Hey,

its too obvious to state that i should be reading books & articles instead of an influencer. Although which i do already but the thing is most of the time that advice can't be actionable even if i try, and there always a career tension ( i am 20 ) , despite academic focus (which isn't humanities also) my readings are filled with economists/capital owners who don't seem to like marxism or even socialism in general

and let be too real we do use social platforms to build our narrative & i think there are some influencer which do great job in discussing class structure,social behaviour and other anti-capitalist frameworks and they do bring some genuine insight/input on current & historical issues or opposing this fascist regime in general which otherwise i would either have overlooked or would have rather never knew about .

also,

1. i don't need polarized thinkers like lakshay speaks ( i know he isn't marxist ) but you got my point

2. i don't need influencers who just read newspaper headline to me ( i already do that lol) or explain what marxism is

the only one i follow right now is onlytheoreticallyhot on ig & Samim Asgor Ali JNU on youtube

THANKS!!

I came across this reel some time ago by a Marxist creator, and the argument perplexed me. I took these screenshots at the time but haven't been able to find his account again.

I'm relatively new to Marxist theory. I've read more Marxist ideologues than Marx himself, so I'm wondering whether I'm misunderstanding the argument or whether this is an actual debate within Marxism.

I understand that Marxism approaches society through material conditions, class relations and historical processes, rather than simply making moral judgments about individuals or systems. But surely there's a distinction between using materialist analysis to understand why exploitation exists and having a moral commitment to ending it.

What I'm struggling to understand is whether these two things can really be separated. Isn't emancipation from exploitation one of the central aims of Marxism? And doesn't the desire to emancipate people from exploitation, suffering and domination necessarily involve some kind of moral commitment?

Dear comrades,

I'd like to hereby announce that I have successfully wasted 23:50 seconds of my irrelevant life, I'm ashamed to accept I gave the neuter lord Nitish's video a view, it was probably the worst video I've seen on the subject, the neuter lord somehow managed to avoid discussing the Nakba, Apartheid laws, and any documented crimes commited by IDF and Israel, while listing Hummus crimes on the other side and Arab invasions. I don't think I'll see anyone more neuter than Lord Nitish, and I get why he's so highly regarded in the morally correct people's groups. 🙇

Like they accuse Muslims of being terrorists and Christians as "ricebags".

A sikh guy could be normally making a video on any nrormal subject and they will begin spamming gift related to Lassi, drugs and shit.

I just saw a video of a north eastern guy covering the CJP protests and some dehati Gujjar is likee "chal ek plate momo laga".

But god forbid anyone make fun of them for drinking cow piss and shitting in the river that they're supposed to be worshipping.

Like i made a comment criticising the behaviour of jatts and guitars and defenders came saying "dont generalise bro plij. We are bhery nice people" fuck off lil bro 🤣. Indian rednecks.

Parvez Parwaz was passing in front of Gorakhpur railway station when his eyes fell on a large crowd gathered near the statue of Maharana Pratap. It was 27 January 2007. Evening was beginning to fall. He saw that Bharatiya Janata Party’s Gorakhpur MP Adityanath, dressed in his saffron robes, was delivering an inflammatory speech, and people in the crowd were raising slogans of praise from time to time in excitement. Parvez knew that recently, during the Muharram procession, there had been a clash somewhere in the city in which a Hindu boy was injured and later died. Considerable tension had spread because of this incident. He told 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙣, “𝘚𝘦𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦, 𝘐 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘭𝘪𝘱 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘥.” The crowd mainly consisted of members of the Hindu Yuva Vahini. Adityanath had formed this organisation of young men about five years earlier. Parvez always kept a camera with him, and with the help of that camera he began recording Adityanath’s speech.

In an impassioned manner, Adityanath said, “In the coming time, for the blood of one Hindu, we will not get an FIR registered against the administration, but will instead have at least 10 such people killed.” The crowd applauded in excitement.

As soon as Adityanath’s speech ended, Parvez quietly returned home, but the city had begun to boil. Sunil Singh told 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙣, “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘈𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘩’𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥, 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘩𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥.” At that time, Sunil Singh was the state president of the Hindu Yuva Vahini and was Adityanath’s right-hand man. He is also an accused in this case. He had addressed the crowd immediately before Adityanath’s speech. He told 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙣, “𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘭 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘪𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘬𝘩𝘱𝘶𝘳.”

Inframe : @/valentin.henault

"Hum small business owner hai na , humara yaha aise hi hota hai 😭😭🥹😓" - ASHISH CHANCHLANI VINES.

I just got into a fight with her over the protests. I have asked her to stay away from the political side of youtube to maintain peace of mind. She refuses to listen and watches exteme right wing bullshit.

I'm just so tired man. What do I do?

Before asking my question I would like to inform you all that this post is not made for some controversial,political or hatred reasons.its purely out of zeal for history and research.

Ambedkar in AOC mentions that during Peshwa rule Dalits were forced to put a pot(matka) around their neck and they had to put a broom on their back.

I couldn't find historical sources of these claims. Additionally I found posts making refrence to Kelkar( A Maratha historian) who asked Ambedkar about sources for these and Ambedkar did not provide any evidence.

So is this story true? And are these claims false?

And to what extent in historical research can we trust the local narratives and stories especially those associated with historically oppressed classes

Nothing has changed, he is still asking uploading reels and posting stories , its really sad . If u can follow or support him in any way it would be good

Its the bugle of war.. we need revolution.. Viva la revolucion..

He is back 😊🫶

Honestly they should realise they are the last guardian of the constitution and our liberty.

on 20th July protest when police used brutal force and cracked skulls of many people, used pellet guns yet SC just blatantly rejected the plea..it's absolutely horrible.

and right now..closing down every transport medium..cutting down internet, press people are detained, assaulted and SC is just chilling.

what happens when people loses faith in every institutions ?