r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

AskALiberal Biweekly General Chat

1 Upvotes

This Tuesday weekly thread is for general chat, whether you want to talk politics or not, anything goes. Also feel free to ask the mods questions below. As usual, please follow the rules.


r/AskALiberal • • 3d ago

Israel and Palestine Megathread Israel and Palestine Megathread

1 Upvotes

This thread is for a discussion of the ongoing situation in Israel and Palestine. All discussion of the subject is limited to this thread. Participation here requires that you be a regular member of the sub in good standing.


r/AskALiberal • • 3h ago

What do liberals think of Sen candidate James Talarico (D-TX) recently coming out in opposing trans women in women's sports; backing TX oil & gas, fair voter ID & GOP bipartisanship; calling Biden a failure on border security; putting Texas over the party; and wanting legal but minimal abortions?

37 Upvotes

Sources:

1.) Yesterday's James Talarico CNN-Jubilee Town Hall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tweubjhuaPo

2.) James Talarico coming out in opposing trans women in women's sports in Sept Fox News interview: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NqUJq22ww1c

In yesterday's CNN-Jubilee town hall, James Talarico expressed support for Texas oil and gas industry, saying he'd oppose climate legislation that'd undermine it. He also praised "fair voter ID laws" (while not committing to voting for the SAVE Act).

Crucially, Talarico said former President Biden "failed Texas" by leaving the southern border unsecured. He wants to reform ICE, but opposes abolishing it, viewing immigration enforcement as necessary.

He also praised bipartisanship and partnering with Republicans, said he will go to the US Senate to represent the 31 million residents of Texans, not the Democratic Party. He said he supports keeping abortion legal while wanting to minimize the number of abortions via contraception access and proper sex education.

Earlier in a September Fox News interview, Talarico came out in opposition to trans women competing in women’s sports in cases where it "endangers safety and fairness."

What do liberals think of Talarico taking these positions?


r/AskALiberal • • 15h ago

Trump is sending the DoJ to build an obviously rigged case against Ilhan Omar. It aims to strip her citizenship. How should Democrats respond?

68 Upvotes

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/10/15/trump-administration-seeks-to-strip-ilhan-omar-of-us-citizenship-wsj

In my opinion, attempting to strip the citizenship of a sitting member of Congress, with no new evidence and only the vague hope that her father wrote a 17 instead of an 18 decadrs ago, crosses a line. I don't believe this is an occasion where it is appropriate to sit back and let the system work.

Considering the state of Somalia, this is in my opinion the President abusing his power to threaten a political opponent with harm or death, and demands something more than a letter or statement of dismay, even up to threats of legal retaliation against everyone involved if the farce continues.


r/AskALiberal • • 2h ago

What is the alternative to electorialism?

4 Upvotes

So many people get up in arms about voting for the lesser of two evils and fighting over small nuances in a candidate's politics, and whether voting works or not.

But what is the actual alternative to voting? What can we do instead of it?

It seems like a lot of people on the left who are opposed to voting's plan is

  • Step 1: We have a violent revolution
  • Step 2: Some stuff happens I dunno
  • Step 3: FULLY AUTOMATED GAY SPACE COMMUNISM is instated as the law of the world

r/AskALiberal • • 1h ago

When I see my state spend money on "education" it always seems to get gobbled by admin pay, new constructions, and little spent on teacher pay or anything to help academics. Why should we keep raising the education budget and what should be done about excessive admin pay?

• Upvotes

Another example is they give admin titles and fat checks to people doing work of office secretaries.


r/AskALiberal • • 7h ago

Do you think the soda bans are about nutrition?

7 Upvotes

I am particularly frustrated with the soda-ban cycle because I run a food pantry that works with our county SNAP office. And every couple of years a politician shows up with a bill banning soda, or steak, or birthday cake mix. Every time, the actual nutritionists say the same thing: it costs more than it saves, it pushes families off the program, and it doesn't make anyone healthier. The bill passes anyway (while we spend billions on wars overseas) because the point was never food.

The people who study what hungry families eat could write a sensible list in an afternoon. Less sugar, yes, and more of what kids are actually missing. Meanwhile my line keeps getting longer. I know it's the last week of the month without checking a calendar, that's when the cereal runs out. Hungry kids get sick more, end up in the ER, and their reading slips. And it's never just the food. The kid who eats is the kid who shows up, who can focus past ten in the morning. And a full plate means good grades, because it's all connected. Take the plate away and things fall apart.

I get not loving unelected experts deciding things. But the list is being written right now by Reps who need a culture-war clip for their next campaign ad, the ones that voted for the cuts in the first place. They took a million and a half kids off the program, and now they want credit for policing the cake mix the rest of them can still buy.

Shouldn't the food part follow the food people?


r/AskALiberal • • 5h ago

Do you have successful techniques for combating the fear/world-is-full-of-bad-people/everyone-out-to-get-me mindset of conservatives?

3 Upvotes

I have a MAGA co-worker who I work closely with. I genuinely believe that he is a good person at heart, at least when you consider his everyday words and actions. However, he is deeply entrenched in MAGA propaganda, especially when it comes to things like trans kids or abortion.

When we talk in a general sense about what would make the world better, a lot of his ideas lean liberal. But the second anyone says something remotely anti-Trump, he flies off the handle. He'll bring up off-topic MAGA talking points, shout everyone down, and say that everyone is against him because he's MAGA (our office leans liberal). For example, he'll talk about "those crazy liberals forcing their kids to be trans" and when I calmly say, "That's ridiculous. People aren't doing that," he scoffs at me and says that I don't understand how many bad people there are in the world.

I've read about how conservative brains tend to respond to fear-based arguments, but I'm wondering if there are rhetorical techniques that I can use to subtly shift this perspective.

Anyone have suggestions?


r/AskALiberal • • 7m ago

Is the dyed hair that a minority of working-age left/woke/liberals get, a privilege to some degree?

• Upvotes

A lot of people can't really risk to get such hair (blue, pink, purple etc), as it would lower their economic prospects when seeking work. It's safer to get this sort of hair colour if someone is in a stable job, works in or is applying to more lenient fields (eg human services), or have a strong safety net (living with a family of origin or partner). Perhaps it's a little easier to professionally get away with for some races and for women than for men.


r/AskALiberal • • 11h ago

Is there an issue you feel strongly about but also know will go nowhere/lost the majority of your country on?

4 Upvotes

Just curious to see


r/AskALiberal • • 9h ago

Have you ever considered studying Trump's speeches to learn how to talk to conservatives?

4 Upvotes

I was listening to a clip of Trump explaining to his base why oil inflation isn't so bad:

I know you're worried about having to pay a tiny bit more for your gasoline. Just remember that you're doing it so that a very evil country -- it's a very evil country, the number one state sponsor of terror in the world. We don't want that country to have nuclear weapons. Remember that when you have to pay a little bit more, $4. I'll never apologize. I did the right thing.

Trump's words are not very eloquent, but his argument is simple enough, Trump presents the audience with two hard choices: (1) complete annihilation, or (2) pay a tiny bit more in gas prices. Conservatives are rationally self-interested, so they choose the option that hurts the least. They accept today's gas prices as the cost of tomorrow's freedom.

Liberals balk "but there's more than those two options, and getting nuked is the least realistic one". That's why you guys can't talk to conservatives. That's why you are never going to persuade them to stop taking people's rights away.

Appreciation for nuance is a liberal value. Conservatives are not liberals. They don't share your values. You can't use a nuanced, measured approach to talk to conservatives on your level.

You have to talk to conservatives in the most black-and-white, good vs. evil, red vs. blue way possible.

You have to raise the stakes of every issue to life and death, sunshine and darkness, the status quo or revolutionaries who overthrow the entire order of society as we know it.

You have to appeal to their selfish, self-serving, emotional impulses. "If you don't do what you're told then YOU'RE WHOLE FAMILY IS GONNA DIE! I can't protect you from the wolves and vipers who are hunting you down right now!"

This is a foreign mindset to liberals, but it is the factory default for all conservatives. Since logical arguments require nuance, you can't you use logic to navigate your way through the conservative worldview. None of your logical tools of reason are going to work on them.

Please watch this analysis of Ana Kasparian's interview with Tucker Carlson as a case study in reframing left-wing points of view in the moral framework of conservatism.

Have you ever considered studying how Trump effortlessly persuades and speaks to conservatives on their level?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

What policy shifts in the last century do you guys think have contributed the most to our current economic struggles and general problems in the United States?

10 Upvotes

Let me know what you guys think? What are 3-5 shifts, or more that have really lead to those problems.

Would love to hear different perspectives and I have been trying to learn more about economics lately.


r/AskALiberal • • 6h ago

Would you be in favor of taking away welfare from undocumented immigrants who commit violent crimes?

0 Upvotes

In my state, there was a cyclist who was injured by a hit and run driver who is undocumented and lives in state public housing. The waiting list for these long-term public housing units is very long. Since this is a sanctuary state, there were no immigration or welfare related consequences for the perpetrator

Is it unreasonable for taxpayers to stop financially supporting undocumented immigrants who commit violent crimes?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

What if red states were never unwinnable?

4 Upvotes

Reading this sub you'd think the red-state map is fixed. But go look at this year's Senate numbers. Peltola is running ahead of an incumbent Republican in Alaska. A Democrat keeps beating Marshall in Kansas, IN KANSAS. The independent in Nebraska is up on Ricketts poll after poll, and his whole pitch is basically that he doesn't owe either party anything.

I think what those races share has less to do with ideology than with hitting the right issues at the moment people are mad about them. The Republicans already in those seats have worn out their welcome and Trump is dragging them further, and the challengers keep talking cost of living and corruption, the two things people already bring up on their own, nobody even has to plant it. That looks like the whole trick. The state doesn't stop being conservative, it just stops being unwinnable, if you show up talking about what the kitchen table is already arguing about. Because a lot of us are struggling the afford basic things.

I get that October leads tighten and a good stretch of issues doesn't mean the map is flipped forever. Maybe some of this is just incumbents having bad months. But the map looks a lot more open than anyone admits right now. What issues do you think are the right ones to be hitting at this exact moment?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Is the Democratic Party equipped to fight a competent version of the GOP?

15 Upvotes

A lot of Trump and the current GOP’s political vulnerabilities stem from hubris, incompetence, and being sloppy/overly blatant with their corruption.

If a future GOP administration emerged that shared the exact same radical goals and was just as corrupt, but was also highly competent, disciplined, and discreet, do you think the modern Democratic Party or the broader leftist movement would be formidable enough to stop them? Or does the current opposition rely too much on the GOP tripping over its own feet?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

As a foreign male grad student reacting to the Cornell incident, how should I balance "silence is complicity" with American social norms that view discussing politics as annoying or poor etiquette?

1 Upvotes

I am an international male student in my first year of grad school in the US, and I am confused about American social norms around speaking up on social issues versus keeping things like personal social media light and fun. For context, it's possible I'm on the high functioning autism spectrum as well.

Recently, several female classmates posted on their Instagram stories about the fraternity sexual assault incident at Cornell. Many of their posts stated that men who stay silent are complicit, that they were disappointed so few men on their Instagram feeds were speaking out, and that men need to use their voices and privilege to support women by showing solidarity both online in terms of generally and publicly sharing and posting stories on Instagram, and supporting women offline in more private ways. I completely agree, and in wanting to be a good ally, I reposted several of these stories over a couple of days to show support.

The reactions I received were contradictory and confusing. One popular domestic male classmate told me that posting about political or social issues on Instagram shows poor social skills, because people find it annoying and prefer seeing fun, casual content like vacations or parties. He posted nothing, yet remains popular with the exact same female classmates who were posting that silence is violence. He is well-liked on campus for hosting parties and social events.

Another male classmate, who privately leans conservative privately (as a Never Trump Republican) but publicly acts moderate on campus, told me that posting five stories was weird and performative, whereas one would have been plenty. He is also well liked by these women. Meanwhile, another popular male classmate posted about ten stories on the incident and received praise and private messages from female classmates thanking him for being an ally.

When I posted, I had over two hundred views, but zero likes or messages. Later, during lunch with female classmates who were venting about men not speaking up, one woman mentioned she saw my posts. The others said that while they noticed, speaking up is the bare minimum and does not deserve praise. Later on, that same female friend told me privately that while she genuinely me speaking up, my posts were "a lot" and that I had posted a day too late compared to when the topic was trending as a popular discussion point.

An American friend from my prior job explained that unwritten American social rules often contradict stated values. He said people who are already seen as charismatic, fun, funny, attractive, or cool can post about these issues and receive praise, while less charismatic or attractive people are judged as awkward or annoying for doing the same thing.

I want to understand how liberals view this tension. On one hand, progressive discourse emphasizes that men must speak out, that silence enables harm, and that social issues affect every part of life. On the other hand, there is a strong American etiquette rule that politics and religion should remain private, that there is a time and place for serious topics, and that bringing them up on casual social media annoys people who just want lighthearted interactions, a sentiment shared even by some women, even those who say they're liberal or feminist.

I am seeking advice on how to navigate the contradiction between the moral expectation to speak up and the social expectation not to be annoying or bring politics into spaces meant for casual socializing.


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Could there be a reasonable argument to be made life in prison(without the possibility of parole) is a form of cruel punishment?

1 Upvotes

Thoughts?


r/AskALiberal • • 15h ago

Is it hateful/racist of me to identify as "white/non-trash" when asked my race/ethnicity on forms?

0 Upvotes

Serious question. Most forms allow you to specify an ethnicity not listed. That's how I identify. I'm white, and I'm not trash. I make the distinction because I see roughly 1/3rd of my fellow whites as being, well, trash. And we are all familiar with the stereotype of which I speak. I feel it is important to me, and my specific white culture, to specify that I am of the non-trash variety.

Edit: Interesting note: while there are many comments along the lines of, "calling someone trash is trashy," no one offers that same retort when it's directed at Trump. This tells me that a) the use of white trash seems to stir fewer emotions when applied equally across class bounds and b) Trump is widely viewed as white trash. So my definition is more or less, trump supporters = white trash. Most of them are white, and most of them are trash because they support trash. They can certainly redeem themselves, trash isn't something you're born as. Trash is learned. So I'd argue, white trash isn't racist at all.


r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

Do you think Donald Trump's Presidency will even still be widely remembered in, let's say, 10, 15 or 20 years? Will it remain in popular conscioussness, or are we overestimating how interesting it is?

26 Upvotes

Do you think Donald Trump's Presidency will even still be widely remembered in, let's say, 10, 15 or 20 years? Will it remain in popular conscioussness, or are we overestimating how interesting it is?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Do you think item eligibility for SNAP should be decided by nutritionists?

0 Upvotes

If we could start from scratch, would you prefer that item eligibility for SNAP mostly be decided on by a group of educated nutritionists, who aren't a member of any political party?

So for example if sugary soda wasn't allowed, it'd be out of nutritional concerns, rather than moral outrage?


r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

Should a state press charges against Katie Zacharia for UPL fraud?

23 Upvotes

So I've just learned about our latest press secretary. Putting aside her painfully obvious lack of public speaking ability, she claims to be an attorney.

Here's the thing. No, she is not.

Reporters asked her in which state she passed the bar and she dissembled and vaguely mentioned getting it while she was in China.

I've been enjoying trying to find out if there's any possible loophole by which she might not be lying.

TL;DR: There is absolutely no circumstance in which she could actually be an attorney. Only Chinese citizens can sit for the bar in China. Who took the bar in the United States is a matter of public record and she did not.

This means she lied in public, is lying currently on her LinkedIn, and lied to the administration. It was also, *super fucking easy* to find out. Which means the administration didn't do the barest of background checks on this person. If she or someone else in the cabinet isn't a Russian spy, it's because Russia isn't even trying anymore.

Moreover, it is illegal to falsely claim to be an attorney in the United States. It's an actual crime.

Note: This does not mean that you have to actually attempt to practice law or represent someone to break this law. Literally just claiming that you are a lawyer is called "holding yourself out," and holding yourself out as though you are an attorney is a crime in almost every US jurisdiction. In New York, it's a felony.

If it was on a resume, it's also falsifying public records if she handed it to the White House.

It's treated almost exactly the same as painting "Police" on your car. This is a *very public* crime we're watching her commit over and over.

So my question is "now what"?

Do we just... Let this slide? Throw it on the heap because there are so many prosecutable offenses, it's just a free for all now? Or should we encourage a state AG to actually go after her? California and DC would definitely have standing, but likely others would as well. Politically speaking, how do you think either decision plays?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

How do you find nuance when navigating political issues?

0 Upvotes

On the Internet, its either all or nothing. Apparently, Shane Gillis told a misogynistic joke about how women dress in the gym. I'm not a fan of it. Now, I see one side saying that women need to cover up head to toe in burqas for the other to be happy. On the other one, its women never do anything for attention in the gym, even filming content.

Is nuance just not a thing anymore? How do you navigate complex political topics in this all or nothing environment?


r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

r/Conservative after the Ukraine attack on Russian data centers--how much of r/Conservative is just Russian bots?

38 Upvotes

Recently a data center in Russia was attacked by a Ukrainian strike (slava Ukraini, eff em up) and was knocked out for 8 hours. During that 8 hours, Russian bot activity was dramatically reduced.

At exactly the same time, several accounts and several subreddits showed a sudden drop in their new posts. So I heard (still looking for the source) that r/conservative or one of those subreddits, has over half of their new posts from just two accounts -- and those two accounts were unusually silent during the 8-hour shutdown.

Amusingly, I found this post on r/conservative: https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1x4yn6a/reddit_traffic_dips_after_ukrainian_strikes_on/

In the comment section, several people are noticing that the subreddit feels much calmer and saner during the shutdown.

So:

  1. Russian bots clearly derange our online spaces, making everyone seem more aggressive and crazier than they really are. But how big is the effect? If not for Russian bots, would American conservatives be better, saner, return to a level of decency that at least approximates the pre-Trump era? Clearly not all the traffic is Russian bots, but if they just normalize and habituate evil behavior, could that be a large cause of current Republican culture?

  2. How much Russian bot activity also affects the left? I doubt it's nearly as much, but I also would think it would be silly to imagine it's zero. Too much hateful far-left behavior has that same style of deranged flood-the-zone manipulation. Liberal Reddit spaces are better than Republican, but you still get some deliberately antagonistic and irrational people. Some might be Russian bots, and some might be Americans who have been unhinged by interaction with bots. But it all makes me wonder if something like 95% of the quality of online interactions is the result of Russian bots and 13-year-olds.


r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

Why are conservatives so scared to drop the mask?

14 Upvotes

Conservatives clearly favour authoritarianism. They cheer on the president using his political power to go after political opponents with fake lawsuits and raids, they cheer on the complete upending of our democracy from fake elector slates, to raids on electoral offices to masked men in the streets “securing” ballot boxes at the presidents behest. Hell, they even openly support authoritarians like Viktor Orban, with JD Vance literally going to Hungary to vie for him…

Yet, when asked… they say they love democracy and the tenets of Liberalism. What gives?

Are they all playing some kind of long game? Do they all just have insane levels of cognitive dissonance? Why can’t they just admit openly, “yeah, I like authoritarianism and want the US to be a right wing authoritarian state”? They support all the actions, they just aren’t saying the words.


r/AskALiberal • • 2d ago

What does it cost to have your rules written by people you can never vote out?

4 Upvotes

Four million Americans in six jurisdictions follow every federal law Congress passes, and their delegates watch the floor vote from a desk that doesn't count. Congress also sets their shipping rules, their program funding caps, the terms of their recovery after hurricanes. When the people writing your costs never need your vote, your costs are somebody else's abstraction. Mainland states get senators who answer for the price of things. The territories get a courtesy seat. Rules without accountability are like budgets without audits, everything in them drifts expensive, and nobody in the room has to notice.