r/AskPsychiatry • u/Infamous-Doubter • 5h ago
Are fake memories the same as fragmented memories
Just confused about the concepts.
QUESTION: Are fake memories the same as fragmented memories?
What I mean by fragmented memories is like bits and pieces, they don't specifically confirm anything, but they can be befores and afters, or in-between, contain feeling or thoughs, just bits and pieces. Might be recall in a fragmented manner.
Is that the same as a fake memory? What do you people mean when they say fake memories? Like elaborate stories where you are remembering the elaborate stuff and not what you figured out or feel or implictly recall supported by fragmented memories.
are fragmented memories real?
i understand memories are reconstructions, but then how come some memories are considered fake and others are considered real. when wouldnt all memories just be fake then, none of them are the original, all of them are edited, and you can never know for sure can you? you cannot go back in time and be fully certain for breakfast you had cereal or a bagel. someone said something harsh to you or someone complimented you. unless you have some corroborating evidence, how do you if anythng is real.
anyways, not the question. got carried away.
TLDR; Are fake memories the same as fragmented memories? Where fragmented memories are bits and pieces of events/moments/memories that may not be recalled properly, with full detail, and might be missing parts. And fake memories would be fake? Are fake memories elaborate stories, but if someone has fragmented memories and a story is that fake memories because they have a narrative?