r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 18h ago
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Analysis/Theory What Muslims get wrong about al Aqsa, Dome of the Rock, Al-Haram Al-Sharif - Useful links and references at the bottom ⬇️
For many years now, emails and graphics that purport to reveal the “True Masjid al Aqsa” have disseminated themselves widely across the internet. “Dear Muslims, Please make sure you and your children know which is the real Masjid Al Aqsa,” a message would typically read, alongside an accompanying graphic that boldly highlights certain buildings within the Haram al Sharif compound in Jerusalem(Al Quds). It laments that “many Muslims think the Al-Sakhrah Mosque, also known as the “Dome of the rock,” is the Al-Aqsa Mosque!!” before proceeding to boldly assert – with the assistance of visual aids – the differences between ‘Masjidul Aqsa’ and the ‘Dome of the Rock’. People can check Graphically if they need the best graphic related information.
The message usually concludes with a warning: “Please make sure you and your children, your friends all know which is the real Masjid Al Aqsa. Check your house for pictures!! many people have picture in there homes showing the wrong mosque!!”
At the heart of such campaigns, lies an apparent desire to thwart an alleged Zionist strategy that seeks to play up the importance of the Dome of the Rock Mosque, particularly in photographs, in order to draw the public’s attention away from ‘al-Aqsa mosque.’ “Israel wants to eliminate the picture of Al-Aqsa mosque from the minds of people, so that when the time comes for it to destroy it and build its temple, it can show the Dome of the Rock and claim that Al Aqsa is intact,” is one rationale that is repeatedly offered.
As noble and well-intentioned such initiatives may be, at this juncture in the history of Masjidul Aqsa, they can also be deeply problematic. Most messages are far too simplistic in their conclusions, fail to grasp the complete Islamic guidelines on Masjidul Aqsa, and potentially even play into the schemings of the Zionists whom these campaigns purportedly seek to expose.
Much of the confusion arising from this matter can arguably be traced back to the onomastics, or the names that human beings themselves have lended to buildings within the Holy City with the passage of time. Referring to the Isra, or the miraculous night journey of the Prophet(PBUH) from Makkah to Jerusalem, Allah says: “Glory be to Him Who made His servant to go in a night from the Sacred Mosque[Masjidul Haram] to the Remote Mosque [Masjidul Aqsa] of which We have blessed the precincts, so that We may show to him some of Our signs; surely He is the Hearing, the Seeing.”
Quoting from the book “Baitul Maqdis and Masjidul Aqsa” by Mohammed Hassan Sharab, the leader of the Islamic Movement in Occupied Palestine 1948, Sheikh Raed Salah, highlights that The Aqsa Mosque mentioned in the Surat Isra’ refers to all of the Haram Al-Sharif, and that the rewards promised in the Ahadeeth for praying in it can be achieved by praying in any part of the land surrounded by the wall.”
The classical Hanbali scholar, Mujir ad-Din al-Hanbali expounds on the constituents of the Quranic Masjidul Aqsa even further. “al-Aqsa is the name of all what is within its compound inside the walls, the building in the foremost area and others, the Dome of the Rock Mosque, the corridors, etc.; al-Aqsa means all that is within the walls,” reads the explanation in his book al-Uns al-Jaleel.
Thus, Islamically speaking, the entire enclosed area, also known as the Haram al Sharif, is to be designated as the al-Aqsa Mosque. In practical terms this encompasses more than 200 buildings, domes, schools, wells, fields, walls and pavements. Quite clearly, this would include not only the mosque with the golden dome, the Dome of the Rock, nor the mosque with black lead dome, Al Masjid Al Qibli. Rather, both would constitute mere sections of the larger Al Aqsa mosque compound.
As the aforementioned messages demonstrate, it is not uncommon to encounter references to the black domed Masjid in the foremost area of the Haram al Sharif compound as ‘Masjid al Aqsa’. These are not entirely frowned upon. However, it should more rightfully be titled Masjid Al-Qibly, stemming from its nearness to the Qiblah. This structure constitutes the nucleus of Islamic activity within the Haram al Sharif, and is undoubtedly most significant comprising both a Mimbar and Mihrab. Still, its can lay no claim to nobility in isolation, but is rather dependent on its affiliation to the wider Masjid al Aqsa, for its sacredness.
The current structure of Masjid Al-Qibly(the black-domed Masjid) was certainly non existent at the time of the Miraj. It’s origins can be traced back to 637 when the Muslim conqueror of Al Quds, Umar bin al Khattab RA first erected the structure. Faced with the dilemma of being unable to build an enclosed structure that would encompass the entire area of Masjidul Aqsa, Umar RA had to settle for a simple crude mosque, which had to be positioned on a specific location orientated southward towards the Ka’bah in Makkah. Umar RA consulted some people as to an appropriate site for the mosque and Ka’b al-Ahbar, a Yemenite Jew who converted to Islam, proposed that the mosque be placed behind the Rock so that the old and new directions of prayer (qiblah) merge, as it were, with one another. However, Umar RA disapproved, reasoning that such a course of action would imply imitation of the Jewish religion. Hence, the mosque was erected in the front of the Rock, that is, the southern part of the original al-Aqsa Mosque, thus making those who pray turn their faces towards the qiblah and their backs towards the Rock. “We were not commanded to venerate the Rock, but we were commanded to venerate the Ka’bah”, he explained.
Umayyad Khaliphs subsequently adapted the building making them the first to erect the Masjid al Qibly according to its current configuration. Renovations and additional structures were added later on by succeeding Abbasid, Ayyobian, Ayoubi, Mamluke, and Ottoman Khaliphs.
The Umayyads were also first to erect a Dome over the famous Rock situated at the centre of the Masjid al Aqsa compound. This rock, itself, was the Qiblah of the Prophets of the Children of Israel – peace be upon them – and is presumed to be the departure point for the ascention of Muhammed SAW into the heavens on the journey of Miraj. However, its significance truly lies in being just another part of the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque; and its eminence shouldn’t be exaggerated.
According to Islamic teachings, a prayer in Al Masjid Al Aqsa – whether inside the Dome of the Rock, Al Masjid Al Qibli, underneath any of its trees, or beneath any of its domes – is equivalent to many prayers elsewhere. This is because all the walled area is actually Al Masjid Al Aqsa, and the sacredness is not confined just to the Dome of the Rock and Al Masjid Al Qibli, or either.
Inaccurate references to the southern musalla of the Al-Aqsa Mosque (Al-Qibly Prayer Hall) as “Al-Aqsa” or failure to recognise the position of the Dome of the Rock within the wider Al Aqsa, may in fact further Zionist claims for other parts of this holy compound, a strategy that is now being actively pursued. Having seen previous attempts at destroying or invading Masjidul Aqsa frustrated, there is a currently a determined drive to divide the mosque into Jewish and Muslim sections – a plan modeled on a similar division of the Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron where the Prophet Ibrahim(AS) is buried. Under the guise of religious pluralism and freedom of worship at the Temple Mount, an Israeli member of parliament has drafted a bill that mandates separate hours for Jewish and Muslim prayer at the holy site. An Israeli judge also recently ruled in favour of Jews performing Talmudic rituals inside al-Aqsa Mosque, asserting that Jews have the “right to pray in the courtyards of al-Aqsa mosque,” in defiance of the protests of Muslims.
In this treacherous climate, the most worthy service that those seeking to educate the public on Masjid al Aqsa should embark on is realising the distinction between the Al Aqsa sanctuary, and what is now commonly referred to as Masjid al Aqsa, and disseminating these findings widely. As Ismail Adam Patel writes, “It is extremely important to appreciate that it is the land of the Al Aqsa sanctuary that is most precious and blessed. When the Quran refers to Masjid al Aqsa, it is this land of al Haram al Sharif(al-Aqsa sanctuary) that is implied, and not any of the buildings. Although the buildings within the noble sanctuary, like the black domed Masjid al Aqsa and gold domed Dome of the Rock are of great historical significance, however, one must understand that it is the land that is holy and blessed and not the bricks and mortar.” Link to this article Masjid al Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock – An important clarification – Masjid al Aqsa
10 Facts video: https://www.reddit.com/r/islamichistory/s/eDEV6n7y90
10 facts about al Aqsa: https://www.reddit.com/r/islamichistory/s/K3TsAXELXF
Dividing al Aqsa documentary: 14 minutes in, they claim the Dome of the Rock: https://youtu.be/DN3xyimKF0k?feature=shared
Temple Institute, the leading organisation seeking to build the Third Temple places the site on the Dome of the Rock: https://templeinstitute.org/illustrated-tour-the-temple-mount/
Temple Institute tour shows the extent of readiness to build the third temple (skip to 1 minute) https://youtu.be/pVBb3A22IaY?feature=shared
NB: There is no consensus where the actual first and second temple by biblical scholars: https://youtu.be/oKTO8YYs29c?feature=shared however, the Dome of the Rock is now the main targeted site for the third temple.
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Analysis/Theory In defence of Aisha/Aysha (R.A) and the allegations made towards the Prophet Mohammed (S) about her age - Four useful links below ⬇️
Articles:
Aisha: The Charge Nobody Made for Thirteen Centuries
https://www.fireline.press/p/aisha-the-charge-nobody-made-for
How old was Ayshah when she married the Prophet Mohammed (S)
What They Did to Mary Magdalene, They're Doing to Aisha
https://www.virginmonkboy.com/p/what-they-did-to-mary-magdalene-theyre
YouTube:
Was Aisha (R.A) 9 when she married Prophet Mohammed (S) https://youtu.be/-U4ZzqRvrz4?si=SP7ty2PFuRAIYfwV
Same articles above are posted in this subreddit directly
https://www.reddit.com/r/islamichistory/s/NM55uFBoc9
https://www.reddit.com/r/islamichistory/s/pzrDIrCH5O
r/islamichistory • u/AutoCentral • 10h ago
Artifact Silver Dirham of Sultan Jalal al-Din Khwarazmshah
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 10h ago
Did you know? How 30 tons of priceless Ottoman archive documents were sold to Bulgaria as waste paper
r/islamichistory • u/AutoCentral • 11h ago
Video Why did the Islamic golden age end? Dr. Roy Casagranda
Season two of Lessons from the Past continues with Dr. Roy Casagranda examining the Islamic Golden Age, the extraordinary intellectual achievements that shaped the medieval world, and the complex historical forces that contributed to its decline.
Challenging the idea that the Islamic Golden Age belonged to a single religion, civilization, or geographic center, this lecture traces the preservation and rediscovery of ancient knowledge through Persia, the Abbasid Caliphate, and the great intellectual centers of Baghdad, Damascus, and Córdoba. Dr. Roy explores how scholars from diverse religious and cultural backgrounds contributed to a remarkable period of scientific discovery, philosophical inquiry, and cultural exchange.
Drawing from history, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and politics, Dr. Roy examines the House of Wisdom in Baghdad and the contributions of influential thinkers including al-Kindi, al-Khwarizmi, al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Ibn al-Haytham. The lecture also explores how the transmission of knowledge from the Islamic world helped shape the intellectual foundations of the European Renaissance.
Rather than attributing the end of the Islamic Golden Age to a single event, the lecture examines the gradual fragmentation of political power, changing systems of patronage, the Crusades, the Mongol conquest of Baghdad in 1258, religious and philosophical tensions, and the devastating effects of the Black Death. Throughout, Dr. Roy challenges the assumption that intellectual progress ended when empires collapsed.
Ultimately, this lecture explores a larger question about the rise and decline of civilizations: how knowledge is preserved, how societies become complacent, and what happens when intellectual curiosity gives way to the comforts of established power. Connecting the medieval world to contemporary concerns about artificial intelligence and human thinking, Dr. Roy considers the lasting legacy of the Islamic Golden Age and the lessons it offers for our future.
~~~
Lessons from the Past at Museum of the Future is an exclusive, year-long program featuring monthly lectures by Dr. Roy Casagranda. Each session explores pivotal moments in history and connects them to the challenges shaping our world today, offering a rare opportunity for deep, interdisciplinary learning.
Hosted by the Museum of the Future in Dubai, the series reflects the museum’s mission to challenge assumptions, expand perspectives, and explore the intersection of past, present, and future.
00:00 Introduction: Rethinking the Islamic Golden Age
06:50 Religion and Cultural Exchange in Córdoba
11:35 Ancient Knowledge and Lost Technologies
18:00 Persia and the Preservation of Classical Knowledge
22:26 The Abbasids and the House of Wisdom
30:15 Scientific and Intellectual Breakthroughs
40:27 The Great Scholars and Polymaths
49:42 The Transmission of Knowledge to Europe
54:46 Why Civilizations Decline
01:02:09 The Fragmentation of the Arab Empire
01:08:05 Political Patronage and Intellectual Life
01:14:20 Barbastro and the Origins of the Crusades
01:20:20 The Mongol Invasions and the Fall of Baghdad
01:26:45 Faith, Philosophy, and Intellectual Change
01:31:35 The Black Death and Its Aftermath
01:37:11 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Human Thought
01:42:02 Final Reflections
r/islamichistory • u/sensitiverhyme • 15h ago
Discussion/Question About the Battle of Badr
Alsalam alikum brothers and sisters
I've been learning the seerah of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for the last few months from Yasir Qadhi's playlist on youtube. The last videos I watched were about the Battle of Badr so I have some questions
The people of AlMadina almonawara participated in this battle, while there was a clause in Sahifat Almadina sentenced that they would protect the Prophet in the (borders) of almadina, and it's known that this battle were in the planes of Badr. so? Is there an other clause for protecting the Prophet even outside the madina?
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) told the mujahidon that banu Hashim shall not be killed because they were forced to participate, at the same time yasir qadhi mentioned many others who were also forced for this but their bloods weren't expected from being killed as the blood of banu hashim, I want to understand why this?
While Abu Sufian ibn alHarith was telling Abu Lahab about what happened in the battle he told him (according to yasir qadhi) that he could see the angles fighting along with the Muslims against them (Quraish), my question is: this guy is neither a prophet nor messenger, he was a human being with no supernatural power, still worshipping idols at the time. I understand that Allah sent snd created miracles as a proof for all Prophets and messengers but my point is angles, satans, and jins are supernatural creatures and we are not able to see or recognize them in this life, except on the death bed {•
So your sight, this Day, is sharp}. Could it even be true? That Abu Sufian witnessed angles?
- The Muslims took many hostages, the Prophet commanded that just two of them (Uqbah ibn Abi Mu'ayt and Nadr ibn al-Harith) shall be executed, the other hostages won't be free unless their relatives pay ransom or if they teach the people of madina how to read and write. Why those two weren't put on the same situation as the other hostages were put in?
Could anyone who has a profound knowledge answer my questions please?
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Artifact 1868 Ottoman Empire 20 Kurush, minted in Constantinople.
galleryr/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Photograph Starry dome of mocarabe (Hall of Abencerrajes/Nazari Palaces) Alhambra of Granada/Spain) [OC]
r/islamichistory • u/Alarming_Stage5631 • 1d ago
Personalities Harun Al Rashid - The Height of Abbasid Power
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Analysis/Theory Zheng He was a Muslim admiral and a eunuch who led seven major voyages on behalf of the Ming Dynasty in China. The 15th-century "Treasure Fleet" journeyed the oceans and seas, making trade deals and demonstrating the majesty of Chinese maritime power. Later, however, all these ships were destroyed
galleryr/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 1d ago
Analysis/Theory Distribution of Ottoman public debt obligation after the Treaty of Lausanne
r/islamichistory • u/AutoCentral • 1d ago
Podcasts (Audio only) The Political Ecology of Late Ottoman Kurdistan
ottomanhistorypodcast.comWhat do environmental features like plants, animals, landscapes, and climate have to do with the political transformation of the Ottoman Empire? Everything, according to our guest in this episode, Zozan Pehlivan, author of The Political Ecology of Violence: Peasants and Pastoralists in the Last Ottoman Century. As Prof. Pehlivan explains, environmental history can be a fascinating window onto how imperial and global developments reshaped local society. Focusing on the region of Kurdistan, Pehlivan explores the changing relationships between peasants and pastoralists under the influence of commercialization, Ottoman centralization, and climatic change. She argues that these forces interacted to shape a "political ecology of violence," reflected not only in the shocking anti-Armenian violence of the 1890s, but also in quotidian conflicts over land and livestock fueled by Ottoman policy.
Zozan Pehlivan is the Arsham & Charlotte Ohanessian Chair and Associate Professor of History at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Her scholarship and teaching focus on global environmental history, animal history, Indigenous histories, the history of technology and medicine, and public health. Dr. Pehlivan’s first monograph, The Political Ecology of Violence: Peasants and Pastoralists in the Last Ottoman Century (Cambridge University Press, 2024), explores the interrelations among climate change, ecological disequilibrium, economic inequality, and Ottoman state policy in the emergence of intercommunal violence in late-nineteenth-century Ottoman Kurdistan and the Middle East. The book was a co-winner of the Ottoman Turkish Studies Association’s 2024 Book Award. Zozan Pehlivan’s research has received several distinguished honors, including the Harry Frank Guggenheim Distinguished Scholar Award (2020), the McKnight Land-Grant Professorship at the University of Minnesota (2021-2023), and a Mellon Fellowship at the Newberry Library in Chicago (2023-2024) and the Linda Hall Library in Kansas City (2025). Dr. Pehlivan is developing two book projects: Resettler Empires: How Ottomans, Americans, and Britons Conquered Grasslands and Empire of Immunity: Vaccination and Public Health in Ottoman Turkey. Resettler Empires examines how American, British, and Ottoman imperial policies mobilized environmental stress to facilitate the forced resettlement of Indigenous populations in the modern era, while Empire of Immunity traces the history of vaccination, vaccine technology, and public health in Ottoman Turkey from the late seventeenth century to the twenty-first century.

Chris Gratien is Associate Professor of History at University of Virginia, where he teaches classes on global environmental history and the Middle East. His first book, The Unsettled Plain: An Environmental History of the Late Ottoman Frontier, explores the social and environmental transformation of the Adana region of Southern Turkey during the 19th and 20th century. His current project, provisionally titled The Book and the Sword: Civil War and Reconstruction in Late Ottoman Syria, offers a global microhistory of the Tanzimat period, centered on the unsolved murder of an American missionary in the Ottoman Empire.

Ayah Aboelela is a PhD Candidate in World History at Northeastern University. Her dissertation explores the environmental history of Muslim pilgrimage in the Hijaz, Levant, and Egypt in the late Ottoman period, tracing interactions between pilgrims, urban and Bedouin locals, state officials, and spirituality. She is also Managing Editor at Digital Humanities Quarterly.
Podcast
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 2d ago
Analysis/Theory What They Did to Mary Magdalene, They're Doing to Aisha - Two of the strongest women in religious history have been reduced to sexual caricatures that are easier to remember than the women themselves.
Listen here: https://open.substack.com/pub/virginmonkboy/p/what-they-did-to-mary-magdalene-theyre?r=1jdp1w&utm_medium=ios
For centuries, Christianity did something remarkable to Mary Magdalene.
It took the woman who remained near Jesus through the crucifixion, went to the tomb, encountered the risen Christ, and carried the news of the resurrection back to the disciples, and turned her into a prostitute.
The Gospels never call Mary Magdalene a prostitute.
That image came later, particularly in Western Christianity, where Mary Magdalene became conflated with other women in the Gospel stories, including the unnamed “sinful woman” who anoints Jesus’ feet.
Eventually, “Mary Magdalene” became almost synonymous with “repentant prostitute.”
And look at what disappeared.
The disciple.
The witness.
The woman who stayed when others fled.
The woman entrusted with the message at the very center of Christianity.
Instead of remembering one of the strongest women in the Gospel story, generations remembered her primarily through sex.
I keep thinking about that when I see what has happened to Aisha.
Because today one of the strongest women in Islamic history has been reduced to two numbers:
6 and 9.
Sayyida Aisha was not merely an important Muslim woman. She was Aisha, Mother of the Believers, one of the most powerful intellectual voices Islam has ever produced and one of the strongest women in religious history.
She is also one of the most thoroughly documented people of Islam’s entire first century.
After Muhammad died, Aisha became one of the foremost authorities on his life. Thousands of reports come through her. When it came to Muhammad’s private life, his prayers, his habits, his moods, his marriage, his final illness, and the things no public companion could have witnessed, very often Aisha is the reason Muslims know them at all.
Jurists came to her with questions. Companions who had walked beside Muhammad for years deferred to her memory. When men got something wrong, Aisha corrected them, and those corrections were preserved because her authority mattered.
She did not simply repeat what other people had taught her. She interpreted, argued, remembered, challenged, and taught an entire generation that came after Muhammad.
And she was hardly some timid figure confined to the margins of history.
Twenty-four years after Muhammad died, Aisha rode at the head of an army and gave battle in the field.
Whatever judgment anyone makes about the politics of that moment, think about the woman standing there.
This is the woman modern polemic asks us to imagine primarily as frightened, passive and voiceless.
But Aisha was anything but voiceless.
She spoke about Muhammad with an intimacy almost nobody else could. She told people about his kindness and his habits, their disagreements and her jealousy, the times she became angry with him, his prayers, his illness, and finally his death with his head resting against her.
The tradition did not flatten her into a sanitized saint. It preserved a woman with a sharp mind, a strong personality, disagreements, complaints, affection, jealousy, judgment, and conviction. In other words, it preserved Aisha as a real human being, not as the passive figure modern polemic needs her to be.
She had the standing, the intelligence and the voice to tell people what she thought, and the historical record shows again and again that she was perfectly willing to do exactly that.
Yet increasingly, none of this is the Aisha many Westerners ever meet. They meet “six,” “nine,” “child bride,” “victim,” and then, just like Mary Magdalene, the woman disappears behind the sexual story told about her.
There is an important difference between the two cases.
The Gospels simply do not identify Mary Magdalene as a prostitute.
Reports saying Aisha was six at betrothal and nine when her marriage began do exist in later hadith collections. The historical problem is that those reports are routinely presented as though they settle the question while the rest of the evidence is never mentioned.
It does not.
The broader record includes Aisha’s family chronology, her previous betrothal, her memories of the early Meccan period, early biographical traditions, and serious questions about the transmission of the age reports themselves. Taken together, that evidence points away from childhood, with much of the historical weight placing her in her teens.
James S. Coates lays that case out source by source in his Fireline Press article, Aisha: The Charge Nobody Made for Thirteen Centuries. I’m not going to reproduce his entire argument here. If you want the evidence behind the age question, read it.
What interests me here is something else: why are we so willing to let a sexual claim become the entire identity of a powerful woman?
Mary Magdalene becomes the prostitute. Aisha becomes the child bride.
In both cases, everything that made these women difficult to reduce to simple narratives gets pushed aside: their intelligence, authority, courage, voices, and influence over the generations that followed them.
Mary becomes useful as a story about sexual sin. Aisha becomes useful as a weapon against Muhammad. And suddenly everyone is speaking about these women while remarkably few are listening to them.
Maybe Christians in particular should recognize what is happening.
We spent centuries allowing one of Christianity’s greatest women to be remembered for something the Gospel never actually says about her. We should be very careful before doing something similar to another woman.
Aisha deserves to be encountered as Aisha, not as two numbers and not as somebody else’s argument.
She was Aisha, Mother of the Believers: scholar, teacher, jurist, historian, political force, guardian of the intimate memory of Muhammad, and one of the strongest women the religious world has ever produced.
Mary Magdalene deserved the same courtesy.
It took us a very long time to give it back to her.
https://www.virginmonkboy.com/p/what-they-did-to-mary-magdalene-theyre
See also:
Aisha: The Charge Nobody Made for Thirteen Centuries
https://www.fireline.press/p/aisha-the-charge-nobody-made-for
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 2d ago
Artifact Four ornamental wall tiles. Kashan, Iran, 14th century [3500x3500]
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 3d ago
Photograph The Blue Mosque of Ali. Mazar-i-Sharif, Afghanistan, 15th-16th century [1600x1300]
r/islamichistory • u/qernanded • 3d ago
447 years ago Sokollu Mehmed Pasha was assassinated after serving as Grand Vizier for 15 years
r/islamichistory • u/Common_Time5350 • 4d ago
The Yinon Plan for Greater Israel: Divide Sunni & Shia, Fuel Civil & National Wars | Sh.Omar Baloch
Further information:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ibr2htXADag
Oded Yinon: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East – A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties – Translation and Comments by Israel Shahak
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 5d ago
Did you know? Greeks paid about 50% less tax under the Ottoman Empire than they did under the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines adopted the Ottoman tax system to ensure that the Christian peasants would not rebel in parts of Macedonia after briefly capturing the region from the Ottomans.
galleryr/islamichistory • u/sophisticatedbloom • 5d ago
Photograph The Giralda of Seville Cathedral, a former minaret that still stands today
This tower was originally built as the minaret of the Great Mosque of Seville during the Almohad period in the 12th century. After the Christian conquest of Seville in 1248, the mosque was eventually replaced by the cathedral we see today, while much of the original minaret was preserved and adapted into a bell tower.
An interesting detail about the minaret is its interior design. Instead of conventional stairs, the tower features 35 wide, sloping ramps, originally built so that the mu’azzein مؤذن could ride a horse all the way to the top to call to prayer.
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 5d ago
Artifact Ottoman inscription in a Bulgarian village.
galleryr/islamichistory • u/TrueHighlight1067 • 5d ago
Discussion/Question need help with history books
im new to this subreddit and wanted to ask what books i should read, im a sucker for islamic history although my knowledge is very small, i want a book which has detailed events of different islamic empires and for refrence i havent finished these books but i have read destiny disrupted a history of the world through islamic eyes and the last mughal
r/islamichistory • u/AutoCentral • 7d ago
Video Tour Guide: Citadel of Salah al-Din or simply the Cairo Citadel
This historic fortress has dominated Cairo's skyline for over 840 years, offers some of the best views in the city, and is definitely worth a visit. From its fascinating history to ticket prices, opening hours, and a complete walkthrough of the Citadel's layout - including every major attraction inside - this is your ultimate guide to the Citadel of Salah al-Din. Also known as the Citadel of Saladin or simply the Cairo Citadel, it's often mistaken for the Muhammad Ali Mosque, but they're not the same! I'll explain the difference in this video - so let's dive in.
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 7d ago
Books Wonders and Rarities: The Marvelous Book That Traveled the World and Mapped the Cosmos
“Like al-Qazwīnī himself, Travis Zadeh has written a deliciously baggy tome, full of delights and diversions in its tour of the cosmic horizons. This is a book to get lost in, whether one wants to or not.” —Nile Green, Los Angeles Review of Books
“As Zadeh concludes, reformers and modernists have closed the rich and varied archive revealed in Wonders and Rarities…In this beautifully written and engaging text, Zadeh takes his readers back to the world of surprise and enchantment that preceded this closure.”—Malise Ruthven, Financial Times
“This book about a book, like the book it describes, is a rare and marvelous thing.” —Justin Marozzi, The Spectator
During the thirteenth century, the Persian naturalist and judge Zakariyyāʾ Qazwīnī authored what became one of the most influential works of natural history in the world: Wonders and Rarities. Exploring the dazzling movements of the stars above, the strange minutiae of the minerals beneath the earth, and everything in between, Qazwīnī offered a captivating account of the cosmos. Wonders and Rarities inspired generations as it traveled through madrasas and courts, unveiling the magical powers of nature. But Qazwīnī’s compendium eventually came to stand as a strange, if beautiful, emblem of medieval ignorance.
Restoring Qazwīnī to his place as a herald of the rare and astonishing, Travis Zadeh dramatically revises the place of wonder in the history of Islamic philosophy, science, and literature. Wonder provided an enduring way to conceive of the world—at once constituting an affective reaction, an aesthetic stance, a performance of piety, and a cognitive state. Yet through the course of colonial modernity, Qazwīnī’s universe of marvels helped advance the notion that Muslims lived in a timeless world of superstition and enchantment, unaware of the western hemisphere or the earth’s rotation around the sun.
Recovering Qazwīnī’s ideas and his reception, Zadeh invites us into a forgotten world of thought, where wonder mastered the senses through the power of reason and the pleasure of contemplation.
r/islamichistory • u/HistoricalCarsFan • 7d ago
Video Aja'ib al-Makhluqat, or The Wonders of Creation - The Most Mysterious Illustrated Book of the Islamic World by Zakariya al-Qazwini
What if a medieval book claimed to reveal every wonder of creation, from the highest heavens to the strangest creatures hidden on Earth?
In the thirteenth century, a Persian scholar named Zakariya al-Qazwini compiled one of the most extraordinary works of the medieval Islamic world: Aja'ib al-Makhluqat, or The Wonders of Creation.
Its pages describe a universe filled with mysterious angels, celestial beings, enormous birds, dragons, strange animals, distant lands, and creatures that seem almost impossible to imagine.
But this was not simply a collection of monsters.
Al-Qazwini was attempting something much more ambitious: to document the wonders of God's creation, combining astronomy, geography, natural history, religious traditions, and extraordinary accounts gathered from earlier writers and travelers.
In this documentary, we explore the mysterious world preserved inside Aja'ib al-Makhluqat.
We begin in the heavens, examining the celestial spheres, the seven classical planets, and the extraordinary angels described in Islamic cosmology. Then we descend toward Earth, encountering supernatural beings, legendary creatures, unfamiliar animals, mysterious islands, and lands that medieval travelers claimed existed beyond the known world.
The surviving illustrated manuscripts make this story even stranger.
Their extraordinary paintings give faces and bodies to creatures that most people had never seen, turning descriptions of the invisible and unknown into some of the most fascinating images in medieval Islamic art.
We also examine the connection between Aja'ib al-Makhluqat and other mysterious works such as Kitab al-Bulhan, exploring how medieval scholars understood astrology, supernatural beings, strange natural phenomena, and the relationship between the visible and invisible worlds.
But where did genuine observation end and mythology begin?
Some creatures described in these manuscripts resemble real animals. Others emerged from religious traditions, travelers' stories, or legends that had circulated for centuries.
And some remain difficult to identify at all.
For al-Qazwini, the universe was filled with wonders that revealed the extraordinary complexity of creation.
For modern readers, his book opens a window into a world where science, religion, geography, and mythology had not yet been separated by the boundaries we recognize today.
Was Aja'ib al-Makhluqat an encyclopedia of the natural world, a collection of ancient legends, or an attempt to document everything that might exist beyond ordinary human knowledge?