Makes sense. Psychologically speaking. It's a lot of if/then rationalizing. They have steadfast heirarchies and rules but certain things can not confirm and instead of a gray area, it gets immediately classified within the hierarchy.
Edit: I wonder if there are certain mental disorders related to hyper-rigidity of societal structure and roles. Though I guess those folks would never have been sent to an institution before like 20 years.
Rational conservatives maintain that a community with a hierarchy of authority is most conducive to human well-being.
Confucius is another possible precursor. His concern with the breakdown of contemporary political institutions led to a cautious, conservative political outlook; his stress on authority and hierarchy prefigures central conservative themes.
With the Enlightenment, the natural order or social hierarchy, previously largely accepted, was questioned.
Western conservatism is a product from the Age of Enlightenment -- specifically, a Counter-Enlightenment, a reactionary challenge to the concepts of Humanism. Its philosophers inherently reject[ed] a society governed by logic and reason, human rights and dignity, science and democracy, as its ideology solely appeal to the authority of traditionally established hierarchies.
1
u/CaterpillarJungleGym 5h ago edited 5h ago
Makes sense. Psychologically speaking. It's a lot of if/then rationalizing. They have steadfast heirarchies and rules but certain things can not confirm and instead of a gray area, it gets immediately classified within the hierarchy.
Edit: I wonder if there are certain mental disorders related to hyper-rigidity of societal structure and roles. Though I guess those folks would never have been sent to an institution before like 20 years.