring that our favourite party gets to rule without interference.

It is about ensuring that no party gets to rule without accountability.

That, in my opinion, should be the bare minimum expectation of every citizen of this country.

During a historical interview, former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov detailed how Marxist-Leninist regimes utilize ideological leftists and activists during the destabilization phase of a nation. He explained that these figures, often labeled as useful idiots, are ultimately cast aside, imprisoned, or executed once total state power is achieved.

The discussion provides a classic perspective on ideological subversion, psychological warfare, and the historical mechanics of communist takeovers. Bezmenov's insights have long served as a foundational reference point for conservative commentators analyzing political polarization, institutional capture, and radical social movements.

This commentary matters because it highlights the recurring historical pattern where idealistic movements are exploited by authoritarian

Source Credits : @theelectionwire on Instagram

As Title.

The "Low-cost Langley Louts" are trying to outdo each other to gain attention and dollars

The "Xi Xerox" from Stables of Pseudo-Gandhis is trying to throw them over the edge, and tame one of them

The Threat to Bharat is REAL !

https://news18.com/opinion/the-sovereign-siege-asymmetric-warfare-narrative-cartels-and-the-battle-for-indias-growth-engine-ws-l-10378844.html

There is no democracy in danger. Those people pulling you to roads either have immense money or immense backing. Don’t get distracted. We are already behind the curve of AI growth.

many cops and female protestors are literally fighting.

It's so thoughtful of starlink to disable the Ukraine's satelites on US govt order for the welfare of their own ally to prevent casualties.

We need a leader to allow such companies in india so that when we use the starlink satelites for millitary purposes they would prevent us from making hateful decision and harming our enemy