Election Day is November 3rd. Early Voting starts October 24th and runs until November 1st.

Clips Summary:

- Shane Gillis admits to googling tons of underage girls and being afraid to show others his Google search history because of this.

- Shane Gillis calls Disney and Nickelodeon child actors “fucking hot”. Shane also keeps sexualizing children as “hot kids” throughout almost all of the clips.

- Shane discusses feeling like a creep after being turned on by “hot kids” at Starbucks and subsequently discusses being worried about being a father who will be attracted to his underage daughter’s hot friends. Hosts discuss how they will have to hide these feelings.

- Shane and cohost discuss how parents at children’s grade children’s prom all must be having intense sexual thoughts about all the children.

- Shane discusses fantasies about an adult white female teacher from a real school based reality TV show (Last Chance U) having group sex with real “young black athlete” students. Shane says it would make the “hottest p*rno ever”. Shane and cohost than discuss how illegal teacher/student news stories turn them on.

- Shane argues that when Donald Trump grabbed women by the p*ssy he was not sexually assaulting them because Donald Trump was famous and “he can do whatever he wants” .

- Shane and cohost discuss history of msterbating to transgender porn. Shane and cohost discuss “hot transgender kids” but state that they did not m*sterbate to transgender kids.

- There are also other clips to strange to describe where Shane and cohost discuss adult and child sexual relations and media content in extremely odd, blunt, and gross manner time and time again.

Any Shane Gillis fans who want to defend him, this should definitely be your “he’s not like us moment”…if you defend him you certainly seem to be telling on yourself and the weird things you are into or support.

You can feel free to use or repost or use this video on TikTok, Instagram, etc.

Agents from the Department of Homeland Security on Monday raided the Washington, D.C., home of Rep. Ilhan Omar ostensibly in connection with a criminal investigation into her childhood immigration to the United States. The raid was signed off on by a federal judge, apparently after a “back-and-forth” with federal law enforcement, and has been condemned by civil rights groups as highly suspect.

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump’s targeting of Omar escalated even further as federal agents issued subpoenas to many of her relatives, including her sister Sahra Noor, and the Wall Street Journal reported the Trump administration’s ultimate goal is to strip Omar of her citizenship and deport her. This obscene abuse of power comes after years of Trump targeting Omar with threats, racist smears, intimidation, and calls for her deportation.

But with rare exception, the response from the mainstream media’s pundit class has been largely muted, with the vast bulk of the coverage coming in the form of he said/she said, down-the-middle reporting. This is in stark contrast with how elite opinion-shapers responded with uniform outrage in the days after Trump’s also dubious raid on John Bolton, his former national security adviser and a neoconservative commentator, in August 2025. Both are part of a consistent pattern of Trump weaponizing the Department of Justice to attack his perceived enemies, yet only the latter solicited widespread media condemnation.

The very day of the Bolton raid, we saw scathing editorials from the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal. Over the next week, each of these newspapers also published separate pieces from their opinion staff opposing the raid, casting doubt on its legitimacy, and otherwise leveling outrage at the obvious power grab. The raid was explicitly condemned in Politico, The New Yorker, and The Atlantic, which published four different indignant columns.

The raid on Omar’s home has thus far received zero of the above media interventions. No editorials, no opinion columns in the Times, Post, or Journal; no preening in The New Yorker or Politico or Atlantic about the erosion of “rule of law.” The Atlantic did run an article on the Omar raid but it was equivocal and Both Sides in its tone. (A similar Both Sides column The Atlantic published about the Bolton raid was not included in our list of opinion pieces expressing outrage over the Bolton raid.)

This is in stark contrast to the breathless tone of outrage leveled at Trump when his DOJ targeted Bolton last year. “It is clear that Mr. Trump and his appointees,” the Times wrote in August 2025, “are perverting the justice system to serve their political interests and intimidate their critics.” “FBI raid targeting Bolton crosses a line in the Trump revenge campaign,” proclaimed the Trump ally–owned Washington Post. Even the right-wing WSJ editorial board, typically a staunch backer of Trump, got in on the fervor under the headline “Trump’s Vendetta Campaign Targets John Bolton,” which made clear “that second-term success for the President includes retribution.”

The reasons for this glaring discrepancy are likely many: Omar is Black and Muslim, Bolton is white and not. Omar is a woman, Bolton is a man. Omar is considered “far left,” Bolton is squarely in the center-right of elite Washington consensus. Omar is a harsh critic of Israel, and Bolton is among its most overtly and bloodthirsty champions. The reality is it’s almost certainly a combination of all these factors. Writ large, Bolton is a member of The Club, and Omar isn’t.

I don't want the federal government, and certainly not the crazies like Ted Cruz, using the federal government to tell us what we can do with our lives. You live your way, I live my way, he lives his way. That's the beauty of this country. I believe in rights. Rights are rights are rights, are rights. I want everybody to be able to live their best life simply as a function of who they are in a country where the federal government doesn't get used against you if the party in power thinks that the way that you live your life is somehow less than the way that somebody in power chooses to live their life.

I believe in the America where everybody has has their rights."

The answer is Rome, New York, with a population of 32,000

Bienvenidos a casa. Este es su hogar. Happy Hispanic Heritage Month, New York."

And that’s why it’s so important what Selena’s doing tonight raising these kinds of funds and awareness to help people understand that mental health is simply an illness, not to be hidden in the shadows or perceived as a family embarrassment. Loss will be devastating to my soul as long as I’ll live. The great Dolly Parton once said, ‘Grief is love with no place to go. My pain about losing my daughter will always be present in my heart, and I think that’s simply because what we deeply love we can never lose, for all that we love deeply becomes part of us."

As non-working royals, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex visited:

•Himmah Food Bank: https://www.himmah.org/

•Epic Partners, a youth charity: https://epicpartners.co.uk/

•Community Recording Studio, a youth charity: https://www.crsstudionotts.uk/