YouGov conducting an internal review and publishing the results that a single survey has fraudulent responses counts as them being unreliable?
When you say that the UK is bad for "trans rights", how are you defining that? Transgender people in the UK have exactly the same rights as everybody else.
I gave links to multiple articles about different surveys with fraudulent responses. Also, not only are they unreliable, but theyāre unreliable in the same way.
I admit that I do find it a little suspicious that multiple surveys that theyāve been accused of doctoring have had results that are convenient for conservative narratives. Inconsistency is one thing, consistent inconsistency is quite another.
___________________________
2: Iām defining UK as being unsupportive of trans rights by how the general public treat trans people and issues relating to them. Issues relating to discrimination and social justice are seldom issues of legality, after all. Discrimination may be illegal, but such laws are only as good as the people who you mean to follow them.
___________________________
This source seems better than the last one, but I canāt really do much to confirm that myself as I donāt have Microsoft Office.
I also frankly donāt really like surveys in general. The medium is good at polling a wide variety of people at the same time, but thereās very little you can do to ensure that the responses are truly genuine. Itās also impossible to gather why a person believes a certain way or the finer points behind those beliefs just by reading a survey.
The why is because people have come to understand what is meant by trans rights. When everybody thought it was the same as gay rights or black rights, they were in favour of it.
Gay rights and black rights were won by dialogue, by making everybody else see the similarities. Gay people and black people wanted to be treated the same as straight people and white people. Everybody eventually came round to the good sense of that.
By contrast, trans rights activists declared that there was to be no dialogue, no debate, no alternative viewpoint allowed. Anybody who expressed any such viewpoint was to be branded a bigot and cancelled. The TRAs weren't asking for trans people to be treated the same as everybody else, they were asking for special conditions that were entirely non-negotiable.
Look, I get it. Who doesnāt love a little balls and dick sometimes? A nice, girthy, veiny shaft, hot milky cum trickling down the length as it throbs from a job well
done. But this whole āgay sexā shit is getting annoying.
As men, we should primarily be focused on three things: survival, the underrated masterpiece that is dark souls 2, and pounding muff. All this gay shit is, well, fucking
gay.
You think I wouldnāt LOVE to make out with my best friend and suck his cock? Of course I would, but thatās fucking gay. You think I donāt want to feel my cousinās
roommate slide his pecker into my gaping asshole? Of course I would, but thatās FUCKING GAY.
Seriously, I miss when men were men. Anyway, this dildo aināt gonna stick itself up my ass while I watch an hour long femboy asmr hypno goon compilation, heed my
lecture.
2
u/C1nders-Two 1d ago
A political survey conducted on the G7 country known to be least positive towards trans rights (in addition to one of the less supportive countries in the world that doesnāt just jail or kill you. Itās actually really bad, no jokes), run by a data analysis firm based in that same country, which has been accused multiple times of having data that is unreliable at best.
The unreliability issue is a common and persistent issue with them, by the way, which could speak of purposeful intent.
Hmm, I wonder how this might affect the resultsā¦
I do respect actually giving a source, though. Not many people on Reddit do that.