I am trying to find some photos I saw in the last week or so-
They were photos of “Nordic” alien bodies on a morgue table as well as what looked like a Grey alien but with hair. The pics were likely AI, but they were cool and I wanted show my wife.

Anyone know what I am referring to and if so, can you link them?

Thank you!

Does anyone follow dr. Greer and did you watch his latest amazon prime video. I am aware many think and say he is false, but he at least wants some disclosure and he doesnt seem to villain aliens. I also sense he is a bit controlling and egotistical about the matter. Even the people he interviews it just comes off that Greer is in control of the narrative a bit. What were your opinions ?

DNA may show or may have already shown that these beings are a version of a human. But why assume they belong to another species? My friends, what if they are us, not from the future, but from a common ancestry?

My hypothesis is that life throughout the universe shares a common genetic heritage, shaped by ancient biological engineering. This planet may have been under panspermia millions or even billions of years ago by an intelligence with the technology to seed and influence life.

The uncomfortable possibility is that we are a biological asset within a much larger system, being monitored, managed, and perhaps even cared for. Maybe that is the real ontological shock of disclosure: the technology we possess may have been borrowed, reverse-engineered, or recovered from things that fell from the sky. Yet, despite all our technological progress, we may still be just one component of a much larger universal ecosystem.

Perhaps the hardest truth to accept is that we are neither alone nor the center of the story.

The University of Ica plans to allow public visits.

You’ve probably seen this crop: long smooth head, no visible ears, a pointed blade in hand. It circulates as proof of a reptilian visitor.

The reliefs most often linked to it are in the crypts of the Hathor temple at Dendera. The inscriptions there, published by Dümichen in 1877, describe a figure with “the face of a toad, knives in his hands.” Frogs were tied to the Nile flood and fertility, and ivory knives inscribed with the goddess Heqet’s name were used in birth rituals to ward off evil.

I can’t pin this exact crop to one wall or one deity. Dendera has several frog-faced figures, and some commenters see a lioness, which would point to Sekhmet. Both are plausible. Either way, the context is temple religion, not genetics.

I’ve spent years tracing viral “anomalies” back to their source. The pattern is usually the same: tight crop, no caption, and the original context quietly removed. Anyone have the uncropped photo?

The following text portrays the intellectual honesty of user Dragonfruitodd1989. In this public statement, Thierry Jamin—the original researcher of the Nazca mummies, long before Maussan—threatens legal action under Peruvian law against tridactilos.org for copyright infringement against his institute, Inkarri. He also refutes claims that the mummy Josefina is at UNICA and expresses dismay over the "Large Head" publication, which his team's investigation confirmed to be a modern forgery.

Obviously, spurred by the threat of legal action, tridactilos.org corrected the errors; however, this incident clearly exposes that user's ongoing sensationalism and disinformation. Below is the English translation of Jamin's message:

CLARIFICATION LETTER:

I am Thierry JAMIN, president of the Inkarri Institute Cusco. I am sending you this message regarding your website titled https://tridactilos.com/ where you report on the non-human mummies of Nazca.

Several internet users have pointed out a copyright infringement on that page. In fact, you dedicate an entire section to the mummy named "Josefina" by the Inkarri Institute, and in that publication, you use various photographic documents belonging to the Inkarri Institute Cusco.

In these photographic documents, you indicate as photographic credit: "Credit to David," and as you know, Mr. David XXx is an exclusive collaborator of the Inkarri Institute. However, David is in no way the legal owner of the documents disseminated on your page.

To my knowledge, you never contacted the Inkarri Institute to request the publication of these documents. Therefore, we ask that you remove as soon as possible the documents that do not belong to you or correctly mention the photographic credits to whom they belong: Inkarri Institute Cusco, 2026.

If you do not do so promptly, we will be forced to initiate legal proceedings before the Peruvian authorities to enforce our copyright. We urge you to comply with Peruvian copyright law in the future... and with "professional ethics" (if this concept means anything to you).

We must also clarify that the JOSEFINA Mummy investigated by the Inkarri Institute was NEVER delivered to the UNIVERSITY of ICA; therefore, it is FALSE that it is there. According to our photographic archives, the Mummy presented as JOSEFINA actually corresponds to a body identified as Luisa.

One more detail in the interest of truth: the supposed "Big Head" was investigated by our institution and is nothing more than a modern mask. We are concerned that Dr. Zúñiga's team might fall for this type of deception, which adds nothing to the investigation of the non-human bodies of Nazca.

We appreciate the interest of our followers and the suggestion received to clarify these points, which are beyond our responsibility.

THIERRY JAMIN

Inkarri Cusco Team,
October 5, 2026

Hey everybody,

I'm breaking my self-imposed social media ban to post a link to this.

https://xbio.ca/posts/nazca-mummies-human-dna/

There is a truly astonishing amount of misinformation out there about the DNA files that are published in the Nazca mummies case, and I feel like I've responded to most of it at various places on Reddit, in comments, DMs, posts, etc.

I re-ran all of the analysis I've done over the last few years, wrote it up, and made pretty pictures, some of which are interactive. There it is.

This sums up everything I can think to say on the published sequencing runs. So if anybody out there in the mummyverse is still talking about alien-human hybrids, chimp DNA, or repeating the lies about the samples of Maria and Wawita lying outside of normal human variation, you can send them my article.

As usual, I make all of the data available for people to look at themselves.

I'll answer questions for a couple of days and then I am going back to no social media. :)

Preliminary analysis suggests he was murdered and is a teenager.

Will air nationally in Mexico.

Someone linked the image in the comments of one of the ufo subreddits and i can't for the life of me remember where i saw it. The comment was just casually replying to someone in a thread saying something like "well this is a supposed leak pic of an alien that was captured that Spielberg saw that inspired E.T"

I had never seen the picture before. It didn't look that similar to E.T. but it was Alien was brown a little on the darker side... short and had these eyes that were somewhat far apart that kind of drooped with wrinkles around the eyes and looked almost sad? it was a really strange looking alien and it was just standing with a white background. It is bugging the hell out of me that i didn't save it. I didn't even think to save it because I thought it was a widely known alien pic. I tried searching with Ai on reddit and nothing comes up.

Edit: it looked like of photo of this alien but in color : https://youtu.be/8NvVPxELIbA?si=EkA1A7Q05FK-RLOC

I've noticed with my recent post on here that there was some of you who weren't familiar with the 1992 Riviere-Rouge Quebec EBE. So here's a series of images from a Youtuber named newbeat2012 that doesn't exist anymore, you'll have to use the Wayback Machine to watch his video covering this EBE.
Also Credit to the YouTuber named Lately. For making a video about this EBE too, that's where I found out about newbeat2012. You can still watch his video on YouTube.

I’ve noticed that the mouth and deltoids of the EBE’s
Are very similar.

Believers frequently claim there is evidence available.

Weirdly, they never point to a single bit of evidence, just some website that is clearly bought and paid for by known hoaxers.

If the bodies are indeed legitimate, there should be at least one bit of irrefutable evidence that can convince anyone.

Where is it?

If you can't point to any, does that mean you gullibly believed a known hoaxer who peddled false COVID cures, a known hoax network, and a convicted grave robber telling you bullshit about the bodies? WHY WOULD THEY LIE?

Do note, that I will NEVER take any claims seriously because I am the only true observer of my reality according to philosophy, and that I don't trust mainstream science because they stopped answering my calls.

Nevertheless, I will arbitrarily determine myself the victor in any discussion, because I think it is normal for any actual scientific discussion to have a winner and a loser. I will also arbitrarily change my standards of evidence based on whether I want to believe it or not. This is NOT me being biased, as I am a scientist.

Edit due to the extreme dishonesty displayed by the commenters here:

Not only in this sub, people defend hoaxers for blaming mainstream science for "ignoring" these bodies, when in reality there is no rational argument for that at all.

They effectively behave like fanatical believers, they have no rational scientific reason to consider the bodies real, but stop at nothing to paint them that way.

Becoming liars and hoaxers themselves in the process.

Instead of engaging in personal attacks, that only show your lack of rational arguments anyway, you should demand that hoax team actually do their job: to meet the standards of evidence that every other discovery does and to allow access to the bodies by real experts and provide logical arguments based in verifiable data.

Skeptics frequently claim, there were "dozens" of debunks available.
Weirdly, they never point to a single one.

If the bodies are indeed a hoax, there should be at least one irrefutable debunk.
Where is it?

If you can't point to any, does that mean you gullibly believed some frauds telling you bullshit about the bodies?

Edit, due to the extreme dishonesty displayed by the majority of commenters here:

Not only on this sub, people defend mainstream science in ignoring the Nazca mummies when in reality, there is no rational argument for that at all.
They effectively behave like fanatical denialists: they have no rational scientific reason to consider the bodies fake, but stop at nothing to paint them that way.
Becoming liars and hoaxers themselves in the process.

Instead of engaging in personal attacks, that only show your lack of rational arguments anyway, you should demand that independent western academic scientists actually do their job: to honestly investigate the bodies and provide logical arguments based in verifiable data.