Got my 189 invite today (15 Oct round) and I’m stuck on a decision, would really appreciate input from anyone who’s been through this.
My situation
Environmental Consultant (234312), VETASSESS Group A, offshore (living in France)
Bachelor’s in Environmental Science finished June 2018, started a full-time environmental role in Aug 2018, same employer continuously until Nov 2021, then other related roles up to now
VETASSESS used my first year (Aug 2018 – Jul 2019) as the “qualifying period”, so date deemed skilled = Aug 2019
My EOI counted from Aug 2018, so it ticked over to 8+ years in Aug and I got invited at 80
If they go with the VETASSESS date I’m around 7.2 years = 10 pts = 75 total
Why I think the year should count
The Department’s own points policy (SM-5006, section 10.4.1, it’s out there via FOI) says that if the assessing authority’s view gives fewer points than claimed, the officer should look at ANZSCO and “apply the more beneficial outcome”. ANZSCO 2343 is Skill Level 1, bachelor degree, and my degree was done before I started. VETASSESS’s own FAQ also says the PTA is “an opinion only”. I have the contract, payslips, duties letter etc for that first year, and I’d disclose the VETASSESS date upfront in a cover letter, not hide it.
What I’d love to hear
Has anyone claimed the VETASSESS (or ACS / EA) qualifying year under this policy and actually got the grant? Roughly when, and what occupation?
Did you get an s56 about it? What did they ask for?
Did you write a submission citing 10.4.1, or just lodge with the evidence?
Anyone refused on this? As far as I understand, offshore 189 has no ART review, so I really get one shot.
Side question: my VETASSESS letter says 5.21 years assessed, but the periods it lists add up to about 5.45. Anyone else seen their “years assessed positively” come out lower than their own dates? Did it matter?
I just want to hear real experiences before deciding anything. Thanks a lot 🙏