Are there any ideas to make a software copy of Glyphs or Fontlab (as Glyph only available on Mac)

Just like title, aren't you guys developing the IDE(s) alternative to (you know) Jetbrains developed ones?

I know you guys are very busy, but hopefully you can find time to document your experiences. From a historical perspective I think this is a project that people will want to study in the future. From a technological perspective I think people will want to how well the tools you chose worked. What decisions you made, both successes, and regrets. From a sociological perspective how well your team worked.
Perhaps a podcast, blog, etcetera.

We all know what the title means... Flash, whens artcraft going to revive the adobe flash atmosphere after it being gone for 6 years? Sure adobe lost their support but this maybe the funniest turn around of the century if people like the way it works.

Please make the CapCut app open source.

Was ready to jump into video editing in Filmcraft and couldn't find how to add a logo or watermark layer. Thinking there needs to be a video > logo option for adding layers of this type. Thoughts?

{feature recommendation? Yes, there appear to be a couple of ways to do this. Thinking it should be a dropdown option in the video menu}

From PhotoCraft to SoundCraft: what each app does, where it already works, where it still falls short, and what Alpha means for your professional workflow.

schade dass die verlaufsumsetzung noch nicht fertig ist. diese im modus luminanz = max brillanz, the final one!

Hi, i'm trying to get into indie animation and for a joke, i want a character to shatter into glass. I was told Effect Craft can help. Where on here is the effect if there is one. I'm just clicking around and can't find it.

why my klauncher do not have fig craft

I mean its being trivialized as made by AI. But for example photoshop and the entire behaviour and all its little patterns and use cases had to be presented to the AI flawlessly for it to come up with the clone. It looks like a very big and complicated task. I wonder how the devs did it in such a short time

I've been working on a shared Ask Agent module for the Craft apps. These are four proposed integrations, not released features.

Select some text, cells or shapes, write an instruction, and your existing agent edits the file. You can follow up in the same thread, keep the result or undo the request. If several agents are connected, you pick one.

The bit I wanted was to keep using my own session and setup. Claude Code, Codex, another harness or provider: the app doesn't call a model or store an API key. The agent needs to be connected to the app's MCP/control interface.

That also means one session can work across apps without starting a new conversation each time. Figures from GridCraft, a summary in WordCraft, then a slide in DeckCraft. If the graphics apps adopt the module, I'd like the same flow for a FilmCraft clip with audio cleaned up in SoundCraft, or a frame edited in PhotoCraft and used in a slide. Those graphics integrations aren't implemented here.

The Actions menu offers a few starting prompts, all editable before you send:

• WordCraft: shorten, fix grammar, rewrite the tone, translate or summarize.
• GridCraft: clean cells, create or explain formulas, summarize, format a table or highlight outliers.
• DeckCraft: rewrite, make bullets, align shapes, match styling or draft speaker notes.
• PdfCraft: summarize, explain, highlight, add review notes, prepare form fields or mark text for redaction. Signing and applying redactions stay manual.

Reviewing what it did

The Conversation section shows earlier requests and replies while you work. After Keep, the app keeps the request and answer in its comments or notes. That is the conversation trail, not a document-version browser.

• The target is held while the agent works, to avoid competing edits.
• Its answer stays in the file as an agent-named comment or note; the exact review UI depends on the app.
• Follow-ups stay in the request thread and undo group. Keep and Undo are human controls.
• The connection that claims the request owns it; other connections cannot take over its edits.

The shared part

The main proposal is craft-ask-agent in craft-libs: a shared request queue, ownership rules and optional egui bubble. WordCraft, GridCraft, DeckCraft and PdfCraft are the first four examples. Each app supplies its own document operations. The actions, UI and behaviour are proposals too, so they can be adapted rather than copied everywhere.

PRs: Shared module · WordCraft · GridCraft · DeckCraft · PdfCraft · PDF MCP bridge

Still a work in progress. Feedback on the flow or the shared/app-specific split would help.

Repo: https://github.com/midasmatterhorn/artcraft-skills

I use Claude Code / Codex daily and wanted them to do real work in ArtCraft — batch-editing PSDs, generating decks, that kind of thing. The problem was the agent doesn't know what each app can actually do. It would either refuse ("I can't edit PSD files") or confidently invent CLI flags that don't exist.

So I went through each of the 13 apps and documented:

• what the automation surface really is (headless CLI, MCP server, the localhost JSON control channel)
• what works today and what's still broken/missing — this part was the most tedious but also the most useful, it's the difference between the agent spending 2 minutes vs 40 minutes stuck in retry loops
• the correct way to call things, verified against actual app behavior, not just the docs

It's all plain SKILL.md files (the agentskills.io format), so any agent that reads files can use them. One install script per target: install.sh for Codex/ZCode/Devin, --claude for Claude Code, --opencode for OpenCode, install.ps1 on Windows.

Thanks in advance

Look at this beautiful launcher: