r/SipsTea • • 18h ago

SMH The advice didn't age well.

Post image
30.4k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/Atomic-Avocado 14h ago

Houses were cheap because there were way less people and boomers had an exodus from cities into brand new suburbs. Houses are expensive now mostly because cities refuse to allow new dense housing to be built where people want to move

8

u/Inf1z 14h ago

Houses became an investment so many people and companies began buying houses to rent because of passive income.

-3

u/Thiswas2hard 13h ago

About the same number people own homes now then they did in the 80’s. Biggest problem is we stopped building homes at the same rate after 08.

-5

u/renner1991 14h ago

Being a landlord isn’t passive income. A landlord should be maintaining the property, otherwise it degrades over time.

1

u/Inf1z 13h ago

True and especially for mom and pop landlord who own just a few homes. Most of them are handy so they do the maintenance themselves. Others just hire a handy man to take care of things.

0

u/CheGueyMaje 13h ago

Being a landlord is absolutely passive income.

Let’s take my apartment for example. I’ve lived here 3 years. Do you know how much time my landlord has put into “maintaining the property” besides simply raising my rent?

Maybe 15 minutes of gaslighting me telling me the black mold isn’t a structural problem. That’s it. He hasn’t done a single day of work in years.

-4

u/renner1991 13h ago

I said “should”. I thought you were coming to it from a landlord perspective. Sucks you have a shitty landlord.

0

u/CheGueyMaje 13h ago

Yeah, tell that to me and the other billion of us.

1

u/cti0323 14h ago

Yep, which makes builders no longer build starter homes because they have to maximize returns due to limited areas to build.

1

u/krism142 13h ago

I think we need to be more specific about the types of housing being built as well. In this very post you compare suburban sprawl single family homes with dense urban condos, those are not attracting the same buyers

1

u/ClassicTBCSucks93 10h ago

The only neighborhoods that have been going up in my area for the past 10+ years are all 55+ communities, anything else being built are soulless voids of gray apartment buildings for $2k+ /mo. rent and will raise the rates $500-$1000 just cuz.

You'd think those 55+ communities would be full of old crotchety "Get off my lawn" in bed by 7PM and up at 4AM types, but its quite the opposite. Those 55+ communities are wild and devolve into drug and alcohol fueled fuck n' sucks, lots of swinging, and lots of partying. It would make sorority/frat behavior seem tame. Honestly sounds like an awesome way to live out the golden years.

1

u/TelephoneNorth8640 14h ago

Houses were cheap because they were smaller, older, and had expensive financing. No young person today would want to live in a "starter home" from the 80s...

3

u/gfty457 14h ago

Yet those 70k starter homes are now being sold for 350k

1

u/redditis_garbage 14h ago

And yet young people have to live in starter homes from the 80s lol. Any of my friends who own a house have a tiny old house. And it was 300-400k.

1

u/SamanthaLives 12h ago

Mine is from the 50’s. There’s probably lead paint and asbestos but I try not to think about it. 

0

u/Objective_Run_7151 14h ago

100% correct.

A majority of US homes in 1980 did not have a dishwasher. Or a/c. Or covered parking. A microwave was something only the very rich could afford. Clothes dryers were common, but not universal. Same for insulation - even if you had ac, you didn’t run it constantly because you could t afford to.

That’s why houses were cheaper back then.

0

u/modsaretoddlers 13h ago

That's not how that works. The houses haven't just been sitting there since time immemorial, waiting for buyers and now, suddenly, they've all been bought. They get built as a function of demand. The issue today is that only luxury housing gets built and it's only for rich people, anyway.