r/TopCharacterTropes • • 17h ago

Hated Tropes (Hated)changing somenthing to be more "progressive" ends up being a bad thing

Now to be clear,i am not one of these "anti-woke" losers that complain some people exist,and i am also not the type to complain about changing somenthing in a new version or adaptation,however there are cases where it did ended up being a bad idea.

-In the anime of Cowboy Bebop there is the character Gren,despite being short lived the character is very memorable specially thanks to his tragic story.Basically his story was that he was a soldier from the titan war who was a great friend with Vicious(the main bad guy)after the war he was emprisioned thanks to Vicious who testified against him and he was forced to take a experimental drug that caused him hormonal problems,giving him a feminine appearence and even breasts.

In the Netflix live action,for some reasons they decided Gren was going to be non-binary,which wouldn't be a problem(some people believe he was gay in the anime)if it wasn't for the fact that they also removed all the nuances and complexities that made the character memorable and interesting,instead of a tragic war veteran that was betrayed and had his body changed against his will,Gren is just kinda there.

-The original Rugrats cartoon had the couple Betty and Howard,Betty was a big and masculine woman while Howard was a smaller and nervous man,it was a genuine interesting relationship that stood out from the other couples who were the standard straight couple.

In the new series however they replaced Howard with a woman named Trish,two things,first off why?What was the problem with having a woman being the stronger in a straight relationship?Second why does Hollywood seem to think that every tomboy or masculine woman is a lesbian?

Overall not the worst thing but it is jarring that they had a gender reverse roled that was progressive and decided that wasn't enough.

-Oh man,this one pisses me off the most so i am gonna have to break it down

So back in the late 80s and 90s there was this anime called Saint Seiya also knows as Knights of the zodiac,it tells the story of knights who fight for the Goddess Athena to protect earth,being divided in the golden,silver and bronze knights,the anime was a huge hit in latin america and Europe and while it floped in the US it still has a loyal fanbase.

Being a fan myself i can't recommend it enough,now granted the story does have a fair share of flaws,and that's because the author was honestly just making stuff up as he went along(also a lot of side characters are poorly used or even forgotten about)still it is a great story you should check out

But then a couple of years back Netflix got the rights and decided to a 3D reboot,in this reboot they decided to make the story more "american" to try to bring more american viewers,now i could go on and on a big rant about how that was a bad idea and the execution was so terrible that it made me want to strangle someone but this post is about one specific change.

So Saint Seiya has five main characters,those are Pegasus Seiya,Dragon Shiryu,Cygnus Hyoga,Phoenix Ikki and finally Andromeda Shun.

While the other four characters were the standard masculine and brute male characters who were always ready to throw punches,Shun was smaller,more sensitive and even feminine looking,a pacifist who didn't liked fighting,but don't mistake that for weakness because Shun was loyal to his friends and was extremely powerful.

Then Netflix decided to change Shun into a girl named Shaun.

So wait,you have a male character who goes against every male stereotype and you turn him into just another generic female character?

When asked about it,the showrunner Eugene Son said he made that change because there was no girl in the group and having a all boys group wouldn't be acceptable nowadays

First off that's not true because Athena was also part of the main cast,yeah she wasn't the fighting type but she still helped quite a lot in the story even saving the knights on several occasions,second if you wanted to add a girl to the main group why not use Marin or Shaina?Hell,if you were going to change the story anyway why not turn Seiya sister into a knight?

Thankfully this monstrosity was cancelled(so much for trying to bring more fans)

7.7k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

329

u/mangopabu 16h ago edited 6h ago

another from Netflix, but Sokka from Avatar: The Last Airbender was extremely sexist at the start of the original cartoon. Sokka is from the water tribe but isn't a bender like his sister Katara or Aang the avatar. he makes a lot of sexist comments with the underlying implication that he as a man should protect the southern water tribe, not Katara, who is a woman, even though she's a bender and has a lot more inherent power than Sokka.

however, the story explicitly calls it out as bad behaviour through things like pratfalls or even more directly with his sister calling out his behaviour as outdated. it progresses further when he meets Suki, a kyoshi warrior from the earth kingdom who wipes the floor with him. instead of continuing his sexist behaviour, he comes to Suki to apologise and further ask for her to teach him how to be a better warrior. she makes him dress up in makeup as a true 'kyoshi warrior' and, although he protests at first, he ends up embracing all of it and even shows growth by learning from Suki. it ends with him actually getting the better of her in a fight, and they blush together when they jointly realise how physically close they are. this is essentially the start of their relationship in the original cartoon.

the Netflix adaptation advertised a lot about how they were going to remove Sokka's 'problematic' backstory, which in and of itself isn't bad per se, but with all this characterisation removed, where Sokka is first sexist, then shows humility by apologising and admitting he was wrong, then showing respect by asking Suki to teach him, then them showing the first sparks of their relationship. in the show, it just skips to the end, and by removing all of that, it doesn't really make Sokka any better of a person and reduces Suki to someone who's just falling for the first man who comes along.

144

u/abadstrategy 16h ago

We need to let characters be problematic again, long as it aids the story

76

u/Andrew1990M 16h ago

A hero is allowed to just be wrong about things. There’s a lot of discourse right now over if Yosuke is going to be homophobic in the Persona 4 remake. The original never portrayed Yosuke as right, he was just a dumb teenager. 

All your cowboy heroes were probably racist. All your war heroes were probably homophobes. It’s all okay in context so long as the story isn’t supporting those messages. 

24

u/abadstrategy 16h ago

Far, far too many people don't seem to understand that. Not every character needs to be a paragon. Sometimes, an asshole is needed, and the story will remind you they are an ass and not to be emulated

8

u/Vendetta543 15h ago

I think the issue is Yosuke kept doing it and it was always played for comedy. there’s never any point where he apologizes for it and he kept doing it long after Kanji makes it clear it wasn’t fucking funny to him. Like yeah Kanji gets angry but Yosuke never seems to internalize that he should stop being an asshole about it.

I remember one scene where Teddy turned Human and Yosuke asks Kanji if he’s his type. Kanji gets angry but then the scene just moved ahead.

Meanwhile, Yosuke will get attacked by Chie for the stupidest shit but the annoying gay jokes go uncommented on.

6

u/ScarletCelestial 15h ago

A big reason why everyone is annoyed about it being confirmed that Yosuke won't be gay is because it's something that could add to his arc. 

Him making homophobic comments about Kanji, only then to be a potential romance option would have him overcome his prejudices. This would also double as giving a few slice of life scenes more weight. 

Instead they might remove the flaw full stop - which would genuinely have a lot of changes to the camping trip especially.

3

u/poprostumort 14h ago

your cowboy heroes were probably racist

"You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons."

1

u/DeUnderCaker 15h ago edited 14h ago

The whole Yosuke shit makes my eyes roll especially with the news they are toning it down when it's pretty harmless anyway, Yosuke's behaviour towards Kanji was kinda problematic sure but he's a dumb teenage boy, being weirded out by gay things at that age and time isn't that uncommon, not to mention these moments usually come out when Yosuke gets put in some situation or mood where his teenage hormonal brain get imaginative.

1

u/PantheraAuroris 7h ago edited 7h ago

Yosuke never actually like...got over it, which is the part I really wanted to see. I wanted the whole character arc. It would've been even better had they kept the Yosuke romance, so he could be like "oh shit I was afraid of this *in myself.*"

8

u/mangopabu 16h ago

especially when it's how they show growth and allows the story to call out the bad behaviour and see that people can learn and grow from it

3

u/dabPrassion 10h ago

Problematic characters are good if a) they learn their behavior sucks and try to get better or b) the show cleaely frames it being problematic ! I love those characters cuz it adds more drama and character depth.

4

u/Expensive_Amoeba3374 15h ago

I think far too many people don't (or refuse to) grasp the vitally important difference between "Character in a show is problematic" and "Character in a show is problematic and the show makes it clear that they are problematic"

10

u/DarthMelsie 14h ago

In LITERALLY the first five minutes of the first episode, Katara calls him "sexist". Like, his first introduction and interaction with another character and this trait is established.

1

u/t3h_shammy 14h ago

And it lasts for 3 episodes of 60 and is never relevant again after episode 3 to his character lol

7

u/hyperactiveChipmunk 12h ago

True, but don't diminish how important first impressions are for a character (or even in real life, for that matter).

11

u/Fantastic_Bug1028 15h ago

“extremely” sexist is kind of pushing it lol

1

u/BoyCubPiglet2 8h ago

Yeah he was sexist in the dumb teenager type of way. Like he hadn't outgrown "boys rule girls drool". When challenged on his views he started to change pretty quickly, even if it was gradual. 

1

u/AugieKS 4h ago

I actually think it is a very bad thing that they took it out. Examples like this show boys the error of their ways and thinking, and to have a character like that learn to be better in front of their eyes can do a lot to deprogram sexism. It's not enough to just have characters not be sexist, you have to show the harm, that it is wrong morally and factually, and that you can learn to be better

-1

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

5

u/mangopabu 16h ago

gonna be honest and feels like you only read the first part of my comment.