Bild ist vom „reichsten“ und „erfolgreichsten“ Künstler Gerhard Richter

I feel like art is a word that gets thrown around too easily nowadays…. Like the act of engaging in craft makes people artists. We need to differentiate between real art and craft meant to join tribal expressionism. We should discuss the objectiveness of taste and the science behind art so we can stop pretending that art is absolutely subjective and its not educated

For those who claimed that art is only human made.

1. Congo, the painting Chimpanzee.

Congo was one of the most famous animal artists of the 20th century. He painted with brushes and colors, creating abstract compositions. Zoologist Desmond Morris promoted his work, and Congo eventually had paintings sold at auctions.

1. Pigcasso, the Painting Pig.

Pigcasso was a pig rescued in South Africa who painted while holding a brush in her mouth. Her abstract paintings were sold internationally, and part of her fame was connected to animal protection campaigns.

1. The Satin Bowerbird.

The male builds courtship structures and decorates them with carefully selected objects. Satin bowerbirds are especially known for using blue items. They arrange their decorations to create visual displays that attract females. An interior designer with feathers!

Dictated body of text (might have some grammar errors):

So one of the things that really stuck with me when I went to UCD, and they really taught us, you know, a lot of concepts about postmodernism. Unfortunately, I only did my bachelor's, and I wanted to go into, you know, academia, but I wanted to get some money after, so I didn't. But one of the things that really struck me about postmodernism, I remember in the first day, first lecture we had, no shit, this is the first day, the teacher asked, What is art?

And everybody's, you know, and, you know, the teacher asked a lot of people, put their hands up, and everybody gave a lot of, you know, answers, you know, Oh, art is like a painting. Art is, you display it in an art gallery, or art is a, you know, it's a message being delivered to you through, you know, something. But then the lecturer did something cool, asked something like, Would you consider, you know, the sunset and the sunrise as art? Would you say the birds tweeting is art?

You know? And, you know, obviously it made people think, because a lot of people would say yes, but also some people would say no. But then the question becomes, What is art? You know? A lot of people would externalize the answer, like, Oh, it's a book. It's a painting. It's a sculpture. It's something you put in a museum. But then the teacher said something along the lines of, Art is not a thing. It's how you look at a thing, you know? And a lot of my undergrad is kind of like based on that concept, where, like, you know, your perception shapes, you know, reality, or rather your perception is reality. So let me explain. Just for example, let's just say, like a stop sign, right?

Like, would you say that's art today? Like most people would say no. It's just a fucking stop sign. It's a function of the road. But get this: if you put a stop sign in the middle of a postmodernist museum, it suddenly evokes something. You know, it evokes a reaction, discussion, critique, and, you know, some kind of, like, dissection of a hidden meaning of why there's a fucking stop sign in a museum or art exhibition. And then suddenly it makes sense that, like, art is not a thing. It's how you look at a thing.

Unfortunately, I didn't really delve too much into it, into that specific sort of, like, postmodernist topic, because I went a little bit more into, like, gender studies, basically. But I really wanted to explore that, but I think that was more of a master's thing. But what do you think?

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I was wondering how often there are misconceptions about someone’s art, whether it’s a painting, song, book, show, movie, etc., and how the original creator reacts when people interpret their work differently than they intended.

It also made me think about how sometimes an artist might actually change or embrace the perceived meaning of their work because of how the audience interprets it. Maybe they do it to keep the hype going, appeal to a broader audience, or simply because they like the interpretation.

So how much does the audience’s interpretation influence the creator, and how much does the creator influence the audience’s interpretation?

I guess it kind of made me think about the whole idea of “art imitates life,” but doesn’t life also imitate art? And once you put a piece of art out into the world, does its meaning still belong to the creator, or does it partly belong to everyone who experiences it?

Art isn't just emotion. It's emotion in conversation with its moment. The medium, the message, the timing, they're inseparable.

Let's discuss how art and human nature go hand in hand. Can we really understand one without understanding the other?

Also can we really say one art is better than others

Is it an overlooked or under appreciated art form? Hard to get space and store objects and materials?back breaking installs. What are they aiming for the viewer to experience? It’s different from painting/drawing or music/ concert performances with no immediate gain and response. What are the impacts of this medium. The art speak and rhetoric is exhausting the everyday human doesn’t talk like that

Art represents human feelings, history and many other aspects related to the human condition. Therefore art is much more important than politics.

Some of the people who want to end with Woke Art do so because of what it represents politically. But I have a solution: to perpetuate Woke Art and depoliticize it at the same time. My idea is to create an artistic movement which itself brings the name Woke Art and that represents minorities. But all kinds of minorities including those who haven’t been represented yet by the artists who promoted Woke Art in the last decades.

I know Woke Art has a political connotation, but the idea is not to perpetuate its political aspect. In fact, quite the opposite. The idea is to perpetuate the paintings of this kind of art since it represents how people felt and what people claimed at a specific moment in time. Whether you agree or not on people’s expressions, those should be perpetuated in time. Those expressions are opinions, they matter and they should be taken into account. They are part of our human history. Art is a way to express emotions, feelings and opinions in a nice way. Therefore we should keep it. The core goal of my movement is to continue developing this kind of art to defend minorities, but without being political (nor one side of the political spectrum or another one).

Woke Art represents real individuals and this art should be preserved no matter what. Not only that, it should also be enriched. We should continue defending minorities, the ones who are already represented and the ones who are not yet represented. All of them. The idea of representing injustice, minorities, the idea of representing the fact of being different is a great idea. This idea has been embraced by many on the last decades and I want to preserve it. This is the goal and I will do it. I created a website which I will be developing in the next days to come, www.wokeart.org which will be the place where Woke Art is going to be represented and enriched. These words are just a tiny introduction. Please read my Manifesto, the Woke Art Manifesto…

THE WOKE ART MANIFESTO

Art Must Remain Awake

We live in an age in which words are constantly claimed, transformed, weaponized, and discarded.

One of those words is woke.

It has become a political label. It has been praised, condemned, mocked, celebrated, and used as a weapon by people across the political spectrum.

We reclaim it.

We reclaim Woke Art not as the art of a political party, an ideology, or a government, but as art that remains awake to humanity.

To be woke is to be awake.

Awake to suffering. Awake to injustice. Awake to beauty. Awake to memory. Awake to identity. Awake to exclusion. Awake to love. Awake to fear. Awake to the voices that are heard and to those that have been silenced.

Woke Art is art that refuses to look away.

I. Art Comes Before Politics

Politics is temporary.

Governments rise and fall. Parties win and lose. Ideologies change. Political language evolves.

Human beings remain.

We believe that Art possesses a different kind of permanence. Art records what humanity felt, feared, loved, endured, desired, remembered, and dreamed.

A painting can outlive a government.

A poem can outlive an ideology.

A song can outlive a political movement.

A sculpture can preserve the memory of people whom history attempted to forget.

Therefore, Art must never become subordinate to politics.

Politics may be represented in Art. Politics may inspire Art. Art may criticize politics.

But Art belongs to humanity.

II. We Refuse Erasure

Every human being carries an experience.

Some experiences have been celebrated by history.

Others have been ignored.

Others have been ridiculed, suppressed, persecuted, or erased.

Woke Art exists to make room for those experiences.

We believe that the experiences of minorities are part of the human story.

The experiences of immigrants are part of the human story.

The experiences of women are part of the human story.

The experiences of racial, ethnic, religious, cultural, sexual, and gender minorities arepart of the human story.

The experiences of the poor, the displaced, the disabled, the persecuted, theforgotten, and the misunderstood are part of the human story.

To represent a human being is not to endorse a political ideology.

It is to acknowledge that they exist.

III. Representation Is Not Propaganda

Woke Art does not tell the artist what conclusion to reach.

It does not demand political obedience from the viewer.

It does not require allegiance to the left or to the right.

An artist may criticize conservatism.

An artist may criticize progressivism.

An artist may criticize capitalism.

An artist may criticize socialism.

An artist may criticize religion, secularism, nationalism, globalism, institutions,corporations, governments, movements, or even Woke Art itself.

The movement has no sacred political party.

Its only sacred subject is the human being.

We defend the artist's right to observe, question, contradict, provoke, sympathize,condemn, doubt, and remain uncertain.

Because Art that cannot question its own beliefs is not awake.

It is merely obedient.

IV. Empathy Before Ideology

We do not demand that the viewer agree.

We ask the viewer to look.

To listen.

To feel.

To imagine, even for a moment, what it might mean to live another person's life.

A work of Art does not need to provide a political solution.

Sometimes its greatest achievement is simply to make another person's existenceimpossible to ignore.

Art creates encounters between human beings.

And from those encounters, empathy may emerge.

V. Discomfort Is Part of Art

Woke Art does not promise comfort.

It may be beautiful.

It may be horrifying.

It may be tender.

It may be angry.

It may be ironic.

It may be absurd.

It may be disturbing.

It may offend.

It may challenge the beliefs of the very people who believe they are defending it.

We reject the idea that Art must always make us feel morally comfortable.

Sometimes Art must disturb us precisely because we have become comfortable withsomething that deserves to disturb us.

To be awake is also to be uncomfortable.

VI. No Ideological Purity

There will be no test of ideological purity.

No artist must possess the correct political opinions.

No viewer must reach the correct conclusion.

No subject belongs exclusively to one side.

No political movement owns human suffering.

No political movement owns compassion.

No political movement owns equality.

No political movement owns Art.

Woke Art belongs to anyone who believes that human experience deserves to beseen.

VII. Art Is a Record of Its Time

Every generation leaves behind its Art.

Future generations will look at our paintings, films, photographs, sculptures, literature,architecture, music, performances, and digital creations and ask:

What did these people feel?

What frightened them?

What did they believe?

Whom did they love?

Whom did they exclude?

What did they fight for?

What did they fail to understand?

Woke Art accepts this responsibility.

We create not only for the present, but for the people who will one day lookbackward at us.

Let them see us honestly.

VIII. Woke Art Must Evolve

The movement must never become frozen.

The human condition changes.

New voices emerge.

New forms of exclusion appear.

Old wounds remain.

New questions are born.

Therefore, Woke Art must remain open.

What is considered marginal today may become central tomorrow.

What is considered obvious today may be questioned tomorrow.

The movement must be capable of changing because being awake means remainingattentive.

IX. We Defend the Right to Exist

We defend the right of every human being to be represented.

We defend the artist's right to represent them.

We defend the viewer's right to interpret that representation differently.

We defend the right to create.

The right to question.

The right to remember.

The right to criticize.

The right to disagree.

The right to be offended.

The right to answer offense with more Art.

We do not seek a world without disagreement.

We seek a world in which disagreement does not require erasure.

X. We Reclaim the Word

They may call the word political.

They may call it progressive.

They may call it conservative.

They may praise it.

They may insult it.

They may try to define it for us.

We choose another meaning.

Woke means awake.

Awake to the human being standing before us.

Awake to the stranger.

Awake to the minority.

Awake to the forgotten.

Awake to history.

Awake to suffering.

Awake to beauty.

Awake to ourselves.

We are not creating Art for one political side.

We are creating Art for humanity.

We do not ask Art to become less political.

We ask Art to become larger than politics.

Because governments disappear.

Movements disappear.

Arguments disappear.

But the human need to create remains.

And as long as there are human beings whose stories deserve to be seen, heard,remembered, and felt—

Woke Art will remain awake.

We refuse to look away.

© 2026. All rights reserved. This manifesto constitutes an original work of its author, who solemnly declares their full and exclusive authorship of the work and reserves all intellectual property rights arising therefrom.

I would love to fill up this chart ive made classifying ways to make art with some of the purpose or main expresive idea they represent. Feel free to recomend any work you think would fit in a category of your chosing!

are there any surrealist artists who have reached into their subconscious and then painted what they saw there

Or Someone tried to see how their imagination would change depending on the music they listened to.

I think we like to believe that art can exist completely separate from the person who created it. It makes things easier. We can love the song without thinking about the person who wrote it, admire the painting without wondering what kind of person stood behind it, and keep the beauty without carrying the uncomfortable parts with it.

But sometimes I don’t think we can separate them that easily. Art comes from somewhere. It comes from someone’s mind, their experiences, their beliefs, their pain, even their flaws. Knowing who created something doesn’t necessarily destroy what it means to us, but it can change the way we see it.

And maybe that’s the uncomfortable truth: we can appreciate something beautiful and still question the person who made it. We don’t have to pretend the artist was perfect just because their art was. At the same time, we shouldn’t let someone’s mistakes erase every feeling their work gave us.

Because art can outgrow its creator. A song can become part of someone’s life. A painting can mean something completely different to the person looking at it. A story can become yours in a way the artist never expected.

Maybe separating the art from the artist isn’t really about forgetting who created it. Maybe it’s about accepting that something can come from an imperfect person and still become something meaningful to someone else.