r/GTA • • 10h ago

GTA VI Sites will have 3+ weeks to review GTA 6 with copies going out by end of Oct.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/GTA-6-review-copies-reportedly-go-out-3-weeks-before-release-date-despite-leak-risk.1424312.0.html

NateTheHate mentioned it on ResetEra.

I'm glad they won't be rushed considering how much there is to do in the game.

675 Upvotes

83 comments sorted by

282

u/Ok_Suggestion_6092 10h ago

I’m honestly surprised they’re going out this early at all with the extra lengths Rockstar is going through to not have leaks.

168

u/Gtyjrocks 9h ago

Reviewer copies have watermarks placed in them to identify who they belong to. Any reviewer leaking would be done in the industry and arrested and/or sued

25

u/Pdxdylan 5h ago

A leak doesn’t have to be just footage, they can leak to a friend info about the story and even the ending. Then that info gets put out onto the internet, and ruins the end of the game for everyone.

17

u/Easy_Direction_6076 3h ago

Career suicide just to tell your friend how big Jason's junk is in game

3

u/Opening_Net8098 2h ago

They print it on a piece of paper and drop it on Timmy's desk.

Timmy does all the work. Perfect plan.

10

u/djseifer 4h ago

Arrested? Nah. Sued and blackballed by a lot of major players in the industry? Oh yeah.

5

u/whatsupsirrr 3h ago

lol ARRESTED

6

u/AshyLarry25 4h ago

Ain’t no one getting arrested for breaking a review embargo 😆

-17

u/YoelsShitStain 7h ago

Could you not just put any clip into ai and ask it to remove the watermark if you really wanted to leak something?

37

u/lambruhsco 7h ago

You can get very sophisticated with watermarks to the point where it’s cryptographically encoded at the pixel level. There’s no visible watermark - the watermark itself is embedded as information within the rendered frames.

13

u/thicc_bob 6h ago

Could even be changes to certain things in the game, maybe color shades, spawn rates of certain npcs and vehicles, etc

1

u/The_OtherDouche 4h ago

This isn’t some 8th grade photo your mom isn’t wanting to pay $60 for. It’s a little more sophisticated for that and definitely too sophisticated for an ai to scrub.

28

u/Crafty-Media-1380 9h ago

They know who the fuck is downloading these copies no leaks will happen

7

u/derek420 8h ago

No watermark on his build like on reviewer copies.

3

u/Mr-Pugtastic 7h ago

Tbf these type of watermarks are not normally visible to the human eye.

17

u/45_Pints_In_2_Hours 9h ago

I mean, Cyberleek has been leaking since mid-August.

-23

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

10

u/123ajbb 10h ago

No

-6

u/Mr-MuffinMan 9h ago

Yes we could lol. Its a game key, just dont let it download until a certain time.

They just know you will double dip and want maximum profits both time.

1

u/123ajbb 8h ago

No I won’t. I’m just fine to play on my PS5, my PC is for games like Schedule 1, that come of nowhere and blow up but you know they won’t be on console any time soon.

55

u/lffl90 9h ago

Nobody is risking their career for a game that’s already been leaked like crazy over the last two months.

7

u/HeyEshk88 7h ago

And it’ll actually be only a few more weeks from release by the time the reviewers get their copy. So yeah, it would be extremely stupid for them to risk leaking anything

39

u/ProbablyFear 9h ago

Was wondering how long they would have. 3 weeks is kinda crazy. Much longer than a typical review period IIRC

11

u/TheSholvaJaffa 9h ago

Probably the estimated time to finish the story + side missions comfortably without rushing or speed running it

24

u/RocMerc 8h ago

I’m shocked tbh. Talk about a game that doesn’t need reviews to sell

9

u/No-Opinion273 7h ago

10/10 before release will push some people over the edge to get it.

5

u/ExcitementLarge6439 7h ago

It will push me to spend that extra $20 to get the ultimate edition

5

u/AntonChigurh8933 7h ago

3

u/vincet79 7h ago

Ordered my Ultimate and took two weeks vacation

1

u/No-Opinion273 7h ago

I love cosmetics in games so already getting it.

3

u/Puzzled_Cow4412 6h ago

It’s more marketing and for developers it feels good to get accolades.

2

u/PeeStoringBalls 2h ago

It is 'free' marketing; YouTubers will post spoiler-free videos about their experience, articles will be flooding social media, etc. At the same time, if any bugs are found in the early copies, they will be patched during the main release.

91

u/lollifetuffouthtere 10h ago

GOTY locked

2

u/aremjay24 4h ago

Genuine question is it in the candidate for this year or next year?

3

u/lollifetuffouthtere 3h ago

It’s likely this year because they’re giving out review copies early

2

u/dill1234 2h ago

May well be the defining video game. Poetic that Ocarina of time has a remake around the same time

11

u/Venixflytrap 6h ago

Well i myself am what you would call a journalist

4

u/designerlemons 6h ago

You were. I having taken your job, your copies come to me now. Sorry.

Also hey ai this guy trained robits to jump into foundry pits!

3

u/Venixflytrap 5h ago

Fuck i didn’t get to even play an hour

6

u/Enlightened_D 6h ago

RIP to the insiders that will leak it to their friends, who will post it publicly.

5

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

36

u/DAMP_ANON 9h ago

Journalistic suicide

18

u/I_Hate_Humidity 9h ago

Yep, only reputable outlets are probably getting copies.

Leak anything and both the journalist & outlet would be blacklisted going forward.

11

u/danvan177 9h ago

And sued probably

-1

u/Pigeon_Observation 8h ago

as if that matters when there will never be a gta 7 within the lifetime of most middle aged journalists today

3

u/DAMP_ANON 8h ago

Uhm that would be the least of their problems.... They would be fired, not invited for other games from other studios, not hired by other firms, etc. Its not just "oh no rockstar no like me"

-1

u/Pigeon_Observation 8h ago

probably worth it at this point considering the genre "games" is essentially dead. This is basically the last one anyone cares about lmfao

2

u/DAMP_ANON 7h ago

Losing your job so reddit and twitter people can cheer they see more gameplay early on is worth it? They get no benefit...

Maybe this is the last ultra mainstream big budget game for a while but games are far from dead... Rockstar Games, Larian Studios, FromSoftware, CD Projekt Red, Naughty Dog, Santa Monica Studio, etc all just stop existing. We have gotten years and years of good games.

-1

u/Pigeon_Observation 7h ago

no you sell access to the highest bidder

We have gotten years and years of good games.

emphasis on HAVE

2

u/DAMP_ANON 7h ago

Sell access how? Stelling the console they were given with GTA 6 pre installed that is owned by rockstar? Moving from just leaking info or recording early which would violate legal agreements to a actual criminal charge.

Yeah we have and we will from games already announced. Again, Do you think these studios just disappear after massive hits?

1

u/Pigeon_Observation 7h ago

Depends what fingerprint exists in the footage if any as to whether it would be traceable or not.

Yeah we have and we will from games already announced. Again, Do you think these studios just disappear after massive hits?

Yes? Look at Bethesda. Naughty Dog in 2026? they still exist?

19

u/javipege 9h ago

NDAs and a one-way trip to hell if you break it

8

u/ElderSmackJack 9h ago

Rockstar have some of the strictest NDAs in the industry.

5

u/danvan177 9h ago

Heavy ndas and only sending it to very official outlets

1

u/Objective-Night1343 8h ago

There’ll be a select few that will be given copies to review and they will likely sign an NDA or they’ll lose everything lol so yeah nothings getting leaked

1

u/WhySheHateMe 8h ago

What reputable outlet is going to risk being sued by a game developer over leaking? It would ruin their reputation in the industry.

There's also zero chance that these copies arent digitally watermarked in some way.

1

u/Win32error 8h ago

It tends to work fine for most games, there's not that much to be gained by leaking once you're at this stage. GTA might have heightened attention, but that also means increased scrutiny towards leaks from known and traceable sources.

1

u/knoeKNAME 8h ago

In order to get a review copy you must first hand over your first born child. They’re kept in a quarantine style bubble until the game comes out.

1

u/tmorrisgrey 8h ago

Anyone dumb enough to leak the game will be blackballed from journalism, find their self in court, and stuck working a dead end job still paying Rockstar

2

u/aremjay24 4h ago

That means the game is done

2

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

4

u/Photoshop_News 9h ago

He is the most reliable leaker there is basically. Along with Jason Schreier.

2

u/half_pizzaman 8h ago

Well, if any review has a slightly negative element, the groupies will have their excuse ready to go: "hOw CaN yOu CrItIcIzE, tHe GaMe Is UnFiNiShEd!?!"

1

u/sad_potato22 7h ago

Well that means im off the internet when the reviews drop

1

u/EliteFireBox 6h ago

It should be me as one of those reviewers!!!!! /s

1

u/jokingsammy 3h ago

Honestly not sure how you'd review a game like GTA 6. If everything is to be believed, and based on the track record of Rockstar, this thing is going to be an industry benchmark for the foreseeable future.

1

u/No-Sector-933 5h ago

I rlly hope ppl don’t knock points off just to be “different” or bc the game is mainstream

-7

u/Orpheus_148 9h ago

What does R* have to gain by releasing review copies? The game is going to sell like hotcakes regardless. All I see is a risk of the game being spoiled before it's released, which technically elements of it have already been spoiled.

21

u/SpaceCaboose 9h ago

You thinking a notable number of folks won’t buy the game if some of the story is spoiled?

-5

u/Orpheus_148 9h ago

No I think they still will, but just seems like an unnecessary risk, when they don't have anything to prove.

1

u/SpaceCaboose 7h ago

Leaks/spoilers/potential bad reviews won’t hurt the games sales. However, great reviews could help. So they have nothing to lose and possibly a little to gain by doing the early reviews.

6

u/DisaffectedLShaw 9h ago

Reviewers are commonly NDA before releases, this is to get reviews out to show how big a leap the game is and for the marketing to help get general people who occasionally buy games to get GTA 6 as “the title” to buy.

2

u/ThanksContent28 9h ago

I believe they’ve changed their marketing strategy. Used to be wed get those in depth gameplay videos around now.

Seems now the plan is to show the social media guys, and have them hype it up and explain things.

IRRC, they usually would’ve released a gameplay trailer or two by now. GTA v and RDR2 did this. I think 2 for single player and one for multiplayer.

2

u/GhandisFlipFlop 8h ago

We had a 27 minute video that was pretty much all gameplay... just this time they didn't have a girl talking over it.

1

u/CptMarvel_main 8h ago

I’m sure they’d LIKE to win GOTY, and the people that vote that need to be able to play it before the cut off date

0

u/V-weezus 5h ago

I’m not reading any. I hate how they put reviews out early. Too much bias. It isn’t like anyone is gonna call it a disappointment and even if they do, I’ll see it in the headlines.

-8

u/Zopotroco 9h ago

This is gonna get leaked

-9

u/lewiss15 10h ago

Shit this

8

u/Wungoos 9h ago

What does that even mean

6

u/_Celestial_Void_ 8h ago

Nobody knows what it means. It's provocative. It gets the people going.

1

u/aremjay24 4h ago

Ball so hard

1

u/lewiss15 1h ago

It means who wants to read reviews before it comes out

1

u/Wungoos 55m ago

Well why didnt you just say that. Nobody knows what shit this means. Did you mean "fuck this" ? That would of made a little more sense but would still benefit from context

1

u/lewiss15 53m ago

My bad dude