The issue I have with this is that all publishers will start making their obligated end date 1 month after release and all future updates past that will be "generous offer"
Then people won't buy it. Anyone interested will see through shady shit like this, and if they want to buy it anyway, then they wouldn't be stopped by an actual date
But that's the thing. If everyone put 1 month end date and still provide updates years later, than that date would be irrelevant but legally would be like it is now.
Publishers can put a 10 year end date in it and earn good faith through it and possibly make more profit though then you have that 1 game with a. 10 year end date vs multiple with 1 month end dates
Theoretically this can cause that 1 game to make more profit and would force other companies to extend the end of service date
Though this is just a theoretical scenario and we won't know how it plays out in reality
18
u/TriRIK Ryzen 5 5600X | RTX3060 Ti | 32GB Jun 17 '26
The issue I have with this is that all publishers will start making their obligated end date 1 month after release and all future updates past that will be "generous offer"